₦airaland Forum

Rebuttal from someone who's not a buhari groupie
1. You know, Buhari could easily snap his finger and before you know what hit you Ocholi is bo longer minister. That's how easy it could have been to remove him from his position.
2. Yo need to provide a proof of Ocholi's refusal to accompany the president to Saudi Arabia. And you need to remember who is serving who. He's a minister in Buhari's cabinet not the other way round.
Reminder
General Patrick Azazi during the tenure of a past Nigerian President told the world that Boko Haram and the overwhelming state of insecurity in Nigeria is a product of PDP’s infighting and struggle for power. Shortly after that pronouncement he was removed from office and eventually died under questionable circumstances together with a Kaduna State Governor at the time Patrick Yakowa when a naval helicopter in which they were travelling crashed and burst into flames (or burst into flames and crashed). I'm not saying the timing of their deaths isn't a coincidence but its not a coincidence we can just ignore.

Why do I have a feeling you are a madrid fan?

Android apps still run on the bb10 devices so you can still get an apk of watsapp installed on your BB

Un-believable

Amberon:
I will humbly prefer to see the man of God for fresh anointing. Money isn't everything.

We all wish that money isn't everything surprisingly the ones who often use the phrase "money isn't everything" are either very poor or extremely rich. You could rephrase and say "money is not the most important thing in life" but even then...I'd just be wayyyyy happier and feel closer to my Creator with the 5million

Another Nigerian mystery

It ceased to be your pet when it died. Now its just another dead animal

Cassava also contains Cyanide

The owner of this post just hit the nail right on the head. Far north here in Kano is the same thing. Its too erratic and fluctuations are just more than an average Nigerian can tolerate. Worst part is they aren't saying or doing anything about it.

Sweetrolly:
LOOK HOW THESE CHURCH FREAKS ARE BEEN DECEIVED WITH FAKE AND ARRANGED MIRACLES....SO THEY WANT TO TELL ME THEY SAW A MAD MAN COMING INSIDE THEIR CHURCH AND THEY BROUGHT OUT CAMERAS AND PHONES AND STARTED TAKING HIS PICTURES AND LATER CURED HIM AND SHARED HIS PICTURES ""BEFORE AND AFTER"""....I HEAR

Enough wisdom said, thank you Sir

KINGwax007:
if u dnt understand what madness is, u can shut up your mouth. Madness is just one of many mental disorders and walking in rags never made u mad. not yet.

besides, trying to defend that a picture led someone to be healed is madness in its own entirety!

Thank you kind Sir!

"In the past, whenever they see me come outside they run into their house and shut the door"
What have we done to deserve this trolling from you with really bad, uncreative and unimaginative stories.
The act of story telling be it fiction or nonfiction is a gift and you lady do not poses it.

"Its the labor of our heroes past shall never be in vain" you don't just cherry pick a couple of leaders names and make generalization and conclude. Be happy you are in Nigeria we all know there have been past leadership that were really bad and neglected development in general.

If I was a lady and living in abuja I might not be too enthusiastic about meeting you. With the kidnappings, killings, disembowelments and mutilations happening on daily basis I would really thin twice.
But then again I'm not a lady and I'm not living in abuja

kaybee88:
Name one A-list artiste that doesn't jack ideas

Thank you kind Sir

knightsTempler:
Why do i have the feeling that both of you are the same person?

Btw op, where in Ethiopia are you from? I mean are you amara, tigre, Oromo or walaita? Do you actually live in Ethiopia? If yes, where?

Case solved!

There is no advice for people like that. Carry on you good Sir. You are what is wrong with this country, quit a legitimate means of livelihood and opt for "making a living" by cheating, dishonesty, trickery, deceit and fraud.

Run Like Hell if you love your A hole and keep what's left of your dignity! RLH. She's tryin to insert just 1 finger, who knows what she might try to introduce into your hole next?
PS...she's already succeeded. You are no longer a virgin

There are some in Kura Local Government and a new one at Dawanau market (Largest grain market in West Africa) all in Kano state

Siberian huskies are my favorite specie of dogs man. Really nice

Yeah you can, all you need is the luck. I wish you do get it to further prove its not about what one graduates with.

Save us the stress and save yourself the embarrassment. You probably don't look as good as you think.

I am of the opinion that ladies in general shouldn't be hit even with a flower or a bouquet of flowers.
But then again it will depend on why she slapped you, how she slapped you, where she slapped you and in who's presence the slapping act takes place.

