Welcome, Guest: Register On Nairaland / LOGIN! / Trending / Recent / NewStats: 3,205,003 members, 7,990,765 topics. Date: Friday, 01 November 2024 at 12:12 AM |
Nairaland Forum / Nairaland / General / Religion / Atheists Debate Religionists * (11217 Views)
Einstein On Freewill; Atheists & Religionists Respond * / Can you prove that your God is the real God? - A challenge to all religionists / You Non-religionists, What reasons have You for Forfeiting Religion (2) (3) (4)
(1) (2) (3) ... (20) (21) (22) (23) (24) (25) (26) ... (36) (Reply) (Go Down)
Re: Atheists Debate Religionists * by PoliteActivist: 12:04am On Mar 14 |
FxMasterz: Oh, of course, Atheism and Evolutionism are outright religions and not even "of some sort". |
Re: Atheists Debate Religionists * by FxMasterz: 12:49am On Mar 14 |
PoliteActivist: No doubt! But atheists would deny this claim outright. They're even now yearning for brotherhood. They want association. |
Re: Atheists Debate Religionists * by 1Sharon(f): 1:32am On Mar 14 |
PoliteActivist: Sure. And here is a verse to soothe you. Jesus is with you all through the end.
|
Re: Atheists Debate Religionists * by budaatum: 1:34am On Mar 14 |
PoliteActivist: Kind of does, though I'm certain you know that it is the animal itself that chooses to survive, and not anything else stopping it from dying of hunger, just as you choose to survive or not, and not that something somewhere chooses for you. Anyway, I'm letting you be. For starts, it's hard to converse with a person for whom words mean what he says they mean especially if he does not state his meaning, and with someone who thinks he knows nothing and believes others are as know nothing as he is, and even moreso with someone who doubts his own existence and that of those he converses with. If you don't believe the humans you converse with actually exist, it wouldn't be long before you are impolite to them. |
Re: Atheists Debate Religionists * by PoliteActivist: 1:53am On Mar 14 |
Aemmyjah: I get that from time to time ("Young man". It tells me I'm succeeding in my effort to be non-gendered! Oh, I'm just stating the facts, not siding with any side. And they know it |
Re: Atheists Debate Religionists * by PoliteActivist: 1:55am On Mar 14 |
FxMasterz: Oh there are atheist churches. Quite a few. Just google |
Re: Atheists Debate Religionists * by Aemmyjah(m): 3:42am On Mar 14 |
budaatum: Is your brain faulty? The cycles in nature, the magnetic shield The perfect movement of the planetary bodies An earth with with a perfect satellite, a perfect tilt, a perfect distance from the sun (as science confirms) etc... Yet, your brain won't see a mind behind all these |
Re: Atheists Debate Religionists * by Aemmyjah(m): 4:41am On Mar 14 |
budaatum: Let us test if your brain leads to a right conclusion Both images are similar One is biological, the other is not One is living, the other one is not One can see, the other cannot One is able to reproduce, respire, feed, etc, the other cannot One is a million times more complicated than the other Which one is a product of intelligence and which one is a product of mindless chance or chaos? This test can show your level of IQ
|
Re: Atheists Debate Religionists * by HellVictorinho6(m): 5:23am On Mar 14 |
Re: Atheists Debate Religionists * by FxMasterz: 6:55am On Mar 14 |
PoliteActivist: Wow! Just hearing about that for the first time. They've even gone really far in their religious organization. |
Re: Atheists Debate Religionists * by LordReed(m): 8:25am On Mar 14 |
PoliteActivist: LoLz. You keep trying to deflect. No way Jose! You are the one who needs to demonstrate what properties of the universe would allow for unlimited speed. 1 Like 1 Share |
Re: Atheists Debate Religionists * by LordReed(m): 8:29am On Mar 14 |
PoliteActivist: LoLz. Your variations of an article first published on April Fools day and are casually tossing aside the fact that the author called it a conspiracy theory, all as a joke but sure you believe the article is serious. LMAO! Can you hear yourself? You just talk nonsense without saying anything. How have you refuted my point now that simulations are not designed for the limits of processors but for the limits of outputs? |
Re: Atheists Debate Religionists * by LordReed(m): 8:37am On Mar 14 |
PoliteActivist: LoLz. Everyone knows that but you started shitting bricks when I said it. When I call you a phony it's not only an insult, it's an accurate description of you. LoLz! What a good way to show you have no real understanding of the thing you are so strenuously arguing about. To ask where did things like lions liking raw meat and never eating grass, and goats liking grass, come from shows you have no real idea what evolution and natural selection are. You are merely repeating the jargons you glean. Lions have ALWAYS eaten raw meat and goats have ALWAYS eaten grass because they had that characteristic by the time their species evolved. Folks like you always think evolution is like a magic show where things suddenly appear instead of understanding how it all fits together. Of course you'd liken it to religion and faith because that is what you really are, empty of understanding but full of belief. |
Re: Atheists Debate Religionists * by PoliteActivist: 2:10pm On Mar 14 |
1Sharon: 🤣Quite funny But actually it's more like this below
|
Re: Atheists Debate Religionists * by PoliteActivist: 3:05pm On Mar 14 |
