₦airaland Forum

Has Obiano stopped exporting ugu? abi na utazy? What leaf was drunkard of Anambra exporting two years ago that caused sensation?

were!

Rekhina:
Yes your saboteur self is here

I like your new picture. Where was that, in Dubai? Im coming to torment you over there. They have been feeding you bad food. I come with spice, delicious and filling.

Banmeallday:
Fools and deceivers you people are. Constantly trying to distort and deceive, just like your fathers and mothers, mothers whom carried children in their adulterous womb belonging to very local men while married to their husbands......


Gowon sold your birthright to the British for good. He was followed by thuggish semi-literate African shariaist that knew nothing but how to kill and plunder....

You can never ever walk in nor fill Ironsi’s shoes, and you know that.. SO please, go and verify if your father is truly your father by asking your mumsi abeg

Onitsha bridge head tout spotted!

This thread is going to be loaded with ideas to awaken and question (pressure-test) validity of Sovereignty of Nigeria. You must follow this thread.

In case the mods apply their discretion and ruled this topic should be hidden or deleted due to its subject, I will take the awareness away from Nairaland and I will announce url address where you can find my discussions on this and many other awareness topics.

I purposely like to discuss critical issues after hours so when the city wakes up they are greeted by my thoughts and the questions I raise.

Disclaimer - All Onitsha Bridge-Head Touts are hereby advised NOT to say a word or contribute any input on this thread.


My first thought provoking question is this:
What is our tolerance threshold for sovereign contract? In other words, at what point do we recognize that the constitution has failed everybody and is time to drop allegiance and call it quits? Is there a constitution-performance means test by which we can gauge the constitution's effectiveness against some weighted metrics? How do we know when we reach our threshold?


To be continued....

It is very funny when you hear Iboman plead for mercy. When it's too hot for him Iboman knows what to do. Thats what happened here.

"We in the diaspora have long observed that the current unitary structure foisted on the people by successive military governments, is unsustainable. It has become an urgent imperative to dismantle this structure."

mrvitalis:
Lets assume u are correct even tho we still had regional government

Yes a man made mistake ,cant we correct it now ?

Excuse me! Assume... You are making assumptions of a Decree that destroyed my future prospects under the Govt and programs pioneered by the Govt of Western Nigeria?

Yes, it's not cancelled...it's in suspension. So of course, as should be expected, accusations and counter-accusations are fired left and right.

FEATURED
FG may repeal Land Use Act for Ruga, SMBLF alleges
Published July 7, 2019
KINDLY SHARE THIS STORY


Adelani Adepegba, Abuja

The Southern and Middle Belt Leaders Forum has said there is a surreptitious plan by the Federal Government to repeal the Land Use Act and take over the control of lands in the country from state governors.

This, it said, was to enable the government to subsequently implement the suspended Ruga project. The forum said it gathered that the FG suspended the Ruga Settlement Programme due to the Act which restricted its access to land, adding that the government may move to repeal the law in order to facilitate the implementation of the Ruga grazing scheme. SMBLF cautioned Southern lawmakers in the National Assembly to be vigilant and to guard against the introduction of any bill intended to repeal or amend the Land Use Act.

The forum said this in a statement in Abuja on Sunday by its co-spokespersons: Yinka Odumakin (South West), Prof. Chigozie Ogbu (South East), Senator Bassey Henshaw (South South), Dr. Isuwa Dogo (Middle Belt).

The group stated that it was not impressed by the suspension of the Ruga Settlement Project, which it declared as “an expansionist agenda on behalf of the Fulani nomads.” The statement reads, “It is being alleged that there will be moves to repeal the Land Use Act in the (Ruga) suspension period so the Federal Government can have authority over land which is currently under the states. “We therefore call on all our members in the National Assembly to be vigilant about any surreptitious bill that may be introduced to tamper with control of land and thwart such without any waste of time. “The 2014 National Conference debated this issue at length and resolved to retain the Land Use Act in the Constitution.”

