Ositadima1's Posts
Nairaland Forum › Ositadima1's Profile › Ositadima1's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 (of 179 pages)
awesomeJ:Sorry, but you need to calm down and think rationally. The Middle East is not one country, there are Palestinians, Iraqis, Iranians, Syrians, Lebanese, and others. It is not one continuous people. This conflict originally involved Palestine and Israel, but due to long-standing relationships over hundreds of years, other countries have intervened. In the same way, if a country were to attack Italy, much of Europe would likely intervene. Do you need any further explanation? |
mikeapollo:No, they don’t want Israel destroyed, there is no clear indication of that. Hamas and Hezbollah are fighting for their people and land, which Israel continues to occupy. They cannot engage in full-scale war because Palestine lacks strong backing, so they resort to guerrilla tactics. Hamas and Hezbollah are not Iranian; Iran supports them with weapons. It’s similar to helping a younger sibling who is in a fight, nothing unusual about that. All this talk of destroying Israel is largely a result of ongoing exchanges. There is nothing inherently special about Israel. If Nigeria were in that position and had taken land in the same way, they would still have fought Nigeria. There is nothing uniquely special about Jews, my friend. |
mikeapollo:No, they were not living on the land, those lands were predominantly Palestinian. We’ve discussed this before: Israelites were dispersed a long time ago, and other people settled there, so the land does not necessarily belong to Israel or to Jews. Similarly, even in the Bible, before the Jews took that land by force, other people were living there. So technically, there is no direct link. You have to respect those who were there when you return or fight. Another issue is that you repeat things without asking why. Why was Israel attacked? Can your neighbors attack you for no reason? Your idea that U.S. support for Israel is equivalent to China supporting Iran doesn’t fully hold. If Iran and Palestine had received support from China and Russia in 1948, perhaps we would be looking at a very different Middle East today. |
awesomeJ:That may look terrible, but it is part of war, not necessarily by Iran. It is a form of guerrilla warfare: if you don’t have advanced aircraft, you fight with what you have, which often involves surprise attacks. Did you take the time to read how Israel was treating Palestinians in the occupied territories before October 7, or does your knowledge start there? Palestinians in their own land were treated in ways many compare to apartheid. Everything you’re seeing is action and reaction that dates back to after the Second World War. But if you only follow Western media without critical analysis, you won’t understand much. |
Streetinvestor2:I asked him a question to understand Michael’s point of view. It’s clear he is repeating things without understanding them. Now, I can explain why there is friction between Iran and Israel, I’ve actually addressed this before. After World War II, people who identified as Jews, mostly in Germany and other parts of the world, were compensated by the British and the U.S., the war’s victors. Part of that compensation involved establishing a country for them in the Middle East. After that, Israel began to expand, which contributed to the issues we still see today. With the support of the U.S., Israel has, over the years, taken more land from Palestinians and parts of Lebanon. In the last 20 to 30 years, America has had little choice but to side with Israel due to powerful Israeli lobbying organizations like AIPAC, which to a large extent influence who gets elected. |
mikeapollo:Okay, you don’t have answers... My advice still stands: do your homework, don’t just echo whatever you hear. Ask questions, seek truth and logic. Thank you. |
mikeapollo:Let’s assume your claims are true, then why? Why would the Ayatollah want to wipe out Israel? You need to calm down and think; I believe that’s far better than regurgitating others’ opinions. Why would Iran want to destroy the Jews when Jews are also a group within Iran? Or did you not know that? There are Iranian Jews; in fact, one of their synagogues in Tehran was hit and destroyed by an Israeli airstrike a few days ago. So, why? Learn to think for yourself and filter what you read and hear, it’s a useful skill. |
Streetinvestor2: ;So this is the basis of your argument? Wow, no need. |
olaremint:The reason Iran has struggled to develop is largely due to sanctions imposed by the U.S. The petrodollar system is very powerful, it gives the U.S. significant influence over global money flows and the ability to pressure weaker countries. If you refuse to play along, you risk being cut off from the global economy. Even so, Iran is still more developed than Nigeria. We graduate thousands of engineers every year, yet as a nation we struggle to translate that into meaningful technological progress. With the gradual decline of the petrodollar system and U.S. influence, it will be interesting to see how things unfold in the coming years. |
