₦airaland Forum

airmark:
The highlighted is the point and that's all that's important.

So why the incessant tirade of attacks on Jackson?

raumdeuter:
The hysteria of the left is amusing.
Who are these people who don't like you?
Do you like these people?
Why do you need them to like you?
Why is the onus on certain people to like you and not on you to like them

Broda I am not on the left. Me don tell you for the umpteenth time. Because I find the Republican party repulsive does not mean I am on the left.

And that's your problem. People disagree with you on the basis of common sense most times, not because they are left-leaning.

You gullibly, naively hand power to people who don't like your kind but your problem is with me.

I need to tell you that when people don't like your kind, it means they don't like your offsprings as well?

diggz:
Duran must really fvck up for Villa to allow am
Move like that

It might be related to why we pulled out of the deal at the time.

cococandy:
The fall of America.

if you threaten lawmakers/representatives with felonies because of how they vote on certain bills, you're telling us that we live in a monarchy and the only correct response is whatever the king wants to hear.

At this point if you support republican policies, you’re a clear enemy of the American people. These policies will lead to our decline. You have no excuse except that you have a secret wish for America to fully descend into an animal farm.

When I say I laugh at the thought of Black and Latino people voting for Trump, it is because of things like this. Trump is not sophisticated. The fear is about the sophisticated state-level monsters who get emboldened by what they consider "the mandate" to take America down HandMaid's Tale lane.

Those crazy guys who use votes from Dayo and Jesus to attain power, then go ahead to strip them off equal rights and if they can, citizenship. These people don't like you.

Mark my words; they will start to erode voters rights, create more gerrymandering, and eventually institute perpetual power at state and federal levels.

Welcome to 3rd world. The actual decline of America, south Mr Orange in the driver's seat.

cococandy:
DEI is merit based. It ensures that employers are considering all qualified candidates regardless of their race, gender or disability status..

If they do not meet the employment requirements, they’re not considered. This stops Mr Jack from looking at your black name and tossing your file in the bin because he only wants to consider the qualified white candidates.

if they’re not made to consider every qualified person, they’ll only employ the white people. Centuries of slavery and colonialism should be enough pattern recognition to show you that they’ll never think you’re good enough unless the law forces them to look at your qualifications

You’ve been fed “DEI bad” and you ran with it thoughtlessly like a tree voting for the axe.

P.S chat box can summarize text from all sources online (including false information) and give it you in a summary. I hope you don’t use chat box to do your homework or studies.

The fact that you have to explain this is everything that is wrong with these people.

Ibime:
Nigga shut the fvck up. Defenders at the ready as always to provide an out to the idiot-in-Chief who has diarrhoea of the mouth as always

Diarrhoea off the mouth indeed. It's barely a week in office and the chaos has resumed just where he last left it.

Asked what evidence he had of DEI being the fault of the crash, the idiot replied "it's common sense"...

Phucking orange idiot.

raumdeuter:
In WW2, Germany was pummeling Europe, UK, Russia was getting battered unti[b]l big brother USA stepped in and smashed Germany o[/b]therwise you would be singing to the Fuhrer now

US citizens are doing great, They are the most prosperous country in the entire world, The worst state in the US Mississippi



So Europeans don't need to shed tears for the lifestyle of Americans. We can help and we will help our brothers across the pond as we have always done for over 80yrs

Hehe. That right there shows your limited knowledge of the events. This is American revisionism. For a war that was not fought on American soil, the US lost nearly as many Soldiers as the UK - 450,000. But the US smashed Germany.

Continue to indulge in your far right Nationalism. This is the exact reason you guys on the Right cannot see, let alone appreciate any other point of view. It's the same reason you hate the poor.

See the Chinese upstage the US in one fell swoop, with the release of DeepSeek and wiping trillions off the valuation of big tech companies overnight. You dey dere dey calculate GDP, when said GDP is only a factor of how fatter the pockets of the rich are becoming. . GDP wey no reach the poor.

