Sixfeetbelle:


Calm down and reread his initial post, Roma. Not all of it was meant for you.

Romanoff:


Lol. I've seen it. Thank you jare. Why you never sleep?

Sixfeetbelle:


Night browsing.

The only time of the day I don't suffer network hiccups

Romanoff:


Eya. Pele

Romanoff:
The reason I advice women to be financially independent is cause you'll know why you're dating a guy. Not cause he's spending on you, but cause you really like him.

Man no fit use financially stable woman do Shakara.

Many men use their money as a tool to control a woman, which money you wan use control woman wey dey financially stable.

There's a difference between submission and control. Submission is earned and flows easily from the heart for while control is conditional, with something attached to it.

LordKO:




"Man no fit use financially stable woman do Shakara." That your crass statement does not hold true because financial stability neither cures greed and feeble-mindedness nor buy grit. So, being financially independent doesn't automatically make a woman or man gritty. Besides, having a job or business and an ability to scantly buy own toiletries doesn't automatically make one "financially independent."

There's nothing wrong with being a financially independent woman or aspiring to be one, but there's everything wrong when one's purpose of pursuing financial stability is to prove a point, like your mentality through your post connotes. It usually ends in tears when relating with aristocrats.

Meanwhile, only men who haven't conquered themselves will have a problem having a financially independent woman walk and work with them on their lead. Gritty women, regardless of their financial/social standing, aren't meant to be controlled in a relationship and won't condone such, and no sane man will take pleasure in controlling a woman. Only an insane woman, however, deserves to be controlled.

By the way, being on this new moniker doesn't stop you from being the person who's formerly "reb............" If you don't wish to be derided and debased, don't mete out the same to men or anyone, regardless of gender. Humility isn't a sign of weakness, just as arrogance isn't a sign of strength.

IamBroke:
Even me I'm guilty of this.. especially as a broke ass niqqer I find it hard to Toast girls that are financially stable.
One thing about them is that..they are so confident when talking to you.
You can't even use money to get them.
Most of them are so disrespectful because they have money..




Lalasticlala
Seun
Mynd44

Romanoff:


I believe submission is earned. The man earns submission by loving his wife.

Take away the money many men have and see their marriage crumble cause the so called "true colours" of the woman appears cause the money was a tool used to keep her controlled.

Take it or leave it, argue it, it's my opinion and I stand by it.

Romanoff:


I hope you don't see any insult in my comment?

God bless you.

Sixfeetbelle:


Actually, submission was requested of both parties, but I understand why you didn't see the preceeding verse to your favorite litany meant for subjugation. I totally get it

Ephesians 5:21, NIV: "Submit to one another out of reverence for Christ."

Ephesians 5:21, ESV: "submitting to one another out of reverence for Christ."

Ephesians 5:21, KJV: "Submitting yourselves one to another in the fear of God."

Ephesians 5:21, NASB: "and subject yourselves to one another in the fear of Christ."

Ephesians 5:21, NLT: "And further, submit to one another out of reverence for Christ."

Ephesians 5:21, CSB: "submitting to one another in the fear of Christ"

Sixfeetbelle:


Why your aim in a relationship is to control a woman baffles me. Like, is your self-esteem linked to having autonomous authority like a fvcking dictator?

Kebbiprince:

What exactly is it that u want to do differently, if you wouldn't mind

StacyO:


Who dash this wan microphone

Yusufisraelj:


Very well then, but I think you should give it unconditionally.




Not at all, but also look at what someone wrote below:



If you've met me in person you will know I don't twist truth to suit my interest, I take the whole counsel of God. You can point that out without being mean.

Your point is very valid, but as regards love relationship a man feeds of submission (respect) and a woman feeds of love for check and balance, however to your point both should learn to accommodate each other, if we go deeper into the concordance of this scripture to bring out the Hebrew meaning of the verse you quoted, you will know it's not plain submission, there is more to that, but this not the place for that. Cheers

Romanoff:
The reason I advice women to be financially independent is cause you'll know why you're dating a guy. Not cause he's spending on you, but cause you really like him.

Man no fit use financially stable woman do Shakara.

Many men use their money as a tool to control a woman, which money you wan use control woman wey dey financially stable.

There's a difference between submission and control. Submission is earned and flows easily from the heart for while control is conditional, with something attached to it.

Divoc19:

And most financially stable ladies are either not married or end up desperate
Tell me say I lie.

Divoc19:
It's about financially stable ladies. I am not financially stable yet.

Maybe when I become one. I will have more power to do and undo self

Romanoff:


You lie.

In short. Over lie.

My best friend is getting married in April, she drives a lexus SUV.

And she's the sweetest and most humble woman I know.

LordKO:

There's nothing wrong with being a financially independent woman or aspiring to be one, but there's everything wrong when one's purpose of pursuing financial stability is to prove a point, like your mentality through your post connotes. It usually ends in tears when relating with aristocrats.

Romanoff:


I believe submission is earned. The man earns submission by loving his wife.

Take away the money many men have and see their marriage crumble cause the so called "true colours" of the woman appears cause the money was a tool used to keep her controlled.

Take it or leave it, argue it, it's my opinion and I stand by it.

Romanoff:


I do believe it is a symbiotic relationship. A woman forced to submit without getting the love and care of the man is a ticking time bomb.

Sixfeetbelle:


Their relationship is like that because the guy is insecure and fake. A real nigga doesn't get quiver in his boots because a lady earns more. He knows his worth despite her earning power. Most guys are lacking in self-worth

Yusufisraelj:


Yes you are right, fulfilment will be grossly lacking in that set up, which is not an ideal situation. However the Christian's behavior is not on conditional basis, it's born out of love for Jesus and grace helping that believer to live that extraordinary life, it's not found in the flesh or human wisdom. How do you love your enemies?

chatinent:
That's because you toast everything in skirt you see with no intention of marriage.

Build your life, the perfect match will come by. You don't need to validate your wooing skills by deceiving random girls.

You are welcome.
Have a nice century.

Divoc19:
Women are most likely to misuse power because they can be are very emotional and sensitive being, that was why God spelt the duties out to Eve the Bible.

A financially stable lady is hard to control, unlike her male counterpart who can be seduced by something easily.

Control issue is big deal in a relationship. I am currently facing one now. Not good at all

hisgrace090:
Because most financial stable women hardly accep their husband as the head of the family as you hardly see a humble rich lady.

Nonexistent1:
Because the future is female according to one frustrated biitch who men fucck anyhow with fake promise of marriage.

GuyWise101:
Nna mehnnnnnnnnnnnnn


Guys have numbered their brains and found out they stand no chance with a woman who is richer than them,


If a poor, jobless and unemployable fish brain slay-queen can do shakara for them then what chance do they stand in dating a rich girl....