₦airaland Forum

Dtruthspeaker:
You used words like "dispersed" and "captive" and yet you mean the first jews/isrealites have disappeared and wiped off the earth?

So as Nigerians have japad and captured by the west, they are wiped out?

The OP is shallow in his knowledge of the Bible. There is no place in the Bible where God talks about annihilation of the northern kingdom by whatever they are called. The Bible talks about remnants of Israel not Jews only. If you asked the OP, he would deny the authenticity of the Bible divine source. The OP should be an antichristian who has a soft spot for Palestine.
He should support his claims both biblical and historical references.

USA, the country of my dreams.



God bless Nigeria

Septic mouth idiotic pog

nnamdiosu:
Not just that my brother, Hebrews 1:8 says God called Jesus God.

God commanded all the angels to worship him as a baby when he was born.

He forgave sins (no created being can do this particularly. It's left for God himself).

Jesus is God without any controversy.
He is the physical manifestation of an investible God.

True Sír.

There is the periodic table in Yoruba language already.. So there's nothing new.
Yoruba leads in everything.




https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D0WSOI5ONLg?si=p6ba4_Y9-VBSTNvm

Aplaudez:
This country is so sick in the head, leaving what's priority for nonsense things, the rate at which hunger is strolling on the street of this country no concern them!

I just pity we single youth, why is that when we want to start this adulthood thing is when this economy is really not friendly, I was coming from office today a man just fell at mile2 omo, nobody even near the man to sympathise, everybody just dey face where they're going!


Baba God, can you blow the trumpet already??

You don't understand. We already have regional forces - Amotekun, Ebube Agu, Hisbah. Now regional language to teach subjects. That's preparation for disintegration..
May it come soon.

Carcholce:
I had a dream where I was fetching water from a well. On a closer look I saw a dead white goat floating inside the well with a repugnant smell.

Can someone help interpret this? Thank you in advance.

Simply contact Joseph or Daniel. They have answer to your dreams.

Amotolongbo:
https://leadership.ng/breaking-ex-inec-chair-prof-humphrey-nwosu-dies-at-83/?utm_source=&utm_medium=twitter

Great man used against Nigerians by the evil genius.

Your brilliant electoral reforms will be remembered as the best.

Rest on Sir.

gohf:
Melchizedek who's king that Abraham meet GAVE to, was probably not needy so Abraham didn't meet any single needy persons for such act to be recorded by Moses as an example.

How is this following Abraham's example
Are the local church priests Melchizedek?
Did Abraham pay every time?
Or are you making things up 😏?🙂

Are twisting things or making things up?
Abraham met Melchizedek only once.
Later in Law, it was said that tithes was to be given to priests, and the needy.

So, Abraham gave to Melchizedek because he recognized him to be a representative of God.


So I don't see your point here. I still ask if you are advocating not giving anything to God?

cococandy:
He should make sure the bots can produce their own eggs too so the men can fertilize it directly. And breastfeed too.

Then men will truly not need women. That would be amazing.

Na sọ your hatred for women reach?

He should also try to build robotsbands also so that women will not depend on men.

AntiChristian:
Answering the Fallacious Claim of Necrophilia
Compiled, Translated & Annotated
Abu Khuzaimah Ansari

The ignorant people of other faiths, in their emotionally filled rants and outbursts against Islām allege the Messenger of Allah (Sallalahu Alayhi Wasallam) slept with the body of Fātimah bint Asad RaḍiAllāhū ʿAnha based on the wording of this ḥadīth. Such horrible claims are often regurgitated by people who follow and believe in Christianity.

This is an outright lie and a desperate attempt to discredit Islām, such claims are often raised by people who have not read anything about Islām and rather just take some information from websites, who extend most of their efforts to concoct fallacious allegations against Islām.