You are in a temporary bubble, where the poor have nowhere to turn to, and have unfortunately gone to Trump, thinking the price of eggs will come down. When they realise they've been scammed, I will watch you come back and say all this nonsense.

Meanwhile, I dey popcorn mode as the US delves into 3rd world territory with this clown leading charge in full tunnel-vision isolation.

Sportsweb:
E no go ever better for Mateo Kovacic.

He spent 4-5 years at Chelsea but wasn't scoring this much. To make it worse, wasn't shooting outside the ball like he's doing at City

Proud Kovacic Stan here. One of the biggest mistakes we made - selling Kovacic and replacing with Enzo. A Kovacic/Caicedo midfield right now would have been strong.

raumdeuter:
Its easy to make mouth after America has done the heavy lifting already on behalf of Europe whether its vs Nazi Germany or vs Putin Russia
Pray Trump doesnt make good his claims or your Chelsea support would be turned to CSKA Moskva

Abeg abeg. Me i don't line up behind US interests by default.

America does what America wants in its quest for expansionism. Its National Interest is at the core of every move, and not any benevolence to liberate Europe from the Nazi. Japan attacked Pearl Habour, The US declared war on Japan, and Germany on the US consequently. They were ready to sit it out.

You talk about heavy lifting but conveniently forget that Russia gave nearly 25 million lives on the Eastern Front. If Germany was able to run through Russia like they did France, you will not be talking this nonsense you are talking.

The US can and should provide for its poor but it doesn't, because the likes of you like to blame the poor out of misplaced principles. But somehow, find ways to protect the rich who perpetuate ridiculous trillion dollar spendings all in the name of "protecting Europe" from a weak Russia.

raumdeuter:
Defence budget is why Russia has not overrun Europe. I would think Europeans like you would be more grateful for saving them from the Putin war machine

Take away that defence budget and you would be speaking Russian right now

This is what the likes of Marco Rubio want you to think. If you think that Russia is capable of overrunning the UK, Germany and France alone, even without the help of the US, then you are either overstating Russia's intent in a bid to perpetuate these ridiculous DOD spendings, or you know nothing about anything.

These are Nuclear Nations. Do you think Putin invades Germany, France and the UK without M.A.D? You think Putin is that stupid in ambition?

You have the Military Industrial Complex pumping money into politics, sponsoring elections, and subsequently, dictating the resolution of all Chambers of the Legislature, and you think one small detail they forgot was to drop was a little bit of Propaganda iabout Russia's intent?

Is Russia also the reason for Billions of dollars expended on off-book programs, fraud and mismanagement that have made The Pentagon fail audit for 7 years in a row?

Imagine what you are saying..... it's Europe that is the cause of America being unable to take care of its citizens.

raumdeuter:
This govt duty to care where do they get the money from? Is it not from people in form of taxes? Why should people have to pay more taxes to cater for someone elses child?

Is it okay to ask someone who decided to have no child because he doesnt want to pay for children and force him to pay for those who decided to have kids?

You keep saying govt like say govt will pluck the money from the sky. If govt will get the money without taxing other people then no problem

Americans and people all over the world know the disaster that is called communism, Its why people from communist countries flee from it

The Pentagon's budget is nearly $900bn a year. The US does not need to tax a single soul to take care of its citizens. It is just a complex state of warmongers and corrupt politicians, that rely on the radicalisation of people like you.

There is no requirement for a $830bn a year on defence.

raumdeuter:
The right is for personal responsibility

If you get pregnant, then you and your partner should plan within your resources to raise the child and not depend on others who didn't ask you to give birth

When you were giving birth was it part of the plan that others will help you pay for it or you didn't know that having kids cost money

When you are enjoying the happiness that comes with having your kids, do you share that happiness too, when your kids are doing chores to help you, going on vacation with you, gisting with you, and everything kids do for their parents, do you send and share them to others who chose not to have kids?

