PDPGuy's Posts
Nairaland Forum › PDPGuy's Profile › PDPGuy's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 (of 359 pages)
AndSunGorilla:I think Africa will be allocated a minimum of 12 automatic slots, in addition to one intercontinental playoff spot. With this arrangement, as you implied, the likes of Nigeria, Cameroon, and Mali would most likely automatically qualify for the 2030 World Cup. A CAF qualification format of 12 groups of 4 teams, ensures that all group winners advance directly to the mundial. Then, the best 4 group runners-up would all contest for the one IC playoff spot |
The Women’s World Cup is 50 days away…..
|
cococandy:The jokes write themselves 🤣 |
patrickmuf:Spot on! And Cubarsi, for me, is lightweight in that central defense. He would be easily bodied by Lautaro or Alvarez |
Scoring twice against Argentina, at a World Cup, is not for everyone 😎😎
|
E don red!!!! Tuchel is getting sacked!!! |
Thecassanova:Anderson messed up there! There was no need for him to rush out to close down Messi, who was already occupied |
Enzo wow |
Anthony Gordon with a brain fart there |
AndSunGorilla:😂🤣🤣😂😂 |
Not bad for a team that barely escaped relegation
|
BREAKING Due to the scheduled halftime musical performances, the WC final halftime is expected to last for 26 minutes.. |
TheSuperNerd:Nigeria will win! |
MorataFC:True. They lost that first game to Switzerland 😁 |
Beating Spain at a World Cup is not for everyone 😁
|
Spain have recorded 6 clean sheets at this tournament - a record for a single World Cup 🤯 |
Funny to believe that it’s only Cape Verde that escaped losing to this Spain 😂 |
Spain don do am again! They’ve beaten France in THREE consecutive major tournament semifinals! Take a bow, Porto, Yamal, Rodri et al 👏👏 |
No attempts on target for France as of the 86th minute 🤯🤯 |
Pedro Porto, first Spurs player to score in a WC semi 😮💨😁 |
Carot:🤣😂 |
happney65:🤣😂 |
happney65:That was quick lol. I thought he would have stone-walled a lil longer |
FOXDOSSIER:Lol I’m from Anambra. As the Achebe airport barely generates 1 million in monthly revenue, this new aerotropolis would basically finish it off |
Based on performances so far, Africa has clearly shown that they rightfully belonged in the tournament. 9 out of the 10 African teams made it out of the first round and most of those that exited in later rounds, made it very tough for their opponents. So the next time bitter critics such as Gattuso question why Africa deserves 10 World Cup slots, the statistics speak for themselves. In truth, even 10 places may not be enough. Traditional African heavyweights such as Nigeria and Cameroon failed to qualify for the tournament altogether. Add emerging and consistently competitive nations such as Angola, Zambia, Mali, Burkina Faso, Ethiopia and others, and it becomes clear that the continent possesses far greater depth than many are willing to acknowledge. Africa deserves at least 4 additional World Cup slots. If achieving that requires expanding the tournament from 48 to 64 teams, as some have proposed, then so be it. The more, the merrier. Europe could also receive 6 additional places to accommodate strong footballing nations that missed out, such as Italy, Poland, Serbia, the Republic of Ireland, Wales, Romania, Greece, Ukraine, Denmark and Russia, whose absence stems from non-footballing reasons. The remaining slots could then be allocated to the other confederations. Asia, in particular, should receive around four more places, not necessarily because of its current footballing strength, but because it is home to well over half of the world's population, much of which is consistently underrepresented at the World Cup. Just imagine the global interest if football giants in terms of population like China and India became regular participants. The commercial appeal and worldwide engagement would be enormous. CONMEBOL and CONCACAF could then share the remaining two slots. If this tournament has demonstrated anything, it is that football's competitive balance is broader than ever before. The long-held assumption that Europe and South America alone deserve the lion's share of World Cup places is becoming increasingly difficult to justify. One of the major advantages of expanding the FIFA World Cup to 64 teams is not just that more nations would qualify, but that more countries would also have the opportunity to host the tournament. Hosting rights are fiercely contested, and unsuccessful bids often leave deserving countries disappointed after years of planning and investment. A 64-team World Cup would require more stadiums and infrastructure, making multi-nation hosting the norm rather than the exception. This would allow more countries and cities to enjoy the economic, tourism and infrastructural benefits that come with staging the world's biggest sporting event. For example, a future UK bid could more meaningfully involve Scotland and Wales alongside England, ensuring that the benefits are shared more widely. Importantly, expanding to 64 teams would not increase the workload for the participating teams. The eventual champions would still play the same eight matches: three group-stage games followed by the Round of 32, Round of 16, quarter-finals, semi-finals and final. The only structural difference would be the elimination of the current system where some third-placed teams advance to the knockout rounds. Every group would simply produce two qualifiers, making the format cleaner and easier to follow. Neither would the quality of the competition be diluted. As already highlighted, Europe alone had at least ten strong footballing nations miss out on this edition, while Africa had at least six competitive teams fail to qualify. South America also saw Chile miss out despite its rich footballing pedigree. These are countries capable of competing at the highest level and would enhance, rather than weaken, the tournament. The only confederation where concerns about additional places may arise is Asia. However, the best way to raise standards is through greater participation. Giving more Asian nations the opportunity to compete regularly on the biggest stage would accelerate their development, just as increased exposure has helped African and North American teams improve significantly over the years. Ultimately, a 64-team World Cup would make football's greatest tournament more inclusive without compromising its competitiveness. It would spread the economic and cultural benefits of hosting to more nations, provide opportunities for deserving teams that narrowly miss qualification under the current format, and further strengthen the global growth of the game. The Olympic Games cover the whole world, so, nothing unwieldy about Football taking up about a quarter of it with 64 teams.. |
If FIFA expands the World Cup to 64 teams, I expect Africa’s automatic slots to increase to at least 12. The Super Eagles and Italy will finally qualify for the tournament 😂 The CAF qualification tournament could feature a single group stage of all 54 teams, divided into 9 groups of 6 teams. Here, all the group winners and the best 3 group runners-up qualify directly to the World Cup. Then the 4th best runner up would advance to an intercontinental playoff. Alternatively, I will suggest that there should be two phases of the qualifiers, similar to the AFCON qualification format. Here, the final phase will comprise 12 groups of 4 teams. All the group winners automatically qualify for the World Cup; and the best group runner-up advancing to an intercontinental playoff. |
Goke7:As in! |
andrewbaba44:Lmao No arguments for ojoro. Ref applied the law correctly 😁 |
tonididdy:You mean the coach deserves dragging |
Embolo should be forever banned from playing for Switzerland |
Nemesis0147: ![]() |
Nemesis0147:FIFA conspired to give Paredes a yellow card, to ensure that Embolo would be shown a second yellow 😂😂 |
