₦airaland Forum

Mtewwwww. They should sell him abeg. Because he scored some goals during OGS start as a manager doesn't make him worth £500,000 per week. Is he as good as Dybala?

MJBOLT:

Endgame sold more tickets in 8 hours than Infinity War in its first week

is endgame out?

laluski:
You're even praising him by calling him an idiot.
You have my permission to call him a bufoon from an entire family of Apes

Don't insult the apes. Relegate him to a family of amoebas.

What's in getting followers on Instagram? Does it give money? Does it make you a better person?

NB : I am not on Instagram and have never been. Just curious.

K.A. Stroud is good if you want straight to point and wuruwuru ways to deriving and solving problems in wide variety of Mathematical fields. If you want to have a deep understanding, you will have to get books that focus on each field instead of clumping everything today in a fast way like K.A. Stroud.

Here is my brother's hard copy, you are free to download it.

Ihedinobi3:
Obviously, the prayer was a mockery of the Lord's Prayer. The latter goes:

Our Father Who is in Heaven
Hallowed be Your Name
Your Kingdom come
Your will be done on earth as it is done in Heaven
Give us today our daily bread
Forgive us our sins as we forgive those who sin against us
Don't lead us into temptation
Deliver us from evil.

See the similarity?

It's not a mockery. It's a different version that exalts the brain instead of an imaginary deity.

Nonsense. The skeptical child was rational to not believe in a life after delivery that he had seen no evidence for. Such skeptic would only believe in life after delivery if he sees evidence for it (when he is delivered alive and can observe our physical world) Problem would occur if, upon delivery and observing our world, he continues to deny life after delivery.

This is similar to atheists. We lack belief in your creator and religious claims because there are no evidences to support them and they have no basis in reality. We will only believe in your god and religious claims if there are evidences to support them and when we see that they have a sound basis in reality. Until then, all you are saying is Super Story. Problem would occur when we see evidences for your god and religious claims(eg. afterlife) and we continue to deny them.

To make it worse, the analogy you gave is inappropriate. The concept of life after delivery to the baby is way more plausible that the idea of your god and religious claims(eg. afterlife). Why? Because a close and sound analysis of the bible, quran and other holy books show, without a doubt, that they are ridiculous garbages and falsehoods. They can't be true.

How shameless and stupid of you to try to suggest that because people believe in certain things without evidence then it's okay to believe anything, however ridiculous, without evidence. A god that can't prove himself is not entitled to anyone believing in him. People have no reason to believe in an afterlife or a god because there are no evidences for then. You have to stop reasoning like this, you are not getting any younger. Is this how you want to waste your life building it around falsehoods? Wake up jare.

An easy way.
Given that a + b = 98, b + c = 90, c + d = 50 & d + e = 33

Using the associative property of real numbers
a + (b + c) + (d + e) = 169 = a + (90) + (33) = a + 123
(a + b) + (c + d) + e = 169 = (98) + (50) + e = 148 + e
(a + b) + c + (d + e) = 169 = (98) + c + (33) = c + 131

∴ a = 46 , e = 21 & c = 38

a + b = 46 + b = 98 ∴ b = 52
c + d = 38 + d = 50 ∴ d = 12

∴ a = 46 , b = 52 , c = 38 , d = 12 & e = 21

Cc. Malayyyyy

IAmSabrina:
I appreciate the help, my brother Martinez . If you want to take my place in this argument, you're welcome. I've grown weary of going round in circles and hence the "I'm Ok with this, Budaatum" comment back in my thread.

Hell no.

cococandy:
She’s a woman so her success must be through prostitution.

Her achievements can’t possibly bring her money

Bia coco. I never mentioned Tiwa Savage. I was referring to those celebrities that live fake lives. Please no one should misunderstand me.

9jaRealist:
So the MTV Europe Award, the MTV Africa awards, the Sony/ATV contract, the Roc Nation deal, the sold-out O2 Arena London show, the Global Citizens show, the Pepsi, Glo and Forte Oil brand ambassadorships, the many other endorsements, the sold-out pop-up tour clothing shop, the royalty payments from Ciara’s “Freak Me” record, and so on and so forth, must be all made up and a figment of an over-active imagination.

