You can keep ranting all you want, you won't still get a mention from me.

I'm a man of dignity and I can't stoop so low to beg online. ME BEG ONLINE.

I only have one moniker and I use it for everything I do here. Dig as much as you can.

Anything I write here endeavors to fact-check it.

Any evidence you have about me paste it here.

MorataFC:
That guy mentality tire me, just because you failed to land your dream job after you got your PhD then you now declare all your certificates and education learning from primary to university level inconsequential.

It's not about mentality but more about dignity.
A person should know he is human and can be wrong and corrected but being hell-bent on using irrelevant thing to conquer relevant stuff is demeaning.

Imagine thinking you can win an informal argument by highlighting your opposition grammatical blunders when you are faced with fact and you can't find a way out.

Dignity is being a man of your words and not run away when your words require actions.
That was how he offered his arm just to win baseless argument and not have the dignity to walk the talk.

Having different moniker just to escape the consequence of your word is demeaning to a man of values.

But he will never learn until he pays dearly.

God forbid I roll in the mud because of a pig.

I've past that level a very long time ago.

iamoyindamola:

I mean talk about rolling in the mud with pig
The dude obviously just want stupid arguments and jodera was there to give him

That's typical him.
Empty drum making useless noise.

swiz123:


You were supposed to understand my point. Trossad's goal in the end helped Arsenal fulfil their objective and therefore consequential.

A final has one single objective; It is just what it is.

I get your point perfectly but inconsequential is not the word in such scenario.

Those commentators often use "it's not enough" for such goal, which means the goal did it's best to win them the cup but it's not enough. This doesn't mean the same with the goal being unimportant.

The only inconsequential goals in football are consolation goals in knockout matches.

Jodera:
Lol, I don drop the matter after that my last post to him. His penchant for wanting to always being right some times makes him type some ridiculousness even when his mistake is obvious.

It's well sha

The funny thing is that he will result to grammars and mind game and stop going straight on the argument.

I will not stay long on the matter too, that's the reason I didn't quote him and I will not.

swiz123:


City's objective was to win the cup. If Palmer's goal won the game and fulfilled that objective, it will be consequential. Sadly for them, Palmer's beautiful goal was rendered inconsequential when Trossad equalised and Arsenal subsequently won on penalties.

Palmer's goal was inconsequential to City's objective.

Then trossard goal is also inconsequential because it's carries the same weight with palmer's goal.

Both goals tied the game in 90 minutes.
Then lead to penalty. Without palmer's goal arsenal win the game in 90 minutes and no penalty.

Penalty is not part of the game from onset, it became a possibility when the two team draw in the 90 minutes. A goal that draw the game in normal time and lead to different possibility for both team is never inconsequential.

The only inconsequential goal is Bernardo Silva's penalty.

There are not many inconsequential goals in football.

The goals that can be term inconsequential are consolation goals in knockout matches.

In league football their is no inconsequential goal because even if you lose 5-2 the two goals you scored will reduce your goal deficit and we've seen team winning the league with goal difference.

Going by his stupid logic then a 3-0 win for a team have two inconsequential goals because the last two goals did nothing to change the outcome of the game.

I'm disappointed in jodera's incessant praise of that guy intellect, intellectual ability is not about grammars or many words.
That guy is empty, I know this since the day he insinuate 3 at back is for defensive football. Now his pep have tried it and it's stopped being defensive formation.

Football is played in phases in a final:
90 minutes decides the winner;
IF TIED, then extra time decides the winner;
IF TIED, then penalty decides who lift the cup.

Inconsequential is synonymous to unimportant, insignificance etc.

Then how can a goal that tied the game that can be won in 90 minutes and propelled it to penalty (a different reality) be unimportant or insignificant?

If you cannot see how dumb that sound then I can't help you.

Person go dey yarn rubbish with full chest.

How can a goal that push the team to penalty be inconsequential?

Without palmer's goal arsenal win in the 90 minutes.

Penalty is different reality.

hensben:
You really know football. I don’t even have problem with Raumdeuter because it is expected of him, but some Chelsea fan arguing the obvious with me. Using Enzo as makeshift is limitation on him and the team.

Those Chelsea fans don't move me. One of them already quoted me I just ignored.

