Luvola's Posts
Nairaland Forum › Luvola's Profile › Luvola's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 (of 168 pages)
Vicjustice: [size=20pt]APOLOGY UNACCEPTED[/size]Who know you church rat. |
As a die hard Suarez fan , I doff my hat for him. losing Suarez of liverpool will spill a doom for the red. |
Prowizy2: Good african teams are out, they can home continue with their fishing, farming and cattle rearinggo and die scums |
Algeria tried even if they lose. |
Front page mod. |
Yes. this boring greece are out.... good night peeps |
I don land........... throw bomb ******* |
abatically: Are u talking about this?so you are indirectly justfying elbow knock ? Man you are more worst than fifa . **walk out of thread * |
The France defender should be banned after swinging an elbow at Oswaldo Minda during the goalless draw with Ecuador at the Maracana on Wednesday By Greg Stobart at the Estadio Maracana The news agenda over the last 24 hours has been dominated by Luis Suarez’s cannibalistic attempt to sink his teeth into an opponent’s shoulder. The Uruguay striker will soon learn his fate and is facing a considerable ban for the latest indiscretion on a lengthy rap sheet. Anything from six games to two years has been suggested as the potential punishment. He has set his own precedent, and is indefensible. But an incident here at the Maracana during France’s goalless draw with Ecuador might provide some perspective amid the hysteria. In the first-half, France defender Mamadou Sakho viciously swung his elbow at Oswaldo Minda as he defended a corner. Fortunately the contact was not as strong as Sakho intended and Minda was able to escape relatively unharmed and with his nose intact. Yet the potential for serious damage was there. What would you rather – a few bite marks on your shoulder or a shattered jaw? Suarez’s indiscretion is deemed worse because it is shocking in its nature and socially unacceptable. Much like spitting at an opponent, the physical damage is not the barometer of its severity. In most circumstances, it would be a one-off. The fact that Suarez has now bitten an opponent on three separate occasions has only fuelled the situation. The Liverpool striker’s World Cup will likely be over – but his club team-mate Sakho should not kick another ball in Brazil either. As they did with Suarez, Fifa need to review the video evidence and throw the book at Sakho with a ban of at least three matches for violent conduct. There is no possible defence. He was not challenging in the air for a 50-50, it was calculated and pre-meditated. Didier Deschamps might reflect anyway that a central defensive combination of Laurent Koscielny and Raphael Varane would be more trustworthy for France’s last 16 clash against Nigeria in Brasilia on Monday. Sakho could have no complaints if Les Bleus’ coach makes that choice. Further to Sakho's indiscretion, second-half substitute Olivier Giroud clearly elbowed Gabriel Achilier on the jaw as the pair wrestled in the area. The blow was not as dangerous and with as much power as Sakho's, but it was an elbow nonetheless. The Arsenal striker was equally fortunate that the referee missed the incident. Referee Noumandiez Doue did however make the correct decision to send off Antonio Valencia in the 50th minute for a studs-up challenge on Lucas Digne. The Ecuador captain may have been going for the ball, but it was dangerous, as well he would know, as a player who once spent six months on the sidelines with a broken ankle. It was the kind of challenge we see on an almost weekly basis in European leagues, the sort pundits would describe as a leg-breaker. Fortunately, Digne was able to continue – but again he will feel far more sore than Giorgio Chiellini. The Suarez situation is unique, but violent play is far more of an everyday issue that football authorities must address. They can begin by starting disciplinary proceedings against Sakho and Giroud. They, like Suarez, must get the punishment they deserve. http://www.goal.com/en/news/3790/world-cup-2014/2014/06/25/4914259/why-is-suarezs-bite-any-worse-than-sakhos-elbow?ICID=HP_HN_2 *** This is the double standard we are talking about.