This treacherous claim rests on the words فاضطجع They claim the word means to sleep, lay down ie he lay down with Fātimah bint Asad to have sex with her and this Arabic word is often used to denote to lie down and sleep with someone. We seek refuge in Allāh from such lies and aspersions. Āmīn


Answer

Firstly: we have shown this ḥadīth is weak in the preceding discourse, but let’s assume for arguments sake that it was authentic, then;

Secondly: The word اضطجع means to lie, lie down, recline, repose and sleep according to the well known Arabic dictionaries. It does not mean to sleep or to lay down for sex. This is also the word the Christians use in their Arabic translation of the Bible. Hence, they say وَدَخَلَ أَلِيشَعُ الْبَيْتَ وَإِذَا بِالصَّبِيِّ مَيْتٌ وَمُضْطَجعٌ عَلَى سَرِيرِهِ. [And when Elisha was come into the house, behold, the child was dead, and laid upon his bed. (2Kings 4:32) Kings James Version).

So one asks, does the word laid here also mean, ‘lay to have sex?’ Of course it does not! Then why is this meaning specified and restricted to the ḥadīth only.

Thirdly: the wording of the ḥadīth clearly mentions the Messenger of Allāh (Sallalahu Alayhi Wasallam) entered the grave after it was dug and the body of Fātimah bint Asad RaḍiAllāhū ʿAnha had not been lowered into the grave. The Messenger of Allāh (Sallalahu Alayhi Wasallam) lay in the grave after it was dug by his companions. The grave had a Laḥd, which is a horizontal opening in the vertically dug grave. The Messenger of Allāh (Sallalahu Alayhi Wasallam) also dug the grave and the Laḥd after which he lay in it. Thereafter, he stood up and eventually the body was lowered into the grave.

It should therefore be noted; the body was lowered into the grave after he stood up – the body was not even in the grave when he was lying down in it! What kind of necrophilia was this? We presume the claimants can further shed some light on this matter, for the claimants are likely to know the reality and details of necrophilia the best, perhaps from experience in the modern Christian atheistic world, because surely one only accuses others of things they have experience, practice and knowledge about.

So we ask again? How is the alleged incident even possible when the Messenger of Allāh (Sallalahu Alayhi Wasallam) did not even lie next to the body, unless the detractors have developed other forms of sex!!! Again, this would not be surprising because this is what happens when you abandon your scriptures by distorting the divine message they contained.

The wording of the report further shows the great care and love the Messenger of Allāh (Sallalahu Alayhi Wasallam) had for Fātimah bint Asad RaḍiAllāhū ʿAnha, the alleged wording says,

“When camphor water was brought, Allāh’s Messenger (Peace Be Upon Him) poured some water into his hands. Then Allāh’s Messenger (Peace Be Upon Him) took off his shirt and clothed her with it and used his own sheet of cloth as her coffin.”

This showed the love and care the Messenger of Allāh (Sallalahu Alayhi Wasallam) had for her due to her status. The detractors show more affection and care for animals and dogs and regularly bathe them, how about Fātimah bint Asad RaḍiAllāhū ʿAnha, who was his paternal aunt and looked after him just like his mother! At what expense is the human mind and intelligence being carelessly wasted.

Fourthly: another indication which shows the futility of this repulsive allegation is the fact that the Messenger of Allāh (Sallalahu Alayhi Wasallam) used his shirt and wrapped it around her and then used his own sheet of cloth as her coffin, the words are,

“Then Allāh’s Messenger (Peace Be Upon Him) took off his shirt and clothed her with it and used his own sheet of cloth as her coffin.”

Again, a sane, upright and normal human being asks, why would a person use their own shirt to wrap the corpse of his paternal aunt – a mother like figure, then use his own sheets as her coffin, then dig her grave with his own hands, then lie in her grave and supplicate to the creator to forgive and have mercy on her (allegedly as the ḥadīth is weak), then to have her lowered in the grave, then unfasten the coffin sheets and shirt and then indulge in necrophilia? Absolutely preposterous!

We would like to exercise our common sense by using our brains and minds, given to us by our creator and ask, what were the other companions doing during this incident of necrophilia? Why do this in the grave and not on the ground if they were looking?

