Young Da Naval: Any News Abt SEASON4? Plz!

sexyjessy: yes! season 4 z out
i hv only 4 episodes on.ma system...dunno abaw odaz

@^^^ and anybody else who needs Season 4, or previous seasons, I have the complete series, all 40 episodes with English subs. If you live in Lagos or Abeokuta, you can PM me.

@OP, I agree with the poster that said there should be a Wildling FC. Afterall, they have more men than the house of Stark, whose best hope is a cripple... And even though their King Beyond the Walls has been captured, we don't know what is coming in the next season... For the night is dark and full of terrors

Vir... what??

Virgin my black hairy butt

Kudos?

I just lost half a year of my life on Nairaland. All my likes, comments and topics. Including my hard-earned Front Page topics, FTC spaces, etc.

I am sooooo very pissed right now.

RIP to the Departed.

This is so sad. May we NEVER know our children's graves. AMEN.

Adeebiwa09:
Sir, do people dscus ds sex lyf as a couple. Nt an insult bt did ur parent or any family member ever did wt u? D truth s wateva hapens in d confined of a matrimonial 'room' (apotrophy cos u can do it anywhere u lyk as lng as na 2 of una; kitchen, sitn rum, bathroom e.t.c) s only meant 4 dr nt 4 anybdy 2 hear, see or knw except wt ur permisn i.e in case of counselin. So if u do al d kama sutra styles, involve in fetish, mastubate wt each oda, v nude pix of each oda, anal, oral, bos*som sex e.t.c e no concern anybdy na una 2 e concern and its nt a subject of debate. Gbam

Bro, as usual, your contributions are on point.


But please try, even though you're on mobile to write more legibly and stop breaking Nairaland's Rule 21.

Thanks and have a lovely day.

thymedcurry: Only a dickless A-hole would see this as joke. That tweet was completely disgusting and tasteless. Anyone that finds this funny should be sodomized.

If he were abroad he would have lost all sorts of endorsement deals by now. His career would have been over.

For just a harmless and TRUE joke?? Or are you among the type of girls he described in the joke?


There is no unlike button, so take this instead

Aggrippa: my question is that do people have or do these kind of unconventional sex in marriages in Nigeria? if they do please be kind enough to gives us examples!

Examples of what? Oral se.x is hardly a stand-alone sexua.l activity. Usually, it is part of fore.play.

And yes, Nigerians practice it. Why not?

carammel: The bible didn't give a particular way of having sex between married couples. So oral or not is welcome.

Thanks for your contribution. This is the summary of @Yomex's link above (http://www.gotquestions.org/Bible-oral-sex.html). And I quite agree with it.

So why should a Pastor say that this is the cause of someone's problems?

This is bullshi.t!

All because the OP is a Mod, he created his own topic and put it on FP when someone else has already shared the same topic yesterday (https://www.nairaland.com/1581583/basketmouth-under-fire-molest-joke).

@OP, you better do the needful. Or you can Go and Die

Adeebiwa09: .
Apostle, calm down so make we jst dy pour evrytin inside make we dy born any aw. Kai! Al ds ISOLATED scriptures. Did u read d part dat says if any man cannt provid 4 hs aushold e s worst dan an infidel, gv birth 2 chldren u can raise. So if withdrawal s ur way of 'family planing' gud. And 2 d story of Judah and hs 3 sons onan dnt want 2 raise chldren 4 hs brother hs actn was nt based on f.p or anyoda ryt reason bt evil so nobody go die as abv

^^^ Thanks for the contribution. However, I believe @Macof is a traditionalist/pagan, and so has limited understanding of the scriptures.

macof:
In shorter words it's ok to spill the fluid?

Yes

^^^ The same thing(obsession) can apply to all other sexua.l acts and not just oral se.x alone.

So no, that is not a reason to stop it.

macof:
Genesis 38:8-10 "And Judah said to Onan, go in unto thy brother's wife and marry her and raise up seed to thy brother. And Onan knew that the seed should not be his; so when he went in unto his brother's wife he spilled it[sperm] on the ground, lest he should give seed to his brother. And the thing which he did displeased the Lord, wherefore he slew him.."

