₦airaland Forum

Mccullum:
If China, North Korea or Russia attack any one of the NATO member states, NATO wont confront the two countries directly due to the fear of nuclear warfare. They will only resort to economic war with bundles of sanctions

Joining NATO only assured that country protection against aggression from weak nations.

Russia has exposed this in Syria and Ukraine. This forced the West of fighting in proximity.

How do you even participate in any discussion with zero knowledge per the basics and the most elementary part of the discussion.?

cuteralph101:
one country against the world lol talk about guts

The real guts is small Ukraine taking on Russia, a so-called superpower, inflicting serious pain and loss, still fighting and till standing, that's real guts.

Xpress24:
is Ukraine a member of NATO?sometimes u ppl talk without reasoning

Like most Putin supporters, they don't know anything and it shows.

Referring to Ukrainian soldiers, he noted: "The desire to defend their motherland very much exists. Ultimate victory on the battlefield is determined by the high morale of troops who are spilling blood for the ideas they are ready to fight for.

The reason why Russia cannot defeat Ukraine, Putin picked the wrong enemy.

gambojimeta:
I hope this Baba won't dissapear after this interview.

Dem fit say he commited suicide now.

Or mysteriously poisoned.

Demolakay:
soo ur ignorance level did nt tell u dat durin wars,soldier's clear a smaller towns,to make path for logistics in other to launch unto a bigger prize? Russia wanted d donbass region,in oda to get dere,wont dey annex adjoining areas,nd use it as a launch pad to achieve deir goal? why am i even telling u sef,no lecture can cure ur ignorance.

So, just to achieve their Dunbass goal, they lost thousands of troops, thousands of military equipment including fighter jets, attack helicopters, drones, warships, 12 generals, 40 colonels and loss of prestige as a military power that can not defeat a small country with less military capacity like Ukraine?

Some of Putin's supporters are not doing him any favors because your posts make him look foolish and hopeless.

2loadedguy:
I am not even sure a lot of you understand the reason for Russia's war on Ukraine. It's just been termed Ukraine joining NATO as the reason but that's not Russia's reason. Russia's primary reason for the war is to liberate the Russian speaking territory of luhansk and dombass from Ukraine and probably Annex them and as at the last time I checked those territories are already occupied by the Russians. So please how has Russia lost the war? The same Putin just said he doesn't give a damn if Finland and Sweden joins NATO and that's not his business in as much as the territories are not harmed so how people twisted this war to be about joining NATO is still what I dont get.

Please, corroborate or show us the official reasons from the Kremlin to support your own fabricated reasons for invading Ukraine.

Is it no longer the De-Nazification of Ukraine?

subsidywise18:
It isn't .



Every country has the right to form security and other alliances the way they want to...Rossiya and the US of A included.

I don't remember saying they can not or are not allowed to and the last time I checked, it is Russia going berserk and fuming because other countries are joining their own preferred alliance and even foolishly going to war because of self-induced paranoia about other countries joining NATO.

Cubalabloo:
Are you aware that Turkey is also against Finland joining NATO?

Since all Putin's shakara against Finland and Sweden joining NATO don melt away after realizing that he can not do anything to stop both countries, your new hope and hero is the Turkish president who is just looking to score concessions here and there and will eventually greenlight both countries joining NATO.


After a few days when Turkey pipe down, I wonder what your next gyration go be?

Meanwhile, Putin joined his own version of NATO, a rag tag and inconsequential mix of Armenia and others to do pity party and console Putin in his time of loss and suffering...

This is very laughable.

Armenia, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan..

See rag tag and rif raf allies. Please, don't abuse the word supperpoer.

Russian don fall below zero..

Emoc:
Ukraine in ruins
That clown president destroyed his country for nothing.

You'd rather surrender your country, your people, your sovereignty and be enslaved.

Is it not better to go down fighting than surrendering and giving away your land and your future?

You can rebuild your country, but you cannot rebuild the one you surrendered or while you're a slave under another country.