stcool:What about the damage done to the USA? The petrodollar concept that has helped the U.S. fund its development for almost 50 years is coming to an end. The dollar-for-crude system has been cracked open. It was already happening gradually, with Russia and China increasingly buying and selling crude in non-dollar currencies, and this Iran war will only accelerate that shift. Regarding Iranian infrastructure, don’t worry, China and Russia are there. Iran will likely rebuild faster than you expect. It has oil (and therefore money) and powerful allies. At the end of the day, they have kept their uranium and still retain the freedom to pursue their missile capabilities. If there was division before, this war may have helped unify the country. You should be asking: what has the U.S. actually gained from this campaign? Netanyahu will likely be dissatisfied, as his objective appears to have been the complete destruction of Iran to secure uncontested power in the Middle East. If I were Iran, I would quickly restock from China and Russia, especially anti-missile systems and air defenses, because Netanyahu could return with another justification for an attack. |
EDUECO:Stop arguing with people who clearly have no idea what’s going on. Ask Street to explain what this war is about, and you’ll be surprised by how little he actually understands. It’s the same issue as always, people take sides based on emotions rather than a clear grasp of the situation. For those who think critically and genuinely seek the truth, the U.S. will not be the same internationally after this war. Trump will face his downfall sooner rather than later. That’s my prediction, take note. I’m not here to fight or argue with anyone. This is simply my view. If you disagree, make your own prediction and let time decide. |
People who made money in Ellah Lakes have made money; those who lost, lost and the rest can keep wailing. Not everyone has to be an investor. It’s perfectly legal to trade any stock on the NGX. And to a large extent, it is the duty of the NGX to protect investors. I traded Ellah Lakes from 3 up to between 6 and 8, then decided to exit while waiting for further justification. Trading is about buying and selling at a higher price while managing risk, I’ve said this before. ![]() |
Streetinvestor2:It sounds like you get your news from a beer parlor. I don’t have time to educate you individually. Take the time to study, or remain ignorant, that’s your choice. |
What is driving the U.S. is hubris, the sense of invincibility that will be badly punctured. ![]() |
GeeKudi:Lol, how exactly do you intend to get that done? Iran’s terrain alone is a massive advantage, and that’s before even considering the fact that they’ve been preparing for this scenario for years. The U.S. would suffer heavy casualties if it pursued a ground invasion, and it still will not win the war. Anyway, you’ll understand when it starts unfolding. |
![]() Lol, |
awesomeJ:Ok nah, kwantinue. You nah big genius. |
awesomeJ:That edge will be quickly eroded once others catch on to what you’re doing (Have been eating from it too in the last few months). This strategy won’t last long if you keep exposing it, buying from impatient sellers and flipping for small profits. You should already be planning your next strategy, because at this rate, you’ll soon be sharing those returns with a wave of new entrants, some of whom may be even smarter and more resourceful than you. You dey make money, enjoy your money na, make the thing no cast. ![]() |
... |
Teenaira: ![]() |
chimex38:Let me understand, are you asking for handouts? In the Bible, Jacob was born in Canaan (specifically in the south, near Beersheba). However, his family were considered “resident aliens” or migrants. 1. His grandfather (Abraham): was an immigrant from Iraq (Ur). 2. His mother (Rebekah): was from Syria/Mesopotamia (Padan-Aram). 3. Jacob himself: spent 20 years living in Syria, married two Syrian women, and had almost all his children there before returning to Canaan. So, while he was born on the land, the Bible consistently describes his family as “sojourners”, people living in a land that belonged to others (the Canaanites). |
Hahahaha. The matter tire ooo. |
The question of where the Israelites—and by extension, the Jewish people—originally came from is a point where the Bible, Archaeology, and Genetics offer slightly different, but overlapping, stories. If the Jebusites and other Canaanite groups were the "original" inhabitants of Jerusalem, here is the breakdown of the three main theories on the Israelite origin: 1. The Biblical Account (Mesopotamia & Egypt) According to the Torah (the first five books of the Bible), the Israelites were not "indigenous" to the land of Canaan but were a family that migrated there. * The Patriarch (Abraham): The Bible states Abraham came from Ur of the Chaldeans (modern-day Iraq/Mesopotamia). He migrated to Canaan as a nomad. * The Sojourn (Egypt): His descendants later migrated to Egypt to escape a famine. * The Exodus: Under Moses, they left Egypt and spent 40 years in the desert before "conquering" the land of Canaan from the tribes already living there (the Canaanites, Jebusites, Hittites, etc.). 2. The Archaeological Perspective (Internal Evolution) Modern archaeology tells a different story that challenges the "conquest" narrative. Most archaeologists today believe that the Israelites were actually a subgroup of Canaanites who broke away from the main population. * The "Highland" Settlement: Around 1200 BCE, new, simple villages began appearing in the rocky central highlands (the area around the West Bank). * Distinct Culture: These people looked like Canaanites, spoke a Canaanite dialect (Hebrew), and used Canaanite tools. However, they stopped eating pork and stopped worshipping the full pantheon of Canaanite gods (like Baal), focusing instead on a single deity. * The Theory: Rather than an "invasion" from Egypt, many scholars believe the Israelites were oppressed Canaanite peasants or nomadic herders who fled the wealthy, corrupt city-states on the coast to start their own egalitarian society in the hills. 