The left have a way of weaponizing poor people and the sentiments, there are many ways of helping the poor which include charities and giving. Not mandating and guilt tripping that people who worked earned their income despite the inconvenience have to part with it to help someone else whether the like it or not

But the Right likes to project this picture you just painted, whilst craftily distancing their dependency on said 'poor' to maintain their standards of living.

On one hand you are lamblasting people for having poor children, but hiring said poor children as Maids, Gardeners, Porters, etc, paying poorly, overworking them, in order to keep more money to maintain your life style.

If the Right truly believes in Personal Responsibility, then its proponents will practice what they preach by doing their own dishes, cleaning their own homes, looking after their own children by themselves, doing their own gardening. But they don't, and wouldn't.

The truth is you depend on people having kids out of their budget, so you can maintain comfortable lifestyles. This is not a principle.... it is hypocrisy. If you are that principled, then refrain from hiring poor people altogether.

Like I say, I am a centrist. And there are many issues I agree with the Right on. But on this issue, I agree with the Left. There will always be poor people. And every truly prosperous nation must do something to look after its poor.

bemeruca:
Another TDS patient lying to himself

I wish I knew what TDS means.

I watched it at the time. Followed very keenly. Unless you are part of the actual March, how do you know for certain that tiki-torch-matching, Neo-Nazi, White Supremacist had fine people amongst them?

The statement was rascist at best, white-supremacy-leaning at worst. No part of it was good.

But let them rewrite history. Soon they will tell you it is fake news that Trump dined with Nick Fuentes at Maralago.

swiz123:
Stop making excuses for these boys!!! Curbasi is 17 and has been excellent against Real Madrid.

Stop making exceptions to the norm as norms.

Statistically, there will only be one Curbasi for every 10,000 that try. Perhaps even more than 10,000.

Therefore you must judge young players based on excepted development within norms and not with exceptions to the norms.

hensben:
Reason he shouldn’t be starting against top teams.

Okay.... and then play who? Who do you have that is better than him in his position?

hensben:
Colwill has always been rubbish in big games since he came here.

Colwill is 21.

Postdiggers resolving issues again.

lordfalcao:
when Morata was at Chelsea, you wanted belloti to replace him.

Can we compare morata vs belotti career since morata left Chelsea?

Or will you hold on to 8 years abi 10 years relapsing injury?

Nateevs is still right, Morata is not a failure, Belotti is.

At least the Morata I supported is still playing top-flight football, going to the last Euros and helping his team to yet another trophy.

Where is Bellotti?

I just look at the guy. How many arguments can I match? I don't have time like him.

Android17:
Reminder, Poch drew 1-1 & 4-4 with City. Also lost 0-1 in the FA Cup SF where even I will admit CFC deserved to win.

Maresca lost twice 0-2 and 3-1.

The North remembers!

What is the point of this?

airmark:
Go dirty ke?. Sebi you go clean talking about my children?.

Binned.

airmark:
That you knew Garnacho only has 3 goals and 1 assist in 21 games and still want him, you deserve the hottest part of hell.

One day your children will wonder how could their dad stupidly defend Morata and Jackson, even when they were obviously wastepipes dragging the team down. They may ask their mum questions regarding their paternity.

Elejo wewe. Mr "anything can happen to any player" wants to go dirty.

Binned.

airmark:
Guirassy scored last weekend, while your wasteful and calamitous boy got bundled out in the 61st minute of a crucial game for being useless.

You defended Morata and you collected L. You've just abandoned your useless boy, Jackson, after throwing caution to the wind, shamelessly defending the wastepipe for months. Now you don dey shush and no more 'my boy' chant.

Few days ago, you affirmed that Garnacho is the one we need to make the difference upfront. You didn't know he only has 3 goals in 21 matches this season until i informed you. Is it that you are ignorant of things to check before making conclusion on attackers or you are a weapon fashioned against Chelsea on this board, to be recommending and defending nonsense?

