₦airaland Forum

raumdeuter:
The same Biden and Democrats who shouted themselves hoarse how Trump will abuse his presidential powers and pardon himself and his allies then go ahead to pardon his son who was convicted

At least Americans now know them better. They are liars and lied every step of the way

Biden was sharp as a tack
Biden will never drop out
Biden will never pardon Hunter
Kamala was tied in polls

All lies the same thing they accused Trump of

Trump already pardoned his allies so WTF are you on? LoLz.

Kukutente23:
DeepSight
Your righteous Demonrats have done it again
It is not Trump this time so you're quiet like an overfed lapdog
I guess if it was Trump your fangs will be out biting the keys of your phone eh
You can see how agbadorians are rejoicing and using this news as validation of the corruption of those they voted into government on the altar of "change" in 2015

And if it was Trump you'd be defending it with your last breath.

typicalgamer:
Buy the gift cards online then redeem it on steam

Where do you buy Steam gift cards from?

raumdeuter:
Biden pardons his son Hunter. I remember when he said in summer that he won't

https://apnews.com/article/biden-son-hunter-charges-pardon-pledge-24f3007c2d2f467fa48e21bbc7262525

Are you surprised? A Trump supporter surprised that the president used his presidential power? Really?

Jovi10:
Well In this case who can they go after amongst the BRICS nations? Na USA go beg last last.

LoLz. You think CIA is just a fancy acronym? Those guys don't play fair. When they orchestrate monstrous plots they do it and the president will have plausible deniability. Putin is banking on Trump being friendly with him, the almighty dollar comes before friendship. If he does too much we go hear say Putin don sick and died in his sleep.

Kelechi009:
it’s hard not to call it nepotism. The guy is literally his son! Would anyone else get that kind of pardon if they weren’t a family member. Fair point, but presidents do have the right to pardon anyone. It’s in the Constitution. Maybe he thought Hunter was unfairly targeted or that the charges were politically motivated.

There’s a difference between pardoning a political ally and pardoning your kid. It feels way more personal, like blurring the line between public service and family business.

People who are not the President's family members get presidential pardon so that is not the issue. I think it's an FU to the incoming Trump admin. Think of how much Trump and his cohorts vilified Hunter, then imagine how much more they will do with the office of the President behind them. This gets Hunter safely away while also sticking it to Trump and what he has used the presidential pardon to do in time past.

God1000:
So I came across this post on trump's Facebook account and I couldn't just believe it.

LoLz. This is one of the fundamental cores of US Foreign policies, no matter who is President if you attack the dollar, you'll be in trouble. Why do you think they went after Ghaddafi so hard? Why do you think people were disappointed with Obama for that move?

lanreni:
I like such cerebrally strong ladies. To hold a conversation for more than an hour without ordering for Hennessy and Shawarma on the guy's head. She was looking for content. She didn't order something expensive showing prudence and not wanting to destabilize the man especially if he doesn't have money (from her assessment).
The guy might lose her if he ruminates too much on such flimsy things.
As she communicated mental strength, he should have complemented with emotional strength by apologizing for not asking what she will take, as her if she will take more than the meat pie (even if you don't mean it), and offer to pay.

That requires emotional intelligence this our guy doesn't have. Look at him asking if he should let her go after he goofed by his own self.

DyshApp:
A young Nigerian man shares his frustration over an awkward first date experience with a lady who ordered herself food, neglecting him.

In an anonymous post to popular social media influencer @wizarab10, he recounted how the lady’s actions left him feeling overlooked.

The man revealed that the woman paid for her transportation and clothing expenses for the outing, which he appreciated. However, things took a surprising turn when she ordered food only for herself during the date.

“I went on a date with a girl, our very first date and she paid for her clothings and transport. When we got there, we spoke for over an hour and she was listening though. Then, she suddenly called the waiter and ordered meat pie and ice cream for herself and she was eating and listening to me. Isn’t that callous? She didn’t even ask me whether I’m hungry, she just ate, listened and replied me,” he wrote.

He concluded the post by asking followers for advice on whether he should continue pursuing the relationship, humorously adding, “Should I fling?”

She just taught him how not to be an insensitive dullard. He spoke for 1 whole hour at an eatery and did not order anything, that is a giant red flag. Glad she had sense.

basilico:
Kash Patel nominee for FBI director.

“I regularly used to tell people that the fastest way to move up in the government is to just screw up, and the bigger the screwup, the bigger the promotion. Every person implicated in your mistakes has an interest in covering up what they did, so they will promote you. That means the people at the very top are usually the most immoral, unethical people in the entire agency.”

― Kash Pramod Patel

Zonefree:
A seller keeping the agreement he had with a buyer after depositing over 85% of the actual cost is now a thing of testimony in Nigeria.

Have we deteriorated so bad that having an honest and successful transaction is now seen as a miracle?