The problem with some people here is that they don't know when egbon dayo is serious or pushing agenda.

hensben:
Nor mind them. Truth is staring them in the face but because it’s Hensben let’s attack him by asking foolish questions. If truly they know football, aside position of players how about their ability, isn’t it obvious Enzo is not the regista type because he likes to move forward with the ball which make him a CM.

Egbon always argue in line with his agenda so I'm not surprised.

Let me put Enzo in all the top teams in the world to see what we get.

Enzo in city is not going there to bench Rodri (their DM) it means stones is leaving the midfield.

Enzo in Bayern is not going there to bench kimmich (their DM) it means laimer is faced with bench.

Enzo in united is not going there to bench casemiro (their DM) Erikson or mount is leaving the midfield.

Enzo in Barca is not going there to bench romeu (their new DM) it means gavi's time is up.

Enzo in Madrid is not going there to bench tchuameni (their only DM) but kroos.

Etc.

But in some cases a CM can be ask to play DM which is a makeshift plan and not the norms.

Like kroos against city,
Gundogan for city at some point,
Enzo for Chelsea last season, etc.
But saying Enzo and jorginho play the same role is like saying kroos and busquet played the same role which is naive and comical.

But egbon no dey use eyes see your post he must counter it.
I leave it to you both.

Their is no level egbon can't go to push agenda,
One is a regista, one is a CM but egbon is feigning ignorance.

Regista are protected by team structure because they play Infront of the defender and no room for DM e.g busquet, jorginho, pirlo, verrati etc.
But CM dictate the tempo of the game in the middle e.g kroos, xavi etc.
Only pep manage to roll the two role into one in Rodri.

Enzo was always pair with florentino Luis a natural DM in benfica but Chelsea should not get him a DM because he cost 100m.

Throughout this pre season either Gallagher, Santos, casadei have been the one playing the role of regista while Enzo was the more advanced midfielder of the two pivot.

But we should go to the season with Gallagher or Santos as the first choice in that position because we have Enzo Fernandez which cost us 100m.

We are currently being link with every DM in the market but they want us to believe Enzo is a DM, can we have 100 million DM and still be linked with so many DM?
That alone shows Enzo is not going to the season as DM.

I get it sha agenda must agend.

BlueAngel444:
Carlos Borges to west ham for £14m, just knew that kid won't stay in City with Haaland there. If Carlos continues his run of goals into EPL what a star he could become

How is halaand blocking Borges?

Mediocre don lost it's meaning for egbon dayo dictionary.

akwesenana:
Havertz10 and ova200.

Are you well or blind or both?
It's clear as day that you lack comprehension, go and dig anywhere I wrote that out and if you can't you are bast@rd son a thousand father.

You lots will just be showing your low storage brain and lack of proper education at every single opportunity.

Bring where I wrote that out or you are a f©©l.

lateefGRDT:
Roman was ruthless
Lampard few months before been sacked

Honestly I'm not the biggest fans of his but he did a decent job in his first stint here.

He make top 4 with academy boys and transfer ban, that alone is by no means an easy feet and I can tell you any coach will have a hard time attaining that.

He breeze past ucl group stage and was 1st on the log in the beginning of December, injury to kante and kovacic really dealth with him and their is no choice than jorginho and loftus cheek.

Seeing someone here tagging him the worst coach in history is clownery.

And about his stint at Everton; he didn't perform to expectation but if we want to use Everton as criteria then benitez and ancellotti are also failures.

I'm anticipating what he will do with these set of player before I draw my verdict on him.

Trevor012:

They played better than this just 2 weeks back against Leipzig winning 7:0. You all will pretend like we haven't seen Manchester city struggle with Alvarez leading the line many times this season.

They did not played better than this, they just scored more.
Leipzig was stupid for trying to play out from the back despite city extreme pressing.

Liverpool have only 1 shot on and off target combines.

City completed more than 100 passes compare to against Leipzig.

It's Liverpool we are talking about here not some Bournemouth.

And it's not about Alvarez but about haaland ability in tight spaces considering guardiola pattern of play.
They played very well with G. Jesus and even without any striker.

And the Cruz is how often it happens with playing good and playing not so good.

Can someone help with when last city play this good?

When I point this out some people with little football understanding was running mad in my mention and taking my comment out of context.