We don start. Epistle Lori iro. Elejo wewe.

Idiot thinks I didn't know Garnacho has only 3 goals. I want Garnacho because I am convinced he can do better in a Chelsea team and Maresca's style will fit his playing profile. I never abandoned Jackson. Not sure where you got that from. I stand gidigba with Jackson.

Meanwhile your long list continues. Bellotti, Vlahovic, Guirassy, Solanke, Sesko, Rodrigo Muniz, plus the long list of players that have disappeared off the face of the earth after endorsing them..... and you think you want to shame me for one L on Morata. I didn't realise that on top of your life struggles, you don't know how to count.

One day your children will read all your posts and wonder what happened to Dad's capacity to compute logic.

But I am sure you will argue against them as well.

Elejo wewe.

airmark:
You always argue on faulty premises, that's why you always argue blindly and collect cheap Ls.

Hehehe, coming from a guy who is walking away from his umpteenth striker backing after recommending Bellotti, Vlahovic, Guirassy, Muniz, Solanke... to name a few.

What's the new phrase? Anything can happen to any player. Na im make you no get sense.

diggz:
I saw the whole exchange from the start, bro. I only jumped in because it seemed like you were starting to argue in favor of our three bums. If that’s not what you’re doing, then no vex.

That's what he's doing.

airmark:
You need to follow our convo from inception and not jump in the middle of it.

They know you are talking rubbish. I already removed Madueke from the topic. We've been through that, but your don't stop. This is why they think you are turning Amala. Because you are just jaba jaba everywhere.

airmark:
And i told you that they could do what that washed Sterling couldn't do and you goofed as usual as seen below.



Meanwhile, no sane coach wouldn't have asked Sterling to be ejected.

If this is how you argue in real life, life go hard for you bros.

airmark:
Make we kuku go buy striker for Remo stars for £1m.

Why don't you share your thoughts with the Eghbali and Boehly?

raumdeuter:
Are you saying you don't rate Vlahovic anymore? So if Chelsea don buy am when you say for 100m na so you for deny am within months

Na so im go deny am na. And he will just say anything can happen to any player.

airmark:
You are desperate to rate his worst season over our wingers', when they haven't even completed a season.

Madueke don serve you the needed L for putting Sterling over him like that stupid Pochettino did too.

You are talking utter nonsense. Absolute utter nonsense. And this is what you do with every argument.

You were telling about the reason Sterling was shipped out. You said Maresca shipped him out because of performance. I am saying no, he had no hand in that, and that the board did because of his wages. I then backed it up by saying if it were for performance, why is Madueke still here, along with Neto and Sancho.

And your started your sideways argument off a tangent, as though i am sorry Sterling or pitting Madueke against Sterling.

I just didn't want the debate to go sideways, because in your rush to just argue, you used Sterling's last season performance against Madueke's 24/25.

What is not clear about this? It was a Maresca v Board argument, and you've someone managed to find a place for you to win in it.

Ibime:
You are wrong. A nigga that can bench Enzo can bench Sanchez anyday of the week

Lets not forget what he's done to Noni and Veiga also

I am sorry, but I don't see what I am wrong about.

popizaino:
The motion video even makes Jackson looks more amateur than the still image. Miss like this of Jackson is why i said these new generation of strikers cannot produce something out of nothing,unlike older strikers who can always produce something out of nothing.

Rooney in that position would have scored that goal in 3 different ways,either by toeing that ball straight into the net,like the one Eto scored against us at the bridge with inter Milan,or by quickly adjusting his body to just pass the ball into the net,or even controlling with his left leg and curl it into the other end.

Mind you i used Rooney as an example because he was also a supporting striker like Jackson.

If we bought Eto' or Rooney, I guarantee you, we will not be in doubt. Because we wouldn't have paid £30m.