₦airaland Forum

richmond500:
There is no way Tinubu would have won massively.
If it was APC and PDP, he would have failed woefully.
That little edge he had against PDP is a result of the chess he played

More like the chess played by INEC
Don't forget he actually lost the election.
Why didn't chess help him win his stronghold, Lagos?!

caandi:
yeah true cos they’re both teens sef
She can only seduce him!

Nope! That's not what I meant. In the US any sexual contact between a person below the age of consent and a person at or above it is rape. The age of consent in that state is 17 so she can rape him by touching his genitals or MouthAction.
But it'll be virtually impossible for her to FORCIBLY have him penetrate her.
Here's why (as people wrote earlier):

A female can be penetrated anytime. On the other hand, certain conditions can make a man UNABLE to get hard to penetrate a woman - one of them is trying to rape him - forcing him or threatening him to have sex.
Let's stop pretending we live in la la land.

Here's another:

The male organ has to be stiff and erect before it can penetrate a female organ for sex or penetrative rape to occur.

caandi:
please ignore those quoting you
I don’t support rape
But I also believe it’s more terrible when it’s a woman/girl child that’s been molested!
The 14yr old boy child might enjoy it or it might leave a stigma
But what they don’t know is that a female child is scarred nd stigmatized for life!
A female child gets her hymen broken and her virginity taken away forever!
How’s rape is rape in this scenario??

Not only that, it is virtually IMPOSSIBLE for a 17y.o. girl to perpetrate forcible penetrative rape on a 14y.o. boy!

Bhol28:
Grace matters in anything we strive to achieve in this life.Obi and Atiku cancelled each other out for Tinubu to emerge.That is Grace.

So why didn't Tinubu win massively, or win Lagos and Abuja?

This is definition of:

AFTERTHOUGHT!!

Madaraa1:
Please stop you sounding like a typical nigeria
They is a reason rape is rape b.c if it was a 17 yrs old boy all the women in us would hold a protest for the boy to be jailed for life the double standard is too much they made the law they should face it and stop saying the boy will bost to his friends that's rubbish yes he will b.c society made it so not b.c he wants to

This is not true at all. If a 17 y.o. boy in Nigeria has sex with a 14y.o. girl, no one will hold a protest for him to go to jail. If anything they'll say she is his girlfriend, or worst her parents will warn him, or she'll be termed a slut

Emotionss:
[color=#006600][/color]


I honestly pity any male rape victim that come across someone like you in a police station or even in court.

People like you are one of the reasons why most male rape victims are mocked and shamed to silence.

You still haven't explained to us how a 17y.o. girl will forcibly perform penetrative rape on a 14y.o. boy.
Meanwhile see below, 99% of rapists are men. Why don't this huge number of female rapists you folks keep citing show up in statistics??

syntekelite:
Your choice of words speaks volume... Using the word sexing is a window into your thought process..
Now use your same arguments to analyse a 7year old boy being sexed according to your language by a 14year old girl.. you dont need to type it out just mull it over in your mind and reflect on what kind of psyche you really have..

The "psyche" is only in your head. I clearly explained it was laziness. Instead of writing long "statutory rape" I simple wrote sexing. But subsequently I simply wrote "rape". Did my "bias" suddenly disappear?

syntekelite:
Psychological problem at play with the poster you quoted,if you read btw the lines of his argument you could deduct its actually a female or an apologist..
A boy of 10 will almost always get hard when forced by a girl cos of the age of curiosity and innocence, his organs will definitely act cos he knows nothing,and the female rapist who has experience as a child predator knows what to do to her prey to get him aroused, thats why girls of 4 to 8years who have been raped rarely speak out,most cant comprehend what the pedophile did to them cos there is no predisposition or foreknowledge of sexual acts in their psyche..
Pedophiles are always mostly gentle with their prey, only a few re violent, cos they want to make their victims feel what they do to them is normal and that they(the victims) want it in the first place.