It is also imperative to understand without any
qualms or hesitation, that the Prophet (sall
Allāhualayhi wasallam) married ‘Ā’isha
(radiAllāhu anha) when she was 6 years old, and
they consummated the marriage when she
reached puberty at the age of 9. [2] This is the
only explicit piece of evidence that has directly
identified the age of ‘Ā’isha (radiAllāhu anha)
when she married the Prophet (sall Allāhualayhi
wasallam). On the other hand, the reports that
suggest she was older are implicit, and derived
from very tenuous assumptions based on events that occurred during her life. [3]
With this in mind, many academics have
successfully refuted the allegation of paedophilia against the Prophet (sall Allāhualayhi wasallam) using evidences that clearly disassociate him from such a label . However, this has led to a further onslaught of similar claims against him that have repeatedly been refuted by Muslims and non-Muslims alike , illustrating that a clear agenda exists to defame the Prophet even though his accusers are well aware that the slanderous claims they attribute to him are false. This is supported by the primitive nature of these allegations because their single objective is not to prove that he is guilty, but rather to tar his name with these iniquitous ideas, thus attempting to create
hatred in the hearts and minds of society
towards the religion he founded. Therefore, it is
felt that disproving this false charge using evidence will produce nothing but a never-
ending cycle of accusations that will only end
once the antagonists have achieved their
objectives. Thus, to prove that the Prophet is
free from the allegations he is accused of, the
claims brought forward by Western polemics will be refuted based on the very same standards that the Western world have used to measure their own moral behaviour, and thus prove that their opposition to the Prophet is steeped in hypocrisy.
Firstly, Islamaphobes judge the actions of the
Prophet using a moral compass that is only
applicable to modern society. In order to justify
their Islamophobic sentiments, they seek to
impose moral judgments that are only relevant
in the present, on practices that occurred 1400
years ago, where rules and cultural norms were
different to the norms and customs of today.
This is something that anthropologists who
study cultural phenomena warn against,
because it is unacceptable to judge previous
cultures and civilisations based on modern
standards of living. Instead, a society and people must be judged by the rules and cultural norms that existed in their era. Therefore, if marriage to a 9 year old was a normative practice throughout various civilisations over 14
centuries ago, then it is just as valid as current
legislation in the UK, which states that people
cannot be married until they reach the age of 16.
Secondly, it is interesting to note that these
accusations against the Prophet were only
brought forward during the last century. Before
1905, no such claims against the Prophet existed and were only introduced and popularised by David Margoliouth, a British historian who was affiliated with the Zionist movement. This was because 100 years ago in many countries around the world (including the USA), the general age of consent for marriage was 10 years old, and in one state it was even lower at 7 years old. Thus, by using the moral index of the West, it appears that the Prophet is free from the accusations that are levelled against him because the very nations that accuse him of despicable crimes 1400 years ago, allowed the same acts to take place within their own societies only 100 years ago. This has clearly exposed the double standards that exist in Western society and shown how certain
individuals have purposely tried to damage the
reputation of the Prophet for the sole reason of
achieving their aims and objectives.
So the question remains, why have certain
individuals in the West remained silent about
non-Muslims who married prepubescent girls
between the ages of 7 and 10, but have chosen
to single out the Prophet (sall Allāhualayhi
wasallam) in their attacks? It is because these
attacks have been used to push public opinion
against Islām and thus given certain figures in
the West the opportunity to achieve their
political objectives.
To further prove their hypocrisy, Islamaphobes
fail to mention that in the US, the current
minimum legal age for marriage in New
Hampshire is 13. Where is the grievance
there? The same modern rules by which
Islamaphobes seek to judge the practices of
seventh century Arabia dictate that children
should be a lot older and mature before they can be given the choice to marry. So why does the
charge of paedophilia not enter the discussion
when individuals marry children at the age of 13
today in the state of New Hampshire? In fact,
why is the state law system not put under the
same scrutiny for not stipulating—as Islām does
—that puberty is a condition for consummation
of marriage? This is another example of the
hypocrisy that exists in individuals who attack
Islām because they pick and choose what they
publicise. Will accusations of paedophilia be
leveled at individuals who openly practice
marriage with 13-year-old children, who may not have reached puberty yet, or are these attacks only limited to Islām and the Prophet?
To further outline the hypocrisy of individuals
who accuse the Prophet of paedophilia, they
conveniently choose to ignore cases where
central figures of other religions married