The forum further warned the lawmakers against passing the ‘Bill to establish a Regulatory Framework for the Water Resources Sector in Nigeria,’ sponsored by the executive, noting that it was meant to give the FG sole authority and control over the nation’s rivers and underground water. The group added, “When this obnoxious Water Bill is taken alongside the Ruga programme and the speculated assault on Land Use Act, the internal colonialism agenda is complete and we would have no one but ourselves to blame if we don’t effect our no-pasaran (They shall not pass — a slogan used to express determination to defend a position against an enemy).

“It is pertinent to ask why the FG is not going ahead with Ruga in some northern states that have accepted the policy if the whole idea was not about land-grabbing in the South and Middle Belt states,” it said. The political pressure group stated that the FG’s support for local government autonomy was hinged on the Ruga scheme to allow “aliens” to take over allotted land under the programme. It vowed not to relax its opposition to the project, stressing that only outright cancellation of the initiative was acceptable to the forum. “The whole policy has opened our eyes to the reason why the President has been harping on local government autonomy now and then,” the group stressed.

FCBboy:
Those guys are just greedy, out of every then slots coming to kwara (jobs, political posts e.t.c) they will take 9. isn't that unfair?

I hear you. You must continue to participate and work on a balance that invlude everyone. Your grievance is part of the result of Saraki legacy. You have a new Governor who is more balanced and very capable. You have opportunity now to experiment and revolutionize a new Kwara with this forward-vision governor.

Let me share with you that for a long time political posts in Lagos State Govt was a Lagos Island affair. But Lagos Island is one of five divisions (we use divisions, legacy of the old province designations). Even during Tinubu first term Governorship there were still challemges but now we have an accord that appointments and distributions must cover all five and Governors must rotate.

So Abulrazaq is a goodman for the future of Kwara. You are sons of the soil, your inclusion must happen.

Maikanti will get retirement and other privileges from NNPC for life.

How long was he in NNPC?

Anyway, God Bless Gov Abdulrazaq of Kwara.

Congrats to the new SAN, may God prosper his efforts.

Team Kwara!


See me from Lagos but proud of Kwara, and one of their own no even value and take pride in his people.

FCBboy:
my state is known for academic excellence.

especially Ekiti/oke-ero people.


as for Ilorin people, nah only Arabic studies dem sabi.

Look at how you are behaving like Ibo, discriminating your own brothers in same state. No wonder they call you people in Kwara Afonja. See as you threw your own brothers under the bus. Smh...mtcheeew. . Na wah for Kwara!

Decree 34 of 1966 - the baby of Aguiyi Ironsi enforced unitary government.

YorubaHero12:
I don’t care if you are from Gambia or Futa Jalon. That’s your own cup of tea, what i’m just telling you is that the Fulani enslaved you already and you’re conquered territory. They made sure they relegate a whole major tribe to 5 small erosion ravaged region that made you all turn refugees in Yorubaland.

immhotep:
OK. But it is not by force to sell land.
Receive sense.

Argue that when miyetti show up with money. Is there anything Ibo love more than money?

Rekhina:
Vanguard news
7/7/19
A general meeting done by members of ladies forever worldwide in portharcourt which ended in controversies on sunday 7 of june ,2019 was on an issue regarding land to build their massive vibrators multi-supermarket to boost the economy ...

On sunday 4:30pm speaking about challenges regarding land its vice president Engr Adaibeku opined that we should move the investment to katsina state to help boost the economical strength of the state! Knowing the present of Oil
On the other hand Nurse amatarasha disagreed due to numerous problems facing katsina state, Nurse amatarasha suggested that we should move the love machine investment to sokoto when her personal assistant deepfeel was calming the situation, while the arguement lingers the meeting is adjorned till 15th july ...25 top executive members from accross the world were present Signed by: president Rekhina al fareeda who was......


READ MORE ON VANGUARD...

Cc immhotep metaphysical sarrki bigcowhorn khiaa analqueenluci tanid lzaa

Rhekina, metaphysical is present.