Honestly it's mind boggling. The most mundane things are seen as noteworthy. Imagine someone giving testimony that she found her keys that were missing. SMH.

DeepSight:
Hello Reed,

Now, I am going to make an exception in my usual approach. I usually try to communicate based on logic and with premises that build an argument. However this question you have asked, I sense is a sincere inquiry and not an argumentative one. And even if it happens to be argumentative, I have decided to approach it differently. So in this instance, I will make an exception and simply share my personal experiences with regard to your question. In doing so, I risk being seen as perhaps deluded or even psychotic but no matter, I am not one to be bothered what people think of me. So here goes.

In terms of dreams, a spiritual dream is recognized by its very nature - it often comes out of the blue and out of sync with the petty matters of everyday life. Our nature is such that as we sleep off, all the matters in our minds begin to play around in our subconscious and often crop up as dreams of this and that everyday matter. These dreams are run of the mill and are of the physical and mental realm only. Dreams which involve the spirit are often strikingly different. In my personal experience these elements tend to pop up:

1. The dream is strikingly real and feels like something that has happened in real life, not just like a dream

2. The dream often involves symbols, and very often other-worldly creatures and beings unknown to this world

3. The dream presents you with abnormal powers and capacities

4. The dream predicts the future with uncanny accuracy

Since I was a child I have had a steady flow of dreams which predict the future with staggering accuracy, and this has become a normal part of my life. It is way too consistent and way too accurate for me to ignore or deny it, so much so that I know that there is little that can happen around me which I do not see ahead in a dream. I have repeatedly told people around me exactly what will happen in their lives in a short while, or who will die suddenly, and unfailingly it comes to pass in staggering detail. This kind of thing enables me to know that these are not run off the mill dreams, which often just involve spatterings or memory and daily activities playing around in one's mind.

Let me move deeper. At a point, I began to have the ability to be lucid in my dreams. This is called lucid dreaming and it is a state where one is in a dream and one is aware that it is a dream. When I began to master the art, I would recognise that I am in a dream and then be able to take control of the dream and go to spiritual locations and observe events and places which one cannot access in the waking world.

This led me to gradually begin my first astral travels, because I realized that in that state, I could begin to float in what appears to be a world-ether and go to varying places and interact with other beings. I realized this was real when I began to go to places far away from my home and the next day, be able to recount to the people there exactly what transpired where they where, and who did what, etc - with accuracy. This has left people around me doumfounded and I know its something very real - it's not a trick of the mind.

Let me add that I am not special in this regard, almost everyone has these capacities, people just key into them at varying levels or not at all.

The spiritual is very real. However these things are beyond what can be argued or proven with normal logic and certainly not with science as we know it. Maybe a day will come when we will evolve to a level of science that addresses such things. Let me stop here.

Try and see the movie "Behind her eyes" on Netflix. It gives a very clear idea of the sort of thing I am talking about in terms of astral presence and astral travel.

I had to take my time in responding because I wanted to thoroughly ruminate as some of your own experiences are mine as well which is what leads me to my dilemma. Previously when I was a believer, I would have agreed with you that these experiences where spiritually or even spirit driven. However, when I think about it now that I am no longer a believer, I realise the only reason I would have agreed with you baack then would be because I believed.

The thing with your 4 criteria is how can we say that they are truly indicative of spirits and not just the effect of being part of the universe? Like I said I have had similar experiences even now as an atheist which I cannot attribute to spirits since I have no belief in them and still left no way to tell.

With no way to objectively confirm that these things are spirit based would you say that you believe them to be so?

Also, not sure why you want me to watch a fictional series, what would that provide evidence for?

.

Winnin009:
Bro, let me give you an instance of the top of my head. The Hormone regulation pills taken for the period of the trasnsition are covered by health insurance. A good percentage of america are on govt medical insurance. That translates into million of dollars set aside for gender transition pills.

Now you do see how the government funds its? The materials that are used to educate kids about this crap in public schools; that's money from the government coffers.

I'm sure you get the idea now.

Musk could use the ‘Department of Government Efficiency’ for self-enrichment
Source

Still think this is about LGBTQ?

Suncity4:
I met a guy, we exchanged numbers and started talking, on our first date, just on the road to where we can have a lunch, guy was just so rude, he finds every little opportunity to insult any car or trycycle that drives anyhow or blocks his way.
He over reacts at everything, I will just laugh at some and some I will calm him down.

I overlooked the attitude that day thinking maybe he had a bad day, but on our 2nd meeting, he did same thing again.

The annoying part is that he didn't see anything wrong in doing that, he sees it as a normal thing.🤦No remorse.

Omo after that day I ex him sharperly, mek e no come reach my turn one day, e fit even turn to beating😂
I cannot come and die because I see man wey get big car😂

I pay attention to signs.

Good for you! Not all that glitters is gold.

