₦airaland Forum

Welcome, Guest: Register • Login • With Google • Trending • Recent • New

Stats: 3,344,291 members, 8,511,092 topics. Date: Saturday, 31 October 2026 at 07:11 PM

Toggle theme

Mrshape's Posts

Nairaland Forum › Mrshape's Profile › Mrshape's Posts

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 (of 83 pages)

Education › Re: Mathematics Give Away Challenge For Geniuses by Mrshape: 8:34pm On Apr 18, 2020
DesChyko:
I've tried to fault where I got it wrong here aside the other value of x but I couldn't. The mathematical blunder remains elusive.
Please someone help out.
But the disadvantage of that plot is that you can't see more than 4 dp or so.
So you will take it to another plot to see five dp and approximate the sixth.
Or better use Lambert W if you are fortunate it will lead you to omega function that have constant special value (like our special angle in trigonometry you don't need program for such just substitute you will get your exact answer ) otherwise you program it. And get your exact value
Education › Re: Mathematics Give Away Challenge For Geniuses by Mrshape: 8:29pm On Apr 18, 2020
DesChyko:
I've tried to fault where I got it wrong here aside the other value of x but I couldn't. The mathematical blunder remains elusive.
Please someone help out.
Here is the correct plot.
I don't know if you understand what I saidvand another fault is that you interval is to wide
Maybe you can use rage of values of x as 0.1, 0.2, 0.3,0.4.........
And also you need to plot on a graph of equal dimension

Education › Re: Mathematics Give Away Challenge For Geniuses by Mrshape: 8:25pm On Apr 18, 2020
Ikennablue:
i already did
Give me some few minutes let me make the plot
Education › Re: Mathematics Give Away Challenge For Geniuses by Mrshape: 8:21pm On Apr 18, 2020
DesChyko:
I've tried to fault where I got it wrong here aside the other value of x but I couldn't. The mathematical blunder remains elusive.
Please someone help out.
You made x a constant x us not a constant it is a straight line graph with slop of 1 that is start from the origin a pass the center dividing the rectangular plane into two triangle
Education › Re: Mathematics Give Away Challenge For Geniuses by Mrshape: 8:16pm On Apr 18, 2020
DesChyko:
I've tried to fault where I got it wrong here aside the other value of x but I couldn't. The mathematical blunder remains elusive.
Please someone help out.
Let me Chen it out
Education › Re: Mathematics Give Away Challenge For Geniuses by Mrshape: 8:13pm On Apr 18, 2020
Many of the number solutions here are funny kikiki.
Must especially all who used logarithm and index
Education › Re: Mathematics Give Away Challenge For Geniuses by Mrshape: 8:07pm On Apr 18, 2020
smeag0l:
Mrshape don't worry. I'll still do another one next month as I'm thinking of making this a monthly thing. Be sure to be on the look out and also be fast with your solutions. You're a great guy!
Thanks boss.
Look forward to taking part in it.
And may God blessing you for promoting mathematics education you are the the best
Education › Re: Mathematics Give Away Challenge For Geniuses by Mrshape: 8:02pm On Apr 18, 2020
femi4:
Alright
When I saw femi there I know it must be you
Education › Re: Mathematics Give Away Challenge For Geniuses by Mrshape: 8:00pm On Apr 18, 2020
femi4:
yay! I m one of the winners
Congratulations boss
Education › Re: Mathematics Give Away Challenge For Geniuses by Mrshape: 7:36pm On Apr 18, 2020
PERSONALGUY1:
Yes bro..I want you to check this method binomial series method
It woks by coincidence,
Why did the other root of the quadratic equation not sanctify the equation?
So it is obvious it is a wrong approach because the..
............. Will make it lose some or add dome values to ut
Education › Re: Mathematics Give Away Challenge For Geniuses by Mrshape: 7:04pm On Apr 18, 2020
PERSONALGUY1:
I really appreciate your kind gesture..may God continue to bless you...u really a man of your word...am intrigued...this is what I sent
You got the second one
But the first one became invalid when you eliminated log as if it is a variable connected by multiplication
Congratulations
Education › Re: Mathematics Give Away Challenge For Geniuses by Mrshape: 6:33pm On Apr 18, 2020
dprpikin:
Thanks, man. I wished you won yourself, because you've been championing stuff like this. But as our people would say 'one's time awaits him', you'll also be rewarded in due course. Keep doing what you know best to do.
Yeah true.
Very encouraging.
Thanks
Politics › Re: Nigeria; A Nation Full Of Hypocrisy by Mrshape: 5:38pm On Apr 18, 2020
rejoice4eva:
Hypocrisy is when you see things and you are saying the opposite
Hypocrisy is when you are complaining secretly, and you are crucifying the one complaining openly.
Hypocrisy is when you are crucifying some one for doing something, and you are praising some one for doing the same thing
I can go on and on. Give your own description
But hypocrisy is evil and any society bedeviled by it will find it difficult to move forward.
Can Nigeria ever be truthful and frank for once ?
Hypocrisy is when you tell people no gathering stay at home. And you went for a burial (funeral)
Education › Re: Mathematics Give Away Challenge For Geniuses by Mrshape: 5:29pm On Apr 18, 2020
dprpikin:
I will like to appreciate smeag0l for putting up this challange and making good his promise.

