₦airaland Forum

Fvck the law! And fvck ma alamu!

.

mrnigeria:
Easy, calling me a liar when you don't even know me. I haven't called you any name, have I? Let's try to be civil. At least, pretend to be diplomatic.

Voltaire said, 'I disapprove of what you say, but I defend to death your right to say it'.

Voltaire was a wise man... Go figure.

i havnt insulted you. I only accurately described what you just tried doing. My point still stands anyway.

A drunk man is happy. Reality sucks

Tjayjosh:
Why?

i wont engage you for the fact that you are intellectually dishonest

I wonder what his wife would be cooking for him at home

Tjayjosh:
But many people do, in fact, call themselves atheists while simultaneously expressing outrage toward a God whose
existence they deny.
Still others reject the idea of God because they want Him to be
easier to find. When well-known atheist Richard Dawkins was
asked, “What would you say if you faced God after death?" he
responded, “I would say to Him, Why did you take such great pains to conceal yourself?’” Some
people frown at the fact that God is spirit, invisible, and found only through faith
(Hebrews 11:6;
Jeremiah 29:13). They adopt the attitude that the creator of the
universe owes them evidence of His existence beyond what He has already lavishly given ( Psalm
19:1; 102:25; Romans 1:20).
Jesus dealt with this mindset when He walked the earth. In
Mark 8, Jesus had just fed four thousand people with a sack of
lunch, but the intellectual elites
came to Him demanding that He
perform a sign to “prove” He was the messiah (verse11). Jesus illustrated this
hardness of heart in His parable about the rich man in hell who longed to warn his
brothers about what awaited them after death ( Luke 16:19–
31). From heaven, Abraham answered, "If they do not listen
to Moses and the Prophets, they will not be convinced even
someone rises from the dead.” The most likely explanation for
the continuing rise of atheism has not changed since the
Garden of Eden (Genesis 3:6;
Romans 3:23). The very essence of all sin is self determination. By denying the existence of a
Creator, atheists can do whatever they please without concern for future judgment or eternal
consequences ( Matthew 12:36;
Romans 14:12; 1 Peter 4:5; Hebrews 4:13). In the twenty-first cenury, self-worship has become culturally
acceptable. Atheism appeals to a generation raised on evolutionary theory
and moral relativism. John 3:19 says, “Light has come into the
world, but people loved darkness
instead of light because their deeds were evil." If human
beings are self-created, self-
determined, and self-centered, then there is no moral law or
lawgiver to whom they must submit. There are no absolutes and no one to whom they are
ultimately accountable. By
adopting such mindset, atheists can focus on seeking
pleasure in this life alone. As long as scientists, professors,
and philosophers peddle their atheistic
viewpoints as truth and wisdom, people will continue to buy it because the idea of self-determination
appeals to our rebellious natures. The attitude is nothing new, but the changing cultural norms are making it
more openly acceptable. Romans
1:18–31 details the results of this rejection of God's authority. Verse 28 says, "God gave them
over to a depraved mind, so that they do
what ought not to be
done.” Our world is seeing the results of that depravity. What
atheists call “enlightenment,”
God calls foolishness. Verses 22–23 say, "Although they claimed to be wise, they became fools.”
Since the “fear of the Lord is the beginning of wisdom” ( Psalm
111:10; Proverbs 1:7; 9:10), then the denial (atheism)
is the beginning of foolishness.

you quoted dawkins wrong, dawkins first answered with "which god are you and why have u taken great pains to conceal youself" you are intellectually dishonest here

