₦airaland Forum

Ebenezer2021:
perfect analysis.
How far bro it's EmptyCoconuthead.

Long time my guy. How is life?

FROGMAN101:
Dont mind those wankers. They are moaning that they will win the Premier League asif the other big boys havent won the premier league. Arsenal have. Same with Man United. Chelsea and Man City. Its not unprecedented.

But unbeaten is unbeaten. It hurts that they were so close. Almost every football fan on earth will want their team to go unbeaten.

Gbam! They are acting like they are not hurt and saddened by the defeat at Watford when it is clear they are in deep pains. Many Liverpool fans are so distraught and discombobulated they wish they could turn back the hands of time. Are we even sure many of them went to church today given how they were paralyzed by grief yesterday?

LordAzubuike:
That arsenal's invincible was a joke and not worthy of being called an invincible. It was full of too many draws and near losses. Na oriyomi dem take escape on several occasions.

Until Liverpool can equal that unbeaten record, I will be convinced it's a joke.

kyng:
Can't you all see that the match is fixed
How you go tell me the almighty Liverpool when no fit lose to man u, man city, Chelsea and other rivals go come lose to Watford when dey number 19 for EPL table
Scripted match
A disgrace to England fa Una too dey fix match

Tah! Learn to chop and digest your L without grumbling.

donoro:
please don't put arsenal among top guns they've never been in form for the last 10 years the same out of form man city flogged madrid in their backyard and if u think just 1 loss will dent the greatness of a team that went 18 league games without losing or drawing then u must be a joker

Shut up and learn to comprehend. No one is saying Liverpool hasn't been great this season, we are just celebrating the fact that LIVERPOOL CAN NEVER BE AN INVINCIBLE TEAM. Beside, Arsenal, for a long time, has always been a top gun in the EPL. It just that they were regularly outclassed by other top guns. Arsenal started misbehaving in the 2016-17 season.

Also, I never said Man City weren't in form. I simply said they were shaky. The reason why you can't comprehend my post and you are talking off point is because of the Watford Syndrome, a rare medical condition that shatters ego and aspirations and causes severe "painment."

Liverpool fans are pretending they are not saddened and upset by the loss at Watford. They are using fake smiles and the prospects of a Premier League title to beguile their hurt. Why wouldn't they be pained? That was a rare and perfect opportunity to become an invincible team but they ruined it. A rare and perfect opportunity it was as Man City were shaky and the other top guns (Chelsea, Man United, Arsenal, Tottenham) were not in form. If they couldn't be an invincible team now, tell me when they will ever be? Any Liverpool fan claiming not to be hurt and saddened by this defeat is a liar.

They had better call out Klopp for using the same old tactics that Atletico Madrid exposed and remedied and despite the fact other teams (West Ham and Watford in the first half) were catching up on his tactics and following Atletico Madrid's footsteps, Klopp refused to change.

JONNYSPUTE:
Our unbeaten don scatter. Martinez39 you are happy now I guess?

Before nko.

Lovexme:
More like cut off supplies to the wingbacks and also close all spaces Mane and Salah can run into.

Teams are beginning to play that way against Liverpool: close all spaces to run behind their defence.

I'm not sure Klopp will change anything. He's that stubborn. What he'll probably do is to instruct the midfielders to move and pass the ball quicker, and NEVER play Lovren again!

If Klopp remains stubborn, he can kiss the UCL goodbye and, at worst, he will end badly at Liverpool. Atletico Madrid, thanks to Diego Simeone's genius, showed the way to other teams. West Ham nearly made Liverpool pay but they were unlucky. I thought that West Ham match would have motivated Klopp to sit up and diversify his tactics and game plan but he remained stubborn, got hammered by Watford, and ended his unbeaten run. Too bad. Hope Klopp wakes up and come back stronger in the UCL.

Lovexme:
If Klopp didn't think so before, this result is a kick up the backside.

Atletico Madrid exposed Liverpool (cut off the two suppliers in the midfield and Liverpool is done for ) and after that defeat, Liverpool haven't been themselves. I trust Klopp to come up with something new or else, he can kiss the UCL goodbye. Wolves used the same tactics Atletico Madrid employed.

maynation:
Bros, what would Man U and Ole do to stop losing form and points?

