Martinez39's Posts
Nairaland Forum › Martinez39's Profile › Martinez39's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 (of 157 pages)
MrBrownJay1:You are a very stupid individual. How can you get custody over a child that's not yours biologically when the biological mother is there? Are you sure your brain is functioning properly or are you a female behind a male looking moniker? If you are female, then I don't expect honesty and rationality from you on an issue like this. [s]you are wrongly assuming again that a child crying means he wants to be with dad and NOT mum...instead of assuming that the child simply dont want to be separated from either parent. kids go where they have an easy way...so sometimes they will cry and want to be with daddy when mummy refuse to give them something, and then turn around and do the opposite when daddy refuse them something. thats what KIDS DO. i am in no way favoring women, i am favoring children, and as a father of 6, i certainly know that "such tears" usually means nothing worthy.You have fallen off the bandwagon of sanity. Watch the video and see that the child stated clearly that he doesn't want to stay with the mother. So your ignorant argument that the child wanted to stay with both parents is off-point. You are not to be taken seriously if you argue stupidly in this manner. Watch the video. [s]i shout for what best for the child... there is no black and white here, it all has to do with childs welfare and best interest, 1st and foremost![/s]SMH. Anyway MrBrownJay1:Why would any woman decide to discuss things when she has the incentive to go to the divorce court and get half of his net worth, child support, and alimony? SMH. I promise not to reply you again. I have no more time to waste on people like you. |
KevinDein:These things are very common at an alarming rate but we don't get to hear of them because the main stream media, being a blue pill machine, does not report them. I too have no pity for simps and white knights. Out of great thirst for sex and being too easily smitten by women's beauty and body, they 1) worshipped women (in hopes of getting laid and getting women's approval); 2) gave them free passes and rights with relatively little accountability; 3) highly overrated pvssy and sex; and 4) became victims of the illusion of romantic love. |
Michellekabod2:You and MrBrownJay1 either don't know the marital laws over there or you people are being dishonest, or both. 1) No child at that age will earnestly desire to stay with his father if the father is abusive or toxic. Children will always go to who they enjoy staying with and who treats them well. #FACTS 2) What kind of mother must that woman be for her son to insist on not staying with her? That's a key question. A serious question. If a man who close to a girl of that age and the girl reacted this way to the man, experts will suspect abuse (probably sexual abuse) but somehow, in this case, "the child is too young to know what's best for him." Any serious person who cares about the child will question the mother's relationship with the child but I guess you and MrBrownJay1 are blinded by bias favouring women. Also, we know children are usually close to their mothers while little, so why is the child vehemently refusing to stay with the mother? If you value a child wellbeing above your bias for women, why are you not thinking alone these lines? 3) Gynocentrism exists but the so called misogynistic patriarchy that oppresses and subjugates women is nonexistent in the west and 99.9% feminists all over the world screaming "patriarchy", "misogyny", "toxic masculinity" etc. have equal rights and opportunities as men (or even "more" rights and privileges) where they live. |
An apologist here has fallen off the bandwagon of sanity. Let me watch from afar. ![]() So guys, I hope you will stop worshipping women and see them as mere humans and treat them like your fellow man. Don't be simps like western men. |
I used to believe the lie that feminism in western societies started because men were oppressing women until the video below (with a sound research on the history of feminism) proved otherwise. Feminism has always been the same victim mentality and blaming of men to get special treatment. Little wonder feminists will kill themselves over the wage gap myth (which has been debunked over and over) and nonexistent misogynistic patriarchy instead of seeking ways to liberate their fellow women in Islamic societies. It's all about power. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ll1HCBck25A The MGTOW movement originated as a natural response by smart redpilled men in a toxic gynocentric society. The same movement can be seen in Japan with the so called herbivore men. MRAs are activists pointing out the maltreatment and unfair treatment of men in gynocentric USA and they hope to institute changes in the marital laws and domestic abuse/physical assault laws (the law in general) to make them fair to both sexes. Any smart pill man knows the MRAs will never achieve their aim so MGTOW is the way. Do your research. If you can't do your research and you keep blundering on what the mgtow movement is all about then that's your business.