ORIENTATION101:
cos Igbos re at greater loss if their investment in northern Nigeria is being threatened.
Have u forgotten how Kaduna Declaration 2 years ago put Igbos and their leaders into state of panic and confusion. Igbos have to spread to other part of thecountry to find a target market for their goods and services .cos south east region is not too productive on terms of revenue generations.


If all Traders and businesmen of Igbos in North return to east who will buy their goods and services when majority of their brothers re already traders and businessmen.


Yoruba and other southern Tribes have little or no investment in Northern Nigeria compare to Igbos.

...and we dont want any more Igbo in our land. Those returning from North should head East.

Ib2014:
Yes. Except that they bought the lands with their own money and built houses on them still with their own money too.

Miyetti already said its coming with loads of money to buy SE land for ruga settlement.

If you can settle your people in their villages why are you rejecting same request from them to bring money and get land for ruga in SE?

This is why they are insulting you on internet and threatening to deal with you.

You always want to monopolize.

Amatarasha you are bae!


Ok, i modified post dear. Come back now.

Amatarasha:
my dad is Anambra ,my mum from Ondo ...but was trained in anambra

...

Amatarasha:
i thought is fulani that betrayed dem

But metaphysical said fulani betrayed awo the frog ...

I know you love me dear. Ill be your FFK...your personal Yoruba demon that you can show off and tell your friends youve moved up, no more cucumber...metaphysical between your thighs!

Because Igbos were the first to setup rugas all over Nigeria.

Igbo ruga is in every city, town and village in Nigeria.

What led us here? Igbo greed! It is evident that Ironsi had knowledge of January 1966 coup. Read it here...

On assumption of power, General Aguiyi-Ironsi promulgated the Constitution (Suspension and Modification) Decree 1966. Decree No 1 dated January 17, 1966 but not published in the Official Gazette until March 4, 1966. He then issued Public Order Decree No 33 dated May 24 1966 which dissolved eighty-one political associations and twenty-six tribal and cultural associations.

At the early stage of his tenure, he appointed a three-man advisory team made up of Chief Francis Nwokedi, a Permanent Secretary, Dr. Pius Charles Nwabafor Okigbo (1924-2000) and Colonel Patrick Anwunah, who later became Chairman and Head of the Orientation Committee at that time.

He replaced the then Attorney-General and Minister of Justice, Dr. Taslim Olawale Elias (1914-1991) with Chief Gabriel Chike Michael Onyiuke (SAN), former Director, Public Prosecution, Eastern Nigeria (1960-1965) from Nimo in the present Anambra state.

In a speech to the nation on January 28 1966, he denounced the evils of the Abubakar Tafawa Balewa regime and outlined necessary reforms. ”All Nigerians”, he declared,” want an end to regionalism. Tribal loyalties and activities which promote tribal consciousness and sectional interests must give way to the urgent task of national reconstruction. The Federal Military Government will preserve Nigeria as one strong nation.” He then went on to promise “administrative reforms” and referred specifically to several matters in which regional as well as personal interests were known to have had decisive influence. These were official appointments, public investments, and the universities. He promised that in the public services, efficiency and merit will be the criteria for advancement”. That industrial development would be “coordinated to avoid wasteful duplication of industrial projects”, and that the universities would be “re-orientated to serve the genuine interest of our people.”

Immediately after the speech two Governors kicked against the proposal. They were, Major General David Akpode Ejoor (83) from Ovu in the present Delta State, then serving as the Military Governor of the Mid-Western region and Major General Hassan Usman Katsina(1933-1995), who was then serving as Governor of the Northern region.

Lt. Col. Chukwuemeka Odumegwu-Ojukwu (1933-2011), Military Governor of Eastern Region welcomed the decree while Lt. Col. Francis Adekunle Fajuyi (1926-1966), Military Governor of Western Region never commented on the promulgation of the decree.