You are being too clever by half. Here's the post he quoted:

We know how a man can bleep a 14 year old girl by force. Please explain to us how a 17 year old "evil woman" can bleep a 14 year old boy by force

No where do you see 10y.o. there, and "by force" is clearly stated.

Still you clearly admitted that a woman perpetrating penetrative rape on a boy is a much more complicated affair than a man on a girl!

syntekelite:
If you check the use of words used psychologically by the person you quoted you will sense a premeditated bias, Subtly substituting rape with sexing for the 17year old girl,while using rape for the 35year old male analogy shows a emotional bias towards the female species..

Because a 17 y.o. girl CAN'T perform forcible penetrative rape on a 14y.o. boy. It can only be statutory rape. Instead of wasting time writing "statutory rape", I just wrote "sexing"

detectivejones:
You have patience fa explaining to someone who knows not but claims to know.

Nope. Check my posts. I never said anything like "17yr old girl raping a 10yr child is not rape". Never said anything remotely like that.
That's one HUGE disadvantage of a forum like this - you assume everybody on it is normal like you, forgetting some people on it have very low IQ indeed.
What he wrote has absolutely nothing to do with the point I was making. I think he finally got it and shut up.
Simple: a 17y.o. girl raping a 14y.o. boy is not same as a 35y.o. man raping a 13 y.o. girl.
Has nothing to do with age of consent, crime in US, and other blah blah he was writing!

tonytony208:
What of the 20 year old boy the 17 year old girl also raped?

What??

SPAMBOX7:
Guy you get strength o. See who you arguing with lol

The guy you quoted and you yourself, the point I was making went right over your heads. That's one HUGE disadvantage of a forum like this - you assume everybody on it is normal like you, forgetting some people on it have very low IQ indeed.
What he wrote has absolutely nothing to do with the point I was making. I think he finally got it and shut up.
Simple: a 17y.o. girl raping a 14y.o. is not same as a 35y.o. man raping a 13 y.o. girl.
Has nothing to do with age of consent, crime in US, and other blah blah he was writing!

DSC7:
Men are the highest victims of rape but the society always turns blind eyes ...

So many Young boys Ranging from 1 to 15yrs under their parents roof are being molested by their nannies and so called Big Aunties...

Please ladies stop raping us......

Justice for Men!!!

See below, 99% of rapists are men!

Teymanhenry:
She could drug or threaten him first before mounting him

I'll let these people who posted previously answer you:

A female can be penetrated anytime. On the other hand, certain conditions can make a man UNABLE to get hard - one of them is trying to rape him - forcing him or threatening him to have sex.
Let's stop pretending we live in la la land.

Here's another:

The male organ has to be stiff and erect before it can penetrate a female organ for sex or penetrative rape to occur.
How could the 14 and 10 year old under duress by the 17 year old girl get erection to be raped by the girl?

Najdorf:
Stop wasting time on the ignorant human being. Some people no matter how much you talk they can never under something.

The guy you quoted and you yourself, the point I was making went right over your heads. That's one HUGE disadvantage of a forum like this - you assume everybody on it is normal like you, forgetting some people on it have very low IQ indeed.
What he wrote had absolutely nothing to do with the point I was making. I think he finally got it and shut up.
Simple: a 17y.o. girl raping a 14y.o. is not same as a 35y.o. man raping a 13 y.o. girl.
Has nothing to do with age of consent, crime in US, and other blah blah he was writing!

rabiudon:
You are trying to make a dumb point. Even in the write up, we can see she is being tried as an adult. So what's your point?

I feel like I'm in some sort of twilight zone!
Of course she is an adult in that jurisdiction. What has that to do with the discussion?
Here's the point: guy said all rapes are the same - RAPE IS RAPE! Yet when you use example of a 17y.o. raping a 16y.o. he screams she actually raped a 10y.o. not a 16y.o. - suddenly rapes are different, all rapes are no longer the same!

onuman:
That's it. Some people who believe this story must be living in Lalaland - American style. If the boys got erection, it's like a consensual act.