|
abatically: Have u ever seen a player given a red card after an incident that a referee didn't see? Suarez picked Ivanovic perfectly where the referee couldn't see it because it was off the ball. His ban was longer because FA used his first bite incident against him which is normal. Now his ban is even longer because FIFA used his first 2 incidents against him. If he goes ahead and bite again his ban will be even much longer. That is normal.Mamohd sakho gave an elbow knock to a Ecuador's player in the last match they played ,the refree saw it but ignored . Why didn't they ban him after the match. Feel free to read the elbow story of sakho on Ecuador's player. I repeat ,FIFA abd other conspiracist gang up against luiz Suarez . My argument is directed at the double standard of English press ,FiFa et al. The France defender should be banned after swinging an elbow at Oswaldo Minda during the goalless draw with Ecuador at the Maracana on Wednesday By Greg Stobart at the Estadio Maracana The news agenda over the last 24 hours has been dominated by Luis Suarez’s cannibalistic attempt to sink his teeth into an opponent’s shoulder. The Uruguay striker will soon learn his fate and is facing a considerable ban for the latest indiscretion on a lengthy rap sheet. Anything from six games to two years has been suggested as the potential punishment. He has set his own precedent, and is indefensible. But an incident here at the Maracana during France’s goalless draw with Ecuador might provide some perspective amid the hysteria. In the first-half, France defender Mamadou Sakho viciously swung his elbow at Oswaldo Minda as he defended a corner. Fortunately the contact was not as strong as Sakho intended and Minda was able to escape relatively unharmed and with his nose intact. Yet the potential for serious damage was there. What would you rather – a few bite marks on your shoulder or a shattered jaw? Suarez’s indiscretion is deemed worse because it is shocking in its nature and socially unacceptable. Much like spitting at an opponent, the physical damage is not the barometer of its severity. In most circumstances, it would be a one-off. The fact that Suarez has now bitten an opponent on three separate occasions has only fuelled the situation. The Liverpool striker’s World Cup will likely be over – but his club team-mate Sakho should not kick another ball in Brazil either. As they did with Suarez, Fifa need to review the video evidence and throw the book at Sakho with a ban of at least three matches for violent conduct. There is no possible defence. He was not challenging in the air for a 50-50, it was calculated and pre-meditated. Didier Deschamps might reflect anyway that a central defensive combination of Laurent Koscielny and Raphael Varane would be more trustworthy for France’s last 16 clash against Nigeria in Brasilia on Monday. Sakho could have no complaints if Les Bleus’ coach makes that choice. Further to Sakho's indiscretion, second-half substitute Olivier Giroud clearly elbowed Gabriel Achilier on the jaw as the pair wrestled in the area. The blow was not as dangerous and with as much power as Sakho's, but it was an elbow nonetheless. The Arsenal striker was equally fortunate that the referee missed the incident. Referee Noumandiez Doue did however make the correct decision to send off Antonio Valencia in the 50th minute for a studs-up challenge on Lucas Digne. The Ecuador captain may have been going for the ball, but it was dangerous, as well he would know, as a player who once spent six months on the sidelines with a broken ankle. It was the kind of challenge we see on an almost weekly basis in European leagues, the sort pundits would describe as a leg-breaker. Fortunately, Digne was able to continue – but again he will feel far more sore than Giorgio Chiellini. The Suarez situation is unique, but violent play is far more of an everyday issue that football authorities must address. They can begin by starting disciplinary proceedings against Sakho and Giroud. They, like Suarez, must get the punishment they deserve. source : http://www.goal.com/en/news/3790/world-cup-2014/2014/06/25/4914259/why-is-suarezs-bite-any-worse-than-sakhos-elbow?ICID=HP_HN_2 |
abatically: That is it? I don't have a point, case close(d). I shouldn't be arguing with u if u don't know how to use correct words. Its case closed and not case close. I have given my points, if u think they are invalid then counter argue with me rather than saying case close(d).We are not saying what Suarez did was right rather the blower which is the double standard of English press . It would have been better if they have given Suarez a red card than punishing him severely. Suarez would have gotten little or no ban if he was an English player. |