At about 10am this morning I received an alert of N5,000 from smeag0l for answering question number 2 correctly.

Below is a screen shot of the solution.
Congratulations
Education › Re: Mathematics Give Away Challenge For Geniuses by Mrshape: 2:31pm On Apr 18, 2020
[quote author=smeag0l post=88582406][/quote]Better
Education › Re: Mathematics Give Away Challenge For Geniuses by Mrshape: 2:22pm On Apr 18, 2020
smeag0l:
That's clear enough.What is it you can't see on it?
The write up
Education › Re: Mathematics Give Away Challenge For Geniuses by Mrshape: 2:20pm On Apr 18, 2020
smeag0l:
Here are the winners and the time stamp showing when they sent in their responses. For those of you that sent me mails twice, I did't pick you because I mentioned earlier that it attracts disqualification. I initially intended to pick 5 winners but had to pick one more person.This didnt follow the rule of the fastest but the one who came close to answering question 1.
If I tell you say this thing no pain me an na lie.
Mime came in 9:38am
And that shape I solved it here in this forum about 4 days ago after much begging for the solution.
When there is shape question their will be calling Mr everywhere but when it is money involved now.
No one mentioned me for good 12 hours before I knew

Education › Re: Mathematics Give Away Challenge For Geniuses by Mrshape: 2:01pm On Apr 18, 2020
[quote author=smeag0l post=88580991][/quote]Snap this paper again it is not clear
Education › Re: Mathematics Give Away Challenge For Geniuses by Mrshape: 1:59pm On Apr 18, 2020
smeag0l:
Yeah, these are used to obtain the zeros of the func4ion before plotting it on a single curve. I have posted the solution here. I will not post the newton-raphson one because I have already said one of the winners will post that.
Alright let's wait for them,
Although I can do Newton very well.
But I don't usually consider it as a full numerical value
Education › Re: Mathematics Give Away Challenge For Geniuses by Mrshape: 1:56pm On Apr 18, 2020
[quote author=smeag0l post=88580991][/quote]Alright but how were you areble to read that graph to 4 dp?
Education › Re: Mathematics Give Away Challenge For Geniuses by Mrshape: 12:50pm On Apr 18, 2020
smeag0l:
This is not it. I'll post it shortly as I have completed the graphical one.
Those are my graphs I used
I will like to see yours
Education › Re: Mathematics Give Away Challenge For Geniuses by Mrshape: 12:43pm On Apr 18, 2020
smeag0l:
This is not it. I'll post it shortly as I have completed the graphical one.
I also used this