BTW, there are no guarantees in life - and certainly no guarantees of success, but aspiration and hope is the virtual oxygen for much of human life and activity. Let youngsters aspire to be as successful as they believe (and you apparently disbelieve) that Tiwa is, for no one knows what circumstances will prevail in the future. There were many Nigerian musicians better than Wizkid and Davido but who never achieved anywhere near the increasingly global success these two are currently achieving, because they operated under different circumstances. The aspiration to be a successful professional is a good thing, and frankly one would hope that these aspirations would not be squashed by Naysayers even before they got off the ground. Developing the habits of success (such as hard work, creativity and innovation, self-confidence, etc.) are always good traits to cultivate even if the initial goals/aspirations are not achieved. As the cliched saying goes, “If you aim for the sky...”!
.

I never mentioned Tiwa Savage. Referring to people that leave fake lives.

Timbuktuo:
Don't waste your breath. They will strawman you and you will start defending something that isn't even your line of argument. Leave idiots to argue with themselves. As you can see, the chief idiot has been AWOL since good news has been posted

Exactly. When arguing with the incorrigibly stupid, you have to know when to terminate the debate and leave them wallowing in their own stupidity.

Timbuktuo:
Hello Americans and lovers of America. This is Tim dropping a dose of Liberal Salt Extractor for today.

Enjoy...

That second meme is pure gold . The first meme describes the stupidity of the brainwashed and entitled liberals (especially liberal college students and undergraduates) who act as if America has infinite space and infinite resources.

I see this face I the middle of the night, na heart attack straight.

budaatum:
Enjoy it enough to be a scientist? Engineer myself. A make things happener. Structures built on subjective foundations don't bother Babel, they just come tumbling down. And yes, a very worthy pursuit. Research into it alone is mind blowing. Living it subjectively is fascinating. Very enjoyable too. And it gets easy over time.

Biggest lie of the century. You can't live out the principles of engineering subjectively. The principles are objective. Your language might be different but the observation and principles are objective and the same.

Edit: Here you admit recognising and making decisions based on objective reality but I later writings, you turn your back on this arguing for "pure subjective reality" for whatever reason known to you.

Not quite. IAmSabrina please do not be lazy! First, we take our photometers to the photometer calibrator who calibrates them then we ensure we are on the same measuring scale on our photometers and are both measuring from the precise same points to the same end points. Still, forgive I see a rhombus!

You are really stubborn. Why do you like complicating things? Who or what is the photometer calibrator? What is the photometer? I guess the eyes. The principle of reflection, refraction and electromagnetic waves are the same throughout the universe and are OBJECTIVE. Given this and the fact that everyone's eyes are built with the same basic framework, everyone with unimpaired eyes will see the same thing.

What I see as round would be seen as round by you. Even though we may have different languages but the observation and concept are the same. If you use the English language, then what I call round is what you will call round. If you use the English language and you claim you see a rhombus then you are saying that you see a quadrilateral whose sides have the same length. What you see as a rhombus is what I see as a rhombus whether I like it or not.

Your observation or oblivion has no bearing on the existence of objective reality. You observe objective reality with your senses.

How are the eyes in my head not subjective to subject me who's head they are in? Are my eyes in some other subject's head too, Sab?

Oga, your unimpaired eyes and brain will observe the same thing as everybody even though they belong to you.

We hear things the same? How so? Does your brain power not determine what you hear to begin with? If you don't have brain power can you understand maths?

Everything one hears the same thing because the nervous system and auditory organ of every human are built on the same basic structure. Given this and the fact that the physical law of sound transmission is the same then everyone will hear the same thing. The only exceptions are auditory hallucinations and hearing impairment.

You're going to have to clean this for me, I think I misunderstand. There's a lot of people who have not learnt maths out there, by any objective measure.

