₦airaland Forum

xxix:
The flags weren't waving!

If you actually look at the footage shot on the moon instead of reading idiotic conspiracy sites, you can clearly see that the flags only ever move for one of three reasons:

An astronaut touched the flag or the pole holding it up.

An astronaut passed by it, and his electrostatic charge caused it to move.

The LEM ascent stage was taking off, and the rocket exhaust moved it.

Ever heard of CGI?

xxix:
The flags weren't waving!

If you actually look at[b] the footage shot on the moon[/b] instead of reading idiotic conspiracy sites, you can clearly see that the flags only ever move for one of three reasons:

An astronaut touched the flag or the pole holding it up.

An astronaut passed by it, and his electrostatic charge caused it to move.

The LEM ascent stage was taking off, and the rocket exhaust moved it.

Ever heard of CGI?

Blakjewelry:
you are funny sha. if I may ask what is the benefit of the moon landing? the rush for the moon is much more like a boll contest it doesnt contribute anything to man so why waste billions of dollar on such trip.

if scientific probs can land safely on planet like mars with enough gravity moon is a piece of cake.
right now apart from the fact that NASA fund has been on the steady decline over the years, there is no urgent need to visit the moon, beside the fine sand on the surface of the moon is huge threat to scientists

I did not say NASA are no longer interested in the moon, I said NASA CAN'T go to the moon cos they no longer have the technology. Can you spot the difference?

xxix:
You are the one who is seeing it from a non-logical point of view.

What can you point out from the actual moon landing to convince yourself that it was faked?

After the first landing there were other landings, there have been probes to Mars and discovery and study of black holes etcetera. NASA has done away with the moon obsession and now focused on deep space study. Like I told the other guy, stop drowning yourself in conspiracy theories okay?

Are you sure about this?
Did you read up what I wrote?
NASA said they can no longer land on the moon cos they lost the technology.

You should read to understand, don't read for argument sake.

Miggs:
The quality of the show has depreciated but GOT fans will never admit it.The characters and plot of the show have become unbearable.All the programme emanates from me nowadays at every turn are eye-rolls.I personally find it embarassing discussing this show now because it is that atrocious.I cant wait for this train-wreck to be over

You did not point out where the flaws are,
Or how did they get it wrong?
What where they suppose to do that they are not doing?
This is how you table argument, at least be objective,
Saying the show is an embarrassment is just not enough.

Miggs:
Almost everything about season 8 is a mess.The only positive thing is the aesthetic of the programme which still looks solid but the plot,storyline,characters are all rubbish.
A few weeks ago,I wrote a post about how Avengers:Endgame treated its new,relevant protagonists as side characters.The opposite is the case on season 8 of GOT where many side characters have become too prominent on the show.TOO MUCH FILLER has ruined this once great programme.It has been turned into watery akamu.
Anyway,the producers all got paid right?That was clearly their main concern for this season

You are wrong on all front sir,
Just say GOT has arrived at a point that people are still playing catch up.
In warring events the protagonist are set aside and the chaos takes center stage, that what you are having now. If there was anything I learn from Avengers Infinity Wars is to accept and try to follow the where the producers are trying to take us, but if you still try to rate things from your previous experience of the series, you wont see or appreciate the big picture that is playing out at the moment.

As far GOT is concern we are getting to the end game and that means there will be major changes so try to change with it.
And as far as am concern GOT has hold true to its roots, both in the storyline and its plot, its like the whole thing was already written out like LORD OF THE RINGS.


The people criticizing GOT are not even the one telling the story if you ask them whats going to happen in episode 7 watch them start predicting what they have no idea about.
It was even the clueless critics that brought up suggestion that Bran was the Knight King.

KoiceReloaded:
To add to what I said earlier; in the first video of the "moon landing", the American flag wasn't limp as onewould expect of an object in an airless place, instead, it was moving in a motion reminiscent of a breeze blown flag. How can you explain that?

Don't ask questions, okay? Accept everything their media feeds you like a good little sheeple, why don't you. Mtchew.

CGI did not start today i guess

KoiceReloaded:
Dude, think with the brain your mama gave you, and stop bowing to your emotions. I know you're one of those that swallow everything the western media feeds you, but every now and then, try to think, okay?

There has been no definitive proof that America went to the moon. A lot of people are questioning it right now. We are in the 21st century, and no country apart from America has gone to moon since. Why? It's simple, the technology hasn't been perfected. Yet, somehow, even before IBM invented a computer chip, America went to the moon? How? Think about it. It's hard to believe is all I'm saying.


