₦airaland Forum

budaatum:
This is precisely what we've been trying to inform you, yet you keep yelling Descartes, but go even worse than he does by claiming you are only sure you think. And when we ask you who this particular entity called you that thinks is, you go blind and don't see the question.

Elegantspiker:
Not with that scenario

Elegantspiker:
What are you saying exactly? Because you are trying but haven't said anything.

LordReed:
Bwahahahahahahaha! The liar here is you.

budaatum:
Your argument is that you are not certainly sure that

HellVictorinho6:
budaatum

this thing

again says you ,despite not being sure of you, cant do bla bla bla

the b@stard has 4tified her bank account despite not being sure


she wud say it can happen in a dream



but y cant she send murny 2?


cant she send murny in a dream?


what a crook!

Germi9:
Those guys are enemy of the entire world, dem no get friend

budaatum:
You are way too sold on Descartes, who's doubting was to prove the existence of a God, which it seems he did not bother to doubt too much despite having no evidence for the existence of his god, and which shows you are just beginning the journey of understanding your own existence.

Descartes' Error: Emotion, Reason, and the Human Brain is a 1994 book by neuroscientist António Damásio.

I've included a pdf link so you have no excuse not to get a copy and read it.

https://archive.org/details/antonio-damasio-descartes-error

LordReed:
Bwahahahahaha! Here comes the changing of mouth because you've been schooled.



You claimed he was a solipsist now you want to change to he adopted solipsism. BTW he absolutely didn't adopt it. He came close to it but the fact he acknowledged the existence of others beside himself means he was NOT A SOLIPSIST.

Lemme keep schooling you while you keep dreaming of defeating.me. LMFAO!

budaatum:
You are way too sold on Descartes, who's doubting was to prove the existence of a God, which it seems he did not bother to doubt too much despite having no evidence for the existence of his god, and which shows you are just beginning the journey of understanding your own existence.

Descartes' Error: Emotion, Reason, and the Human Brain is a 1994 book by neuroscientist António Damásio.

I've included a pdf link so you have no excuse not to get a copy and read it.

https://archive.org/details/antonio-damasio-descartes-error

budaatum:
By the way, your entire argument is based on dishonesty, and finger pointing to evade your own actions of repeatedly insulting and avoiding answering questions you know point out the flaws in your position.

budaatum:
Your argument is that you are not certainly sure that you exist. And that despite the fact that you must have woken up somewhere today, and eaten today and have relatives and friends and neighbours who must have communicated with you today, and have people you call mummy and daddy and who call you their child. So, kindly explain the point of further explaining to you that you must exist just to respond to this post.

And would you also claim not to know for sure if the children you go on to have exist or not?

budaatum:
This is just plain stupid and a waste of time.

LordReed:
Bwahahahahaha! You posted junk from Quora but still have mouth to talk. Go and check the same Quora you'll see that Descartes WAS NOT a solipsist on there. I posted a Brittanica link there showing clearly that Descartes was not a solipsist but fool like you will ignore it to continue to wallow in ignorance.

Stupid arse that didn't even know who a solipsist is is now forming knowledge that Descartes is synonymous with solipsism. LMFAO!

LordReed:
Bwahahahahaha! Once again more shallow stupidity from the perennial dumbarse. You went shopping on Quora but failed to actually comprehend the substance of what is being discussed.

budaatum:
No one is claiming their senses are infallible!

LordReed:
What a stubborn fool you are. Google was Descartes a solipsist and save yourself further embarrassment from me doing it for you and showing the world how foolish you continue to be. Bwahahahahaha!

HellVictorinho6:
Can u help me with 3k please?

budaatum:
I don't need to prove them wrong, just as I don't need to prove you wrong.

What I don't need do is buy into their ignorance and stupidity to think I'd wake up when put in a box and stuck deep in the ground when dead.

And I definitely would not be combining my resource with such fools on any project or venture.

budaatum:
So, you can't independently verify what your senses tell you about the true nature of the cars approaching the busy road you are about to cross?

I'm just glad not everyone uses their senses as little as you do or there'd be plenty more road killed.

budaatum:
The same senses that I have bothered to train myself to use better than you who hasn't bothered because you think they don't even exist?

And what do you think therapy is for, I wonder, and even psychodrugs?

https://www.nhs.uk/every-mind-matters/mental-wellbeing-tips/self-help-cbt-techniques/reframing-unhelpful-thoughts/

budaatum:
No one is claiming their senses are infallible!

That's why one would ask and knock and seek instead of merely believing the first thing one observes or is told, so as not to be lied to or lie to oneself.

But I suppose you might be the sort who crosses the road after your senses have lied to you that there is no car coming after it has lied to you that you don't exist.

budaatum:
I guess one must accept that you do not know how to use your senses, and you assume everyone must be lazy and as incompetent as you are because that must justify your lack of effort to learn to use your senses.

LordReed:
LoLz! Dumdum is dying of embarrassment. Bwahahahahahahaha!

What part of I am not interested in solipsism do you not understand?

Dialpad:
Hope prices of goods and services will reduce as people have taken undue advantage of this situation

LordReed:
LoLz. Stop being a stubborn goat and learn. Bwahahahahaha!

budaatum:
No, I do not rely on my senses to tell me what is going on. My senses merely perceive, while my mind is used by me to interpret what my senses perceive.

There's no way my senses can perceive a fat man that is not there, because my mind will tell my senses to look again to confirm.

But if your senses work that way and perceive fat men that are not there, be a Ferrari salesperson so your senses can tell you to exchange a real actual brand new red Ferrari for the imaginary million pounds in my imaginary bank account that are both not there please.

LordReed:
Dumdum is discussing Decartes A PHILOSOPHER and wants to discount the PHILOSOPHICAL meaning of a word. What a stupid ignorant arse! Bwahahahahaha!

Stop being an arse and say thank you for learning something new. Bwahahahahaha!

LordReed:
4
Bwahahahahaha! Dumdum educate yourself and stop being an ignorant ass. LMFAO!

budaatum:
It is not your senses that deceive you when a magic trick works, but your actual lack of knowledge of the trick, and you not developing your senses, and the trickers ability to misinform your underdeveloped senses.

What makes magic tricks possible is the knowledge the tricker has, and your own ignorance. If you were not ignorant and instead knew how a magic trick works you'd find you wouldn't be tricked by magic.

LordReed:
Bwahahahahaha! Dumdum you have just confirmed how SHALLOW you really are. A pretentious simpleton who gets orgasms because of big words yet has no true understanding.

Read the encircled and be educated dumbass.

budaatum:
I think it is English that is your problem.

If one claims to be perceiving something that is not actually happening, would you not say that person is stupid and tripping and maybe high on bad weed or just plain lying?

if I perceive, as in register with my own senses something actually happening, then something must actually be happening for me to perceive it.

For example, if I perceive, as in register with my senses, a boxing match where an ant is beating Anthony Joshua, then that ant must actually be beating Anthony Joshua for me to be perceiving it.

Now, that doesn't mean that anything you claim you perceive actually happened, because you have admitted that you don't know how to use your senses and you just might be lying or tripping, while I don't create imaginary crap in my own head and claim I perceived it when I couldn't possibly have perceived it.


Some people watch Tom and Jerry and claim rats talk too, but Tom and Jerry and Matrix is not actual reality the last time I checked.

LordReed:
Again if you want to believe live in a lalaland that's your prerogative, I am not interested.