One beauty about objective reality is that your observation and oblivion of it has no bearing on it's existence. Your acknowledgement or denial of objective reality has no bearing on it's existence.

The fact that people haven't learnt maths by any objective standard doesn't mean that the principles of Mathematics are false and subjective. Go anywhere in the universe, the Pythagorean Theorem is valid whether you like it or not; or whether you've studied Mathematics objectively or not.

The language of description maybe different among people but the observation and concept are the same. The principles of Mathematics are valid for every observer. You trying to make it out that if people haven't learnt about certain parts of objective reality then it's not objective to them. There is nothing like "my facts," you only have "your opinion." Facts are facts and don't belong to anybody and are valid even without our acknowledgement.

Helpless? Stop overdramatising Sab, it can't be that bad, or can't it. It's not as if we understand objectivity now to be honest, though we don't build much on here either, just constant tearing down. I put my beans in a pressure cooker with lots of onions, dried fish, panla, ede, salt, cowtail, water, cook half an hour pour in pepper, tomato, oil, simmer half another hour. You must know some people like theirs agoyin! Beans is not beans, Sab, who chop am matter!

This is pure nonsense and deliberate misunderstanding of IAmSabrina's point. She didn't say the preparation would be the same for everyone. This is what I would expect from TATIME. Beans is beans regardless of who eats it. How it is prepared depends on the person's references but it is still beans. SMH, I am very very disappointed. You are simply, in a nonsensical way, waging a war against objective reality. There is a difference between observing objective reality and understanding what you are observing. The fact that you don't understand objective reality doesn't mean it different for you.

Using your toto to get wealth is not a crime under the Federal Republic of Nigeria. It is your fundamental human right. It is nothing to be ashamed of. If people are criticising you for using your toto to acquire wealth, give them two options :
1) let them foot your bills and expenses, or
2) stfu and get lost.

The only problem is when you are deceiving others that you are hustling "legitimately" to acquire your wealth. When you do that, you create a false expectation for those that want to take up your profession only for them to be disillusioned and hit hard with reality. Though you have the right to live a fake life but it would be better if you don't mislead those that aspire to be like you.

Herdsmen:
He's healed...in Jesus name.amen.

Lol

He will not forgive you, you son of perdition. The wages of sin is death. You will rot and roast in hell for all eternity for sinning against your maker. Nothing unclean shall enter the kingdom of god. Oshisco.

POSSIBLITY ONE
He might have been forming Mr. Nice Guy buying her stuffs because he wanted to be with her. After spending much(we might not know how much or what great extent he went to keeping the girl happy), he felt that he deserved a relationship. When she said "no" after enjoying the oshi free, the boy couldn't accept that all his spending and investment had been for nothing. Hmmmmmmmmm.

POSSIBLITY TWO
He is a narcissist and/or psychopath.

POSSIBLITY THREE
The story is deeper than we think.

Obinna Nsofor, Odemwinge, Obafemi Martins and co were too full of themselves then. Their shakara was too much for Sia Sia. They felt irreplaceable until Keshi came and showed them that Nigeria can depend on home based players by winning the 2013 AFCON. They started humbling themselves but it was too late for many of them as they never smelled the national team again.

Obinna Nsofor, where is he with all the disobedience and shakara for Sia Sia then?

So people fell for this nonsense. Sometimes people are so stupid that we don't blame those who took advantage of them but blame them for being stupid. MenzGold ko WomenzGold ni.

budaatum:
Have you read my thread on subjectivity and objectivity? If not, I strongly suggest you check out the objectively available evidence of my qualifications on the subjects, 39, instead of making up things in your head!

Awualam. How do you know I made it up in my head? You are yet to answer. Chisos o.

Please tell me if these my English words that I have joined together inside my own head are not at this very moment existing!

I am not questioning the existence of anything thing in your head. The existence of anything inside your head is not a subject of our discussion and has never been so why this statement? How did you arrive at the this point. Stop disorganising our argument.

