Ositadima1's Posts
Nairaland Forum › Ositadima1's Profile › Ositadima1's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 (of 179 pages)
The funny thing is that Arab nations initially accepted the return of the Jews, but then Israel began expanding beyond the land that was allocated to it. Because it had the backing of Britain and the United States, it was able to capture more territory and displace the people living there, the Palestinians. Why, then, would you expect there to be peace? Not only that, Israel and the United States have been influencing Arab and Persian states in ways that have limited their military strength. This is one reason we see various groups engaging in guerrilla warfare against Israel. Israel seeks greater control in the Middle East to influence regional outcomes. This is why Iran is being targeted, and some argue that if Iran is weakened, countries like Turkey could be next, there are already statements from some Israeli leaders portraying Turkey as an even greater concern than Iran. At its core, this conflict is about power and control, not what it is often presented to be. |
mikeapollo:Let me tell you what happened, I hope you learn something today. 1. The Great Revolt (66–73 CE) Cause: Rebellion against Roman taxation and religious interference. Key Event: The Siege of Jerusalem (70 CE), led by the future Emperor Titus. Outcome: Destruction of the Second Temple; thousands were killed or enslaved. Legacy: Initiated the first major wave of the Jewish diaspora. 2. The Bar Kokhba Revolt (132–136 CE) Leader: Simon bar Kokhba, who briefly established an independent state. (Not Ireal to be clear) Roman Response: Emperor Hadrian launched a campaign of total suppression. Casualties: Approximately 580,000 Jews were killed, and about 1,000 villages were destroyed. Rebranding: Hadrian renamed the province Syria Palaestina (after the Philistines) and banned Jews from Jerusalem to sever their connection to the land. Since then, they dispersed and integrated across different parts of the world. Don’t be surprised that some of them are in places like Iran. Egypt, however, was never similarly dispersed; it has consistently been the land of the Egyptians, with a history going back more than 6,000 years. |
SonofElElyonRet:So Jews were dispersed for 2,000 years, and now the people who have lived there during that time are expected to become occupied and controlled because some people claim to be descendants of Jews. I don’t see how that logic is justified. In fact, many, arguably the majority, are not originally Jewish but are Europeans who later adopted the religion. Moreover, there was never a nation of Israel at any time before 1948, check this fact carefully. Jerusalem and its surroundings were not home to Israelites alone; check your Bible again. If that is the case, then Americans, both Black and White, should also be forcefully removed, since thousands of years ago, America was home to Native Americans. Have you heard of the Aztec civilization? These were among the original peoples of lands now called the USA, yet I don’t see you arguing in their favor after Europeans decimated them. Why does this argument apply to Jews but not to Native Americans? |
mikeapollo:But there was no state of Israel before the 1940s, you can confirm this. Israel as a country was established in 1948. One could even argue that Nigeria, as a country, is older. This is a fact you can verify. In all your long writing, you never mentioned why there was no Jewish state prior to the 1940s In fact, there were no Jews living in those lands. They came from all over the world; this shows a gap in your knowledge. Why don’t you calm down and do some research, or ask me respectfully so I can explain it to you? |
Valthegreat:Actually, there are several hard-line Islamic countries that possess nuclear weapons. For example, Pakistan, India’s long-standing rival due to the Kashmir conflict, has them, yet we have not seen them used. Iran is not an Arab country; it is overwhelmingly Persian. Even if Iran had nuclear weapons, they would likely be among the last to use them. If you are following the conflict, most of Iran’s actions can be seen as counter-moves. Let’s hope the United States does not nook them, because that risk appears to be increasing. It is contradictory to accuse a country of pursuing something you already possess, if it is truly unacceptable, why keep it in your own arsenal? Much of the current tension exists because Iran does not yet have nuclear weapons. In my view, Iran is likely to become a nuclear state soon. |
The problem in the Middle East can be traced back to the 1940s, after the Second World War, when the state of Isrãēl was created, and the subsequent acquisition of more land using the Bible as a pretext. |
Valthegreat:The USA has also sponsored terrorist groups it considered useful for achieving its objectives by providing arms, funding, and training. Let me give you a few examples, there are more subtle ones, but you can start your research with these: 1. The Afghan Mujahideen (1979–1989) 2. The Contras in Nicaragua (1980s) 3. Cuban exile groups (1960s–1970s) 4. Syrian rebels and “Timber Sycamore” (2012–2017) Let’s not even get into the countries where governments were overthrown for being anti-West. I always say this: don’t hold strong opinions about any subject, including trading, without digging deep into it first. |
Valthegreat:This is not true. Iran was attacked first for political reasons. In fact, the U.S. has no clear, universally agreed justification for doing so. The U.S. has largely contributed to the current fuel crisis affecting the world, not Iran. If you don’t understand the mechanics of the conflict, ask questions or read more to gain a clearer perspective. |
Itzlinda:Lol, it’s like you’re new here. Anyone who followed Agba since 2022 would not have bought anything. Haven’t you heard about his Ichimoku Cloud or how he kept insisting that GTCO would return to 20 naira even while it was rallying? Even till today, just read his posts, when he’s not joking about something, the next thing is a market crash. |