Lt-Col Ejoor was reported as saying that the ’National Government’ set up by the army was the prelude to ‘the reintroduction of a unitary form of government’ and insisted that it would create future problems. Shortly afterwards, the Supreme Military Council announced that a senior government official, Mr. Nwokedi, had been asked to consider and to report to the Supreme Military Council on the establishment of ‘an administrative machinery for a united Nigeria’ and the ‘unification of the Public Services and Judicial Services.’

In his own speech on February 19 at the Kaduna Airport, the Governor of Northern region, Lt-Col. Hassan Katsina said he was not aware as a member of the then Supreme Military Council of the modalities for the proposed National Government. ”I am afraid the egg is about to be broken”.

On February 21 1966, General Aguiyi-Ironsi again addressed the nation on the issue. He said: “On the question of the political future of the country, the experiences and mistakes of the previous governments in the Federation have clearly indicated that far-reaching constitutional reforms are badly needed for peaceful and orderly progress towards the realization of our objectives. I have already touched on some of the major issues involved in recent broadcast to the nation. It has become apparent to all Nigerians that rigid adherence to ‘regionalism’, was the bane of the last regime and one of the main factors which contributed to its downfall. No doubt, the country would welcome a clean break with the deficiencies of the system of government to which the country has been subjected in the recent past. A solution suitable to our national needs must be found. The existing boundaries of governmental control will need to be re-adjusted to make for less cumbersome administration.’

As a follow-up on May 25, General Aguiyi-Ironsi promulgated the Constitution (Suspension and Modification)(No. 5) Decree 1966. Decree No. 34 (the ‘Unification Decree’).

After the promulgation, the country was thrown into turmoil which led to demonstration particularly in many parts of Northern Nigeria at that time. On his return to Kaduna on May 27, Col. Hassan Katsina was besieged with demands for an explanation. It was feared that in a unified service, Northerners would be at a disadvantage. It was no consolation that the Decree provided for the delegation of appointments and promotions, except the most senior, to Provincial Civil Service Commissions.

With its authority challenged and shown to be weak, at least in large parts of the North, the National Military Government had little option but to proffer its assurances and to explain its actions. The Supreme Military Council met on 7 and 8 June 1966 and issued the following statement:

“The public must not be led to confuse the Military Government with government by a civilian regime under a constitution approved by the people. Nobody will expect the present Military Government to cease to function until new constitution has been approved or to be compelled to operate the old system of government with its obvious weakness. It cannot be too seriously emphasized that the Military Government while in office can only run the government as a military government under a unified command. It cannot afford to run five separate governments and separate services as if it were a civilian regime. Final decisions on the territorial structure of the country and the public services will be matters for the Constituent Assembly and the referendum.”

The Supreme Military Council also decided that General Aguiyi-Ironsi should invite traditional rulers from all parts of the country to a meeting to be held in Lagos as soon as possible and that the Military Governors would immediately summon similar meetings in their own Regions. This was presumably an attempt to improve the channels of communications. There had in fact already been a meeting of Northern Emirs and Chiefs in Kaduna on 4 of June and the Military Governor had been given a list of grievances and recommendations to take to Lagos. The Emirs and Chiefs met again on June 16 to receive General Aguiyi-Ironsi’s reply.
Sadly on 29 July 1966, General Aguiyi-Ironsi and the Military Governor of Western Region, Lt. Col. Francis Adekunle Fajuyi were murdered in Ibadan during a meeting with the traditional rulers from all parts of the country.



https://www.google.com/url?sa=i&source=web&cd=&ved=2ahUKEwi-5quxgKTjAhVST6wKHb6EBxUQzPwBegQIARAB&url=https%3A%2F%2Fguardian.ng%2Fopinion%2Fhistory-and-the-future-of-decree-34-of-1966%2F&psig=AOvVaw26rEjkjXQKl0jBuJBdI5Jr&ust=1562629965511687

By Emma Amaize, Ben Agande and Denis Agbo
World Igbo Congress, WIC, a platform for all Igbo in the diaspora, yesterday, has said that plans have been concluded to mobilise resources worldwide for the formation of an indigenous militia for self-defence against the RUGA settlements in the south-east.