Thanks but not quite. The story is very likely true.
See, in America sex does not have to be penetrative for statutory rape to occur. Any sexual contact between a child and a person above the age of consent (adult) is rape!

onuman:
American wonder. Make believe.
The male organ has to be stiff and erect before it can penetrate a female organ for sex or rape to occur.
How could the 14 and 10 year old under duress by the 17 year old girl get erection to be raped by the girl?

Exactly!
Though, to be fair, in America sex does not have to be penetrative for statutory rape to occur. Any sexual contact between a child and a person above the age of consent (adult) is rape.

mekus15:
So what's the difference? Are they not all sexual assaults? Many women claim that a man who is raped by a woman actually enjoyed the experience since he might have ejaculated. And this is one of the major reasons they downplay rape against men. But I have also heard of female rape victims who reached orgasm while being raped. The fact that a victim of rape reached orgasm does not in any way lessen the gravity of the offence irrespective of the gender involved.

It is not a question of enjoying or orgasm, it is a question of possibility. A female can be penetrated anytime. On the hand, certain conditions can make a man UNABLE to get hard - one of them is trying to rape him - forcing him or threatening him to have sex.
Let's stop pretending we live in la la land. See below

tiswell:
you are sik upstairs

I'm not "sik" at all. You the one living in la la land.
Explain to us how a woman can forcibly have pentrative sex with a male

kacheezy:
I condemn rape. But I don’t mind being raped by a girl with short hair, dark complexion and big nyash.

You sure??
You'd be traumatized for life, with all sorts of PTSD issues

SmartyPants:
Whats the differrence? In both of your examples and ADULT actively engages a minor.

What distinction are you trying to show?

Will your answer be different if a 14 year old girl seduces a 20 year old man?

Pertaining to sex, the legal definition of adult is age of consent.
As you can see from the below the lowest age of consent is that of our wonderful country - 11. Next is Angola at 12.
I bet in Angola a 13y.o. engaging a 12y.o. is not viewed same as a 60y.o. engaging a 12y.o., though both are rapes in Angola!

Flamemignon1:
They posted their marriage on their page,blame the bloggers for taking it up and promoting it but bigots will be bigots

Point is, THEY SHOULDN'T BE GETTING MARRIED!!
They can have their love affair behind closed doors. I have no problem with that. Just don't try to normalize DEVIANT behavior!!!

Fighter2029:
...... Doesn't make sense in anyway,nature is nature,it is either male or female,no matter the madness people choose to partake in,down there in the grave,the skeleton will either be that of a male or a female,it doesn't buy the idea of Gayism or transgender.

The problem is that same NATURE has some people with both genitals (hermaphrodites), some women with no genital opening, some men with practically no dicks, some men who look totally macho masculine outside but are actually women inside (of course NOBODY would choose that), some very beautiful women who are actually men inside. I'd suggest no one would CHOOSE to be gay. I mean, WHY?? Everybody wants to be normal, nobody wants to be a freak. I'd suggest somehow NATURE got some wires crossed and somehow some people find themselves attracted to same sex exactly same way you are attracted to opposite sex!

Fighter2029:
This idea of sleeping with a fellow man or a woman sleeping with another woman is one thing that will never make sense irrespective of how hard you try to make sense out of it,Gayism has no place in nature .

Playing devil's advocate, how about if you were attracted to women the way you are right now BUT somehow you have a female body?
Understand now?

Wagwanbrethren:
Love, maybe.
Gay marriage should not be a problem for anyone

I think it's a problem and looks downright ridiculous
What they do behind closed doors is non of my biz, just don't bring the illness outside

Good luck. Hope some zillionaire with a heart comes accross this

If you couldn't generate so much money before what makes you think you can generate it after you get N1m loan?