The only way we can truly know that America landed on the Moon is if another country go there and see the American flag. Until then, it will serve you well to claw out of America's ass and think like someone with a brain.

You nailed it right there.

xxix:
You like to pride yourself with being enlightened yet you spew this shit?! I won't be surprised if you think the Earth is flat.

Can you detail the possibility of faking the moon landing? How come after all these years no one among the scientists and astronauts has come forward to debunk the moon landing. How is it possible that the USA could be able to keep thousands of mouths shut?!

And how is it that they can land on the moon with analogue technology, but cant land on the moon with the most advance technology of the modern day? think about it.
how in God's name do you wipe out the technology you spent Billions of dollars on just like that?
we are talking America here that wont stop once they succeed at something. How come they stopped going to the moon?

If there is a time to go to the moon now is the time, with the global warming and shiiit, but no for some reason the team that worked on the first trip to the moon had amnesia over night so they could not passed down the blue print, or maybe they did but fire and brimestone melted iron safes they put the document and burnt it to ashes.

You should know the main stream media is controlled, they will only tell you what they want you to hear, all i say is you should think about it from a logical point of view.

Femite74:
Hello house, I noticed that airtel has changed their night browsing airtime plan from N25 for 500mb to N25 for 250mb. The terrible part is that the plan itself is only about 150mb and not the 250mb they are deducting money for. Has anyone noticed this anomaly? Please advise which network and plan can I switch to for movies/series download. Thanks

I have been buying my data from a 3rd party, but of late you can get 3gb for 1500 on mtn (valid for 30 days) using MyMTN app, But if Glo network is blazing in your area, it should be your best bet.
you can browse the phone section to find the cheapest data seller in that section.

Miggs:
The critics are on point with their criticisms of season 8 though.I never believed in a million years season 8 of GOT could be worse than season 7 but the shows' producers proved me wrong.Season 8 of GOT is nothing more than a high budget,glossy B-movie.All flash and no substance

Let's discuss GOT here how is it so bad?
Is it the plot? The script or the story line,
I need to know you are not criticizing it because the main stream media does.

As far as am concerned with the 5 episodes of season 8 I have watched so far, GOT season 8 is on point as far as we are talking GOT.

So I would like to know which aspect season 8 failed to live up to your expectations?

JeromeBlack:
Why do humans always equate aliens to martians.

Have you even considered that aliens could look exactly like humans but with a different bone density due to a different gravitational force on a different planet?

Na men,
I feel more comfortable with the idea of aliens being Martians, the rest is more like a scam to me.

I also feel NASA is a scam, I mean you claim you landed on the moon, OK let's do it again, but you said No, because you have destroyed all the technology you used to land on the moon,
I mean we are talking billions of dollars here, but you destroyed all the blue print, who does that?

So if those same set of people come out and say there are aliens, I won't trust them no-niggas

JeromeBlack:
I'm actually an alien.

Oh?
Am sorry your Weirdness, I didn't know you were a Martian.
Pls try to understand we primitive creature are just too dumb for your advance race, and am not trying to be sarcastic here.

KoiceReloaded:
Season 8 may be very underwhelming to some, but I'm pretty sure it's still a good show. Season 7 was terrible compared to it's predecessors, but it didn't stop me from enjoying it. See, even on it's worst day, GoT is still worth more than 90% of tv shows floating around nowadays.

Spot on about what you are saying.
The way this season started shows there is way to much to come to take out the Knight King so early, now am beginning to see why.
It's like the army of the dead was just a tip of the iceberg.

The GOT critics need their heads checked.

JeromeBlack:
Normal and natural do not mean the same thing.

A hemaphrodite is a natural trans person
A crossdresding man who chops off his penis is an artificial trans.

When it comes to defining normal, it is quite tricky. It is dependent on culture and time.

Did you know that in olden times, a 6 foot person was an abnormal? A giant! People were shot then.

It is easy to say that a person with six fingers is abnormal because they are a minority. Do you know that it is now abnormal to have 32 teeth? Most people nowadays don't grow the last teeth at the back.

So, if you define normal, as what the majority are, then fine, gays, trans, six fingers are all abnormal. But as shown, it is a shaky definition.

There is reason why it's called normal, unless you are not dealing with humans.

JeromeBlack:
I'm not talking about transgender or sports. There has been a ruling that has solved the issue- at acertain level of testosterone, you will be banned from entering womens sport.