So your Bible God doesn't like spilled Semen, be careful lest you die

I am glad you brought up that verse, I have been waiting for someone to bring it up since...

The reason God slew Onan was because of his wickedness. Back then in the land of Israel, it was customary for the brother of a dead man to sleep with his widow in order to raise children for him(the dead man). But Onan was wicked and decided instead to spill the fluid.

In fact the reason why this particular passage is interesting is because it is actually pro-contraceptive. To the best of my knowledge, this is the only place in the Bible where spilling of fluid is mentioned. It appears to have been common-knowledge in that era for a commoner such as Onan to be so skilled in performing it.

Despite being somewhat common, we didn't hear of anyone else being punished for engaging in that. In fact if not that Onan had applied the method out of wickedness, it may never have been recorded in the Bible.

@Liv4Christ, I will tackle your arguments in order.

With ur mouth confession is made unto salvation, Isaiah declared dat he is a man of unclean lips, de bible talked about how we can set de course of nature ablaze with our tongue nd saveral other passages dat talks about de fruits of de lips, how it bring life or death, i believe dat God created de tongue to praise nd serve Him with

Most of our body parts serve more than one function. That I use claps my hands to worship God in church does not mean that I cannot use the same hands to caress or 'romance' my wife in the privacy of our home. That I use my mouth to sing praises to God does not mean that I cannot kiss my wife in the mouth, brea.sts and then downtown. As you can see, it is a natural progression.

Genesis 1:31a (KJV) tells us that And God saw every thing that he had made, and, behold, it was very good. If God didn't want us to be stimulated/arous.ed by mouth on genitals, then He wouldn't have made it so during creation.

nd in Romans 1:26 it talks about changing de natural use of women nd men.

Romans 1:26-27 is condemning lesbianism and homosexuality. It mentioned nothing concerning body parts.

Finally if God had wanted us to be having MouthAction, de organs would have been placed on our foreheads.

I seriously don't get the rationale behind this statement. Please can you explain further?


As always, thanks for your contribution.

@Mynd_44 and @Striktlymi please where is the thread you created. I will like to add my own arguments, but I don't want to derail this thread. Just so you know, I am pro-contraceptive.


#TeamContraceptive

^^^ Really? Now I'm more interested. Why is spilling the Fluid an issue?

striktlymi:

It is my opinion that oral s*x is not sinful. It is more or less like touching the genitals of your spouse which can make s*xual intercourse in wedlock a bit more pleasurable. But care should be taken not to spill the semen outside the lady's v*gina.

^^^ Thanks for your contribution. But you've brought in a new angle.

Why should the man be careful not to spill the semen outside the vagin.a?

@BabaGnoni, I disagree with this part:

it however can have a sting in the tail, as it is definitely not 100% safe

And what is Specsavers

@macof, No be me talk am o! Someone came for deliverance, and the Pastor said oral s.ex was the cause of the problem. Who am I to judge?

As for BehindBased, no mind Seun, na ana.l I write before.

^^^ I disagree with you. There is equal risk of infection and STDs with other forms of sex like kissing, a.nal, and even missionary sef.

But that aside, in my church before marrying a couple together, the elders make them do a plethora of tests. Some weddings even fall through because of STDs and incompatible genotypes. I don't think anyone marrying at this time and age will go ahead without all forms of lab tests.

So this point is moot, because we are only talking about married couples who are already known to be free from infections and STDs.


The only reason I don't have tattoos today is because of that reference I quoted above. So yes, I may not be perfect, but I try my best to obey the WHOLE Bible

Question: "What does the Bible say about MouthAction?"

Answer: MouthAction, also known as “cunnilingus” when performed on females and “MouthAction” when performed on males, is not mentioned in the Bible. There are two primary questions that are asked in regards to MouthAction: (1) “is MouthAction a sin if done before marriage?” and (2) “is MouthAction a sin if done within a marriage?” While the Bible does not specifically address either question, there are definitely biblical principles that apply.