Btw, Russia lost and Ukrainiane won because Russia didn't get to keep Ukraine, more countries will join NATO.

You should be telling us what Russia won.

Russia to the world right now is a weak country that could not defeat a small country next door, that's a huge loss.

How did Igbo people get to this lowly primitive and backward point?

And you wonder why the SE is so poor and jobless.

Belarus, Armenia, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan

See allies. Inconsequential and irrelevant 4th rate countries..

This is when you know that Russia don downgrade to embarrassing level. See life..

goslowgoslow:
Sovereign nations abi?
Why are other nations not bullying Russia for not being part of NATO?

Putin supporters are very funny sha.

Even Putin himself don back down, but his followers on NL are still doing agidi..

Russia is so weak now they couldn’t risk another humiliating defeat,” he said. If Russia were to attempt to send troops into Finland “in a couple of days they would be wiped out. The risk of humiliating defeat is high, and I don’t think they can take that.


https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2022/05/14/finland-russia-nato-ukraine-retaliation/

Finland is not playing with Putin..

AldrichAmes:
Well, that’s your village square uneducated understanding of what it’s going on.

If US and NATO think Russia can’t bite - they would’ve at least joined the war directly rather than keep sending billions of dollars in weapons. The US is always trigger happy to invade powerless countries and show its faux military might - why’s it hesitant this time and relying on propaganda war? Those at pentagon know better, lol.

I can list all US failures in Iraq and Afghanistan here and they’re more horrible than whatever Russia’s perceived failures in Ukraine are. And Russia is fighting a much more powerful country with endless access to billions of dollars worth of western weapons and the Russians are outnumbered by 3:1. American troops wouldn’t survive a month fighting the way Russian ground forces are fighting, trust me.

Russia isn’t even using its elite units in Ukraine apart from a BTG of VDV and SSO. The legendary 200 VDV paratroopers that captured Gostomel airport in Kiev and held it against 3 brigades of Ukrainian forces and hundreds of NATO special forces until other Russian troops arrived. And they never lost that airport and they all left voluntarily for Donbass. No unit in US military can pull that off and a lot of US vets on Twitter are still in awe of those guys.

Fear the Russian bear like Pentagon/NATO does, lol. Even without nuclear weapons (Russia can destroy all NATO countries in 30mins like the head of Russian space agency said) - NATO ground forces aren’t a match for Russian ground forces. The only advantage NATO has is with airforce. BTW, Russia captured 3 British SAS members two weeks ago around Dnipro and SAS are more elite than any special forces group in US military.

Leave the bear alone, lol.

NATO and the USA fear Russia, same Russia that small Ukraine is not scared of, the same Russia that small Ukrain is punching and slapping around like mumu.

Ukraine doesn't have a Navy, but they sank Russian ships with ease with their own locally made Neptin missiles like a superpower, they wasted 12 Putin generals like a superpower, they wasted40 colonels like a superpower, they destroyed countless Russian military hardware like a superpower, they blasted Putin back to his borders like a superpower...

.but it is NATO with the most modern military with the best military capacity in the history of man that is caring of weak Russia that is still struggling with a small country that doesn't even have one active fighter jet ii the air, no navy or any serious military hardware apart from MANPADS and drones..

Leave NATO alone, maybe we'll take you seriously when Putin is successful on the battlefield with small Ukrain that he can not even defeat.





Dude, your posts are so off base, so ridiculous and void of reality, I think you are just joking around and should never be taken seriously.

France says will defend Sweden, Finland against any attack amid Russian threats

https://www.google.com/amp/s/finance.yahoo.com/amphtml/news/france-defend-finland-sweden-against-180440510.html

Putin is seeing red...

colonelwealth:
Nobody is rubbishing Russia. Cuba& Venezuela for years defiled US&Allies with the help of Russia and nobody spoke about it.