Stop trying to twist the issue. I am talking about hemaphrodites- how do you then see it? This is because, they are gay no matter what gender they choose to love.

Now, they were clearly born that way, so you cannot claim that its unnatural. Now you have a conundrum, you cannot even say that gays are unnatural once you accept that logic.

And if one is coming from a religious view, then it would be questioning God because he created hemaphrodites. Does God create unnatural things? Hmmm

i believe you are not a religious person so lets leave religion out of it, I started this without religion and i intend to keep it that way.
Am sure you are well aware of the a lot of freak of nature, snakes with 2 heads, people with 6 fingers, co joined twins, people without a nose....
the list goes on, so should i call these people normal because they said so?
I want to ask you a direct question, is having both male and female genitals in one body normal?

JeromeBlack:
I fail to see the point you are making. All I am saying is that a hemaphrodite should be treated with dignity as a human being.

You say that such a person is a freak of nature. God forbid that you have a child like that. Would you say that to his/her face? A freak of nature?

Hemaphrodites actually bring an interesting nuance to the gay rights discussion. A hemaphrodite is gay whatever gender they choose. This is of no fault of their own. So how do you then address this?

The way i address this is not going to go down well with the trans, and this where they will have to accept the reality or jump off a cliff.

lets say if a trans compete in a male category sports lets say in the MMA and he gets beat up badly because his testosterone is not of the same level with a normal man cos of the trans biological make up, it will not be fair for the trans to compete here because of the unfair advantage the male contenders will have over the trans.

Now you say ok since the trans cant compete in the male category let the trans compete in the female category of MMA, the trans goes in there and beats up the female contenders cos the trans testosterone level is higher than that of normal woman.

so where do you now place the trans? they are neither here nor there. what do you call people like this? do you say "honey fvck what people are saying you are a girl with a diick you are normal" or do you tell the truth that they are a rare case?

even my kids will have the truth raw from me straight up, its better to have a clear sense of what is normal than to create an illusion that will even hurt them the more when they realize the truth from someone else.

The case of treating people with dignity has always been a problem with humans thats why we have wars, but you cant demand a person to call you what you are not, that will be more like imposing your self on them, thats why i said they will have to jump off the cliff if they dont like being called what they are.

JeromeBlack:
False. That wouldn't make my argument false.

It is still discrimination based on physical attributes that cannot be changed.

The only difference is the scale of severity

so a freak of nature should be accepted as normal is that what you are implying?
Fine let people that are born with disabilities compete with able bodied men in sports cos they are "normal".
Let blind kids be given the same kind of education like the other kids because after all the blind kids are "normal".
should i go on?

JeromeBlack:
The hemaphrodites were born that way. You say that they should accept that they are an anomaly.

Not long ago, blacks were treated like an anomaly.

really?
are sure?
ok lets start treating the trans as slaves that will make your argument valid.

JeromeBlack:
So what about bisexuals?

Then hemaphrodites?

I have nothing against them if they accept what they really are - an anomaly.

JeromeBlack:
Normal is overrated.

For instance, kneeling or bowing to greet elders is abnormal in the UK or US. Yet, it is normal to you.

Is it also normal to have an illiterate as a president? Yet the Nigerian president barely has any adult qualifications.

Still does not equate to being a ret@rd,
It's a ret@rd that thinks a man's asshole is the best thing that ever happened when it comes to sex.
It's a retard that need artificial lubricant like KY before they can shove their dick inside a hole whose mean biological function is to pass out waste products.

The problem now is that the ret@rds are not flying the flag of ret@rds, instead they are flying the "we are normal flag", herein lies the problem.

The 2 instance you spotted up there are not even close to defend abominable products like your ret@rded cousins.

One is about respect something your western society can't instill in their kids,
The second is about politics something you have little or no knowledge about.

If I had my way, I would give your gay cousins a country of your own, there will be no women only men. You will stay away from the straight people since they are not enlighten like you.
If you want to make babies to extend your lineage you will use men for that.
We the foolish ones will try to make babies the old fashion way.

Then after 100 years we will know who is normal.

BetWinners:
Do you guys remember the wachowski brothers?They are the guys who wrote & directed the matrix.Well they are now known as the wachowski sisters

And the ret@rds will call it normal.

KoiceReloaded:
Pfft. How long did it take you to compose that, you _moron. You think you sound smart? You sound like a child throwing a tantrum. How old are you, btw? Can't be exchanging word with a 13 year old with an internet access.

