Romance › Re: Neighbours Help Side Chick Escape As Wife Returns Home Unexpectedly by PoliteActivist: 10:15pm On Aug 29 |
Diamond098454: Poor married man ➕ poor sidechick
Hmmmm people are really going through a lot How is thr married man "poor"? |
Romance › Re: Neighbours Help Side Chick Escape As Wife Returns Home Unexpectedly by PoliteActivist: 10:10pm On Aug 29 |
Sonnobax15:
 Imagine the stress a caring side chick had to go through simply because she only wanted to offer the man what the so-called house wife couldn't offer . For the neighbors to help her escape,it simply showed that the wife must had been devil incarnate in the innocent man's life .
May God continue to bless every side chick and uplift every good and kindhearted neighbors out there, especially the ones who are playing their roles well  See this one. And he actually got likes😅 Tells you Nairaland men are SICK! |
Crime › Re: FBI Confirms Extradtion Of Two Nigerians Accused Of Sexual Misconduct by PoliteActivist: 8:24pm On Aug 29 |
ReubenE: "It is reciprocal"
That is what they tell you on paper, and that is what they want you to believe but it is not.
Nigeria always only get the short end of the stick when dealing with countries like the US, France, the UK.
They will not extradite their citizens to Nigeria to face prosecution. I'm even surprised you actually believe they will because it is suppose to be reciprocal. Because of legal hurdles by lawyers. All a lawyer has to cite to a judge to deny the request are prison conditions, human rights standards, and unlikelyhood of a fair trial. |
Crime › Re: How Friend Deceived Me To Sell My Kidney, Bought Phones With Payment — Victim by PoliteActivist: 8:16pm On Aug 29*. Modified: 9:20pm On Aug 29 |
. |
Crime › Re: How Friend Deceived Me To Sell My Kidney, Bought Phones With Payment — Victim by PoliteActivist: 4:48pm On Aug 29*. Modified: 9:21pm On Aug 29 |
GrammarNazi1: Two kidneys: normal total filtration capacity, often GFR around 90–120 mL/min/1.73 m² in a healthy young adult.
One kidney: GFR is often around 60–90 mL/min/1.73 m², although it varies considerably. The remaining kidney compensates, so the person may have little or no noticeable impairment.
You may make your research. . |
Crime › Re: How Friend Deceived Me To Sell My Kidney, Bought Phones With Payment — Victim by PoliteActivist: 4:46pm On Aug 29*. Modified: 9:21pm On Aug 29 |
|
Crime › Re: How Friend Deceived Me To Sell My Kidney, Bought Phones With Payment — Victim by PoliteActivist: 4:39pm On Aug 29*. Modified: 9:22pm On Aug 29 |
GrammarNazi1: Modified: With two kidneys, filtration is better and easier. Xxxxxxxx̌xxxxxxxxxxxx |
Crime › Re: How Friend Deceived Me To Sell My Kidney, Bought Phones With Payment — Victim by PoliteActivist: 4:37pm On Aug 29*. Modified: 9:22pm On Aug 29 |
Sleekfingers: You are using a smartphone. Your smartphone is not for decoration. Use it meaningfully Xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx̌xxxxx |
Crime › Re: How Friend Deceived Me To Sell My Kidney, Bought Phones With Payment — Victim by PoliteActivist: 4:26pm On Aug 29*. Modified: 9:23pm On Aug 29 |
Xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx̌xxxxx |
Crime › Re: FBI Confirms Extradtion Of Two Nigerians Accused Of Sexual Misconduct by PoliteActivist: 3:58pm On Aug 29 |
ReubenE: Good one.
But the issue is, the US will not allow their citizen to be extradited to Nigeria to serve punishment. It is particularly very interesting that the Attorney General appealed the case after the Federal High Court rejected the extradition application.
The US get whatever they want from us. Who told you? It is reciprocal |
Business › Re: .::. Scam Alert : Omowunmi Allen And The Pre-order Mess .::. by PoliteActivist: 1:16pm On Aug 29 |
|
Travel › Re: Bus Girl Darkskinnedella Update: They Sent Thugs After Me by PoliteActivist: 9:35am On Mar 19 |
. |
|
|
Christianity Etc › Re: Atheists Debate Religionists * by PoliteActivist(op): 12:01am On Mar 28, 2024 |
Steep: Then that renders your whole argument null and void. However, that ignorance is for you and you alone. Your hypocrisy is that you can't live out your world view, when you cross the road you avoid vehicles because you are sure vehicles exist and they can kill you. When you are thirsty of water you are sure to drink water not sniper. If you weren't truly sure that reality exist you would have died by now. I said there's high probability things are as we perceive them, but NOT SURE! But even Einstein who was sure still drank water. See below
|
Christianity Etc › Re: Atheists Debate Religionists * by PoliteActivist(op): 11:53pm On Mar 27, 2024 |
triplechoice: This is completely off and no where near what Harry postulated. You didn't understand what you read from him at all.
The "self" he talked about is not the "real self" but the "false self" ,the human personality, which is a product of the environment the individual grew up in.