children under the age of 12. For example, those who contest the Prophet’s marriage to ‘Ā’isha have never mentioned that the last of the ten saints in Sikhism, Guru Gobind Singh, married a 12-year-old girl called Mata Sundari. Now unlike with ‘Ā’isha, it was never established
whether Mata Sundari reached puberty before
she consummated her marriage with Guru
Gobind Singh. Also, it is well known that from
the Christian understanding, Mary married
Joseph when she was between the age of 12-14
and Joseph was 90. Why is this fact left out
during debates about underage marriage in
religions? Furthermore, according to Judaic
traditions, 3-year-old prepubescent girls were
forced to have sex with men under the guise of
Mosaic Law. However, under Islamic
traditions, such claims against Prophet Mūsa
(alayhi salām) are completely rejected and are
falsely attributed to him by the corruption of
other faiths. Additionally, Jewish law states that
the age of consent for girls to marry is 12,
regardless of whether they have reached
puberty or not. Yet we find that Islām and
the Prophet have been slandered for a practice
that carefully considered the rights of females
when it was undertaken. The fact that these
individuals conveniently overlook the above-
mentioned issues proves that their accusations
are fuelled not by a moral opposition to the
Prophet’s (sall Allāhualayhi wasallam) marriage
to ‘Ā’isha, but by a dislike for Islām and its
Prophet, as well as the need to achieve their
political objectives.
These facts have clearly exposed the hypocrisy
of those who attack the Prophet for marrying
‘Ā’isha because while they have opted to vilify a
man who married a young girl in accordance
with the biological and social framework of his
time, they have voiced no concerns or
disagreements regarding practices that existed
in other major traditions. Additionally, the height
of their hypocrisy is palpable in their silence on
clear-cut examples of paedophilia that are being
practiced around the world and in Western
countries today. Therefore, before such people
make false accusations against the Prophet, it
would be far more appropriate for them to
address the problems that exist in their own
cultures first. They may benefit from pondering
over the clearly more sensible conditions of
biological and psychological maturity that Islām
requires for marital relations to occur, compared
to the plucking of an arbitrary minimum age out
of the air for many societies today. In doing so,
Islām—uniquely—prevents harm to pre-
pubescent children as well as the plethora of
societal ills that result when human beings are
prevented from fulfilling their biological needs in
a safe and honourable way, when the minimum
age is too high for an individual.
Thus, it is not difficult to see that the basic
premise of the attack against the Prophet is a
flawed one, as it is illogical to apply the
incidental tastes and moral standards of today
to seventh century Arabia. It has clearly been
proven that the disparaging claims directed at
the Prophet are false because they are built on
unconvincing and dubious foundations, in order
to suppress the increasing support and growth
of Islām that the world has witnessed during the
last century. The aspersions cast against the
Prophet are borne out of hypocrisy and double
standards because the very nations that first
created and spread the accusations allowed the
same practices to take place in their own
societies just over a century ago. Moreover, the
paedophilic crimes that have taken place within
other religions are not criticised but are met with
silence, which not only forces one to question
the intentions behind the attacks against the
Prophet, but also frees him from the accusations
that are levelled against him for his marriage to
‘Ā’isha. Therefore, since these accusations only
surfaced a century ago, it is no exaggeration to
say that they were and still are, fuelled by a
desire to tarnish the name of the Prophet (sall
Allāhualayhi wasallam), and to promote the
personal and political agendas of those who
fabricated them.
source: www.islam21c.com

JohnieWalker:
academic 2.1....wasn't economic status cos I did my best as a bf

A woman's mind is a mystery my brother

Kings 11:3
1.But king Solomon loved many strange women, together with the daughter of Pharaoh, women of the Moabites, Ammonites, Edomites, Zidonians, [and] Hittites;
2.Of the nations [concerning] which the LORD said unto the children of Israel, Ye shall not go in to them, neither shall they come in unto you: [for] surely they will turn away your heart after their gods: Solomon clave unto these in love.
3.And he had seven hundred wives, princesses, and three hundred concubines: and his wives turned away his heart.

You just gave her half of the money she so desperately needs so she's just reciprocation in kind. I suggest you invite and give her the D when you're completing the money.
NB pls stop asking stupid and necessary Q's

I really don't believe this story. Are you sure its because of your grade or your economic status? Is the guy with the 2.1 really an academic 2.1 or an economic 2.1?

We can all try to be this Jimoke lady but as you rightly said its providence. It was totally random, a chance an act of luck. There are millions of bread sellers some who are even more good looking, nicer and more articulate in the art and trade of bread selling but as fate would have it, Jimoke was the one to reach there first. There are even bread and confectionery bakery owners who haven't had such providence You can try your best its not just going to be good enough without luck.