₦airaland Forum

Antichristian2:
You said:
Mohammed (SAW) could not save his parents from the raging fire. He begged Allah, but he refused!

Did he begged Allah in the hadith you quoted?

Your lying is legendary!

What about those who died Christian from the Old Testament?

Antichristian2:
Opuro Jesu!

Show us the evidences!

Antichristian2:
Tell us who is talking in the Bible as the Bible has no mouth!

Did the Bible tell you to lie?



Bring the evidence that he begged Allah!

Show us where anyone died as Christians in the Old testament you liar!

Antichristian2:
It's better to keep mute than to 1¹ the 1rd



continue to lie without proof!

"He who sits in the heavens laughs" Psalm 2:4 He remain small make them talk say God dey marry!

Continue to laugh!

Antichristian2:
Petty Diversion!

You said they all died as Christians.

Show us where anyone died as Christians in the Old testament you liar!

Antichristian2:
You said they all died as Christians.

Show us where anyone died as Christians in the Old testament you liar!

FuckTheMod:
Really?
Adolf Hitler was a Christian too. This is even a fact.
But pharaoh? Which one? But I know all historical Pharoahs were idol worshippers.

Gabrielshow24:
Mohammed that was not certain of where he was going to 😂😂😂!!!

Antichristian2:
Give us blibical proofs!

And don't go gbogoin as usual or divert!

Antichristian2:
Show me how Abraham saved his father?

Show me how Jesus saved Joseph?

Or Did Joseph died as a Christian?

The soul who sins shall die. The son shall not bear the guilt of the father, nor the father bear the guilt of the son. The righteousness of the righteous shall be upon himself, and the wickedness of the wicked shall be upon himself." Exekiel 18:20

Antichristian2:
Saviour that can't save himself!

Antichristian2:
All Prophets did!

Antichristian2:
Salvation in Islam is the deliverance from sins and the admittance into Paradise! The key components include Iman (Faith), righteous deeds, sincere repentance and submission to the will of Allah by following the Prophet he sent.

Antichristian2:
If the earliest Christians within the first two centuries after Jesus did not need a New Testament to qualify their faith, why do modern Christians have such a need? If they did not sanction or consider any other writing beside the Old Testament to be scripture, then isn’t it a digression from the ‘true faith‘ of the earliest believers to incorporate something new as scripture? The first New Testament was codified and canonized by the heretic Marcion who believed that the Jewish YHWH was not the true God, the first time the largest Christian Church sanctioned a New Testament was during the 2nd Ecumenical Council of Carthage in 397 CE, some 360+ years after Jesus.

One of the more telling issues with the questioned posed above is that those who have responded to it believe that the question was tricky to answer. I agree it is tricky to answer, that’s the very reason I asked it in the first place! I therefore, don’t find that description of the question to be a problem, it’s more an affirmation that I framed the question properly in the first place. I’m essentially asking one question:

Is the New Testament required to be believed in for salvation in Christianity?

In other words, can someone be a believing Christian without having need for, or being dependent on the New Testament? Can someone reject it and yet, still be saved? This is effectively how the earliest Christians lived, without a New Testament. Some have tried to respond with the following passages:

*“Repent and believe in the gospel” (Mark 1:15)
*“believe in the Lord Jesus Christ, and you will be saved” (Acts 16:31)

These verses do not answer my question. What these verses teach is that you should believe in the good news, but it does not require belief in this or that or any other Gospel. The authors of Mark, over its centuries of development, never emended the text to say, “repent and believe in this gospel,” there’s a reason for that, the verse is conveying the point that it’s good to believe in what Jesus brought, i.e. his message, not the documents written by people decades later who never knew him. Rather, what is emphasized for belief is in him, Jesus, not any written work by any man. That’s the point I’m trying to make here. There is no requirement to believe in the New Testament as God’s inspired revelation to be saved in Christianity. Consider for a moment, this very important passage:

All Scripture is God-breathed and is useful for teaching, rebuking, correcting and training in righteousness, so that the servant of God may be thoroughly equipped for every good work. – 2 Timothy 3:16-17 (NIV).

It’s useful for lots of things, except for salvation. This passage does not state that belief in scripture is a requirement to be saved. Scripture is useful for many things, but it’s not a requirement. It’s like the difference between having an umbrella in the rain and not having one. Sure, the umbrella is useful and it is good for many things when it’s raining, but it’s not a necessity or requirement for when you’re going into the outside world. This is the distinction between something’s usefulness and it’s necessity, one is clearly not the other.

So then, the question begs itself, doesn’t it? Do you require the canonized and codified New Testament, to be believed in, as a requirement for your salvation in Christianity? The earliest Christians did not seem to think so, so why do you?

and God knows best.

omoredia:
Forgiveness of sin is different from assurance of salvation. Salvation is the contract, forgiveness is just one of the benefit of being saved. Thats why man can also Forgive but only Jesus can save our soul from eternal damnation

Factcheck0001:
All these nzogbu nzogbu people self

They throw common sense to the wind always

givedemwotowoto:
The language of peace in the Middle East if force!

revived2:
You had to say it, which means he's worried.

Lol

GistMedia0:
A Nigerian man has stirred conversations online after revealing how he has been supporting his wife’s education since their marriage. According to him, he married his wife while she was in her first year at university and, despite being jobless at the time, worked hard to ensure she completed her degree.

Taking to social media, the proud husband shared how he took on responsibilities after her graduation, securing a job to sustain their family. However, when his wife later expressed her desire to attend aviation school, he continued to support her dream.

"After graduating, I jejely looked for work with my first degree to feed my family. I married her in 100 level without a job, but I managed as a jobless guy to sponsor her through her degree at Uni Agric. After her degree, I never went to any other school, but my wife said she wanted to go to aviation school, so I had no option but to support her," he wrote.

He also dismissed the belief that a more educated wife would disrespect her husband, stating:

"I am one of those few ones who never believed that if your wife is more educated than you, she will not respect you. When I no get strength, she go train my kids. Kunav girls no deh mumu."

While many praised him for being a supportive husband, some critics warned that his sacrifices could "end in tears."

"I just pray she doesn’t meet someone better than you in aviation school," one person commented.

SadiqBabaSani:
A bat is flying in this matter