Tjayjosh:
But many people do, in fact, call themselves atheists while simultaneously expressing outrage toward a God whose
existence they deny.
Still others reject the idea of God because they want Him to be
easier to find. When well-known atheist Richard Dawkins was
asked, “What would you say if you faced God after death?" he
responded, “I would say to Him, Why did you take such great pains to conceal yourself?’” Some
people frown at the fact that God is spirit, invisible, and found only through faith
(Hebrews 11:6;
Jeremiah 29:13). They adopt the attitude that the creator of the
universe owes them evidence of His existence beyond what He has already lavishly given ( Psalm
19:1; 102:25; Romans 1:20).
Jesus dealt with this mindset when He walked the earth. In
Mark 8, Jesus had just fed four thousand people with a sack of
lunch, but the intellectual elites
came to Him demanding that He
perform a sign to “prove” He was the messiah (verse11). Jesus illustrated this
hardness of heart in His parable about the rich man in hell who longed to warn his
brothers about what awaited them after death ( Luke 16:19–
31). From heaven, Abraham answered, "If they do not listen
to Moses and the Prophets, they will not be convinced even
someone rises from the dead.” The most likely explanation for
the continuing rise of atheism has not changed since the
Garden of Eden (Genesis 3:6;
Romans 3:23). The very essence of all sin is self determination. By denying the existence of a
Creator, atheists can do whatever they please without concern for future judgment or eternal
consequences ( Matthew 12:36;
Romans 14:12; 1 Peter 4:5; Hebrews 4:13). In the twenty-first cenury, self-worship has become culturally
acceptable. Atheism appeals to a generation raised on evolutionary theory
and moral relativism. John 3:19 says, “Light has come into the
world, but people loved darkness
instead of light because their deeds were evil." If human
beings are self-created, self-
determined, and self-centered, then there is no moral law or
lawgiver to whom they must submit. There are no absolutes and no one to whom they are
ultimately accountable. By
adopting such mindset, atheists can focus on seeking
pleasure in this life alone. As long as scientists, professors,
and philosophers peddle their atheistic
viewpoints as truth and wisdom, people will continue to buy it because the idea of self-determination
appeals to our rebellious natures. The attitude is nothing new, but the changing cultural norms are making it
more openly acceptable. Romans
1:18–31 details the results of this rejection of God's authority. Verse 28 says, "God gave them
over to a depraved mind, so that they do
what ought not to be
done.” Our world is seeing the results of that depravity. What
atheists call “enlightenment,”
God calls foolishness. Verses 22–23 say, "Although they claimed to be wise, they became fools.”
Since the “fear of the Lord is the beginning of wisdom” ( Psalm
111:10; Proverbs 1:7; 9:10), then the denial (atheism)
is the beginning of foolishness.

we are outraged at the idea called god

mrnigeria:
Thanks bro... Your support is appreciated.

Atheists, answer the simple question. Wetin God do you That your mind will not rest until you convince yourself He doesn't exist. You are not convinced and attacking those who believe is a way of convincing yourself... I'm cool with everyone, but we should learn to respect each other...

i won't respect the belief of someone who say 1+1= 3, instead i will try to correct that person. If you call my correction disrespect then so be it.

mrnigeria:
I don't attack muslims. I have muslims as friends and colleagues. I have pple who don't believe too... But I respect everyone's right to believe what they want.
Y'all claim to be more enlightened as atheists so I was expecting much better sense of reasoning from your lot.

you are a liar by saying u dont attack islam theology. You might say u respect everyone's right but deep down u wish the muslims were christians. The sense of reasoning you expect from atheist is a strawman you have created by your own hands

Fearcom:
Foolishness or Reality?

i will choose reality

mrnigeria:
It is no news that every article written by the average atheist is designed to attack the judeo-christian God. I read an article earlier today about a transgender who took the word of God out of context and twisted it to suit his end. I'll tell you what I discovered from the twisted article.

DENIAL: For you to call God a monster, it means you admit He exists. For you to say you would rather burn in hell means you have considered the possibility of hell's existence.

ANGER: The subcutaneous anger, a subliminal reason for the transgender to write such a misguided article. Maybe society was harsh to him. It doesn't mean God does not exist.

THE GAMBLE: It is a choice. A life of holiness, or a life of poor self restraint. If hell doesn't exist. Well, you gambled. If it does, you will have a eternal supply of suya from your own body.

Finally, I've seen God. He's everywhere. You have freedom to say He doesn't exist. I have a conviction that He does. I am not going to force you to share my belief, but you also have to respect my belief.

It is a shame that the minority who are asking for respect and equality do not understand what it means at all... You atheists are free to attack me, it just shows your anger and confusion. God is alive. Long after you are dead, He will be. Respect that.

if you rem why you attack muslims on nl you will understand why we attack you

A god sends down a manual for us to live our life and decides to hide the message

Do not pass by my epitaph, traveler. But having stopped, listen and learn, then go your way. There is no boat in Hades, no ferryman Charon, No caretaker Aiakos, no dog Cerberus. All we who are dead below Have become bones and ashes, but nothing else. I have spoken to you honestly, go on, traveler, Lest even while dead I seem talkative to you.