Prowizy2: Your mother..if I see you , I will chop off your head. scums |
abatically: You might have a point, but only little. yes Defoe did bite Mascherano but u can't compare that with what Suarez did. Defoe was fouled by Mascherano and in retaliation he bit his arm.. that is human even though its wrong. Moreover Defoe was not fined because the referee saw the incident and booked both players.you do not have a point. Your analogy connote the conspiracy theory against Suarez. case close. |
FA will not punish Defoe 'bite' The Football Association will take no action against Tottenham striker Jermain Defoe over the biting incident in Sunday's game with West Ham. Defoe seemed to bite the arm of Javier Mascherano after he was fouled by the midfielder, with both players booked by referee Steve Bennett. An FA spokesman said: "We are unable to take any action because the referee has already dealt with the incident. "Fifa regulations prevent us from taking retrospective action." Interview: Jermain Defoe's agent Sky Andrew Manchester City defender Ben Thatcher was punished by the FA after the event earlier this season when his forearm smash left Portsmouth midfielder Pedro Mendes in hospital. However, that incident was deemed as exceptional because Mendes suffered serious injury but in most cases, the FA's hands are tied because of Fifa's stance on the issue of retrospective punishment. Defoe felt his actions had been "blown out of all proportion". "The referee was standing over me and if he felt I had done something bad he would have sent me off," said the 24-year-old. "It doesn't look great on TV and I accept that I have a responsibility to conduct myself in the right way. "When the West Ham player fouled me, I reacted in a bit of a mischievous way - my character is a little like that at times." Sports minister Richard Caborn had earlier called for the FA to examine Defoe's actions. Caborn told The Times: "Any action like this I hope the authorities will decide on. Players in these positions have a responsibility to set a good example." The incident came towards the end of the first half of Tottenham's 1-0 win at White Hart Lane. Spurs boss Martin Jol described Defoe's bite as a "comical nibble". "He was nibbling his arm - there will be no mark. Ask Mascherano if he has got a mark," said Jol. "It is part of the game. They kicked him three times from behind in 10 minutes and he wanted to show his frustration in a nice, comical way." However, Hammers boss Alan Pardew, who saw his side slide to a fifth straight Premiership defeat, did not see the funny side. "Mascherano brought him down from behind and that was definitely a booking," he said. "I didn't quite see the reaction from Jermain but it looked like he gestured towards Mascherano but whether there was any contact I don't know. "In today's game he could have gone. If he was sent off there, it would have changed the game." http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/football/teams/t/tottenham_hotspur/6076094.stm **** Just because he is an English player. double standard. *** To hell with FiFa and England |
Prowizy2: And i wasn't expecting any reasonable reply from a f*cktard who calls himself a liverpool. . . If the ban is paining you. Go kill yourself.your fada |
Those castigating Suarez. .. go and die |
Daninya1: you shld b d one to stop smoking poo.saurez cost Africa the world cup..or r u suffering from inferiority complex?u sound like a person wu worship a whyt man..are u suffering from juvenile deliquency?u r suffering from behavioural disorder...nxt tym,just waka pass if you are clueless on what to say...oloshi burukutu...Go and die I repeat. |
jotey: he is a vampire Na..DAT dude needs serious medical checkupand you think you do not need mental test as well ? go and die I repeat |
Daninya1: Aside being a high profile German shepherd dog known for infecting defenders with the football rabies syndrome,i hereby suggest that he either visit a dentist to have his teeth filed so that his bites can bore deep into the skin of victims or beta still,have the two front tooth removed....LOLXXXXX.....Jokes Apart,We from the continent of Africa will never forgive Luiz Suarez for handling the ball against Ghana in that tension soaked match in 2010 in S/A...The Ghanian National Team Would Have Made It To The Semi Finals...Please don't remind us of the penalty Asamoah Gyang missed...yesterday we saw the likes of Hulk,Willian missing their penalty kicks...Brasil escaped by the whiskers.....For this singular reason,the FIFA hammer fell mightily on Luiz Saurez.....my opinion though.....SOURCE-ME.....Stop smoking that weed before typing and if you must type , do n't smoke weed. |