He says the human personality, the false self, which most identify themselves with is not real person, but illusion that's controlled automatically by neural pathways in the brain formed from what's made of the impressions received through the five senses .
And he recommended that to transcend this "false self" one should practice meditation to rewire the brain and free themselves from it's control and influence and start operating from the position of the "real self "that existed before it, human personality, was formed..
But for you you have mistaken the "false self" for the "real person" and believe if the thoughts which has created it is eliminated, the real person seizes to exist. That's not true. Go watch his videos below. They are not that long to watch
|
Christianity Etc › Re: Atheists Debate Religionists * by PoliteActivist(op): 11:49pm On Mar 27, 2024 |
Steep: Is this about mocking religious people? You are even more religious than the so called religious people. He'd said religious people don't use their heads. Your quarrel is with him |
Christianity Etc › Re: Atheists Debate Religionists * by PoliteActivist(op): 11:46pm On Mar 27, 2024 |
triplechoice: You're generalise nearly everytime. Everything is not hypothetical.
We "basically" know something, but not everything. That's the correct thing to say, or maybe it's you who " don't know anything" , your own words in quote, and assume everyone else doesn't .
We don't need to be completely sure of what's "out there" before we start interacting with it through our senses. That's what our reality is,and it's about time you embraced it to end confusion.
And we have been doing that , interacting with what's out there, and that's why, for instance, it's possible for both of us to have this conversation through the gains of such interaction; the Internet.
A blind person from birth is still able to interact with it's environment to be "sure of what's out there , how much you with eyes to see., but seem not to want to use because you already assume it's inadequate. As long as you always have at back of your mind that you only see 0.003% of light, and don't know what 95% of stuff around you is, and your earth is smaller than an atom! Study what Einstein said below
|
Christianity Etc › Re: Atheists Debate Religionists * by PoliteActivist(op): 11:37pm On Mar 27, 2024 |
Steep: lol Since you are not sure of the true nature of thoughts, how do you know that thought exist, Or that dreams exist? Explain. can you define reality? Exactly. We don't! That's why the conclusion of Descartes ought be "something exists" NOT "thought exists" and definitely NOT "I exist" |
Christianity Etc › Re: Atheists Debate Religionists * by PoliteActivist(op): 11:34pm On Mar 27, 2024 |
triplechoice: No. I don't agree with you.
We know enough of what water is and what it's made of through interacting and experimenting with it .
But If you, yourself, are not sure or confused about what it's, then you can try this little experiment to clear your confusion.
Stop using that we all call water for three weeks starting from today; Don't drink it and don't bathe with it, and after then, please come back to share your experience with us so we learn from you..
It's said that nothing can be known except through its opposite. I believe when you experience the opposite of not using water for that period of time you will learn something.. You don't know what anything is. Quantum mechanics has gone from everything is atoms constantly in vibration, though they may seem solid, to now saying everything is immaterial information! |
Christianity Etc › Re: Atheists Debate Religionists * by PoliteActivist(op): 11:30pm On Mar 27, 2024 |
y3mi: Dimensions from a theoretical sense as it's relates to complex maths and physics enriches our understanding as to what define our reality beyond what we readily perceive as thus. It is you who have concluded other dimensions are bearer of beings. I think what you meant , as I'll put it... they could be realities wherein other consciousness (entities) operates on more dimensions than ours so they possibly could be inaccessible to us, metaphysically speaking however there are ways by which those before us could connect to them, either to acquire insight, noesis, knowledge, truth, clarity, foresight etc. That's what's meant by "beings" and that domain is supernatural to us. Just as we are supernatural to them. Unless you say nothing is supernatural because it is not supernatural to whoever is native to it |
Christianity Etc › Re: Atheists Debate Religionists * by PoliteActivist(op): 11:25pm On Mar 27, 2024 |
budaatum: Your opinion is that you are extremely real but you are not sure you are real?
You should listen to yourself so you hear how you sound. No, u listen to yourself. My opinion is Putin is a reptilian, but I have no way of being sure! |
Christianity Etc › Re: Atheists Debate Religionists * by PoliteActivist(op): 11:20pm On Mar 27, 2024 |
triplechoice: Wrong. What seizes to exist is the human personality, "the false self" that's a product of those memory. My " real self", the real me continues to exist. My friend, the human being is not a machine or a bot for that to happen, and infact science says such a things is scientifically impossible since the neural pathways which controls our objective behaviour is unique to the individual. You don't know this science hence you have imagined what can never happen.