3. The Genetic Perspective (Common Roots) DNA studies conducted on both modern Jews and modern Palestinians show a fascinating result: Both groups share a massive amount of DNA with the ancient Bronze Age Canaanites. * The Reality: This proves that the "different groups" you mentioned earlier—who inhabited the land after the Roman exile—were often the same people, just under different names, religions (Christianity, then Islam), and languages (Aramaic, then Arabic). * The Split: Genetically, the ancestors of the Jews and the ancestors of the Palestinians were largely the same people living in the Levant thousands of years ago. One group eventually identified as "Israelite," while others remained and eventually became the modern Arab population of the region. |
chimex38:Let me shock you a little: the biblical narrative is very clear that Jerusalem was a city belonging to another people group, the Jebusites, long before the Israelites arrived. The Israelites came from elsewhere and surrounded Jerusalem, capturing it under King David around 1000 BCE. So even the Bible clearly shows that Jerusalem and its surroundings were acquired through conquest. Please, no insults, check your Bible. |
chimex38:It is not about documentation. We know for a fact that the Cherokee were the natives of the USA, but they haVe no backing. The Jews, because of Germany, and also because Germany lost to Britain, were favored, and many of them are Europeans. So the Bible is just a side story used to appeal to religious people. I know that, as a Christian, it can soften your heart. |
mikeapollo:No, you are wrong. Go and check again. The Romans expelled them and even banned them from entering Jerusalem and its surroundings. Many of them were killed at the time. The Jewish return is relatively recent. Please do your research. |
mikeapollo:Your problem is that you just want to prove me wrong for the sake of it, nothing more. You have access to data and the internet on your phone, and I assume you have the same level of critical thinking as I do (maybe more). Do your homework. Let me clarify this one more time. Prior to the UN plan, some Jews had already begun returning to those lands. Many of them bought land from Arabs who were living there at the time. So yes, Jews were initially welcomed. Then the UN, which you could argue was influenced by Britain, the USA, and Europe, decided to compensate Jews for the Holocaust carried out by Germany against Jews, and proposed a two-state solution. But that land was already inhabited by other people. What do you think those people would naturally do? What would you have done if your forefathers had lived on that land for generations, and now outsiders came and started telling you a different story? Once again, you have the same resources as I do. Do your research. |
"This conflict is fundamentally a clash between two competing national movements, Jewish nationalism (Zionism) and Palestinian nationalism, both claiming the same land. It developed through four key stages: In the late 1800s, both groups formed national identities and sought control of the land. During World War I, Britain made conflicting promises to both Jews and Arabs about the future of the region. Increased Jewish immigration in the early 20th century led to rising tensions, as Palestinians saw it as a takeover, while Jews saw it as a return and refuge. In 1947, a UN plan to split the land was accepted by Jewish leaders but rejected by Arab leaders, leading to the 1948 war, mass Palestinian displacement, and the creation of Israel without a Palestinian state. At its core, the conflict is a struggle between two claims to self-determination over the same territory." |
PropTrader:No, don’t portray Israel as if it is on the receiving end, that is not the case at all. My stance is this: the Jews were dispersed by the Romans during the Roman Empire because they were not subservient. After that, other people, also originally from the region but from different groups, inhabited the land. The USA and the UK reinstated Israel by force to compensate for the Holocaust. Then Israel began claiming more land, and with the support of the USA and the UK, it captured additional territory. Ask yourself: why is part of it called the “occupied West Bank”? |
mikeapollo:It’s like you just want to argue for argument’s sake. Some people were forced out 2,000 years ago, and others replaced them, which is natural, so where exactly are they supposed to come back to? Australia is not originally White; the real natives are Aboriginal people, who were suppressed by the British. Does it make sense to forcefully remove present-day Australians, who are mostly of British descent, to make way for Aboriginal people? Or does it make sense to remove present-day Americans because Native Americans lived there before? Please be impartial in your judgment. |
mikeapollo:No, it doesn’t. You were dispersed, you lost your land, and other people took it and lived there for thousands of years. The land does not belong to you, but to the people currently living there. By the same logic, Native Americans lived in what is now the United States, and Europeans, especially the British, fought and killed many of them. Should current americans, then, be removed from the USA according to your reasoning? |
?