Recently it was Assad of Syria(Small Syria) messed up the whole of NATO. They failed wholefully in Syria, all because Russia came in and changed the game.

This is the same thing NATO wants to do to Russia in Ukraine but Russia is the master of such game.

It will only take time but their goals they are achieving silently as they keep NATO guessing what their goals are, this is the reason why Russia never gave out their timeline for the military operation in Ukraine instead the western media created one for themselves.

Russia is so weak now they couldn’t risk another humiliating defeat,” he said. If Russia were to attempt to send troops into Finland “in a couple of days they would be wiped out. The risk of humiliating defeat is high, and I don’t think they can take that.

When a nation like Finland reached a conclusions and openly say to your face that you are so weak that if you send troops to Finland, they would wipe you out in a couple of days, you are totally being rubbished.

And I do believe that Finland and Sweden processes the capability and capacity to deal with Russia decisively, even better than Ukraine because they won't be begging NATO for fighter Jets and weapons because both countries have their own, they are formidable weapons manufacturers, Sweden's manufactured Gripen jets are better and more advanced than Russia's backward rubbish with GPS tapped on their dashboards like Abule jets that Ukrainians are shooting down left a right.

Btw, stop trying to divert by talking about Cuba or Syria, this is about Finland and Sweden and what's going on in that region.

Finns have also concluded that the Russian military’s unexpectedly dismal performance and setbacks on the battlefield in Ukraine suggest it no longer poses the threat it once did, Toveri said.

“Russia is so weak now they couldn’t risk another humiliating defeat,” he said. If Russia were to attempt to send troops into Finland “in a couple of days they would be wiped out. The risk of humiliating defeat is high, and I don’t think they can take that.


https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2022/05/14/finland-russia-nato-ukraine-retaliation/

See how Finland just rubbish Russia.

Demolakay:
And day same most powerful military alliance cannot invade a weak Russia, despite it contravening international laws by invading anoda country.All dey could do is covertly send weapons.Lets assume it's anoda country invading a sovereign state,will NATO look on ND just send weapons without putting deir foot on d ground? Russia is nt fighting a war in Ukraine,[b]if Russia want to destroy Ukraine ND take it,it won't take Dem a week,j[/b]ust apply d normal chemical ND biological weapons,ND d rest will b history.Or how did u tink d USA chase out d Taliban in Afghanistan, Killed Saddam Hussein in Libya,ND all Oda wars dey've been involved in,just by hand to hand combat?if Russia tried wat d USA did in Libya in Ukraine,d war won't last one week.pls go do ur research.

Is there any reason for the West to invade Russia when in fact Russia could be easily destroyed pain free without confrontation or firing a single bullet?

War is not always about gra gra and boasting, the lesson is playing out as we speak on the battlefield, Russia can not defeat Ukraine, but you still want us to believe they can destroy Ukraine in a week, something that they can not even achieve after destroying towns and cities who to me is madness and frustration, not military strategy.

Ukraine is at the Russian border as we speak, Russian prized warship is at the bottom of the black sea, 12 generals are dead, 40 colonels are dead, countless military hardware including tanks, jets, helicopters, command and control structures are destroyed and so on so when is Russia going to destroy Ukraine?

Small country like Ukraine shouldn't be inflicting so much pain and damage on a supposedly called superpower.

So you want us to give Russia another week to achieve that objective?

goodheart01:
This statement reeks of foolishness

I see a lot of them in this thread..

As we speak, Ukraine is at the Russian border.

Small Ukraine beat Russian back to the Russian border.

The hunter is now the hunted.

See life..

Demolakay:
.All Russia needs to do now,is to court other countries too,ND collaborate.Nato is no threat, Russia is d threat to NATO,dat was d main reason d organization was founded in d first place.

A weak Russia that can not defeat small Ukraine is a threat to the largest and the most powerful military alliance in the world?

Must be sarcasm..