We are in transition just as Liverpool was in 2014-15 season till they became a powerhouse in 2017-18 season. With a few more wise buys in the transfer market and a good tactician (that's if OGS doesn't sit up), we are good to go. Just give Man Utd time.

As a Man Utd fan, I am very happy at the result tonight. However, this is a wake up call for Liverpool and Klopp. Liverpool and Klopp need to diversify their game plan and tactics.

Match don finish.

maynation:
Awon steady losers.

We aren't steady losers, we are just in transition. For now, let me savour and bask in fact that my hated rivals will never be an invincible team.

shogsman:
If it's not gross stupidity, you're trolling a club that has almost 30points lead on the table because he is on the verge of losing 3points,some Nigerian youths are a special kind of STUPID.

maynation:
You think I am not happy? Ohh.. you expect to start calling Klopp out?

Through all ups and Downs... we are reds.
Through all thick and thins... we are still reds.
Shaking no dey.

.....

NextD18:
Something tells me Liverpool will still win this match.

[img]https://media1./images/bfb10ae2ef6b745b0a933ecf56cc8ff4/tenor.gif[/img]

They can still win this match. Just two goals from Torres and a free kick from Steven Gerrard.

JONNYSPUTE:
Liverpool will still win this match.Plenty time dey.

Liverpool just scored. It was a long range shot by Fernando Torres out of retirement. 3 - 1

CAPSLOCKED:
THESE CONDITIONS EXIST BECAUSE MANY MEN TODAY ARE FOOLISH SCUMBAGS.

As long as men keep falling for that trick, women will keep playing it.

This is why I always tell people to give birth to children they can take care of up till post graduate level instead of leaving everything in the hands of God or hoping for the best. By the way, why go to a university whose fees you can't afford?

They should have maintained the former coach, equipped their midfield and defence with better players since those two were their weak points, and improved on tactics and game plan. Bringing in Sarri left me shaking my head.

Ubunja, Omar09, and CAPSLOCKED, can you people do this?

abbey621:
It seems you had a very rough childhood hence the bias in your statements. Let's examine your quote:



Here's your initial statement:


You are the one that believes men fulfilling gender roles is the norm but when a woman does the same it is not seen as such. I only pointed out the hypocrisy in such statements. You obviously believe a woman taking care of the home, being submissive is equal to being a slave rather than her just fulfilling her gender role hence my rebuttal.

Moving on, any woman that you see contented with her husband not showing any sign of progress or goals is FOOLISH at best and WICKED at worst! How do you know what women are praised for or not? You mean generally men don't appreciate their submissive wife? You mean they don't praise how delicious her food tastes? You mean they are not proud when she visits her in-laws and she is celebrated? Perhaps you mean, husbands don't appreciate their wives managing their financial resources wisely? I'm trying to figure out how you came to your conclusion because as a guy, I can tell you EMPHATICALLY that we boast about our wives submissiveness and resourcefulness. It is only a foolish man that would take such things for granted in this age of feminist wannabees. Just like women praise their husband for buying them things and staying faithful, we men value such sentimental things as well. Do not deceive yourself, every marriage is different, the dyanmics of one should not be compared to another. Your experience stems from that of your parents, you'll be surprised another person might have a way different point of view based on his or her own experiences.

Never take women's arguments, especially that of feminists, seriously. They are the embodiment of hypocrisy and double standards. They are incorrigible in this regard.

opebiboy:
no smoke without fire.

Rubbish.

Evidence? No rational person gives credence to news lacking solid evidence.

Who gives a śhit?

When the person comes back, ghost them forever. Unseriousness should never be tolerated.

CAPSLOCKED:
YOU MEAN THERE ARE NO GENUINELY NICE AND LOVING SINGLE MOTHERS AND OVER 30S?

Maybe loving and nice to their children. Women have no genuine romantic love to give to men. A man, in the eyes of a woman, is a disposable utility. Her association with him is dependent on how financially useful he is. The "niceness" single mothers and evening newspapers show you is not genuine. It's just their weapon and leverage that they have over the non-single mom fresh products in the dating market. It's the only desperate attempt they can muster to ensure the naive beta simp overlooks non-single mum fresh products, go for them, and, where applicable, put up with the challenges and risks of dating a single mum.

When you finally marry a single mum or an evening newspaper, her true colour will come out.

@infinixhot2

I sent you a DM. Let's speak offline.

cRobo:
Love don't exist

Welcome to the club.