These people have no idea about the stature, uprightness and credibility of the illustrious companions, that they would allow someone to do such a heinous act in front of them. The companions were powerful, they were Ūsāmah bin Zayd, Abū Ayyūb al-Anṣārī, ʿUmar bin al-Khaṭṭāb and the Abyssinian companion, May Allāh be pleased with all of them. Who does not know the lofty credentials of ʿUmar bin al-Khaṭṭāb, that even satan was forced to change paths when he would see him due to his, principles, morals, standards, character and firm belief. That the likes of these companions just stood there and watched this evil incident to unfold.

Fifthly: the detractors should know in Islām purification and cleanliness play a pivotal role in the daily life of Muslims. For example, Muslims are instructed to hold their private parts with their left hand because they have been instructed to eat with their right. They are instructed to sit down while relieving themselves, they are instructed to protect themselves and their clothes from urine and faeces, they are instructed to clean themselves with water, they are instructed to wash their hands everytime they relieve themselves, they are instructed to conceal their private parts from others and much more.

The Muslims were given these instructions by the Messenger of Allāh (Sallalahu Alayhi Wasallam), whose words in the Religion are taken as divine texts, ie from the Prophetic Ḥadīth. This said, the rules, regulations and etiquettes for sexual intercourse between legally married partners in Islām require a greater level of purification and cleanliness.

The point being, on another occasion the Messenger of Allāh (Sallalahu Alayhi Wasallam) asked his companions to help lower a body into a grave, and he asked them if any of them were in a state of sexual impurity, ie if they had spent the night with their lawful wives. One of the companion who was in a state of sexual impurity was asked not to help in lowering the body (Bukhārī).

This honours the deceased, ie the people who help lower the deceaseds body are in a state of ritual purity and clean. So when a person is in a state of sexual impurity and he is not allowed to partake in lowering the deceased, then how about the act of sexual intercourse with a corpse! Let alone the rules and regulations Muslims have when it comes to intimacy and intercourse.

We mentioned examples of how Muslims uphold purification and cleanliness while relieving themselves and at the same token the clever people who regurgitate these treacherous lies about the Messenger of Allāh (Sallalahu Alayhi Wasallm), are the same people who do not even wash their hands when they go to the toilet, they have cascades of urine droplets on their clothes and toilet seats. They are the same people who would not bathe for weeks, just less than 100 years and when they would bathe, the whole family would use the water, whereas our glorious Prophetic Divine teachings go back 1400 years.

Therefore, it is absolutely absurd and a despicable aspersion to even suggest this notion of necrophilia, which is an outright treacherous lie.
Share this and receive reward.

https://www.salafiri.com/answering-the-fallacious-claim-of-necrophilia/

Lielam

gohf:
I am not am advocate o, but speaking of advocates, was it recorded in the gospels Jesus commanding you should to give money to God?


So you NONE, meaning tithe is neither part of the promise nor the gospel

But yet you write "more than 10% by Christians under grace." Please tell us what is your basis for this statement?

Show me where Jesus condemned tithing and giving in the gospels.

gohf:
And seeing as Abraham gave tithe once and for all, for did he give it again or was he required to do so regularly, does that mean others should also give it once and for all as well

Nope, he met Melchizedek only once.
You meet your local church priests and workers and the needy everytime. So pay everytime.

gohf:
you don't understand is that why you did not answer and you are asking me a question instead?

Make your question clearer then.

gohf:
is the tithe then of the "promise" or of the gospel?

None of appreciation to God by Abraham, recognized by Jacob, made a Law to Israel to be more than 10% by Christians under grace.

So, do you now advocate nothing to be giving to God?

gohf:
10% is small to the rich to pay for what is free but is it small to the poor to whom the blessings is given to for free?

I don't understand.
Do you advocate not giving to God? If no, what percentage?

Elon Musk is testing a robot to carry pregnancy.

I hope he has plans to build robots that can bury people killed by robots.

School na scam. The small English I use on this platform is inherited from my mother who was scammed.



Akpabio needs to check his head whether correct or not.

I can now know why milk is scarce.

It can only be Muslims dispensing their violent peace peacefully.