Demolakay:
U mean d same countries joining a league of nations,for protection can actually defeat Russia.And to think,if NATO ND Russia fights now,it will b just lyk dat? Russia will damn any consequences ND fight dirty,ND definitely will receive allies support too,it's definitely gonna b d end of d world.All d NATO countries tgeda are nt bigger Dan Russia.A nuclear bomb can clear almost all of Dem.All Russia needs to do now,is to court other countries too,ND collaborate.Nato is no threat, Russia is d threat to NATO,dat was d main reason d organization was founded in d first place.

Using nuclear weapons means you and your people won't survive so it's actually not fighting dirty, it's fighting foolish and suicidal.

Stop this talk about Nuclear weapons, Putin can not and will not use it.

Instead of admitting that Russian is weak especially the fact that the so called superpower can not defeat a small country next door, Putin fans don't want to confront that reality and Putin failure, now they shifted the goal post to nuclear weapons that he can not even touch.

Russia is a weak country that can not defeat a small country that didn't have any strong military or serious weapons before the war.

Face the truth.

kingthreat:
You keep underestimating Russia. Well it is what the media tells you, you believe.

No, the world overestimated Russia as a strong military power, but Ukraine exposed Russia as not only weak, but also can not fight smart, modern, and strategic warfare and that the Russian troops are poorly trained, poorly equiped and badly demoralized.

Yes, the world overestimated Russia, but thanks to Ukraine for showing the world the real truth about Russia.

Finland and Sweden are already NATO partner countries, meaning they are NATO members, but not formally which is about to change, they coordinate their policies, ideas, and values, they give each other weapons and intel and conduct military training together with NATO for decades.

Finland and Sweden are not Ukraine, they are very rich and powerful, they have robust military infrastructures and they've been preparing for Russia for decades.

These countries won't be begging NATO for planes and military gadgets like Ukrain because they have their own ready to go, they won't be begging NATO for fighter jets, because Sweden is the maker of the powerful Gripen Fighter jets, and the fact that Sweden and Finland already have security guarantees from the US and the UK means Putin can not mess with them.

Putin might just want to take his losses and not suffer more embarrassment with another fruitless adventure with more powerful and militarily p and politically prepared countries.

LKTJ123:
America should remember that Russia has more nukes than the whole of nato

They don't need more than 100 Nukes to destroy each other, stop focusing on numbers. Putin and Russians can not survive any Nuclear war unless he himself and Russians are ready to die.

He can not even use it in Ukraine because the radiation will kill Russians too.

wink2015:
I do not think Russia will allow American war ship in the Baltic sea.

Any small attack right in there at the doorsteps of Russia will lead to conflict.

American and NATO warships enter and train in the Baltic sea all the time. 2 US Navy destroyers entered the baltic sea last March and Russia did not and couldn't even do anything.

noisy45:
Oga Putin has said that he won't have that time to amass troops to face nato but that he would just use nuclear weapon straight even before nato will have meeting to attack Russia

Kids.

But it is highly likely that Finland’s membership won’t require a significant NATO troop presence, analysts say. Finland has a robust and well-equipped army that has conducted regular training exercises with NATO countries. Its military is already well integrated with NATO military systems.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2022/05/14/finland-russia-nato-ukraine-retaliation/

Finland and Sweden are already NATO partner countries, meaning they are NATO members, but not formally which is about to change, they coordinate their policies, ideas, and values, they give each other weapons and intel and conduct military training together with NATO for decades.

Finland and Sweden are not Ukraine, they are very rich and powerful, they have robust military infrastructures and they've been preparing for Russia for decades.

These countries won't be begging NATO for planes and military gadgets like Ukrain because they have their own ready to go, they won't be begging NATO for fighter jets, because Sweden is the maker of the powerful Gripen Fighter jets, and the fact Sweden and Finland already have security guarantees from the US and the UK means Putin can not mess with them.

Putin might just want to take his losses and not suffer more embarrassment with another fruitless adventure with more powerful and militarily p and politically prepared countries.