₦airaland Forum

I'm available

I'm available

jaephoenix:
All 2 verbs mean to cause the death of another person, but there is a difference in their meaning. To 'kill' means to make someone or something die. 'Murder' refers to the crime of deliberately causing someone's death.
The countries fighting wars are simply killing. Murder is criminal in any country worldwide.

So meaning every country engaged in killing ls in war today is justified even when millions of people have died including women and children?
So none of these countries in wars today is deliberately causing someone's death?😁😁😁
They are all mistakenly shooting each other abi😁😁😁

AImoneyAdder:
You Still Have Right To Your Own Opinion.

Thank you....so the standard is your personal opinion.

AImoneyAdder:
Yes, Please.

In A World of No Psychological Disorder, There is No INSECURITY, And There is No Need For The Military.

Where did you get this standard from?

AImoneyAdder:
Yes, They do.

Engaging in WAR is A Psychological Disorder.

So ot means people in the military and their commanders are all suffering from psychological disorder, right?

jaephoenix:
Killing is different from murder, manslaughter etc. Murder/manslaughter is wrong in any country. Killing is not

So which country is committing killing and which country is committing murder in recent wars around the world?

Car inspection

Available

Available

jaephoenix:
Bro, I don't justify any killing. I'm merely explaining why those countries decide to go to war and kill each other, including non-combatants like women and children.
By the way, if I pull a gun on u and u manage to see a plank u can break my head with, would you do it? Yes or no? And why?

Ok....it's fine that you've explained why countries go to war. Youve talked about self defense. Do you now see that not everyone agrees that killing is bad? And not everyone that kills has psychological problem. So there is no universal standard when it comes to killing. Some see killing as good and as a means to achieve what they want and some see killing as self defense. So again if you say killing is bad, it is your personal opinion.

reallifegospel:
Overcoming the Spirit of flightlessness:
Flightlessness is defined as the inability of a creature of earthly existence to fly in the air or the inability of a creature to change it's location by flight.
If man could fly like the birds of the air, a lot of wonders of modern transportation would no longer be needed.
Man is a flightless creature by default.
However God has made it possible that man's flightless biological nature does not mean that he can't fly.
Man's Spirit being is designed to be able to take flight and make a great transformative impact via the kind of flight I'm talking about here.
What can make man able to fly in his flightless biological state and do things that are not possible for him to do in his limited biological state of existence?
The quickening and empowerment of the Holy Spirit is the way to actualise the flight mode of man's being.
Being imbued with the power of the Holy Spirit as written in Acts 1:8 is like being given wings of flight in the spirit realm.

The Holy Spirit is the embodiment of God's omnipresent, omnipotent and omniscient nature.
Your are elevated from the levels of limitations to levels of limitless possibilities by the omnipotence of the power of the Spirit of God.
Your views of the world and it's affairs change, because the Spirit of God's omniscient empowerment elevated you up to realms that you never imagined existed in your limited biological state.
The giants and mountains that stand menacing before you now become small and look like ants or tiny specks of dust in the new reality manifested by the empowerment of the Holy Spirit.
The kind of fearlessness and confidence that this brings to you can make a few folks could think you've become psychotic at the same time, it can inspire others to want the empowerment of the Holy Spirit.

That's why shining the light of God in you for all men to see is better than hiding it under the bushel.

Yes, on several occasions I've done things so fearlessly based on what I observe with the eyes of faith and at the initial stages or instances a lot of folks would think I was barking mad. The truth is, no one becomes a champion of faith without being that courageous.

What does this is the change of your view of worldly affairs via the elevated perspectives of the omniscient, omnipotent and omnipresent nature of the Holy Spirit of God.
It was this perspective that made Moses, Joshua and Caleb see things differently from the other spies who went for the surveillance of the promised land.
The 10 fearful ones were fearful because they limited all their perspective to their limited biological nature.
Read Numbers 13:1-Numbers 15:41
When you limit your perspective of life and the world itself to the observations via your limited biological nature, you would see yourself as tiny in size compared to the giants and mountains that you encounter along the way.
But if you see things the other way round (via the empowered perspectives of the omnipotent, omnipresent and omniscient nature of the Holy Spirit of God) you see the giants and mountains become small, so small that you would get them out of the way in an instant and enter into the promises of God to you. A bright future and an awesome end.

