Napoleone's Posts
Nairaland Forum › Napoleone's Profile › Napoleone's Posts
The duo of Joseph Ogunmodede and Francisca Walter of the Faculty of Law University of Ibadan (UI), have beaten other contenders to win the inaugural Olasupo Shasore Moot and Arbitration competition. The University of Nigeria, Nsukka (UNN), came second while University of Lagos (UNILAG) took the third place.http://thenationonlineng.net/new/ui-wins-moot-contest/ Pix: Ogunmodede (right) receiving his award from Mr Bello Salihu
|
It's a pity people will still not appreciate the sagacity of Nigerians. |
An argument occurred now between my colleagues and I as to who is more intelligent between Otunba Gbenga Daniel and Dr. Olusegun Mimiko. Without prejudice to the corruption of OGD and the fact that Mimiko is moving stuffs in Ondo, some of the development sprung up by OGD are unprecedented and it's a clear pointer to his utmost sagacity! HAVE YOUR SAY!!! Cc: lalasticlala |
pman06:Well... If there's anything I like, it's objectivity. Without prejudice to the fact that Amosun is not perfect, did you get all these facts from a credible source? I mean like the newspaper, news broadcast? Something I want you to know is that there are so many stories behind whatever happened and each person will tell a bias story to favour himself or herself. As regards deduction, my mother was also affected and I know how it feels like but my question is this "who shouted when he paid the 2months arrears OGD was owing them?". I also want to intimate you with the fact that no reasonable politician will deliberate decide to owe salaries some months to election. In fact, a typical Nigerian politician will get the money at all cost and make them suffer immediately the wins. What do you know about the financial oppression from Aso Rock? As regards retiring PS, we can't eat our cake and have it! We are complaining that civil servants are not getting promotion and yet, we are complaining about the government retiring Permanent Secretaries whose retirement were due but refused to leave the office by continued backdating of their age. Well...no wonder OGD said we, Ogun State indigenes, are gullible. My take, there are actually so many stories surrounding these issues people are complaining about and it's unfortunate that most of us have decided to settle for hearsays. |
prissyluv:You're most welcome |
prissyluv:The evidence of a customary marriage is the payment of BRIDE PRICE by the family of the husband to the family of the wife. Therefore, failure to lead evidence to the effect that the bride price was paid leaves the court with the conclusion that it's mere cohabitation. The court can also make pronouncement on property and children under maintenance and custody of children respectively. It must, however, be noted the rules governing these two subject-matters differ from those of the statutory marriage. Although the husband is obliged to maintain the wife under customary marriage but she's not automatically entitled to the husband's property like the statutory marriage.(The more important reason not to take statutory marriage with levity). Also, as regards custody of children, the man has exclusive custodial right i.e he is the owner of the children unlike under customary marriage where the child is given to the best person that can take care of the child, even if a third party. As regard foregoing customary marriage, it may not be advisable. The reason being that each have a role to place and this has led to a high incidence of double deck marriage. For example, it is customary law that gives the society the impression that you're married. It also helps family harmony most times because, apart from the fact that no family member will disturb the marriage having given consent to your union, the family can also help resolve dispute and protect the sacrosanct institution of marriage. Quote me! Marriages where the family of the wife loves the husband so much and vice versa lasts more. I don't mind the questions. It's my joy when people walk on this path without missing it. You're welcome. |
prissyluv:Battery low! Will reply later. |
Hmmm...it's well! |
prissyluv:Note that if there is not marriage in existence before, there is nothing to dissolve because mere cohabitation does not constitute a marriage. However, the phrase "without having the Marriage Act Certificate" may mean that they were not married under the statute but under customary law. To dissolve a customary law marriage, there must have been all attempts by members of the family to reconcile the parties. If this fail, the divorce can be initiated by either the husband or the wife. The husband can initiate it by sending the wife packing while the wife can do so by leaving the man's house and informing him that she is through with the marriage. However, it is pertinent to note that a customary marriage only comes to an end when the husband has been refunded the bride price/dowry paid to the wife's family in respect of the wife. As a result of this, it has also been submitted that a wife can bring a customary law marriage to and end by going through the preliminary steps of a marriage with another man, with a view to reforming the estranged husband the bride price from the one the new husband will pay. It is noteworthy that the parties sometimes resort to court for a divorce order because there are circumstances where the husband or the wife may refuse to recognise the divorce and this may affect the either's subsequent remarriage (especially when the want to undergo statutory marriage). As regards the question of which is superior between statutory and customary law marriage, there has been several argument in an attempt to find a definite answer to this question. However, where parties undergo both statutory and customary law marriage, also known as double deck marriage, authors appear to favour the view that the statutory marriage supersedes. |