Someone should help me tell the mods to move it to ther right section, seun please this thread shouldnt be in the phone section

lexiconkabir:
oh, an atheist? but i hope you are not trying to hide christianity as your religion. that will make you a hypocrite.

unecessary deviation

lexiconkabir:
lol, you dont seem intelligent. your bible supports slavery too(if you dont believe ask me for a verse), the only difference is in islam when the slave feels he/she is independent, he/she can ask for his/her freedom, and the slave would be set free, if you remember the reason why they became slaves for their master(they needed protection, clothes, food and all form of sustenance), you should agree that the master was even kind to have accepted them as slaves. i hope your daft brain would accept this, my friend.

the bible supporting slavery doesnt justify your cliam. And am nt even a christian

Gmajor:
did he say anything new? this theory has already been criticised by various author in many different ways so how is his own different?

thank you o. And he was made a professor for his crappy inugural lecture

lexiconkabir:
i have given this answer before, when a city loses a battle, the people that were well-to-do would have lost their money and properties, which means they will need masters to give them sustenance, hence they become slaves, now if a woman is among those that needed sustenance, and paraventure she falls among the women that went to prophet muhammad(s.a.w), now tell me, whats wrong in that? for him to have agreed to give them sustenance, is that wrong? you are just filled with hate, thats all! so you see my friend, your point is daft!!

you saying am filled with hate is ad hominem, when you call en-slaving people: "giving them sustenance " then it show more about what you religion and prophet teaches.

.

lexiconkabir:
thats a daft point. when you have something better to say, quote me.

do u have a reason to say my point is daft or do you just say it is daft?

A Professor of Philosophy in Ekiti State University, Professor Zacchaeus Ogundare has submitted that the Evolution theory of man which claims that life emerged from the physio-chemical reactions in inorganic matters could be in- consequential after all since new studies revealed that evolution could not bridge the gap of the huge leap between chance explanation and possibility. The University Don, delivering the 42nd lecture of Ekiti State University, explained further that evolution which supports spontaneous generation of life from non-living matter could not explain, for example, the origin of the genetic code which poses a massive chicken- and-egg problem, relative to proteins and Deoxyribonucleic Acid (DNA). According to him, intelligent source of life, such as egg and chicken alongside other postures included in the origin of the amazing photosynthesis, the order in the Milky Way galaxy with its billions of stars and the natural laws that govern the universe could not favour evolution. In the lecture titled: ‘’ORIGIN AND EXISTENCE: THE INCONSEQUENTIAL CONCLUSION, Professor Zacchaeus Ogundare also posited more counter arguments to the Darwin’s evolutionism stating that it would amount to an un-examined conclusion about origin and existence if we agree without probing that ‘’LIFE IS BY CHANCE’’ adding that the whole episode was beyond evolution considering the evidences from the Genetic Code Argument, the amazing photosynthesis, the Complex Awesome Universe and our Unique Planet and the Natural law Argument. Professor Ogundare submitted that the universe was replete with superb organization that staggers imagination and could therefore be appropriate to conclude that superb organization requires a superb organiser; and intelligent designer “who must be God”. Professor Ogundare further acknowledged the argument of some philosophers like Leibniz Theodicy, St. Aquinas and St. Augustineth of Hippo who favoured the existence of a God as the author of the universe. The gathering was attended by intellectuals, from across the country, the EKSU community led by the Vice-Chancellor, Prof Oladipo Aina during his presentation of Professor Z.B. Ogundare to the audience described him as a hardworking, focused and highly cerebral intellectual who had devoted immense energy into research of epistemology and philosophy of science.

lexiconkabir:
whats your point

my point is on justification of your prophet's actions

lexiconkabir:
@parisbookaddict did you know that taking women as war booty is also permitted by the bible? look up deutronomy20:13-20 women has been taken as war booties long before islam

whether they have been taken as war booty long before or after it still doesnt justify that a self proclaimed prophet of God took women as war booty

true2god:
ACT 11:26;
'...and when he found him, he brought him to Antioch. So for a whole year Barnabas and Saul met with the church and taught great numbers of people. The disciples were called Christians first at Antioch'.

They (chritians) met in a church (not mosque) and were first called christians (not muslims) in Antioch. Christians are mere followers of christ hence they gave them the name christians. If you follow the teachings of christ (as the son of God) you are a christian and if you follow the evil teachings of mohammed (as a slave of allahh), then you identify yourself as a muslim.

mohammedian

Are you from boluwaduro nii

BraveGuy:
To the sceptics of the existence of Jesus of Nazareth, eat your heart out!


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4bLlpiWh9-k

please send me MB to watch this video, shud i giv u my nos

Maccabi Haifa-Norwich City bonanzawin inplay under 0.5 firsthalf @1.50

pesty100:
Club Cerro Porteno Asuncion-Club Rubio Nu bonanzawin inplay goal of team one under 1.5@1.75 under 2.5@1.20 goal of team two under 1.5.@1.10

ALL GREENIFIED

pesty100:
Club Cerro Porteno Asuncion-Club Rubio Nu under 2.5 and under 3.5 inplaY bonanzawin

BOTH GREENED!

How would he be afflicted with the above and he is nt yet retired