Nothing is too hard for God to do.
Jeremiah 29:11, 32:27
Remain Blessed

Article written by Apostle Constance C. Friday Ani

So does a man need to die before he flies, or the holy spirit can make a man fly before he dies?

Car inspection in ibadan

I'm available

Available

jaephoenix:
Did you read the part I talked about infringing on sovereignty or u have developed tunnel vision suddenly?
Palestine/Hamas engaged Israel cos of land dispute. Same as Ukraine vs Russia

So at what point are you justifying the killings that is going on now in those wars?
So you mean that at a point of attack, bombing of women and children can be justified?

jaephoenix:
Hitler's case is different because that second world war was unprovoked.
In the case of these current governments theirs was provoked by acts perceived to infringe on their sovereignty as countries. Thus wars occur. These wars are products of escalations from civil rifes or border disputes. They may not be related to psychiatric
diseases.
So in those cases, killings would be termed self defense

Lol....so you mean every country involved in wars is in self defense apart from that of hitler. You mean European colonizers were on self defense. Russia, Ukraine, isreal and Palestine are all in self defense mode and therefore they can kill people?

jaephoenix:
It may help your cause if you do some research. Adolf Hitler.

Hitler has often been associated with mental disorders such as bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, and psychopathy, both during his lifetime and after his death. Psychiatrists and psychoanalysts who have diagnosed Hitler as having mental disturbance include well-known figures such as Walter C. Langer and Eric

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychopathography_of_Adolf_Hitler#:~:text=Hitler%20has%20often%20been%20associated,Langer%20and%20Erich%20Fromm.

Why are you isolating a case?

So do you mean that all governments that has ever engaged in wars in the past and in our time that has led to millions of human death, has psychological problems? Yes or no sir?

Car inspection

Available

I'm available

jaephoenix:
Terrorists and psychopaths have psychiatric issues. Check out delusions of grandeur/megalomaniac tendencies.
Disagreeing with Tinubu doesn't make one commit crime. I don't vote for any politician and have never voted. I don't care or agree with Tinubu's decisions/laws especially concerning fiscal policies and crypto but I haven't gone about stealing peoples money, or killing folks.

What of governmental armies who engaged in wars that led to millions of death like in world War 1 and 2, do they have psychological issues too?
What of countries fighting wars today that leads to death of adults and children, do the government in those countries have psychological issues?

jaephoenix:
People break laws due to many reasons. Some think they can get away with the crimes.
Some may not agree however those ones may have psychological problems. Example are psychopaths who kill people for fun. They don't agree with the law. But in all these, the laws have been laid down sane folks and even though those psychos don't agree, those laws can't be changed because of them

Oga who has the right to determine to all humans what is good and what is bad?
Are you saying that if you don't agree with a governmental law and you break the law, it then means that you have a psychological problem?
Do you mean all terrorists that are against governmental laws have psychological problems?
You should be thinking more than this na.

So if you don't agree with Tinubu, it means that you are not sane?

Car inspection in Lagos

I'm available

I'm Available

Available

jaephoenix:
Good question.
The answer is human nature. We are destructive and irrational. So laws and ethics are supposed to keep us in check. Unfortunately this fails sometimes. So people break those laws despite the punishments attached to them

People break laws because they don't agree with those laws and ethics even when they are cultural or governmental laws and ethics. That is why there is never a universally accepted moral code by all humans on earth. If you think doing something is bad, it is your personal opinion. If you try and push your personal opinion on people, Then you are beginning to act like a God.

Car inspection

Car inspection

Available

Car inspection in Lagos