Naptu2's Posts
Nairaland Forum › Naptu2's Profile › Naptu2's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 2427 2428 2429 2430 2431 2432 2433 2434 2435 (of 2585 pages)
His actual birth date/year is unknown. What we have is an estimate. naptu2: Obasanjo's apperance over the years. |
He's continuing the family tradition (taking after Al-Hassan and Aminu Dantata). I wonder where Gilbert Chagoury, Antonio Oladeinde Fernandez and Femi Otedola would rank on Forbes' list. |
I think it's a good idea, but it needs refining. For example, what if a person's name is actually Okoro? Are we permitted to post Emeka Okoro or Peter Okoro? So, I think it's more about context (which is difficult to specify) than the actual words. By the way, the post below requires your attention. Tigerhead: Am I the only one to catch this? This logo has not been announced yet to the general public, but it is on Nairaland curtsey of WHO? As I understand it the LAPTOPS are agents of PDP so who is this? All along it has been the (you guessed right - the yo-robbers) that have had agents crawling all over this website.https://www.nairaland.com/1214989/apc-logo-flag |
Marine Bridge, Apapa. Marina Bridge. Outer Ring Road Bridge, Marina. |
Good morning. Please unban Ishilove and release her post. She was banned by the anti-spam bot AntispamBot banned Ishilove for http:// www.nairaland.com/1205583/iyawo-nylon- bag/2#14589757. Ban expires at Today at 06:29:14 AM. Banned by AntispamBot in Literature/Writing for https://www.nairaland.com/1205583/iyawo- nylon-bag/2#14589757. Ban expires on 5:29am On Mar 05 Thanks |
tayoccu: You do know that the the dress code is in the law?Please cite it (bear in mind the what section 1 of the constitution says). |
tayoccu: M'am we all agree that the schools are govt funded, but its the same govt that gave the schools dress codes, and the last time I checked, the hijab wasn't on the list of permitted gear,Berets are allowed instead.The government is subject to law and the law gives muslim girls the right to wear hijab. |
Indeed in the UK, sikhs are exempted from wearing motorcycle crash helmets, hard hats at construction sites, etc because they have to wear their turbans.m |
A similar case from the UK. All male baptised sikhs are obliged to wear a turban. In 1982 a headmaster at a school in the UK prevented a boy from entering class because he was wearing a turban. The boy's father sued. They lost the case at the Appeal Court because the court ruled that the law prevented discrimination against races and ethnic groups, but it did not prevent discrimination against religious and political groups. They won the case at the House of Lords (the UK supreme court). The law lords ruled that sikhs are an ethno-religious group and you cannot prevent a child from attending lessons in government funded schools simply because he is wearing a turban. naptu2: MANDLA v DOWELL LEE [1982] UKHL 7 (24 March 1982): |
naptu2: I pray pyguru doesn't ban me. |
Relevant sections from The Constitution of The Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999. 10. The Government of the Federation or of a State shall not adopt any religion as State Religion. 38. (1) Every person shall be entitled to freedom of thought, conscience and religion, including freedom to change his religion or belief, and freedom (either alone or in community with others, and in public or in private) to manifest and propagate his religion or belief in worship, teaching, practice and observance. (2) No person attending any place of education shall be required to receive religious instruction or to take part in or attend any religious ceremony or observance if such instruction ceremony or observance relates to a religion other than his own, or religion not approved by his parent or guardian. (3) No religious community or denomination shall be prevented from providing religious instruction for pupils of that community or denomination in any place of education maintained wholly by that community or denomination. (4) Nothing in this section shall entitle any person to form, take part in the activity or be a member of a secret society. 42. (1) A citizen of Nigeria of a particular community, ethnic group, place of origin, sex, religion or political opinion shall not, by reason only that he is such a person:- (a) be subjected either expressly by, or in the practical application of, any law in force in Nigeria or any executive or administrative action of the government, to disabilities or restrictions to which citizens of Nigeria of other communities, ethnic groups, places of origin, sex, religions or political opinions are not made subject; or (b) be accorded either expressly by, or in the practical application of, any law in force in Nigeria or any such executive or administrative action, any privilege or advantage that is not accorded to citizens of Nigeria of other communities, ethnic groups, places of origin, sex, religions or political opinions. (2) No citizen of Nigeria shall be subjected to any disability or deprivation merely by reason of the circumstances of his birth. (3) Nothing in subsection (1) of this section shall invalidate any law by reason only that the law imposes restrictions with respect to the appointment of any person to any office under the State or as a member of the armed forces of the Federation or member of the Nigeria Police Forces or to an office in the service of a body, corporate established directly by any law in force in Nigeria. http://www.nigeria-law.org/ConstitutionOfTheFederalRepublicOfNigeria.htm |