|
MrBrownJay1:Before you insult other people's intelligence, at least don't be stupid and learn to comprehend and reason before typing. I never spoke with certainty on the cause of the divorce. In fact, I used the words "as it seems". The main issue here is not what went down between the couple but why the child must be separated from the dad against his will. What kind of society does that? Is that a moral thing to do? Also, given the marital laws, let's be careful not to down play the fact that marriage is a full time business in America. No matter what happened between the couple, its clear that the child has a good relationship with the dad or else the boy would not have desperately wanted to stay with the father. Why then separate the boy from the father? They do this because the child support and alimony goes to the mother and when it does, the court will collect their share as tax. What kind of mother must the woman be for her son to vehemently refuse staying with her? Why didn't the court take this disturbing occurrence into account? Why? It's all about the women and women are, indirectly, agents of the state with men as the disposable utility and children as pawns for child support. You are saying rubbish because you are not in the father's shoes. B) just because a child cries does NOT mean anything... thats what children do, duh! a child would cry if you refuse to give them candies, should we now listen to kids and give them candies all day long?!?!?!Clap for yourself and please do that while looking at your vile self in the mirror. So it's okay to separate the child that wants to see his father even when they have a good relationship because "thats what children do, duh! a child would cry if you refuse to give them candies," ? Clap for your shameless self. C) what has the above got do do with worshiping women?! what about LOVING women, just the same as they love us back? what about havingThere is no point arguing with you. Your brain is now one and the same with the blue pill. Good bye. |
budaatum:That case is not peculiar to just that woman. It happens to a lot of men. If the mother wants, the children are cut off from the dad even against the children's will. Funny enough despite the children's desire to stay with their dad, the court will still believe the father molested the children and abused his wife if his wife says so. Not only that, it's a common thing for men to pay child support for children that ain't their's. Even when it is proven that they are victims of paternity fraud, they still pay. I could discuss many ways of gynocentric america (from the divorce laws, alimony laws, child support laws, etc) but that's not my aim. I just wanted to say that men should stop worshipping women and condoning gynocentrism. Here are video evidences: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BJJ5Z_5lllw https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UH9fnRnEcr0 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LU-pxzBl1jY Ubunja, emmaodet, CAPSLOCKED, JONNYSPUTE, Omar09, healthserve, AstroG, HARDDON, |
2) CASE TWO (woman with power) There is a reason why smart men prefer women that are very low in finance and education as wives. It's not that they hate women's success but it's because wives become toxic, disrespectful, and snubbish were they have more money than the husband and have to step in to pay the bills when the husband hits hard times. Many married men can attest to this. In this video, we see a woman who has been granted sole custody and when the father of the kids came to visit them, she and her mother (monster-in-law) ganged up against the man. To further shred the man's heart apart, the woman said "what right have you to see these children?" The mother stood in support and didn't do anything. The man maintained his calm. Here is the video (the video is 12mins long) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FQ1lsVKQsb0 LESSON: you never know the true colours of a woman until she has power and advantages over you. Also, during a dispute, women are not just content to be right, given undue privilege, or given a free pass. Any chance that will make them hurt your feelings deeply, they will take it even if it is very petty of them. Most will deride you to hurt you because they can and they can get away with it. Also, even if you worship women and pass laws to grant them mind-blowing privileges, you will be readily thrown under the bus by them if it's for their benefit. Don't worship women, don't think they are angels, and don't condone gynocentrism. If not, you will suffer. Ubunja, emmaodet, CAPSLOCKED, JONNYSPUTE, Omar09, healthserve, AstroG, HARDDON, |
I have always said it that smart men don't worship women and condone gynocentrism. If you do, you are going to suffer in the system you created. Let's look at the following cases : 1) CASE ONE (gynocentrism at it's peak) The woman in this video took her husband to the divorce court. The son in this video is a very little boy and the mother is quite young hence we can say the marriage is still young but, as it seems, the mother is pulling the trigger since she now has alimony and child support. Anyway, in this video, sole custody was unsurprisingly granted to the mother but the child didn't want to stay with the mother. On being told that he wasn't going to see his father, the child was crying and bawling his eyes out and the court staff or, perhaps, the wife's sister/relative (it wouldn't matter, they would do the same thing) were trying to console the boy but he wouldn't stop crying. The boy, while crying, made it clear that he didn't want to stay with his mother Notice that the mother never said she would let him see the father instead she tried to win the boy over by telling him she has gifts for him blah blah blah blah blah blah. Hope we can see where worshiping women and being blue pilled has led American men? ![]() Another important question is why would a child dread staying with the mother? Here is the video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tx-SuKQd2nY LESSON: Gynocentrism places women above men, children, and animals. It is all about the women. When a woman rapes a man and gets pregnant or steals his used condom and gets pregnant, the same gynocentric courts will force you to pay child support using the excuse "we have to do what is best for the child" but in the case shown in that video, the best interest of child is thrown through the window. Never join the simps in being too thirsty that they worship women and give them free passes and special privileges. Men who worship women will suffer in the hands of women and won't be spared in a gynocentrism society. Gynocentrism is all about the women. The rest are tools and pawns. Women are not fair players in the game and they are cold. Ubunja, emmaodet, CAPSLOCKED, JONNYSPUTE, Omar09, healthserve, AstroG, HARDDON, |
KevinDein:The dude is going to be burnt so hard. |
ubunja:Just seeing this. Harddon has already written about what happened in the video. I still suggest you watch the video. |
Ariza: |
BetWinners:With themselves. Watch the video. They have been together for five years. |