DaddyCoool:
People like you, instead of reading and learning you'd be commenting on things you don't know much about.
It was durring the 1954 constitution conference that Awo proposed a secession clause, long before independence.
So there was no question of "The idea was to get rid of the external enemy first and then settle internal problems".😅
Awo was supported by the North of course, but vehemently opposed by Zik. In the end the colonial masters sided with Zik and so no secession clause was included!

Aha.
Boss?!

If Awolowo believed in one Nigeria, rather, a marriage of two strange bed fellows. why would he propose a secession clause?

Two people were in courtship, five years before wedding one was suggesting a time in the marriage when they would divorce for any reason best known to him.

Okay I am learning from history not your position.

The truth is that Awolowo never believed in one Nigeria. He made his intention known his parties and people were in opposition after independence.
He ran different governments and programmes from the one of alloy of north and south.

How else would he have express himself?

When the war eventually broke out, it was between two pact partners. Okay, you people blame Gowon, what about Obasanjo, Benjamin Adekunle and the rest form other tribes who fought the war? Did Gowon even fire a shot at any Igbo man?


Till today, the alliance between igbos and the north is still intact and robust.

Igbos want to take over Lagos, calling it no man's land.
Are you aware that the constituction of Lagos is being translated to Yoruba language. It is a signal to other tribes to be wary of.

However, my position is still this, it is better for igbos to extend right hand of fellowship to their brothers in the south - Southwest and Southsouth to be able to realize their aims. The north will never allow an Igbo presidency. I lived among them, I know how they reason and dubious ways of politicking.

If you are an Igbo person, educate your people. I have no problems with igbos. I am a pure breed of Yoruba race, married to another Yoruba woman. All my children have Igbo names as part of their names.

I am only expressing my opinion. The idea of igbos killing themselves and destroying their properties will not work neither will blaming people that killed their people. What is the offence of Dr Akunyili and many others killed by IPOB?
Right political alignment is what igbos need. After the war, many igbos have intermarried with more North and other tribes and have built more businesses across the divides.

Forkthiefnubu:
Did u read this near idiotic comment before u posted it ? Am ashamed of you

As how?

You don't expect everybody to do your bidding, do you?

Anyway, the deed has been down.
Why hasn't IPOB hunt down the killers?

A

Good technology recommended to federal government for catching oil thieves

Which kind wahala be dis?

Children wey drink animal milk no dey hear word.

Nah the one wey machine born go make sense?

Shooo!!!

Doylestown92:
He was even born in the North. Niger State precisely.

Thanks so much..
He was Igbo physically and northerner mentally.

DaddyCoool:
You are now rambling disjointedly.
NCNC was closest thing to a National party in Nigeria as at then, with competing interests. You can't "hand" it to anybody.
It is very hard to imagine now, but there was actually little tribalism in Nigerian politics as at then.
Much like America, people did not run for or hold political offices based on tribe or place of origin, but on party and where they lived and did business. That is, until Awo did his thing. Read below

You refuse to see the picture. Nigeria wás never one before and after independence. The agitation for independence was not agreed upon the same time. After the independence, Awolowo proposed a secession clause. The idea was to get rid of the external enemy first and then settle internal problems. The problem has not been solved sixty - four years after.
The expert's you provided just showed the differences in ideology that were not taken into consideration by the players.

Have you too visited the Garden of Eden ?

I have watched videos of some Nigerian's prophets claiming to have seen Abraham and Elijah. One even claimed to have riden his car to heaven!?



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2V7ePAKl8Lc?si=wKRB97nxDLZ4bFAA

Interesting, after finishing the money, will he sell himself?

DaddyCoool:
You are writing more nonsense but again it's not your fault - you just don't know. First of all Zik was NOT at all in control of NCNC the way Awolowo was in control.of AG. NCNC had many competiting interests and groups. It was first headed by Herbert Macaulay, a Yoruba, and had lots of Yorubas - and these Yorubas were vehemently opposed to any alliance with AG and Awolowo. Another group threatening to pull out of the party upon any alliance with Awolowo was the the Okotie-Eboh group (Warri and SS). But the most important reason NCNC couldn't have allianced with AG is that the North did NOT want to be part of Nigeria and were looking for any excuse to pull out. A gang-up of Southern parties would have given them the perfect excuse. They also had to have the prime-ministership instead of Zik. All were things the North had to be "bribed" with to stay in Nigeria - which was what Zik wanted more than anything else!

