shadeyinka:

Something is still not right. INEC didn't supply any result which would have been an evidence for or against. Whose result then did the Supreme Court use?

shadeyinka:

Something is still not right. INEC didn't supply any result which would have been an evidence for or against. Whose result then did the Supreme Court use?

shadeyinka:

Let's agree that INEC did not supply any evidence, whose result did the Supreme Court use to decide the winner of the election?

NORSYK:


That is the question they have refused to answer.
What Supreme Court should have done in the case like would have been order for a rerun

LegalAnalyst:
[s]From the very beginning, I knew something went wrong. No sane justice of the supreme court will accede to political pressure to upturn an electoral victory of an opposition party in zone such as South East; bearing in mind of the many recent events in the zone.

But the perception that judiciary as presently constituted is Buhari's puppet makes some Nigerians, especially PDPs, think Tanko-led Judiciary has compromised.[/s]

shadeyinka:

Something is still not right. INEC didn't supply any result which would have been an evidence for or against. Whose result then did the Supreme Court use?

OgundeleT:

The one APC present.

berrystunn:


Government magic



People way no know dey happy,

People wey know them dey look.

But me I know say na government magic.
Then go give you 200 reason.

OgundeleT:

If INEC failed to do that, why Didn't PDP present the one that was given to their party agents? They don't have it. Hope won that election, but, I don't know whether it was rigged.
Court accept the one APC presented because there was no contrary results.

OgundeleT:

If INEC failed to do that, why Didn't PDP present the one that was given to their party agents? They don't have it. Hope won that election, but, I don't know whether it was rigged.
Court accept the one APC presented because there was no contrary results.

festacman:


That's negligence on the part of INEC and on the part of Emeka Ihedioha's lawyers. May be Emeka should explore possibility of suing INEC for gross negligence as a precedence for electoral process but again being a politician he may likely not be ready to be in INEC's bad book.

shadeyinka:

The supreme court was already compromised. They just needed a reason to bend the election results in favour of APC.
Yes, I agree.
The worst the supreme court should have done is to order a re-run

festacman:


That's negligence on the part of INEC and on the part of Emeka Ihedioha's lawyers. May be Emeka should explore possibility of suing INEC for gross negligence as a precedence for electoral process but again being a politician he may likely not be ready to be in INEC's bad book.

goslowgoslow:

How does this meaning to the facts in the post. If you can't bring a counter claim, stop commenting. I do know who curse don kill.

NORSYK:


Yes they perfected the plan before the case was even heard.
The rumors of Uzodinma taking over from Ihedioha came before the Case, Ihedioha tried his best to salvage the situation then, but met brick wall

OgundeleT:

There was no other results anywhere other than the on APC presented in court. If there is, PDP or INEC or Ihedioha's lawyers would have presented.

shadeyinka:

No sir!
The Supreme Court cannot accept the result from either APC or PDP as valid because they are not INEC.
The supreme court should have forced INEC to bring the results even if it was cancelled as evidence.

shadeyinka:

The loophole in their Judgement is just too glaring. They could have ordered for a re-run of the election

shadeyinka:

This is Nigeria.
The next election is going to be WAR. Since politicians know that they can't win fairly in court nor expect INEC to be neutral, it will be a battle of who can kill ,steal or destroy most lives and properties

festacman:


Are the 388 polling units non-existent? If they were then INEC or Emeka Ihe dioha would have simply proved that. Seems elections actually took place but the original copies of the documents, which Hope Uzodimma's team tendered are hidden somewhere or were destroyed.

shadeyinka:

I wouldn't be surprised if INEC was compromised just as the supreme court. It's just a matter of saying that the Oga at the top is interested in the case. After all, the FG pays the salary of both

ZombieHUNT:


Buhari is a disaster

festacman:


Why would "Oga at the top" be interested in removing Emeka Ihedioha and not Governor of Abia or Enugu state?

OgundeleT:

Results of each polling units were given to party agents and the security men/women at the units. If INEC failed to show theirs, PDP should show theirs. But, none of then could do that.

berrystunn:



They gave there reason to favour APC
Will they favour PDP if the case was the other way around.?

NORSYK:


The whole system is in shambles, 2023 gonna be extraordinary interesting

shadeyinka:

The loophole in their Judgement is just too glaring. They could have ordered for a re-run of the election

NORSYK:


it is not correct that Ihedioha did not cross Appeal. He did . The case was listed as no 9 for hearing on 13/1/2020 as SC/1470/2019, RT HON. Emeka Ihedioha vs Sen Hope Uzodinma& 3 ors.

Finally, it is not true that it is only at the polling center that results can be rejected. See the guidelines 2019 by the provisions of paragraph 28(c)(i)-(iv) which reads;

i) Review the figures against reports from the polling units;

ii) Request explanation(s) from the Presiding Officer(s) concerned, the circumstances of the inconsistency;

iii) Accept the results form if satisfied with the explanations; and

iv) If not satisfied locate the point of discrepancy, resolve the discrepancy and request the Presiding Officer to endorse.


Assertion from Ken AHIA, SAN.

berrystunn:



They gave there reason to favour APC
Will they favour PDP if the case was the other way around.?