BetWinners:No he is not. Both of them are already in a relationship. He, being a nice guy, is doing all these things out of commitment, kindness of heart, and true love while making the usual mistake of nice guys — thinking that others are just basically like them and would reciprocate kind gestures. Nice people who are still naive and have no experience of the nature of humans in general can't mentally grasp or reason wicked and mean behaviours hence they assume most ordinary people are basically nice like them. The guy in the video was confused and confounded when the panel implied his would be finished and left for dry when his girlfriend leaves him. That's why nice people, like the guy in the video, are usually taken unaware and get serious burnt. The kindness of nice people are seen as foolish to those that understand human nature but nice people see their niceness as the good and proper way of doing things. That's why when a nice guy has been burnt, the first set question that comes to his mind admist his feeling of hurt is "why?" (this is because he finds many cruel and mean acts unthinkable, unnecessary, and petty) and "but I have been good and helpful to that person?" (he made the mistake of thinking others are basically like him and would reciprocate kind gestures & treatment). The guy in the video is heading that path. This world is not ideal for the nice and gentle but for the strong and brutal survivalists. Cc. emmaodet, armadeo |
bobowaja:Good to see you have woken up. |
luminouz:We all know that no one owes us anything but that's no the issue here. The issue here is that true romantic love doesn't exist and men can be very stupid with love. I agree with your post nevertheless. |
Omar09:My bad, I will tag you next time. |
emmaodet:A lot of kind hearted people find themselves in similar position. The greatest mistake kind people make is assume others are basically like them. |
Chi59:Your post gave you away. Anyway, I will ignore your post from henceforth. No time to waste on feminists. Good night. |
2buffagain:I hope he will and I hope he won't be stung so hard before he wakes up. What a simp. ![]() |
Keep being confused, keep misplacing your priorities, and don't focus on your studies. When you fail, you will explain to your children why you screwed up something important for a girl that didn't marry you, give you the p-sleeve but gave others, and ended up with someone else. Go son! ![]() |
Women! In the very short video below (which you have to watch till the very end to understand), we can see how being a simp and fool for love has led a man into a terrible position where he is being used and can be discarded without a sweat. Also, notice the woman's answers at the very end and see why you can't trust women just because you love her. Boys, watch this very short video and tell us the great foolish things you have done because you were in love, just simping, or being a white knight. Ubunja, CAPSLOCKED, pansophist, AstroG, healthserve, JONNYSPUTE, emmaodet, lukui, HARDDON https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rksYbGA1QS8 |
9ja083:You are not even sticking to your argument. In trying to debunk my post on her decision to abort the pregnancy, you said the reason for her decision to abort was because nursing school doesn't allow pregnancy for students. In doing that, you left out the fact she knew about the school rules, deliberately got pregnant with the intention of keeping it initially, and didn't use the school rules as an excuse when deciding to abort it and I pointed these out thus invalidating your argument. Also, she could have given birth and written the exams later. The school rules are not my business. All I know is, of her own accord, she wants to terminate the pregnancy. |
Chi59:I don't have your time, I sure you have, like your fellow feminists, taken to seeing men as cruel deadbeats and source of female oppression; nonexistent sexism against women; and the reason for many women's laziness, misfortune, and inadequacies. This is a man who could have denied the pregnancy but he insisted on keeping it, how will such a man japa when the baby is born? When his girlfriend wanted to abort it, that was his chance to japa but he didn't and he even came to open a thread on nairaland stressing that he wants to keep the pregnancy, tell me how such a person will japa? Your resentment towards men is your master and you will rot in that resentment. Silly feminist. |
9ja083:1) The 29 year old nursing didn't give any school rule as an excuse instead she said "my mum said...", "my dad said...", blah blah blah blah blah blah. She was also clearly aware of the school rule. So your post is out of line. 2) If she had agreed at first, why is she really doing a 180° on her decision? The girl in question is 29 years of age. I repeat, 29 years of age. The girl does not want to keep it. Think properly before replying me next time. |
Tannhauser:Maybe she suddenly found a higher bidder or some feminist friends are at work. ![]() |
Feminist loading. just kidding. |
She is the one that wants to terminate the pregnancy. Forget the excuses of "my mum said...","my father said..." etc. She be small pikin? These are the same useless excuses females use when they want to end things with their boyfriends. If she doesn't want that pregnancy to be terminated, it wouldn't be terminated. If you still plan on staying with her no matter what, then just forget about it because the pregnancy will be terminated. Or better still, tell her that if she terminates the pregnancy you will dump her and stand on it. |
cococandy:I knew you would be here. ![]() Any woman who is not faithful shall be dumped. There is nothing bad about an ungrateful THOT going homeless. ![]() One THOT down, more to go! ![]() |
LadySarah:You are a very stupid person. So if the man had cheated, will the wife chase him from his own house and take away his own money? Instead of disparaging house wives, advice women to close their legs and stay faithful to their husbands. If she had been faithful, she wouldn't have been homeless. There is nothing wrong in answering wife. |
One THOT down. ![]() |
Are you sure your brain is functioning properly or are you a female behind a male looking moniker? If you are female, then I don't expect honesty and rationality from you on an issue like this.
. No sympathy for simps and white Knights and I only visit those forums if I want a laugh.
What kind of mother must the woman be for her son to vehemently refuse staying with her? Why didn't the court take this disturbing occurrence into account? Why? It's all about the women and women are, indirectly, agents of the state with men as the disposable utility and children as pawns for child support. You are saying rubbish because you are not in the father's shoes. 
If she doesn't want that pregnancy to be terminated, it wouldn't be terminated. If you still plan on staying with her no matter what, then just forget about it because the pregnancy will be terminated. Or better still, tell her that if she terminates the pregnancy you will dump her and stand on it.