Honestly it would have made more sense if you were delivered through an ass hole, then arguing with you would have been worthwhile.

Beorn:
When uneducated mofos can't match up to superior logic exposing their stupidity, the next move in their archaic plan to make is start accusing his opponent wrongly.


You remind me of the moronic boys that call ladies sluts_ when they have no proofs of their accusations. When all moves fails them, they pull the oldest trick in their book - calling them sluts_. Dumb move.

So wait I should take someone like you seriously?
Someone that is a weak ass gay bitch that can not call out another man on an open forum only to do subliminals?
Suddenly you now have cojones because I helped you out. That's good.
Now since you have warmed up your nerve, use that to walk up to your day and ask him if he is gay? Don't stop there also ask him if you were adopted because he is gay?

KoiceReloaded:
Man, you sure are dumber than a stack of needles.

No, I may be an asshole but you are fvck face.

You are a disgrace to your entire lineage. If your ancestors were gay I don't think you will even be a molecule talk less of a thought.

You are spitting on your father and your mum,
thank God every man is responsible for his actions or else your Father would have been held responsible for your Buffoonery to think being gay is normal.

If you or your wife or your kids or parents or your grand parents or your great grandparents are a product of homosexuality or their existence was even aided due to the product of homosexuality then am the fool here.
But if they were not, then your brain is operating on frequency shared by maggots.

Beorn:
You're not worth me being afraid to quote. You're just another character on the Internet so stop feeling like a god when you're barely noticeable to anyone.

I stated my reason for not quoting you, and that's because I couldn't stand the stench of ignorance dripping from your stupid post. I wonder how someone could be this ignorant and proud.

Now you're accusing me of having gay parents and cousins, simply because your rank idiocy was exposed. Whatever makes you sleep at night.

It's only a human with an IQ of a public louse would think everybody has to be gay or product of gay relationship before he'd have the intelligence of standing up for someone who's being discriminated.

I'm straight and proud, come from a straight family and don't watch gay scenes coz I can't stand it, but I'm human enough not to hate on a gay. I watch Empire but don't watch scenes of Jamaal Lion kissing his fellow man, but I don't hate him for who he is. As long as he's not trying to r@pe me or force his gay life on me, I'm good. That's the principle I live on.

Sorry I had to call you out, you were acting like a gay biitch, you know, the one that acts like a girl in gay couples.

JeromeBlack:
Heard of surrogates? Or Even adoption?

People have moved past your backwards way of thinking.

Spoken like a true, clown so every woman on this planet are now suppose to be vessels for some ret@rd's sperm.

How dear you mention adoption, you want to adopt a something that is a product of a diick and pusssy? no, pls adopt kids that are a product of diick and assholes.

Kaycee7:
Ever heard of artificial insemination?

Ever heard that it's not affordable for the common man?

KoiceReloaded:
Ever heard of artificial insemination, or surrogacy? If single women can have kids without procreating nowadays, you can bet your dumb ass that gays can have biological kids too.

And your dumb ass should have know the percentage of the human population that can afford surrogacy is less than 10%, and that includes your gay couples.

JeromeBlack:
So straight couples who are infertile are not natural too?

Straight couples are a product of straight straight couples, gays couples are a product of straight couples, infertile parents are a product of straight couples.

Name one your gay cousins have produced

Beorn:
JeromeBlack, just move on from the topic, at least till another time. Wasting your points on uneducated people is a tiring job.

I actually decided to excuse myself from the debate when someone who's supposed to be educated, someone with a functioning brain and access to Google was insinuating that if homosexualism is allowed, humans will stop existing in future. I literally froze for few seconds wondering how someone can be so ignorant to the point of proudly parroting stupid statements without logic. It's shocking. Like homosexualism will suddenly turn heterosexuals to homosexuals. As if it's easy for a straight man to just wake up one morning and automatically become gay by snapping his fingers.

The unenlightened fella probably didn't even know people have been gay even before his parents were born and yet till now humans are still reproducing. Maybe he thinks homosexualism started in 20th century/in recent times. Some people are so dumb, their dumbness can knock you out just imagining how they got to their of stupidity.

Let the issue be. Let he who's chosen to be foolish, wallow in his foolishness.

I dont do subliminals Beorn, all you have to do is quote me and stop being a biitch.

When you are a product of straight parents you will understand the folly your disturbed mind is distributing, so who will continue Procreation for your gay cousins.
So now your argument is let some people be gay and some should be hetrosexuals.
You are a clown.
Until gay couples begin to produce kids, you have no argument.