₦airaland Forum

Maestro21:
LOL

Everyone knows it was discontinued. Stop chasing shadows. Before it was, certain people reacted to it by developing itchiness and what not.

Consequently, not everyone was mandated to take chloroquine or lose their jobs.

Maestro21:
If the lord gave you a fool, he will give you you. Never forget, you are obtuse and we need to let you know because it tends to surprise you at times.

Every drug poses its own potential side effects and reactions to different people.

It is for this very reason nobody mandates all drugs or medicines to everyone.

Maestro21:
If the lord gave you a fool, he will give you you. Never forget, you are obtuse and we need to let you know because it tends to surprise you at times.

Every drug poses its own potential side effects and reactions to different people.

It is for this very reason nobody mandates all drugs or medicines to everyone.

Maestro21:


Dude, you need psychological help.

Yes, some patients react differently to certain NSAIDs. Which is why nobody is going to mandate them for everybody in the world where you swallow them or you lose your job.

Are my getting through?

Maestro21:
You are actually getting boring now.

Some people react to Chloroquine which is why it is not mandated for every malaria patient let alone for every one in the world.

Any breakthrough yet?

Maestro21:
Just seeing this.

Did his brother correlate his sudden death to his jabs? Did his coroner do same?

Maestro21:
Foolfari, in layman, does this particular jab immunize or do you want to regurgitate nonsense by claiming vaccines are not meant to immunize?

Maestro21:
Boy, I have met them all.

lol

So idiosyncratic patients are drivers of the efficacy of vitamin C? lol

Maestro21:
lol

bastardfari, what part of "I am not anti-medicine" don't you get?

Overdosage, over use can cause deaths and injuries but is anybody mandating that 10000mg of vitamin C be orally administered to everyone in the world regardless of contraindication, religious reasons, naturally acquired immunity?

Maestro21:
You are a hopeless troll.

Nobody is panning medicines in general.

But when a vaccine is not a vaccine that is a different kettle of fish.

Does this jab prevent contraction of disease? Does it prevent transmission?

So what does it do (don't tell me about hospitalisations and deaths) and why is it being mandated when both "vaxxed" and "unvaxxed" can similarly contract and spread the disease?

Maestro21:
You are a hopeless troll.

Nobody is panning medicines in general.

But when a vaccine is not a vaccine that is a different kettle of fish.

Does this jab prevent contraction of disease? Does it prevent transmission?

So what does it do (don't tell me about hospitalisations and deaths) and why is it being mandated when both "vaxxed" and "unvaxxed" can similarly contract and spread the disease?

Maestro21:
What an unfortunate dolt.

I showed you the VAERS site showing that they record injuries and deaths following a vaccine given the specified time period after that vaccination. Can you deny that?

Your screenshot has exposed you. Don't you ever respond to me again if you cannot answer questions honestly.

Now your screenshot first talks about ROUTINE vaccine injuries to CHILDREN. Don't ignore that.

Second, it lists those injuries as - shoulder related (if it happens 7 days after),
- vasogal syncope (fainting after 7 days after)
- and then any acute complication or death following the 2 prior incidents (the pdf says above events)
- then lastly, any condition that one suffers based on side effects and contraindications that were listed on the insert by the manufacturer (this time AN INTERVAL IS INDICATED) and it says that interval should be what is listed in the insert by the manufacturer.

Pfizer's interval, Moderna's, AZs , J &Js etc are on or after 14 days - CDC website states so.

So what else do you want to say?

I will injure you with facts.

Adamgeneral12:
Oga say na dangote spag or golden penny?

E get why I dey ask o

Maestro21:
Bastardfari, I asked a question, if you can't answer it, why not get some education and then try to make a comeback?

LordReed:
May the Pasta Lord insert noodly appendages into his arse in the mean time.

LordReed:
Fu-cktard, C is where the solution he is proposing is at. You are the dumbass that needs to conjecture rubbish to satisfy whatever crazed conspiracy you come up with. In a 28min 51sec presentation, he mentions population ONCE. Yet dumbo like you thinks Bill Gates whats to kill your generations. A fu-cktard like you would have been dead 20x over if that were the case.

Maestro21:
lol.

Dumbo. Tell me, does dying with COVID-19 equate to dying OF COVID-19?

donnie:
The man Pastor Chris is far more intelligent than you lot. That is why you cling unto an imaginary statement so as to make a point. But as it stands, he and many others who have rejected those vaccines were right. The vaccine is not a cure and it also cannot protect you from covid19 infection.

Maestro21:
You know there is nothing like autopsies for COVID19 deaths right? lol

LordReed:
Budaatum is both he and she, use anyone you like.

LordReed:
Calm down budaatum is far more nuanced than she might appear.

budaatum:
Just about as much time as I need to spend reading books about fairies and Father Christmas, or angels or messiahs and Physics and gods I suppose, just that there's unfortunately only 24 hours in a day and my eyes only work for 3.

Its why I'm on here so much. I'd rather spend those 3 hours reading what you write than a book you say you believe. You are far more interesting than a Flying Spaghetti Monster, is what I think.

budaatum:
I got it from Russell! Many many years ago!

Pasta. Maybe you should spend some time knowing buda.

budaatum:
I hope you realise its a similar idea to [url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russell%27s_teapot?wprov=sfla1]Russell's Tea Pot[/url]. Like a modern form of it used to ridicule those who wanted to introduce intelligent design into the Kansas School Board?

budaatum:
Sounds like when some say I am darned to hell if I don't believe their book.

HellVictorinho:
I didn't ask you to define the fallacy

I said you should prove that I'm guilty of it

You are guilty of lying

You asked for my definition and I gave you one


Your own definition doesn't matter to me


You have repeated or used your definition in vain


I'm stuck to mine

budaatum:
I guess I'm lost for now. Hopefully, I'll find time for it in the future and become unlost.

HellVictorinho:
Prove that it is

budaatum:
I don't particularly care what anyone believes, Pasta. Especially if its what they believe from reading books. I am an antibeliever, you see, I do not give a flying fuq about the crap people cook in their heads and choose to believe, because I am far too busy understanding my own head.

Please know that I was not asking you for "whole answers", but just for simple answers to "facts" you claimed to be giving. Still, you don't owe me any answers.