All those one touch passes in the center of the pitch free the wingers so much with klopp having no answer to that for 90 minutes.

Van dijk is a serious problem to Liverpool these days.

He always delay pass when in possession and end up playing to a teammate under pressure or play long pass with his left foot witha 50% chance of making it; he majorly move the ball wrongly to his weaker foot making playing from the back so difficult from his side.
Konate is doing a far better job.

Watching attacker move closer to the box before even trying to engage is very dangerous. An attacker like Mahrez that can either shoot, dribble, curl or cutback is suicidal.

Guardiola is now playing 3 at the back, I want to see what tuchel hater and egbon dayo will say about this.

I think city are playing way better with Alvarez instead of haaland.
Those quick close 1 touch passes at the center of the field is good to see and very effective.

Skimpledawg:



Kai, this is funny

He loves donkey more than his girlfriend; he said it resemble his character.

BlueMann:

This is a very terrible 11.

Havertz should not attempt to be a coach: it's good he is considering to open a zoo.

BlueMann:
Anything is possible in football sha. Imagine a PK specialist like Kepa failing to save any of eleven (?!) penalties in that shootout vs Liverpool. If it were Mendy it happened to, there isn't anybody who wouldn't agree that Kepa would've saved one or two, it even more.

Knowing Maignan, I do feel he would've saved one. That doesn't mean the outcome would've been different tho.

For me the point of context is not about winning the pk shout-out because dibu is also a very capable penalty stopper but putting the better pk stopper in goal to increase your chance of winning.
It's like penalty takers too, you put your best takers to have higher chance of winning.

On kepa; after the game Tuchel said he will repeat the same thing over again if he is in the same situation.
Which I wholeheartedly agree with.

It's very simple.

Wahala dey o

Unlimited22:
Thomas Tuchel had us turning up at the Bernabeu with a 3-1 deficit EXPECTING to qualify.

As in, we were confident about going to the semis


Nah that man tried for us shaa

When I look back on tuchel stint at Chelsea na those Madrid matches I remember most; he gets us to turn up 4 out 4 times.

We contain them so much and at the same time attack them so well we left them begging for mercy.

Despite the imbalance squad, injury crisis and sanction Tuchel got us fired up and deliver.

Those are good memories of super tommy tuchel.

bobo65:
Good morning
Available

Boss please can you help me to get Huawei p50 pocket.

Ibime:
Thank God we already bought Bodashile

Cos when I read of £115m link with Gvardiol this morning, I was getting heart palpitations

Josko Gvardiol did not make a single tackle or interception vs Manchester City.

City have not been this fluid in a long time.

Halland is still halland nothing different a box predator.

Leipzig is a very foolish team; city pressing you hard and you still wan form "play from the back" king.
Na why I liked prime jurgen klopp Liverpool, if you press too hard long ball go unlock you one time.

I think we will draw city on Friday.

Ballzproblem2:
he could have protested , boycotted cause disobedience that's how players gets their wish ,not sitting like mope and doing nothing can never be me we

Na only Chelsea news you dey read?

He boycotted training and didn't resume for preseason demanding for a move until they appoint conte that change his mind.

fredoooooo:
The only pride of London

Any London club wey dem born well make him show with these.

Borntosmoke:


Like how?? I don't understand. Tell one striker currently wey dey press pass halland. I will be able to understand what you are saying.

Guy I'm not in for this anymore.
So direct your question to Google.

popizaino:



I really commend you for really trying to reply all this mentions that aims to put words in your mouth rather understanding the context of your clear message.. Your statement is clear enough for anyone not looking for agenda and cheap likes,so allow them to make a mountain of a mole hill of the statement you already clarified.

Bro
Seriously I'm tired, is their any player without weakness or above criticism.

People criticize Messi for his inability to use his weaker foot or heading.
People criticize Ronaldo for relative lesser vision than Messi or kdb.
People criticize adres lujan iniesta for his poor finishing.
People criticize Ngolo kante for his average passing and shooting ability.

If those great player can be criticize then who on God's green earth is Halland.

But the Cruz of the matter is; is it a fair criticism or not?

I don't criticize player unjustly.
I will take halland ahead of many young strikers today but is he a complete package yet? NO.

And those loud-mouthed empty and useless drum are just not reasonable enough to know not all criticism is hatred.