Education › Re: Mathematics Give Away Challenge For Geniuses by Mrshape: 12:40pm On Apr 18, 2020
smeag0l:
This is not it. I'll post it shortly as I have completed the graphical one.
OK let me see yours
Education › Re: Mathematics Give Away Challenge For Geniuses by Mrshape: 12:40pm On Apr 18, 2020
smeag0l:
For those of you I have contacted to send your account numbers and haven't sent , I need it urgently as I may be forced to move on to the next fastest person with a correct answer if you don't respond. Please check your emails urgently.
The last digit 3
I got it by looking and the number of small boxes before the red line I found out is 1/3 of the the line between two thick lines
Education › Re: Mathematics Give Away Challenge For Geniuses by Mrshape: 12:34pm On Apr 18, 2020
smeag0l:
For those of you I have contacted to send your account numbers and haven't sent , I need it urgently as I may be forced to move on to the next fastest person with a correct answer if you don't respond. Please check your emails urgently.

Education › Re: Mathematics Give Away Challenge For Geniuses by Mrshape: 11:43am On Apr 18, 2020
smeag0l:
Where is the graph?Wolfram alpha is free. There are other tools like mathcad that is not a program but a calculation software you can use to arrive at the answer too.
OK I will send it here
Education › Re: Mathematics Give Away Challenge For Geniuses by Mrshape: 11:21am On Apr 18, 2020
smeag0l:
Better. I'm also completing that graphical solution now and may post it here if people want.
I did they graphical to get my solution too.
Because I don't have paid wolfram alpha.,
That's I I got my two values for my solution
The constant value of omega of that function gave one solution.
So I use graph yo evaluate and zoom.
Anyway it was a nice challenge.
What I want to learn from you is how to get the omega value without program
Education › Re: Mathematics Give Away Challenge For Geniuses by Mrshape: 3:15am On Apr 18, 2020
smeag0l:
Yours is also dubious. You people usually do not complete the proof to the Lambert W function. I need to do a lecture on that for a fee on this forum.
When you do the lecture mention me.
I need to be part if it
Education › Re: Mathematics Give Away Challenge For Geniuses by Mrshape: 3:14am On Apr 18, 2020
smeag0l:
So why were you arguing?The problem is that you guys don't know how to complete the solution using the Lambert W function. The Lambert W function will give you the two numbers x=2 and x=0.154953466 when carefully applied.
Alright.
But the answer we usually leave as a function or use programing to get the numerical value.
Education › Re: Mathematics Give Away Challenge For Geniuses by Mrshape: 12:32am On Apr 18, 2020
smeag0l:
I was typing a response(one meant for only mathematics intellectuals) to your earlier message on how flawed your workings were until I saw this so I had to stop. Please check my previous message after the deadline passed. This question has two solutions i..e x=2 or x =0.155.Substitute both numbers into the equation and see what you have. I can provide you a full working of these solutions according to Newton-Rahpson method if you want to learn. I will even show you calculations on how i arrived at my test values . In your solution, (-1/ln2)/(-2ln2) suddenly gives 2 instead of 1/2ln4. I am now thinking you must have copied this from somewhere online.
Oh my fault there I downloaded the wrong solution I made two solutions that day
Education › Re: Mathematics Give Away Challenge For Geniuses by Mrshape: 12:25am On Apr 18, 2020
smeag0l:
I should be the one teaching you about Lambert W functions. I tried using this to solve that question later in the years and didnt still arrive at the beautiful answer I got using the Newton-Raphson method. The solution x=2 is just one root of the equation 2^(2x)-8x=0. The other one is 0.155. Besides, The last two or the lines of your Lambert W solution clearly shows it is dubious.(
Choose for yourself which is more accurate

Education › Re: Mathematics Give Away Challenge For Geniuses by Mrshape: 12:15am On Apr 18, 2020
smeag0l:
I should be the one teaching you about Lambert W functions. I tried using this to solve that question later in the years and didnt still arrive at the beautiful answer I got using the Newton-Raphson method. The solution x=2 is just one root of the equation 2^(2x)-8x=0. The other one is 0.155. Besides, The last two or the lines of your Lambert W solution clearly shows it is dubious.(
0.155 is not close to the answer.
Substitute my answer and yours into the equation and see which will give you better result

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 (of 83 pages)