[size=14pt]Nigerian Muslims Welcome Court Ruling on Hijab[/size]http://www.ummah.com/forum/showthread.php?46139-Nigerian-Muslims-Welcome-Court-Ruling-on-Hijab |
[size=14pt]'Stop Ban On Religious Attires in Schools'.[/size]http://www.accessmylibrary.com/coms2/summary_0286-14506341_ITM |
I'm going to go this way 1) Court Judgement 2) Relevant sections of the constitution. 3) Legal interpretations. 4) Similar case in the UK. |
Ok, I'm going to round up all my posts and repost them, I just hope someone won't ask me to do it again 2 pages down the line. |
rhymz: Bullshyt!Chai! How many times will I repeat myself? Go through the thread, I've already posted the relevant sections of the constitution, I've posted the court judgement, etc. |
MANDLA v DOWELL LEE [1982] UKHL 7 (24 March 1982): Sikhs are a racial group for the purposes of the Race Relations Act 1976 and a rule forbidding the wearing of turbans by school pupils could not, therefore, be upheld because it was it not justifiable in all circumstances ‘irrespective of the colour, race, nationality or ethnic or national origins’ of the person to whom it was applied ‘without regard to the ethnic origins of that person’ (per L Fraser of Tullybelton). |
daylae: This issue is no contest at all. . .Nigeria is a secular state. Probably, islamic republic like iran provides such for girls in school.Please can you tell me what makes Nigeria a secular state? Is it written in any law or any section of the constitution? If it is, can you cite that law for me? |
There is a similar case in Britain. In 1982 a headmaster refused to allow a boy into the school because the boy wore a sikh turban (all baptised male sikhs are obliged to wear a turban). The boy's father sued. They lost the case at the appeal court, because the court ruled that although the law made it illegal to discriminate against races/ethnic groups, it didn't say anything about religious and political groups. They won the case at the House of Lords (the UK's highest court) which ruled that sikhs are an ethno-religious group and it is illegal to discriminate against them. The case is cited as Mandla v Dowell-Lee (1982). |
I have to admit, I'm afraid of the anti-spam bot, but I'm considering posting links that show that sikhs in the UK are exempted from wearing motorcycle crash helmets, helmets at construction sites (in fact, you cannot refuse to employ a sikh on the grounds that he won't wear a hard hat) and also have exemptions in school because of their religious beliefs which obliges them to wear a turban. This is not just a Nigerian or muslim issue. |
deluckiest: That's a muslim view point. I can only take your post serious if an independent news confirm your story.Check the post before that (from P.M News/AllAfrica.) or check the Nigerian Weekly Law Reports. |
I'll have to get used to a new name shows that time is passing by and we're getting old.I was so used to John Paul our pope, Anthony our bishop. Then it became Benedict our pope, Anthony our bishop. And just when I got used to that it became Benedict our pope, Alfred Martins our bishop. Now there'll be a new name. The only thing that's constant is change. |
Policewoman: Yes its true. Pope of your village. ![]() |
prairie: Yawns.............so much ado over nothing, do not mix state matters with religion, the christians here should show decorum, and for those telling us to fight for Jesus and kill for him, sorry we are not God and so cannnot fight for him, he knows best and all we can do for him is do his will and not to kill supposedly for him, and for those calling us illuminaties may the veils fall of your eyes so that u may see. Dominus vobiscumEt cuum spiritu tuo |
Aha! The situation in Britain with regards to sikhs and their turbans (school, motorcycle helmet, construction sites, etc). This is a tip of the iceberg. http://www.sikhiwiki.org/index.php/Turban,_UK_Legislation_Regarding_its_use_by_Sikhs |
[quote author=Okija_juju]Seen... Going by this provision and the interpretation thereof, we can then say that uniforms should be thrown out the window in all aspects of our society... Example: In the Nigerian Army, should a Deeper Lifer join, they are free to replace the military standard issue pants (trousers) with skirts which is what is acceptable according to their religious beliefs and in other words can refuse to be forced to wear one in accordance with their religious beliefs and they also can't be ejected from the army as well because that would be discrimination.. RIGHT!? ![]() Which can also apply to Christian students wearing whatsoever they like to school as long as they can find a religious context to back it up. Does that also make it okay for a Celestial Church member to wear white garments to school? Or for an Olumba member to go to school without shoes? This portion of the constitution like I said is subject to interpretation and can only lead to total chaos.