I simply asked the following questions.

How do you know I made it up? Can you prove the elephant I described isn't at the centre of Neptune? If no, are you inconclusive of it's existence and location? or you lack belief in it because it's supposed existence has to basis in reality?

Oh my goodness.

I no do again. Make I go sleep.

budaatum:
I don't know many people who go about with a photometer, or even know how to use one, so I would think we do a lot more subjective reality despite all the objective reality surrounding us.

Now, imagine an atheist. Not one like 39 who makes elephants up in his head, but a real no evidence, no believe atheist. On what basis does that atheist argue that whatever reality I make up in my own head is not real in my head!? Then imagine the flip of that. Me arguing there isn't an elephant in 39's head. Should I not call me a fool?

I never said whatever is in your head isn't in your head. I never did, where did you get that from? You are fond of playing around with the English language and complicating arguments. I simply asked how you are sure that I made up the elephant. Also, can you prove that the elephant doesn't exist?

IAmSabrina:
I think i get what you're trying to say...

At this stage, we have to define reality: is it the egocentric fables and tales we cook up for ourselves OR the one we're slaves to?

@bold implies subjective reality => everyone has a different view of what reality is because we all have different points of view...
....one thing to note, however, is that objective reality can be verified through independent measurement. Subjective reality cannot.

Two people will perceive "blue" differently, but a photometer will ALWAYS recognize the light's actual wavelength correctly, no matter who measures it or when.

Cc. Martinez39

He is just complicating things. He told me he is using the English language yet he is confusing what objective and subjective realities mean. If something exists in one's head alone then it doesn't exist. Simple English.

budaatum:
I don't lack belief in it, 39,

If you don't lack belief then you believe or know then.

that would be giving it way more consideration than it deserves!

There are many things we don't give consideration to and yet we lack belief in them. My elephant is an example. A golden coloured skin werewolf with silver coloured claws is another example.

And I don't have to prove to you whether it exists or not.

of course. I never said you were obliged to. Those questions were to advance our discussion and make it clear, to you, what it means to lack belief in something.

The words I used to convey exactly how I felt about it, in English Language, was, "the crap you made up in your head"!

I know and I am using the English language too. I was simply challenging your claim that I made up the elephant in my head. How do you know I made it up? Can you prove the elephant I described isn't at the centre of Neptune? If no, are you inconclusive of it's existence and location? or you lack belief in it because it's supposed existence has to basis in reality?

And for proof, no airline flies elephants to Neptune! But don't believe me. Just third party google so you can know!

Lol. Quite shallow. Where would we find an immortal rainbow coloured indestructible elephant on earth? Besides didn't you consider that the elephant could have originated from Neptune and got stuck at the centre thanks to a flying unreachable advanced alien? Try something better as proof.

I have to sleep. Good night everyone.

budaatum:
I don't believe period! When I don't know something I don't know. I do not have to make up reality inside my own head. I see no profit in so doing.

You didn't answer the question. WHY, I repeat WHY, don't you believe in that deity?

Why do I not "believe that there is an indestructible immortal rainbow coloured elephant eternally hibernating in the centre of planet Neptune", do I really need to answer that?!

Lol. Answer. If you think it's obvious that it doesn't exist, an atheist can say it's obvious that god doesn't exist. Besides you where having a problem with what it means to lack belief in something? People disbelieve because there is(are) no good reason(s) to believe.

I don't believe it because I don't do belief and its crap you made up in your head, 39!

How do you know I made it up? Can you prove the elephant I described isn't at the centre of Neptune? If no, are you inconclusive of it's existence and location? or you lack belief in it because it's supposed existence has to basis in reality?

I am trying to use an analogy to explain what it means to lack belief in something.

budaatum:
I don't believe period! When I don't know something I don't know. I do not have to make up reality inside my own head. I see no profit in so doing.

You didn't answer the question. WHY, I repeat WHY, don't you believe in that deity?

Why do I not "believe that there is an indestructible immortal rainbow coloured elephant eternally hibernating in the centre of planet Neptune", do I really need to answer that?!