Prowizy2: Dude stop lamenting Suarez is an animal. .What will a deluded chelshit fan will say before. .. luiz Suarez is going no where . England , FIFA should go and die. |
If only Suarez was playing today.. Zap fifa I repeat !!!!! |
I missed my Suarez. . |
Up Suarez up Uruguay |
Liverpool are close in buying Sanchez. good buy |
biomedixexcel: For #1200, you get 1gb dial *440*4# |
biomedixexcel: For #1200, you get 1gb dial *440*4#Thanks sir. what about the 1000naira own ? |
FiFA was wrong to give luis suarez such a hefty ban,they obviously succombed to pressure from the british media who are pissed because luis suarez elliminated them from the world cup. They have been screaming for FIFA to come down hard on Suarez and FIFA did and this is a shame on FIFA. Different people react differently when under pressure...Zenidine Zidane uses his head,some players use their elbow,rooney becomes aggressive and start going for legg breaking tackles,some players spit on other players and suarez uses his tooth and this isnt a big deal because he does it when he is under pressure and its usually not pre meditated,but impulsive unlike people who use their elbows or those who head butt others.because if you watch the replay you will see that chellini initially used his arm to prevent suarez from moving ahead and the same thing happend with ivanovic and because these players are bigger than suarez he gets fustrated and his naturall reaction is bitting am sure thats the way he grew up. So i believe head butting or using ones elbow on someone else is worse than luis suarez bitting someone,because head butting someone can cause more damage and going for aggressive tackles like rooney is worse and using the elbow on someone is worse as well and these crimes carry red card offences and possibly a couple of match bans. But because of the hatred the british fans and media have for suarez they have been able to push FIFA to come down hard on suarez and take the attention of the fans away from the National team"s poor performance at the world cup. I hope louis suarez can appeal and this ridiculous ban reduced. I believe louis suarez id a fanatastic player and deserves the heroes welcome |
FiFA was wrong to give luis suarez such a hefty ban,they obviously succombed to pressure from the british media who are pissed because luis suarez elliminated them from the world cup. They have been screaming for FIFA to come down hard on Suarez and FIFA did and this is a shame on FIFA. Different people react differently when under pressure...Zenidine Zidane uses his head,some players use their elbow,rooney becomes aggressive and start going for legg breaking tackles,some players spit on other players and suarez uses his tooth and this isnt a big deal because he does it when he is under pressure and its usually not pre meditated,but impulsive unlike people who use their elbows or those who head butt others.because if you watch the replay you will see that chellini initially used his arm to prevent suarez from moving ahead and the same thing happend with ivanovic and because these players are bigger than suarez he gets fustrated and his naturall reaction is bitting am sure thats the way he grew up. So i believe head butting or using ones elbow on someone else is worse than luis suarez bitting someone,because head butting someone can cause more damage and going for aggressive tackles like rooney is worse and using the elbow on someone is worse as well and these crimes carry red card offences and possibly a couple of match bans. But because of the hatred the british fans and media have for suarez they have been able to push FIFA to come down hard on suarez and take the attention of the fans away from the National team"s poor performance at the world cup. I hope louis suarez can appeal and this ridiculous ban reduced. I believe louis suarez id a fanatastic player and deserves the heroes welcome |
publicenemy: FiFA was wrong to give luis suarez such a heftyThis is is a balance view. The hatred on Suarez is very bitter. England ,FIFA and other comspiracy are disgrace to football. |
Timijo: Do you now want the injustice to continue? If FIFA should keep quiet and fold their arms, things will continue to go wrong.I am not saying what Suarez did was right but the double standard orchestrated by the english press . |
still waiting for a reply.plsssssssaszz |
I now hate England as a whole with their press. when jermaine defoe bite a player ,how many match ban do they give to him ? if una life abuse Suarez till infinity but the fact is that if he eventually move to Barcelona and if he played against any English club in the champions league ,he will still sink them with alot of goal. up Suarez !!!!! bleep England and their propaganda. |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 (of 168 pages)