preselect:You must be very matured |
ellechrystal:Thanks for accepting defeat! |
fallout87:Thanks for accepting defeat! |
Truckpusher:Didn't thunder fire you and your Sambo? ![]() |
chibwike:Thanks for accepting defeat. |
Truckpusher:I don't expect you to reply my message because I expect you to have hung yourself by now! ![]() |
AndreRose:Thanks for accepting defeat ![]() |
preselect:Thanks for accepting defeat! |
lloydpras:Am I lying? It's true nw |
lloydpras:see you! They've rigged the stuff! How can those that voted in Akwa Ibom be more than those that voted at Sokoto? Well, I'm not surprised. In a country where. 1010 voters registered and over 2000voted |
It's obvious they are tampering with the results. How will over 1M people vote in Akwa-Ibom when we all know the percentage of people that vote in Nigeria? |
vickylala239:Well...I must say I'm not married. However, I don't think I need to tout my support and solidarity for statutory marriage. For me, I MUST undergo statutory marriage. In fact, I don't know why you have such thoughts towards me. I've always pray that my wife will never have the to regret marrying me and vice versa. I don't know why I will come and spend my time and energy typing and posting this if I'm an hypocrite. That's why we must all pray to God for someone that will complement us. Note that if you don't trust your wife, there are other legal means of curbing excesses than spoiling the marriage from foundation. It's well. |
Sleekyshuga:I think Chibwike needs to see beyond the woman enjoying his property. How about his children? Don't you think if we close our eyes so a bad person can pass by, even a good person will pass? I repeat, why on earth will you marry a woman you are not ready to share you life, body and property with? Besides, if you don't do court marriage, your family may not allow your children to enjoy your property. I have a classmate that's a complete Orphan and is being sustained on her parent's property. Thanks to statutory marriage. However, if you're the selfish type that doesn't want your wife to inherit your property, it's very simple, just make a will as early as possible and update it regularly. That's all! |
Rahmatuparker:When couples get married in the registry and when they are issued with the certificate, they will get in the registry, by a licenced place of worship, it has the same effect. As regards divorce, it is only a court of competent jurisdiction that can divorce the couple and they must prove that the marriage has broken down irretrievably. As regards the fate of the children, the court applies the "welfare principle" in deciding whether to award the custody of the children to the husband, wife or third party. The Act requires the court, in awarding custody of children, to regard the welfare of the children as paramount consideration. In other words, the court gives the child to the person that can take proper care of them. |
Sleekyshuga:I get your point but you know it is now rampant to see people marrying strangers. Especially because someone jilted them |
Sleekyshuga:[b] [/b]YES!!! COMING FROM A MALE!!! |
Sleekyshuga:That's the best but the problem is that most people don't want to marry their friends. They will rather 'friendzone' them! ![]() |
qbd2:Look at my comment and think twice! |
Sleekyshuga:Wow! This is very nice...in fact, I'm falling in love with you right away! It is noteworthy that the term "court marriage" is informal. It is called "statutory marriage" or "marriage under the Act". In essence, it is not the venue of the marriage that matters or determines but whether the procedures stated in the Marriage Act have been strictly followed. For instance, apart from going to the registry, a statutory marriage can also be conducted in a licenced place of worship-this requires the certificate to be returned to the registry. This goes to show that church blessing is not tantamount to statutory marriage. However, it is not uncommon for woman to leave the wedding arrangement in the charge of the man. If the man fraudulently pretends to have done 'court wedding' and starts using that to maltreat the woman or threaten to divorce her by any means, the woman can seek legal redress and succeed. I must also address the fact that "if you're not ready to share what you have with your partner, then why tell her you love her talkless of marrying her?". Research has shown that most males shy away from statutory marriage for a number of reasons which includes, but not limited to, the desire to enjoy the potential to marry as many wives as possible(which the customary marriage guarantee), the reluctance to share both movable and immovable property with the woman, the mischievous intention to divorce her in any manner and at any time etc The disadvantages of a lady undergoing only a customary marriage with a man are countless but I will mention a few. 1. Polygamy: The man has the right to marry as many wives as possible. In fact, it has been submitted that he has a right to commit adultery. 2. Divorce: The man can divorce the woman in an unscrupulous manner. For example, he can just wake up one morning and send the woman packing. That's the end of the marriage. 3. Custody: The man will have exclusive custody of the children. In other words, the man is the owner of the children unlike statutory marriage where they are jointly owned. The implication of this is that if the man has been nowhere to be found since the birth of the child and the woman has been taking care of the children, he can even come when the they are less than 18years to take them away. Etc My submission is that any man that refuses to marry you under the Act i.e 'court wedding' is not worth marrying you at all because he is subjecting you to grave insecurity. You should be suspicious of such man. LADIES!!! YOU HAVE BEEN WARNED!!! |
Where are the riggers? |
Where are the riggers? |
OTUOKE STRAIGHT!!! |





