₦airaland Forum

Truthseeker10:
is there a scientific proof that good and evil exists? Do you believe that they exist?

It seems you've skipped ur meds and escaped ur chains this evening, let me help you out and place you were you belong with the likes of truth speaker using the block button. 😁

BibleInterpreta:
Wisdom is chasing after you but you have always been faster.

No wisdom is found in subjective, baseless and contradictory claims disguised as truth.

BibleInterpreta:
No one is capable of understanding reality beyond his degree of qualitative development.

Typical empty vague platitiudes. Boring 🥱

BibleInterpreta:
Your comment reflects a misunderstanding of the spiritual principles I teach, which are rooted in Bible Interpretation, not in any religious dogma or personal claim to authority. The Creator (YHWH) is not an "author of confusion" but the singular force of absolute unity and bestowal. Confusion arises not from the Creator but from humanity’s fragmented perception of reality, driven by the egoistic desire to receive for oneself alone.

Bible Interpretation does not deal in "word salads" but in precise, experiential methods to transcend spiritual ignorance, defined as disconnection from the unified reality, and attain knowledge, which is the revelation of the Creator’s oneness. No one, including myself, arbitrarily determines what is "right." Truth is not a matter of personal interpretation or magic; it is revealed through the correction of one’s intentions from egoism to altruism, aligning with the Creator’s nature.

If you find this lacking substance, I invite you to explore Bible Interpretation’s methodology yourself. The circus, as you call it, is not in the pursuit of truth but in dismissing it without investigation. Let’s discuss specifics; what exactly do you find meaningless, and why?

There is no "Bible Interpretation Methodology", there's no objectivity ergo your topic. Truth especially as touches on reality is not subjective, it is objective, truth is observable, truth is demonstratable even if not observable, truth has evidence, truth has an objective methodology to determine it, truth is non- contradictory. None of these apply to your biblical truths especially the extraordinary claims.

BibleInterpreta:
The core principle of the Bible is: “Love your neighbor as yourself.”
Love predates all religions. And by love, I mean the intention, not just the action. Actions of love without the intention of love are mere hypocrisy.

Love been taught by the bible does not make the bible predate religion what kind of absurd logic is that. Also its not like the bible is the first to teach about love, there are numerous religions way older than xtainity with their texts way older than the bible that teach love. So what are we saying. Saying the bible predates religion beacuse a phenomenon it teaches - which others have taught before it - predates religion makes absolutely no sense whatsoever. Does the Vedas and Dhammapada predate religion too?! Absurd to say the least.

BibleInterpreta:
The Bible is deliberately written in the language of the branches to ensure that one who has not attained the spiritual degree of the bible language of spiritual actions would not be able to interpret it. There are far too many ignorant, mental-assent Bible preachers and general overseers producing equally ignorant followers.

Quietly admitting with your regurgitated word salad that Yhwh is the origin and author of confusion in xtainity is quite laughable. Who determines who's ignorant and knowledgeable?! Almighty You?! The interpretation you follow just magically happened to be the right one. Determined how, lol?! Circus indeed. Like i said regurgitated word salad, no meaning, no substance in reality.

BibleInterpreta:
Context is everything. You refer to the written Bible, while I mean its core principles before they were recorded. These were shared orally across generations.

And thats not even useful context. Because in what ever way, shape or form it was transmitted even orally, religions were already existing thousands of years before even the people that shared these "core principles" orally. Still an outright blatant lie.

BibleInterpreta:
The bible predates religion. When the bible is properly interpreted, it transcends religion, time, or race.

What kind of outright lie is this. The bible predates religion yet there are religions that are in fact older than the bible and even the Israelites. Na wa.

BibleInterpreta:
The Bible is deliberately written in the language of the branches to ensure that one who has not attained the spiritual degree of the bible language of spiritual actions would not be able to interpret it.

Yet it is interpreted in more than 40,000 ways with no way to demonstrate the right interpretation. A god who claims not to be an author of confusion btw deliberately wrote it so there's so much confusion and no 2 christians can agree on the interpretation?! Fiction that's contradictory is poor fiction.

Cause there's zero objectivity and simply no method to achieve or demonstrate objectivity within, anything goes. This is simply cause it's not based on reality but made up fiction.

Africans and daft superstition like 5 & 6. Tells you why the avg IQ is low.

Truthseeker10:
You mean that luca is the head of your family?😂

I talk am 😅

Truthseeker10:
You mean that luca is the head of your family?😂

As usual when the single braincell u share with ur fellow inbred overheats u enter a persistent loop of stupidity repeating urself ad nauseaum. Tourette's plus inbreeding. Give us a demonstration please. 😄

Truthseeker10:
You mean that luca is the head of your family?😂

So your mom's ur father's sister? 🤔

Everyday247:
😁🤣
I saw what you did there.

😅

Truthseeker10:
😂😂sperm and luca the same now? Give me a step by step of how luca evolved to a human sperm.

It's the same step that led to you having a family circle instead of a family tree. 😁

Truthseeker10:
😂😂sperm and luca the same now? Give me a step by step of how luca evolved to a human sperm.

Too much inbreeding has destroyed ur braincells ergo the point would fly past where briancells ought to be.

Truthseeker10:
😂😂😂funny man. You've not been able to tell me how luca evolved into a human. But you have a problem accepting that a pair of humans produced different races of humans. 😂😂 wahala dey oo. Oga you need rest.