I disagree Sir. The party NCNC was handed over to Zik by Macaulay, but greed would not allow him to choose a premier for the West, the reason Awolowo campaigned against him. There were people he could have used among the Yorubas. Anyway, politics is full of self interests and selfishness by the players not a racial expression of character.

Before almagamation, the north had the idea of plunging the Quran into the Sea. The agenda they still pursue till date. Zik was an unsuspecting victim. He ignorantly entered in treaty with north who planted their men in military and deceive the Christian northerners to support their agenda. To say the North wanted to ever leave the nation is laughable.
Awolowo proposed a twenty - years of probation, after which any dissatisfied sect could leave. Zik, agreed just to rescind his agreement after discussing with the north. (Check your facts). That was why Awolowo played opposition. His words went viral then. ( Kàkà kí a dọ̀balẹ̀ fun gambari, ká kúkú kú: rather than prostrate for the northern elements, it is better to die). His words of wisdom have turned out to be true over the years. Igbos have suffered the most in the hands of the north. Next to igbos are Tivs , who, by their warlike nature prevented jihadists from penetrating Igbo land and rest of the southeast and South South.

Ojukwu attempted to correct the mistake at a very high cost. Yorubas should have joined in the struggle but didn't see any serious reason whatsoever. Awolowo went on aggressive educational campaign and built his people in Law and key professional careers. This, the north has not have a solution today.

It is clear now that war has failed once, it is still going to fail as I don't see any part of the nation that can face federal might.
The only way out is blending rightly with the politics of the country. This I have not seen igbos doing. While I was in school, my Igbo friends boasted about igbo's wealth and how Igbo nation were independent on the Commonwealth of Nigeria. When MKO Abiola was killed by the north preventing him from using his mandate in the freest and fairest election, I saw the hopelessness in igbo's political philosophy and strength of wealth.
I didn't expect Ngige, Amaechi and others to leave APC. No northern dominated party will approve igbo's presidential ambition in the foreseeable future. Of course, that was why the G5 governors ganged up against Atiku who betrayed the Southern presidential candidacy.

My long story is not to run down igbos but far igbos to have a rethink about how to stay healthy in Nigerian's political architecture.

It is better for igbos to stay with the south and middle belt to achieve their aims than alignment with the north. Thank God, Obasanjo opened the eyes of the middle belt to their plight in the hands of the core north. Obi now won in Nasarawa state.

I am not trading blame here but, a possible correction to the mistake of our founding fathers.
Cheers friend.

QuickTrade:
Pardon me as I did not read through. The fact remains that "Christians" has now become too lazy, prefers to be spoonfed, hence they are received.

Let's yearn to grow spiritually and continually

Going through the scriptures, I have not really seen what is wrong in tithing except the way pentecostals are bastardizing it. I have not seen any Orthodox churches having problems with this. In fact, those churches have developed their doctrines over centuries and are not perturbed the every wind of doctrines and sleight of men.

MaxInDHouse:
Christianity means the same line of thought {John 17:22; 1Corinthians 1:10; Ephesians 4:3} not people with contradicting teachings and conflicting doctrines yet claiming they belong to the same God! 1Corinthians 14:33

Do you think different religions arguing about tithing all these years belong to the same God?

How market dear friend?

I am laughing in JWs' paradise's language.


If a church is not following your errors, it not acceptable to your organization or to God?

Jesus Himself distanced Himself from the Law of Moses concerning divorce and misuse of Sabbath your organization pride in today .
Your organization subtly distance itself from certain teachings of C T. Russell and adopt Rutherford as the discreet slave master.

The truth of the matter is, no one person or leader has perfectly presented God except conceited organization like yours.
Check history, the records are replete with all sorts.
So take your hypocrisy outta here.