budaatum:I can't fathom how this statement of yours makes sense to you: "though I'm certain you know that it is the animal itself that chooses to survive, and not anything else stopping it from dying of hunger" Animals who can't compete for food, die of hunger. I don't see how the animal chose anything. As far as being impolite because one doesn't believe other humans actually exist, well read what Einstein said below (these quotes are from what I posted on the OP of this thread)
|
Re: Atheists Debate Religionists * by PoliteActivist: 3:16pm On Mar 14 |
HellVictorinho6: You were born poor and that's how you know intelligent design is nonsense? |
Re: Atheists Debate Religionists * by HellVictorinho6(m): 3:20pm On Mar 14 |
Re: Atheists Debate Religionists * by PoliteActivist: 3:21pm On Mar 14 |
LordReed: Can someone please help me explain to my good but obtuse friend that it is highly UNNATURAL in our world for something to maintain the same speed relative to you no matter whether you are at rest or moving very fast! |
Re: Atheists Debate Religionists * by PoliteActivist: 4:11pm On Mar 14 |
HellVictorinho6: Sooo, how does your poverty connect to intelligent design?? |
Re: Atheists Debate Religionists * by PoliteActivist: 4:44pm On Mar 14 |
LordReed: See the guy who wrote the article below. Go and watch his videos so you'll stop talking nonsense
|
Re: Atheists Debate Religionists * by budaatum: 4:45pm On Mar 14 |
PoliteActivist: Guess what you can't fathom is what the statement means to you. So I'll let you work on figuring it out some. |
Re: Atheists Debate Religionists * by LordReed(m): 4:45pm On Mar 14 |
PoliteActivist: This is not the question I am asking you. You made a claim I am ask you to provide evidence for your claim. Your incredulity at light's property is not evidence of your claim. Now again can you tell me what property of the universe would allow there to be unlimited speed. 1 Like 1 Share |
Re: Atheists Debate Religionists * by LordReed(m): 4:47pm On Mar 14 |
PoliteActivist: LoLz. Still repeating the obvious fact that he published it on April Fool's day to catch idiot's like you mugu. Bwahahahahaha! |
Re: Atheists Debate Religionists * by budaatum: 4:57pm On Mar 14 |
Aemmyjah: No, my brain nor myself do not see things that are not there. I do not look at a thing and assume a maker that there is no evidence whatsoever for. |
Re: Atheists Debate Religionists * by budaatum: 4:58pm On Mar 14 |
Aemmyjah: Neither is a product of mindless chance or chaos. One is an intelligent copy of what already exists in nature, which study shows gradually evolved over time into what it currently is. So there's no reason to assume there is an intelligent designer to compensate for one's lack of knowledge when one can very easily go learn. |
Re: Atheists Debate Religionists * by PoliteActivist: 5:04pm On Mar 14 |
LordReed: My good but obtuse friend you made a foolish statement - "Natural selection does not select anything". Natural selection is a SELECTION of who lives and who dies based on entertainment. So lions have always eaten meat and cannot change? Wjy?? And how come humans can?? Exactly why they are religions - we don't know enough to have an opinion about God based on understanding |
Re: Atheists Debate Religionists * by PoliteActivist: 5:08pm On Mar 14 |
budaatum: The statement is what is called pure nonsense. Animals who can't get food, die! There is no deep philosophy about it |
Re: Atheists Debate Religionists * by LordReed(m): 5:33pm On Mar 14 |
PoliteActivist: Dumdum post where I wrote Natural selection does not select anything. LMAO! Dumdum do you the meaning of carnivorous and omnivorous? Look them up if you don't. We know plenty enough to understand what evolution and natural selection are but dummies like you continue to claim what you don't understand or can defend with evidence. |
Re: Atheists Debate Religionists * by budaatum: 5:37pm On Mar 14 |
PoliteActivist: So, no selection whatsoever, right? Just a matter of the animals desire and ability to find food or die. Can you see why it's absurd to now claim that animal was selected to live by a selector? 1 Like |
Re: Atheists Debate Religionists * by HellVictorinho6(m): 6:01pm On Mar 14 |
PoliteActivist: It shows or requires no intelligence 4 me 2 be born into poverty. |
Re: Atheists Debate Religionists * by LordReed(m): 6:09pm On Mar 14 |
budaatum: LoLz. Oh how I do love thee budaatum. Bwahahahahaha! 1 Like 1 Share |
Re: Atheists Debate Religionists * by budaatum: 6:22pm On Mar 14 |
PoliteActivist: This your "we" bothers me. You haven't bothered to know enough, and you assume everyone else has been lazy like you've been and not bothered to learn anything, so you create us all in your image. Not everyone knows nothing. For while some of you are perfectly content to live naked and ignorant in the Garden of Eden without daring to eat of the fruit of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil for fear that you might die, some would pluck the fruit to test for themselves if they will truly die, and that's apart from those the fruit is being cultivated for.
|
(1) (2) (3) ... (20) (21) (22) (23) (24) (25) (26) ... (36) (Reply)
Religious Section Amazes Me!!!!!!! / The Great Tribulations After Rapture / See The Country Where Garden Of Eden Is Located... (photos)
(Go Up)
Sections: politics (1) business autos (1) jobs (1) career education (1) romance computers phones travel sports fashion health religion celebs tv-movies music-radio literature webmasters programming techmarket Links: (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) Nairaland - Copyright © 2005 - 2024 Oluwaseun Osewa. All rights reserved. See How To Advertise. 92 |