A statement by its Chairman, Prof Anthony Ejiofor, said the move for an Igbo militia is backed by indigenous native laws.

Ejiofor said the development became necessary following the 30-day ultimatum issued by the Coalition of Northern Youth Groups for the implementation of Ruga settlements for herdsmen.

He said: "We call on the Federal government of Nigeria to summarily arrest and prosecute Mr Abdul Aseez Suleiman and his group for incitement and for a threat to conduct domestic terrorism against citizens of Nigeria failing which the Igbo of Southern Nigeria will use our own methods to carry out justice and defend our own people.

"We in the diaspora have long observed that the current unitary structure foisted on the people by successive military governments, is unsustainable. It has become an urgent imperative to dismantle this structure."


https://allafrica.com/stories/201907070009.html

immhotep:
Igbos buy land and do authentic trade.
They are not lame-a$$ land-grabbers looking for free handouts from the corrupt government.

Receive sense.
Igbo amaka.

cc Amatarasha lzaa adaibeku sarrki metaphysical QueenSekxy Bridget95 mrchineke yarimo gaskiyamagana baysol helinues AnalQueenluci yyeske

Dont worry, if na money be the problem, miyetti is bringing money to pay for ruga space.

immhotep:
Sai RUGA

cc Amatarasha lzaa adaibeku sarrki metaphysical QueenSekxy Bridget95 mrchineke yarimo gaskiyamagana baysol helinues AnalQueenluci yyeske

Metaphysical is present.

LegendHero:
You should rather talk to your brothers to duel with me, you’re just a weakling. Like I said mention one of your ancestors that are brave, let’s talk and maybe I can learn from you. Mention one thing pioneered by Igbos before the unitary government.

Mention just one you Ijaw sla.ves, you guys always think you have craze in your head, i’ll Lecture you and you’ll crawl back into the red mud god forsaken hole you come from.

Last week, the fulanis chase people away from Imo and people are running helter skelter like a rabid dog, that should be your concern don’t you think?

You said half of Southwest have been occupied by RUGA, is that a news from IPOB bureau of statistics? I know you guys regurgitate thesame word like a damaged robot and none of you has a thinking of their own. Useless people

You hit the nail on its head. These things are truly damaged robots. All day long everyone of them had said half of SW has been donated to ruga. Who knows where they get their news.

Fulani already know Ibo is a easy target on matters of ruga. Even if they dont put ruga anywhere else, they will invade SE with ruga. They also know Ibo will blame it on Yoruba.

The elders and youth of North are already asking why Ibo is everywhere in the North, including villages, but does not want North to stay in bushes in SE. They are determined to install ruga in SE. The youths want to expel Ibo but their elders said no....thats wrong, the right thing is to build ruga in SE.

These things have ignored the message and choosed to propagate half of SW being given to ruga. We go see drama begin unfold small small between fulani and his future settlement in SE....

I thought NASS members must vote their leaders. Why is PDP meddling in legislative affairs?

PDP ti r'ogo! Gbaja go show una!

Before end of page 2 Ibo will blame this hatred from North on Afonja. Watch...

Born2Breed:


Welcome party for FFK.

The only party FFK will appreciate in Biafra is one that welcomes him with his addiction - Ibo women.

teadrake:
UN Over this issue??The guy will be dealt with, certainly but inviting the UN?? Don't let me further comment before the feminist will descend on me

She said there is a UN Charter that protects women against abuse.

Our journalists do a poor job of putting t hings in balance. I will correct the error.

What Hadiza meant and why it has to go to UN is because it will enter registry as a case scenario. Also, in a male dominated society the offenses of men against women are often trivialized and excused. Imagine that Abbo would have gotten away if there were no camera recording or if the recording never made it to the web.

The legal aspect has to be attended to in Nigeria. The infraction and case study needs to be registered with UN.