ChizzyBuna:
I love and respect my dad so much
He is old in age but he can still drive

The issue is anytime I'm driving him
Instead of him to relax
He will turn to Conductor every 2 seconds, sometimes he will shout that I'm speeding to fast but I'm not going past 60 kmph


Today I drove him to village and on the way he did the same shouting and telling me to look out for bumps.

This distracts me and makes me lose focus. Out of anger i shouted back at him to keep quiet and allow me drive.
That i have eyes and i can see the bumps

Now i told him that he should never enter my car or unless he will keep quiet and allow me concentrate on my driving.
No talking, he should keep it shut through out the whole journey.

Now he is feeling bad, did i do anything bad??

Yeah, you could have been nicer about it but nobody likes a backseat driver. Apologise to him for shouting at him but remain firm that you will not tolerate backseat driving. You can even compromise with him that you won't drive above a certain speed to reassure him you are being careful.

siofra:
Anything short of this and you're just a disgusting, smelly goat

Men don't have discharges like women do. Stop using your female biological make up to judge.

Bea1234:
Is it strong enough to charge my phone whenever there is power outage? And can I also use it to charge my romoss 30kmah power bank?

It's around 40k on jumia

No. But i have the Sun King product that will. For the same 40k I'll sell you the one in the picture.

Where is the so called healing power? Always missing in a crisis.

jesusjnr2020:
So you really do think I am not virtually inactive when compared to my early days here.

Virtually inactive would not be the way I would describe your lessened activity.

MrPresident1:
Black atheist. Thief.

Dundi. Fake arse prophet. Nonentity.

Story without end.

MrPresident1:
African atheist. Such a fool. Thief.

Dundi. Fake arse prophet. Nonentity.

MrPresident1:
It is upon us

You dunno shit.

jesusjnr2020:
That's no excuse to start saying I told you i'm inactive when I never did.

OK sure, I should have said virtually inactive. Still doesn’t change the fact that you aren't virtually inactive.

jesusjnr2020:
If according to you i said virtually inactive, then where did you get inactive from what I said?

Whether I didn't know what it means is not an excuse to say I told you what I never did.

Posting threads every week is not being virtually inactive. Once a month might even be stretching it.

jesusjnr2020:
You actually said inactive though but I never said that but virtually inactive, so it means you made an error right there, it's just left for you to be a gentleman and humbly admit it.

It was you who said you were virtually inactive. Maybe you don't know what it means.

jesusjnr2020:
I know it means inactive to you.

Nope it means you post infrequently. Having threads every week is not infrequent.

jesusjnr2020:
I said "virtually inactive" when compared to then.

As for the haters or whatever you chose to call them, we're both saying the same thing.

LoLz. That's not what virtually inactive is.

jesusjnr2020:
Who said anything about making threads?

Aren't you still actively going from thread to thread as you used to do when I first started here? But you seem to be the only one left of all those atheists I met here doing a similar job, despite saying there are more of you now than back then, that why I wondered how possible?

For me, a lot has changed since then, as I'm virtually inactive when compared to then, far fewer threads, posts and comments, yet more impactful than ever and reaching much more souls with the Gospel of Christ than even when i used be most active here.

The reaction of haters to my threads and posts shouldn't be news to you, because that's probably the most consistent part since I came here, preaching the same Gospel of Jesus Christ that He was hated for preaching and also said we will be hated for preaching.

Dude, you virtually have threads on the frontpage every Sunday, don't tell me you are inactive. I mostly come here when I am bored or need to reply to people who respond to me.

I am not talking of haters. I said people who call you out on your BS.

jesusjnr2020:
More of you? You must be joking or living in self-denial. You're one of the few familiar monikers left still trying hard to prevent the already battered ship from sinking, lol.

Regardless of whatever you've said or done here you're still one of the few atheists I like and respect here. You know I don't do sentiments like some other Christian folks and and rate you more than most of them. I have chosen you severally to moderate issues between me and other atheists. I believe you don't belong there and are working for a cause that doesn't fit you at all. It's up to you though at the end of the day. I can't force you...

LoLz. When last did you see me make a thread on here? Meanwhile anytime your topics hit the frontpage you can see how many people come out to call you out on your BS.

The only cause I work for is maintaining as much accurate information as possible. What tends to happen is most religious ideas are based on BS so the inevitable clash occurs. You cannot believe ancient stories and be in line with reality.

jesusjnr2020:
You're actually the one trying hard to camouflage your obvious error trying to shove what his wife said down my throat when I never mentioned her. You should have instead tried to correct your error and showed me where Paul Enenche himself said such a thing about tithing, not his wife or is it that don't you have any?

As for the heresies of tithing, Oyedepo said that about Job, while David Ibiyeomie said the one about Adam eating his tithe, with the rest coming from other prosperity preachers, including Adeboye who has since apologized for one of them.

LoLz! You are the one accusing Oyedepo but can't show where he said what you claim he said. I am showing you via Becky Enenche that whatever Oyedepo preaches is what the Enenches preach with regards to tithing.