Have you tried it with a dog before to know or you are just imagining things? Ok, unless you believe in supernatural, when a child or a dog is born, does it have a "self". How does the self develop? What's your argument to this below
|
Christianity Etc › Re: Atheists Debate Religionists * by PoliteActivist(op): 4:58pm On Mar 27, 2024 |
budaatum: I'm not surprised you would "only agree with" whoever, since you don't consider yourself real enough to form your own opinion or view of your own self. Oh. my opinion is that I am extremely real, the realest niccur u ever met. Problem is in "sure". I have no way of being SURE! |
Christianity Etc › Re: Atheists Debate Religionists * by PoliteActivist(op): 4:48pm On Mar 27, 2024 |
budaatum: I have wondered. And I can just about see you arguing with the figment of your imagination', except my own real self is not agreeing with your figment self and is calling your figment self out just as I'd hope your real self would, though you haven't shown you'd listen to your self all not to talk of my self. Sam Harris says your "real self" is an illusion, I only agree with him |
Christianity Etc › Re: Atheists Debate Religionists * by PoliteActivist(op): 4:39pm On Mar 27, 2024 |
budaatum: I am not conceeding to you who does not know you have a head. Anyway I suspect you're a figment of my imagination, so what does it matter😆 |
Christianity Etc › Re: Atheists Debate Religionists * by PoliteActivist(op): 4:30pm On Mar 27, 2024 |
budaatum: I am saying you don't use your head! 😅 So you are conceding religionists do use their heads? |
Christianity Etc › Re: Atheists Debate Religionists * by PoliteActivist(op): 4:27pm On Mar 27, 2024 |
kkins25: As I said in my previous response, your arguments, or Sam's statement for that matter, only make sense in the context of perception of reality and not that of questioning the existence of reality.
Unless, of course, you have a different understanding of reality.
A little side note:
I think the point you are trying to make is that the nature of reality, as we know it, may not be the real representation of reality. What we perceive of reality is limited to our five senses, which we heavenly rely on to define our surroundings. Correct?
We cannot question the nature of existence if we don't exist, can we? Sam's statement is about whether you actually exist as you perceive yourself. In reality you don't. It is an illusion. As for questioning, you are assuming that questioning can't exist by itself. You have no way of being sure of that. Dead people think and question while dead. Seems thought can exist without a "you" |
Christianity Etc › Re: Atheists Debate Religionists * by PoliteActivist(op): 4:15pm On Mar 27, 2024 |
y3mi: Those who are 100% sure that the supernatural doesn't exist bear a nuanced understanding of that word - "supernatural" They process it only within a the framwork of Christo-judeo myths repackaged into religion.
Supernatural is as to me as it would be to a 11th century English man seeing how I press some things on my phone screen and he sees an image of himself captured. He yells... "This must only be the work of a devil."
Both you atheists and theists have got lots of retuning to do, because both are as confuse as they come.
Until they remove the limit the mind to explore. The world behind the world can be revealed.
Science though is the ultimate supernatural gift that allows man to understand what make the natural super. Well, scientists have determined there are possibly 100's of dimensions while we perceive only 4. What would you call beings from those dimensions? Also geniuses, including Einstein, Tesla, Drake, Muhammed, etc saud they were fed thoughts. Where are those thoughts from? The problem with our science is that it is like we are trying to answer the question: X+5=?, without knowing AT ALL what X is, wether X is even a number at all or a goat! It is also why our greatest thinkers end up saying we don't know anything - if you don't know what X is, you don't know anything!
|
Christianity Etc › Re: Atheists Debate Religionists * by PoliteActivist(op): 4:06pm On Mar 27, 2024 |
y3mi: Abeg who you know wey don see shape shifting demons everyday. See below. There are people actually in spiritual wars Cultism, for instance, is spiritual
|
Christianity Etc › Re: Atheists Debate Religionists * by PoliteActivist(op): 3:59pm On Mar 27, 2024 |
budaatum: It's not only religionist who are not entertaining your junk here. Even atheists are not buying it because of your illogical dishonesty, which is not an illusion and does not exist entirely in anyone's head since we are intelligent enough to see right through real you. I'm actually the one saying the truth. Which part of my post below is a lie? Here's the TRUTH: You find yourself in this reality. You don't AT ALL know what it is. You don't know if it's an illusion (like Einstein thinks), a matrix, a simulation, a hallucination, a dream, a heaven, a hell, a prison, if you have free will in it or you just have illusion of free will, if the reality is being manipulated, if you're being manipulated, where your thoughts come from, whether you are the one actually thinking them, what thinking actually is, where your dreams come from, whether there is a "you" at all (atheist Sam Harris says there is not), wether things are predetermined (as Einstein thought), etc., etc.. All you know is that there seem to be things going on and you seem to be in them {or they seem to be in you - to the extent there is a "you"} Bottom line: YOU DON'T HAVE THE FOGGIEST IDEA WHAT THIS IS or what is truly going on! To compound all that, you find out you are practically blind (you see 0.003% of light), that you don't know what 95% of stuff around you is, that you only perceive 4 dimensions out of hundreds, and that on a cosmic scale, your earth practically doesn't exist - if the universe were shrunk to size of earth, your earth won't be visible even with the strongest microscope! |
Christianity Etc › Re: Atheists Debate Religionists * by PoliteActivist(op): 3:53pm On Mar 27, 2024 |
triplechoice: "Could exist entirely in your head" is hypothetical and not truth statement
And where "is really there" ? Inside your head or out there? Everything is hypothetical. We basically don't know anything. About "really there", that's the point, we have no way of being sure. We perceive it's out there |