Lol. Answer. If you think it's obvious that it doesn't exist, an atheist can say it's obvious that god doesn't exist. Besides you where having a problem with what it means to lack belief in something? People disbelieve because there is(are) no good reason(s) to believe.

I don't believe it because I don't do belief and its crap you made up in your head, 39!

How do you know I made it up? Can you prove the elephant I described isn't at the centre of Neptune? If no, are you inconclusive of it's existence and location? or you lack belief in it because it's supposed existence has to basis in reality?

budaatum:
First, I'm not asking you to believe anything. In fact, the two beliefs here are ones you made up in your own head. I do not believe any of them!

I never said you were. How do you know I made the elephant up? Can you prove I made it up? Can you prove that the elephant I described doesn't exist in the centre of planet Neptune? Even though you can't disprove the existence of the elephant, you still don't believe in it because, to you, there is no evidence to support it's existence. Therefore you lack belief in it due to lack of evidence.

Perhaps you are not sure if the elephant exists or not because you can't prove or disprove it's existence? *yimu*

Second, and please take note of this, 39, buda does "not believe in nonsense called god and religion which people made up in their head and spread to others". Like you, 39, I got my own head I can make things up in, and know I made it up!

Hmmmmm. I don't get.

Actually, atheists have a disbelieve in deities because something that is lacking in them - Sabrina and I cleared that up, though she didn't expect me to whack her with this I bet. Get on page!

Nah! Atheist have a disbelieve in god because the existence of god has no evidences or sound basis in reality. You don't believe in unicorns for the same reason. However, if evidence for unicorns emerges (eg. seeing one), you will acknowledge the existence of unicorns. Same with god and deities for atheists.

You cannot know, 39. Sorry, but its the truth. You cannot know because you lie about wanting to know.

What can I not know? What can I not know because I lie about wanting to know?

I mean, listen to yourself: You do not believe the nonsense you just make up in your head, 39

How do you know I made it up in my head? What if the elephant exists at the said location? Can you disprove that?

As long as there is no evidence or any sound logical basis for god and religion, you lack belief in those things. . When atheists say "god doesn't exist," they say it in much the way they would say "werewolves, leprechauns and unicorns don't exist." You, budaatum, lack belief in the existence of unicorns.
BY THE WAY, WHY DO THINK IT IS NONSENSE, CAN YOU DISPROVE THAT THE ELEPHANT I DESCRIBED IS NOT IN THE CENTRE OF NEPTUNE?

Cc. IAmSabrina

You haven't answered a single question I have asked so far. Check my previous post to you and answer all my questions so we can make progress.

budaatum:
I too lack belief in a personal diety watching over mankind, punishing and rewarding them for their deeds .

Am I missing something here why are both of you making things up just so you can claim you don't believe it then define yourselves but what you've made up but don't believe? I don't get that!

Why don't you believe in this deity?

I am trying to establish an analogy to explain what it means to lack belief in a concept/idea. Beside, how do you know I made it up? Can you prove the elephant I described isn't at the centre of Neptune? If no, are you inconclusive of it's existence and location? or you lack belief in it because it's supposed existence has to basis in reality?

Please answer all questions so we can make progress.

seyi371:
why don't you take one prayer from the Quran and play with, since you are so sensible.
Is Christianity the only religion in the whole earth ?
You shouldn't because of some persons start insulting the whole of Christianity.
Why don't you create a thread and start dissing Muslims ?
How many times do you see Bill Gates dissing other people's belief ?

Is insulting Christianity the only way to be atheist?

@ iamsabrina, you should learn to respect other people's belief, whatever they believe in, is non of your business,
it is their life.

You have really fallen of the bandwagon of sanity. People can criticise any religion they like. What Bill Gates does with his life has no bearing on IAmSabrina's freedom of speech.

She is under no obligation to respect your beliefs and she has the right to criticise any belief. If you feel she is not criticising Islam enough, why don't you take up the task?