[/quote]Beautiful! So now I'm going to repeat what I said earlier and add a little flesh to it. 1) All sections of the constitution are subject to interpretation (that's what the judiciary is for) and there are even rules for interpretation (Ejusdem generis, etc). There have been court cases over two-thirds of 19 states and definition of "continental shelf of a state". 2) One of my greatest hopes in 1999 was that we would start testing the provisions in our statute books. That's one of the reasons I really liked Gani Fawehinmi. He was ever ready to go to court to test the law and defend his rights. So to your example, (firstly, remember that the person must have a religious obligation to wear that attire), if a woman in the army is religiously obliged to wear skirts and that right is denied her, I would vigorously encourage her to head to the courts to enforce her rights. While we are on this topic, research the situation in Great Britain with regards to sikhs and their turbans |
kokoye: So..why is robbing called "one chance"?In the past, when there's only one seat space left, the conductor would announce "Yaba one chance". This encourages passengers to board that bus because they will not be delayed while the conductor is trying to get passengers to fill the bus. Robbers capitalise on this to encourage passengers to enter their bus. It also helps the robbers to subdue the passenger (there are more robbers than passengers and the victim will be encouraged to sit away from the door so that he doesn't have any means of escape). |
[quote author=Okija_juju]highlight what part of this provision allows a student to wear a hijab to school.[/quote]Wow! This is the third time I'm posting this on this thread. naptu2: I pray pyguru doesn't ban me. |
naptu2: I pray pyguru doesn't ban me. |
jadakiss213: how wld it look like if every student decides to put on a symbol of his/her religion to schoolWell the fact that we have to face is that this is what the law says. And laws are needed to regulate conduct in society. If we all did whatever we wanted without recourse to the law, then there would be chaos. The procedure is that, if you don't like what the law says, then you can challenge it in court or petition your representatives in the national assembly. (It's not about what we feel, it's about what the law says). Disobedience of the law has its consequences. |
Some relevant sections of the constitution (I have explained these earlier) 10. The Government of the Federation or of a State shall not adopt any religion as State Religion. 38. (1) Every person shall be entitled to freedom of thought, conscience and religion, including freedom to change his religion or belief, and freedom (either alone or in community with others, and in public or in private) to manifest and propagate his religion or belief in worship, teaching, practice and observance. (2) No person attending any place of education shall be required to receive religious instruction or to take part in or attend any religious ceremony or observance if such instruction ceremony or observance relates to a religion other than his own, or religion not approved by his parent or guardian. (3) No religious community or denomination shall be prevented from providing religious instruction for pupils of that community or denomination in any place of education maintained wholly by that community or denomination. (4) Nothing in this section shall entitle any person to form, take part in the activity or be a member of a secret society. 42. (1) A citizen of Nigeria of a particular community, ethnic group, place of origin, sex, religion or political opinion shall not, by reason only that he is such a person:- (a) be subjected either expressly by, or in the practical application of, any law in force in Nigeria or any executive or administrative action of the government, to disabilities or restrictions to which citizens of Nigeria of other communities, ethnic groups, places of origin, sex, religions or political opinions are not made subject; or (b) be accorded either expressly by, or in the practical application of, any law in force in Nigeria or any such executive or administrative action, any privilege or advantage that is not accorded to citizens of Nigeria of other communities, ethnic groups, places of origin, sex, religions or political opinions. (2) No citizen of Nigeria shall be subjected to any disability or deprivation merely by reason of the circumstances of his birth. (3) Nothing in subsection (1) of this section shall invalidate any law by reason only that the law imposes restrictions with respect to the appointment of any person to any office under the State or as a member of the armed forces of the Federation or member of the Nigeria Police Forces or to an office in the service of a body, corporate established directly by any law in force in Nigeria. http://www.nigeria-law.org/ConstitutionOfTheFederalRepublicOfNigeria.htm |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 2427 2428 2429 2430 2431 2432 2433 2434 2435 (of 2585 pages)
shows that time is passing by and we're getting old.