Can a single sperm cell evolve into a human?! Brain's just for decoration 😄

Everyday247:
The problem is that you don't understand how biology works.
You're the one who said that LUCA is the same as Adam and Eve. 👇

A single bacteria can multiply to millions via binary fission. Meanwhile a single man and woman trying to populate would give rise to genetic defects from inbreeding.

Or are you saying that it's possible for a man and a woman to give birth to a son and a daughter. Then this two siblings then have intercourse, producing grand sons and granddaughters and then the incestuous cycle is repeated until the population reaches 1000? 🤣

I always find it hilarious how these guys are confident and proud to happily state they're inbred. 😅

Truthseeker10:
😂😂😂na wa oo.....since you don't know the origin of life, are you saying that you don't also know how all species evolved?

What does origin of life have to do with evolution? Try use ur braincells abeg 😒

SIRTee15:
If I ask U to produce evidence for your bogus claim now, wahala go start.
U will begin to write long essay devoid of any evidence.
Na the issue I'm facing with one of U here called Lucyfre.

😅 Says the person defending a claim with a claim and no evidence. Park abeg.

MaxIntheHouse2:
Keep searching and you will find! Matthew 7:7-8

The usual empty claims 😁

MaxInDHouse:
The gospel writers actually wrote all the books three decades after Jesus.
Matthew
Mark
Luke
John
Three of them actually knew Jesus one on one Matthew, Mark and John but Luke wrote what he heard from others and he wrote the Bible book of Act.

Where is the proof any of them wrote anything 😁

olaolaking:
Your point is that the 2 different reports are correct. I should accept that Judas hanged himself and also agree that he fell and bursted? Be a critical thinker!

Of course they want to you to swallow the inconsistencies hook line and sinker and not question it. If it's fiilled with so much inconsistencies why should we believe anything it says.

Antichristian2:
Was it same Judas that threw the 💰 on the ground and went to hang himself picked the money again to buy the land?

🤣 Funny thing is even Papias also has about 2 differing accounts of same Judas.

Everyday247:
It seems like you don't understand how dogma works.
A dogma kept vague and mysterious, will seem incomprehensible and unmeasurable to a human mind and therefore be made divine.

Where as, if a dogma attempts to explain it's ideology in details, it will make it comprehensible and measurable and easy to verify using conventional means.

E.g if you asked most Abrahamics the age of the earth most wouldn't know. Whereas, those who give a date, wether young earth or old earth, will have to explain how dey arrived at the answer, and this can be measured and scrutinized.

The same also goes for the OP's question. Many have simply never asked this question leading to mass dogma amount faithfuls.

And it seems you don't understand how dissonance works why do you think apologetics exists in the first place. I'd suggest you read up on cognitive dissonace especially from a religious perspective. This thread should give you a fine sample, it just breeds more semantics and mental gymnastics. That's my pov though, no point dancing around facts.

Everyday247:
personally, I don't think it reinforces dogmas cuz giving them a theory allows them to scrutinize the theory and determine if what they believe makes sense or not.

You underestimate people's motivation to eliminate dissonance due to its discomfort simply to restore cognitive balance.

Everyday247:
That's short sided.
Explanations like these helps people think.
Dogma results when you accept or dismiss a hypothesis without proper scrutiny.

I disagree but you're not wholly wrong. Asking questions like he's doing is what helps people think. Convoluted explanations serves no purpose than reinforcing the cognitive dissonance that leads to outright acceptance of said impractical dogmas.

Uchesis:
Its quite funny to think that Donald Trump is my biological brother because we are both descendants of Adam and Eve.

Logic.

As i grew older, i started asking myself logical questions.

The Bible said God created only Adam and Eve. After that, he created no other human being , except the ones that the couple created.

Logically, this cannot be true.

How many races do we have in the world today? Over 6 billion humans on earth, and we are all from Adam and Eve? Are you kidding me?

When Cain was driven into the wilderness for killing his brother Abel, God put a mark on him that anyone who sees him will not kill him. And that 7 lives will be taken for anyone who does.

Now the question is: who will kill Cain that won't know him as his brother (since all humans then came from Adam and Eve)? Secondly, are there more than 7 people on the earth then?

This is just me scratching the surface.

Whats your take on this?
Are we all truly and originally from Adam and Eve?

Notice how your statement is 'so so so said', not that it's verified or verifiable. Anyways you'd have to demonstrate an Adam and Eve actually existed in the first place. If not it's no different from Adapa, Pandora, Enkidu, Manu, Ask or Embla. Just more popular. The very fact that if we were inbred there wouldn't be enough genetic variety to avoid massive birth defects and extinction is enough to put it down as a myth like the others i mentioned.

Everyday247:
One theory that I heard from a very religious dude is that there's an incest switch under God's desk. And he can use it to make incest safe or unsafe. So after he sent Adam and Eve out the garden, he flipped off the switch thereby making incest safe for the time being, allowing Adam and Eve and their generations to practice incest without inbreeding consequences. When the population grew substantial God then turned on the the switch and made incest unsafe once more.

Another theory I heard was that God created other humans after sending Adam and Eve out of the garden. But then if this is so, the concept of "All are born sinners" no longer applies because some people weren't descended from Adam and Eve therefore do not have the curse of original sin, which means that they don't need anybody to die for them.

Or or... instead of coming up with convoluted ways to resolve what is evidently not possible and contradictory to what we've observed about how the world works and actual evidence, following Occam's razor we call it out for what it is. A myth, nothing more, no need for mental gymnastics to resolve convoluted impracticalities.