The major issue is actually the partner who may not be keen to bring the issue to a forum or to strangers so to speak who may even be experiencing much more in their own offline lives
freshdude2: True but, not today's Juve. These sorts of scorelines tend to instil some humility and should bring them back to earth. Bayern, for all their efficiency, wouldn't go into the next game playing for a 4-goal winning margin. Remember Chelsea at Old Trafford and the Emirates last season? They played not to lose because, Mourinho was 'new' to the league and had to size his opponents up, so to speak. Arrogance with comes from naivety cost Roma dearly yesterday. Hopefully, they've learnt a thing or two.
freshdude2: Per Bayern, you could say Roma didn't present a good enough opposition. It's the same reason Juve, for all their domestic dominance are woeful in Europe. They have good players but they need to get that European mentality. This is best of the best not Sassuolo.
I actually tip Chelsea for the CL this season . Of course, I'm objectively biased.
City are a fake club with no personality, like PSG. They had only four points more than 3rd placed Chelsea in EPL last season with 31 more goals, let that sink in for a moment, 31 more goals and a measly 4-point difference. They're just all muscle with efficient but dogmatic players, like PSG. They won't go far in Europe till they change their coach.
freshdude2: Roma are over feeling themselves at the moment. They currently disrespect Juve becase they think they have a chance at prising the Scudetto from the Old Lady. But truth is, they cannot grind out results like Juve can and Juve wouldn't by, at most, two goals to Bayern. Roma have got too cocky too soon, and they don't have a goalie.
Is it not the same Juve that chopped 4 goals to Bayern the last time they were in champs league
TV01: To be honest I wasn't aware of the "potting" style seeding. Anyhows they were dull. Bayern were quite chilling., Wasn;t it Roma that held City last time out?
TV
The seedings used to be based on performance in Europe over a 5y period The biggest clubs are ranked in pot 1 and they are seeded
Notable clubs which will have been in pot 1 HAD they qualified are United and Valencia
Schalke and Dortmund can break into pot 1 on the back of superlative performances this year
However league champions will be used now..
Does it mean if barca win, Real will be in pot 2 while Man CIty in pot 1
A club that cant even win Roma or CSKA Moskow... plonkers
ch7...it seems you persist in annotating the book and calling out people (frosbel etc)
anyhow u want it
SO THE QUESTION IS
So which major pentecostal movement in nigeria does not use the highlighted
There are also some "red flags" or warning signs to watch for in determining whether a ministry is sound and worthy of support. I would suggest the utmost caution in supporting or being involved with any organization that has the following marks:
Exerts pressure to give or encourages impulse giving by saying, "You must give now!"
Makes suggestions of condemnation and guilt if you don't give.
Uses hype, emotionalism, and spiritual manipulation, such as "prophesying" dollars out of your pocket.
Makes outlandish promises such as "Everyone who gives now will receive a hundredfold return." Or, "Those who give to this offering will have your debts cancelled."
Does not promote the local church, or projects the idea that theirs is the only ministry worth supporting.
Spends more time and energy raising funds than in doing the work of the ministry.
Builds money appeals around gimmicks and sensationalism.
Also has Mr Hagin who admitted using gimmicks in his ministry also resolvd to embark on a form of restitution like Zaccheus
Interesting scenario pointed out though u did not point out where his decsisions have mostly being beneficial
But you r right and u highlight the fact that one person cannot know it all
Even global CEOs of consultancies make mistakes
Does it mean they should not be head of the companies?
Making a superior counterpoint to the benefit of a relationship is not usurping rather is wisdom BUT that does not suddenly mean the head is useless
vivalableue: Ya... I will definitely say that it's fluid. But let's put conflicts into play. And this is where trust and ultimately having each other backs into play.
Ex: I live in a bilingual city where the majority speaks French. Daddy and I are both fully bilingual, but speak English. So, for the success of the kids were decided they would be better in a French school whilst learning English at home. No problem right? Wrong! I saw far my oldest was experiencing done speech delays and stuttering... At the pre-kindergarten level I enrolled him in a bilingual English school... Dad was livid, he expected our son to follow the program we put him in. But, I insisted that he stay in the school. Time goes on and, not to mine but dad's surprise, they started giving him speech therapy. His language improved,and to my delight he began conversing in French to strangers on the street (bus drivers, cashiers etc)...
So although his father felt like his decision was being usurped, he trusted me to make the right choice, and had my back. We now feel confident that once our younger one will begin school, both can start at the French ones with no difficulties.
Now you have clarified your post... in your model theterm headship is a fluid concept, more of a situational thing depending on the role to be played at that time.
That is clear and it can work also as long as there is engagement of the parties/stakeholders and a clear understandingof the roles and requirements to achieve the tasks.
To each his or her own.
vivalableue: Tbh... I didn't want to include my personal family model because I find that most members on this forum delight in bashing feminism. When the premise is the equality between genders. I Gave my interpretation of a traditional home based on my own upbringing and from what I observed.
If you are keen in knowing my POV... Here it is; in my family you contribute to its success by using your strengths to uphold others weaknesses. For example, the Daddy is a chef, so naturally he cooks most of the meals. I love to build and I'm an IT professional, so I make sure everything is in running order when it comes to that. He's a morning person so he brings the kids to daycare/school in the morning, I finish work with energy so I take the kids top the park in the afternoons. He's better with lists, so he organizes the shopping and trips. I have a better grasp of numbers, so I calculate savings and bills. We both take care of the kids and discipline them in 1 voice regardless of who takes charge in that instance. He doesn't need my cowering myself to feel like a man, because he knows that we appreciate whatever he does for the family. I don't emasculate him for watching the food channel, he doesn't make fun of me for being obsessed with every Tech convention. The kids are allowed to discover their God given talents without feeling the pressure of "not for girls/boys" stigma. So Ya... That's our family unit.
aisha2: Yeah when a will exists nothing much anyone can do except challenge the competence and loop holes if any. Most good wills are iron clad and challenging it usually leads to long pointless battles laden with hate and bitterness sometimes transfered across generations.
The case i quoted was a clear case of a man dying without a will and the daughter being excluded because of her gender. The point is that she could have stayed quite and whine kike most Nigerian women would about how unfair customs and traditions are to women but she did something about it and got a judgement for her and now other women can refer to her case as decided by the supreme court and get their fair share of inheritance
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LEgS2uDMEF4 pickabeau1, this one is for you bro. Enjoy watching Leroy Thompson and Creflo Dollar or throw up - Now you know why he couldn't muster strength to turn up at Hagin's called meeting
donroxy: Don't mind the Op ... How could you be feminist and allowed the buck to stopped @ the man's table ... What happened to mutual decision and collective responsibility for failure !!
The Op is an Opportunist not a feminist .....
@vivalableue, Presently, we mankind are removing ''gender ability'' in our definition of the role of men and women but the truth is Gender structure can never be eradicated in defining role of men and women !!
The man is possibly the muscle and source of strength to the family (the CEO and the strategist) while the mother is the Manager (Monitoring , Control and managing the daily affairs as strategically communicated by the CEO which all stakeholders(children and parents agreed) !!!
There is nothing like shareholders in a family-affairs else na other people go own your family and such family already scatterscatter !!
alutacontinua: I like proof, just like op supported his claims with pictures your statement would be more authentic if you can give at least, 5 examples to back it up
Ehya....for NL in my earlier post..substitute online forums....
Hope that settles it
Or do u know a greencard bride who is an avid online forum poster