Is MouthAction a sin if done before or outside of marriage?
This question is becoming increasingly common as young people are told that “MouthAction is not really sex,” and as MouthAction is promoted as a safer (no risk of pregnancy, less risk of sexually transmitted diseases*) alternative to sexual intercourse. What does the Bible say? Ephesians 5:3 declares, “But among you there must not be even a hint of sexual immorality, or of any kind of impurity...because these are improper for God's holy people.” The biblical definition of “immorality” is “any form of sexual contact outside of marriage” (1 Corinthians 7:2). According to Hebrews 13:4, only the “marriage bed” is pure and undefiled. According to the Bible, sex is to be reserved for marriage. Period. So, yes, MouthAction is a sin if done before or outside of marriage.

Is MouthAction a sin if done within a marriage?
Many, perhaps most, Christian married couples have had this question. What makes it difficult is the fact that the Bible nowhere says what is allowed or disallowed sexually between a husband and wife, other than, of course, any sexual activity that involves another person (swapping, threesomes, etc.) or that involves lusting after another person (pornography). Outside of these two restrictions, the principle of “mutual consent” would seem to apply (1 Corinthians 7:5). While this text specifically deals with abstaining from sex/frequency of sex, “mutual consent” is a good concept to apply universally in regards to sex within marriage. Whatever is done, it should be fully agreed on between the husband and his wife. Neither spouse should be forced or coerced into doing something he/she is not completely comfortable with. If MouthAction is done within the confines of marriage and in the spirit of mutual consent, there is not a biblical case for declaring it to be a sin.

In summary, MouthAction before marriage is absolutely a sin. It is immoral. It is in no sense a biblically acceptable alternative to sexual intercourse for unmarried couples. Within the confines of marriage, MouthAction is free from sin as long as there is mutual consent.

*While MouthAction is safer than sexual intercourse in regards to sexually transmitted diseases, it is definitely not safe. Chlamydia, gonorrhea, herpes, HIV/AIDS, and other STDs can be transmitted through MouthAction.

Source: @Yorex2011, http://www.gotquestions.org/Bible-oral-sex.html


Note: The bot cleaned up the text, so MouthAction or Mouth Action is actually oral s.ex

@Yorex2011, thanks for the link, I will check it out.

@BabaGnoni Thanks for your contributions. But the verse you gave, while somewhat in support of oral se.x, is inconclusive.

Here is what I mean by conclusive irrefutable proof. About the Bible's view on tattoos:
Leviticus 19:28 (KJV) Ye shall not make any cuttings in your flesh for the dead, nor print any marks upon you: I am the LORD.

Adeebiwa09: K, as of my own present opinion its nt a sin bt wen it bcmes perversion it wl lead 2 sin. Bible says we shld nt deny each other ur bodies so if one wants it unda obligatn he/she s 2 v it. Bt it shld b dne wt ful agreement, ryt retrictns and ryt mindset.

Thanks for your contributions. But I don't see how it can become a perversion and lead to sin when it's between a married couple.

BabaGnoni:
Sin, at times, is relative, so to some degree and in this context, (i.e. married couple) this is not sin

Whatever sexu.al activity is done outside marriage is sin. My question is for married couples only.

BabaGnoni:
Song of Solomon 2:3 is your conclusive irrefutable proof, according to the Bible, and not doctrine or emotional gibberish

Songs of Solomon 2:3 - As the apple tree among the trees of the wood, so is my beloved among the sons. I sat down under his shadow with great delight, and his fruit was sweet to my taste.

As Ubenedictus said earlier, most of the scriptures in SoS is figurative and hence subject to various interpretations "as the Spirit leads". From the underlined, we cannot tell if they are kissing or staring into each others eyes. Or if indeed, they are having ora.l sex.

There are numerous instances where the Bible talks about sex. I'm not here to argue Bible with you, so I will ignore you.

Btw, what's the meaning of backdoor?

^^^ Yes, there are numerous Bible references on sex. I listed one above.

Again, please if you have nothing meaningful, backed with Biblical references to contribute, just read along, and let others comment.

Thanks.

@Alfa, what Bible reference do you have to back your statement?

@SpecialGuest, thanks for being the first lady to weigh in.

I agree with you, the Bible talks about mutual consent in 1 Cor 7: 3 - 6. So as long as whatever you are doing does not offend your spouse, you are free to continue.

@Ubenedictus, thanks for your contribution. But those verses you quoted are not solid proofs. They do not expressly talk about o.ral sex.

Almost 100 views and still no concrete answer??

This is really serious.