pluto09:I don't know about that, but I am very sure of his incessant claims about a bear market and market collapse since 2022. His posts are here, I’m not making anything up, and I can quote them. Ever since 2022. Maybe you are his broker, so I wouldn’t doubt you. I’m simply basing my opinion on what is publicly available. |
mikeapollo:Lol, this must be a joke. How the heck do you know he is down? Or are you listening to content creators? Half of them just come here to crack jokes and leave. If anyone is likely to lose big money, it would be Mankind with his pattern of investing. Loco has always been a trader since 2020, from when I first met him here. Once a stock is not going his way, he is out. It’s people like Pa Ema and the other long-term investors that will endure for the stock. If Presco starts dropping 10% daily, Oga will remain there and even buy more. Even after a 50% haircut, Loco can never do that. And Agba? The last time we confirmed he bought anything was in 2022. He mostly comes here to destress. ![]() |
Mankind2024:Nawa o, softly now, why the insults? Honestly, I don’t think you’re better than him, that’s just my opinion sha. |
jckgroup1:LOL, the moves were tactical. I wasn’t investing for the long term, so the actions I took should be judged across all the possible trades I could have made, not just a particular one. Yes, NGXGroup went on to perform "well", but their are others that didn’t. Just ask the people who bought Oando at 80 or 90, it’s been almost two years and the price still hasn’t recovered. So, no regrets. I’m fairly satisfied with what I got from it. We move. ![]() |
alezzy13:I think there are three major forces preventing Oando’s price from rising. First, most of the recent buyers appear to be traders looking for quick profits. They want to cash out fast, people like Peter, for example. Any news that does not strongly support the stock can easily trigger a rapid exit. Second, some investors are taking profits because of the rights issue. If you are confident that you can obtain a good quantity at ₦50, then selling anything above ₦50 plus brokerage fees is essentially locking in free profit. Third, there are long-term holders who may want to exit and redeploy their capital into stronger companies. The truth is that Oando is not performing particularly well on a fundamental basis, even though it still has potential. When I opened Morgan’s iTrade this morning around 10:20 and saw the large number of offers compared to bids, I immediately suspected the price would fall today. The easiest way for Oando’s price to move upward would be sustained positive news. For example, a major spike in oil prices, maybe to $180–$200, could help. But, even that scenario comes with its own set of problems. |
jckgroup1: ghm:This is why not every post is worth indulging. Is Dangote Refinery not a business? Or is Nigerian crude being sold below the market price? It is reasonable that if you buy at a high price, you will also sell at a high price, unless there is evidence that Nigeria is still selling crude at around $60. The only thing we need Dangote Refinery to do is keep producing and prevent scarcity, as long as we are supplying it with crude. |
Stockhunter:Actually, they are not firing missiles indiscriminately as you suggest. They have precise targets, and all the missiles they fire are intended to achieve specific objectives. Don’t rely too heavily on Western media; they tend to portray “others” as weaker and less strategic than they really are. During the first few days, the aim was to neutralize the military bases around them, which they largely achieved. It also served to preempt other Gulf states from joining against them. Now they have effectively isolated the two aggressors, so it is essentially between them at this point. Before this conflict ends, one very large U.S. aircraft carrier will either be sunk or severely damaged. |
Itzlinda:I don’t think the hedge will cause them to lose money. Rather, it means they won’t benefit from additional gains if prices rise above the contracted level. The only real loss would occur if the cost of production increases beyond the fixed price. |
jckgroup1:Based on my dividend valuation model, if we look strictly at the ₦3.00 dividend or even the EPS, the stock should not be valued above ₦100.00. Technically, the share bonus is a zero-sum game; since everyone gains in the same proportion, there is no real difference if every shareholder suddenly holds two shares at an adjusted price instead of one. But, there may be other factors being priced in here. |
Raider76:Depending on where you bought, the game is still on. But, there has been an increase in offers relative to bids. It may struggle for a few days, but if there is real conviction, it will hopefully resume moving up. In the meantime, I’m out. ![]() |
jckgroup1:Lol, I didn’t have any specific reason for buying, it was purely by chance. I opened Morgan and saw the daily value, along with the huge imbalance between the bid and ask sides, and the way they were swallowing the offers. So I entered. Since they’re not really moving it, I’m out. Good luck to those still inside. ![]() |
innovestor:This is better because the price remains unchanged. But what about DS, which is down 10%? |
jonnysessy:I don port, abeg. Make I manage 6.9% (9.6% minus Morgan’s 2.7% fees). ![]() |
NGXGROUP closed at 150 yesterday but reopened at 136.4 today. Does anyone understand why this happened? |
I don’t see a merger happening anytime soon, at least not until there is some level of stability in Dangote Sugar. How do you merge a loss-making company with a profitable one? For it to work, it would severely reduce the value and proportion of Dangote Sugar. |
TerraCota: ositadima1:Unfortunately, another prediction has materialized, I told you guys. |
Itzlinda:If you’re using Morgan, go to ‘Trades’ right under ‘Market View,’ then type the ticker symbol into the search box and sort. |
debeey87:Okay, thank you. At what price do you think their target is? |



