₦airaland Forum

coogar: @ nateevs,

that's an odd way to look at it. if roman didn't pay up 2 years ago, the last financial current you are talking about wouldn't be debt-free. it's a ripple effect! there's no way chelsea can sustain operating cost with 40,000 stadium capacity that is never sold-out! the wages of your players are astronomical and you have hired 10 managers in 10 seasons - having to pay their severance fees for sacking them!!!

ritchboy: But some months ago I recall Nateevs saying "Chelsea cannot sign Rory Delap without Roman's input"... So either:

A. Chelsea have since won the lottery.
B. You were talking nonsense then.
C. You are talking nonsense now.
D. B + C.

The smart money is on D

coogar: incorrect?
if roman didn't pay up chelsea's debt some 2 years ago, would chelsea be able to sustain operating cost? how much do chelsea make in revenue? what's the player wage/turnover ratio?

nateevs: As at the last financial statements, it is absolutely incorrect.

Ibime: Get off ma dikk ninja. I'm telling ninjas what I would do, you telling me nonsense about Barca.

In 2008 when Barca paid £25m for Chygrinski same time Thiago Silva cost £7m, is this the argument you would have used?

I said I would sell Luiz for £30m and buy another dude for £4m and you telling ninjas thank God I'm not Jose, as if Jose has not already offered Luiz in part exchange this very summer and for way less than £30m.

Ibime: You chatting nonsense. There are 3 other competent defenders in the club to mitigate replacing Luiz like for like, although if you try to push that as the argument, I can tell you now that Okore has it all, even more than Luiz.

If Eluaquim Mangala was not valued at £25m by Porto, JM would have bought him as direct replacement for David Luiz. Maybe Jose valued Eluaquim at £15m - yet like for like considered him more reliable than Luiz. Likewise, I make bold to say Okore is even more desirable than Eluaquim based on the strengths of both players. The difference in prices between all these players is simply difference in their level of exposure

Now on what basis would anyone say Sturridge should ride bench for Torres in 2012 as you did. Was that based on 2009 prices?

SailorXY: ^^^ unless your clear abundance of knowledge is trying hard to point out no relationship between the empires @ anzhi, citeh, monaco, etc & chelski, then I can't be bothered understanding your superiority Mr. Einsten

SailorXY: I can't even be arssed bout trying to understand this question

Ibime: Are you being cheeky or what?

So what's the reason that Torres cost £50m and Sturridge cost us £5m.

No wonder nincompoops insisted that Torres must start whilst Sturridge must ride bench.

How much did Luiz cost at age 20? And why does he still make mistakes one would expect from a 20 year old?

SailorXY: Very brilliant post. At least I'm now aware you actually 'think'

dayokanu: By next week we go meet for Supercup

lalaboi: I guess i expected more in terms of stats. . FPL captainship nor dey smile na. .

And No. We had no best player on the pitch. The performance was poor. We were lucky!

FBS: nna bros, did you watch the match? No impact? really?

imo after Oscar, Eden was the best player on the pitch.

lalaboi: yes Nateevs. . Hazard has had no Impact. .

lalaboi: As Hazard just play 2 90mins with no impact is just baffling. .

No talk about the first goal. .

CFCfan: They need to as more attacking forays are needed. We barely tested Brad Guzan apart from the goal.

SailorXY: Let's hope he is not aware of what is happening in Anhzi! The moment the master gets tired of his pet? Bingo! Back to Europa League...where they belong

CFCfan: Since last weekend
NBC has been showing some MLS games for sometime though.

CFCfan: Abi o. I'm enjoying NBC's superb coverage.

Ibime: Nonsense. Upon all the channels, nobody want show match

lalaboi: Guyz. . . Do we really need 4 strikers with a 4231 formation?

I am seriously thinking Rooney will not fit in Chelsea. . he will only be a killer buy to spoil man UTD's title chances/weaken them and not add anything significant to Chelsea! . .
Unless Mourinho is looking at a 2 man striker partnership. . .we all know chelsea play shit in a 4 4 2

OMO IBO: I struggle to understand nateevs sometimess.

Strurridge if I'm correct outscored and desfinitely outperformed tores despite being played out of position and his lack of chances. But for reasons best known to you, you still consider him cr4p. Meanwhile, torres who wasnt under pressure wass busy fluffing chances.

Even Jesus woulda postponed his second coming for Torres.

Ibime: You were not here when Nateevs and Coogar were giving all manner of reasons why Sturridge should stay on the bench, then you came and joined them to yarn opata in support of the Spanish hermaphrodite