HiddenShadow:


Jerusalem will never be the capital of the Palestinians.

Jerusalem belongs to the Jews & Christians.

In Jerusalem, Christ was crucified.


Live with this fact or forget it.

So by that (il)logical statement, Nigeria belongs to traditional religions. Muslims and Christians should vacate. A shrine should be opened in Aso Rock. How about that? And voodoo practitioners from Haiti and Benin republic should relocate to Nigeria and take over the homes of Nigerian Muslims and Christians.

A land belongs to people, regardless of the religion they choose to follow or end up following. You dont import an alien population to replace the indigenous population because the indigenous population, in their majority, follow some other religion over the centuries than the one that was once prevalent.

And for your info, even Israelites (not Israelis o, I'm referring to the progenitors of Jews) did not originate in that land. Everyone on that land is a migrant. That's history. The Palestinians have more genetic claim to the land because the Palestinian people are a blend of the so many races, ethnic groups and tribes that came into that land, including the Canaanites who history record to be the first people on that land; and also they have descent from Israelites, Arabians, romans etc Palestinian people today are more "Israelite" than the alien Zionist Jews from europe who used the Holocaust by the Germans to justify moving into Palestine and taking another people's land. Hitler was not Palestinian. Why not ask for a sovereign Jewish state in Germany?

Those European/Caucasian Zionist Jews belong to europe and America. Some of them are Jewish converts (Khazars/Ashkenazi). They have no racial or ethnic ties to the land.

By the same token that indigenous Palestinian Muslims are denied right to their own land, don't forget that there are indigenous Palestinian Christians who suffer the same fate. Palestinian Christians, some are descendants of Jesus' disciples are equally maltreated. Check on YouTube for videos of Bishop Atallah Hanna, an orthodox Palestinian bishop and his anti Zionist advocacy. Nigerian pastors should listen to him. I'm sure they're not more christian than him. Maybe more of western stooges and follow follow than a Palestinian bishop who belongs to the oldest Christian community on earth.

When Nigerian evangelical/Pentecostal Christians carry Israel on their head, as if it is ancient Israel, and not an apartheid western creation, it is pure ignorance and shame. In fact a lack of self worth. Like apartheid south Africa, like Israel. Both are White colonial projects and any nation built on racism cannot live forever. Its either a one state solution where Jews, Muslims and Christians (and Hebrew and Arabic speakers) all live together in peace as has been the case for centuries before the British colonialists made the Balfour declaration to create Israel, or a two state solution (one for Muslims and one for Jews, and indigenous Palestinian Christians, the oldest christian community in the world, are lost in between). As it stands, Israeli politicians dont want peace and fanatical evangelical Christians are using religious fantasies to justify and support apartheid and colonialism. And this Israel and Jews dont even believe in your Jesus. Not even as a prophet as Muslims do. Jews believe Jesus was an impostor and born out of wedlock.

Today CAN wants the Nigerian government to follow Trump's madness and move it's embassy to Jerusalem. Tomorrow, you will ask america to move its embassy in the UK to Abuja. Madness. Dont forget what Nelson Mandela stated: "our freedom (from apartheid) is never complete without the freedom of the Palestinian people).

iamgenius:


Narrated Abu Hurayrah:

The Prophet (ﷺ) said: Do not make your houses graves, and do not make my grave a place of festivity. But invoke blessings on me, for your blessings reach me wherever you may be.

The Wahhabi Takfiri fanatics heavily rely on the hadith of Abu Hurairah. And these hadiths are highly disputable and controversial and can be contradicted by other authentic hadith in the same Sunni sources. Why the confusion?

Look at the above hadith which says we shouldn't make our houses graves. Yet, the Prophet (s) himself was buried in his own house. Not only that, the two idols of Quraysh, Abu Bakr and Umar, who are demigods to Sunnis generally, chose to be buried in a house too, right beside the Prophet (s). And that house was the one Aisha lived in.

Most times in passing takfir, the wahhabis judge the intentions of those who visit graves and call it "grave worship" or brand it "shirk". Yet, they become wiser to believe and understand that when we as Muslims, generally face the Qiblah, or do tawaf, we aren't worshiping the Kaabah. And our intentions are vindicated. Takfir is just an essential pillar of wahhabism. And sadly, this pillar aims at other Muslims who reject Wahhabi extremism and terror. Wahhabism means dividing Islam and branding Muslims " kuffar". We all know what the Prophet (s) said about a Muslim who brands another Muslim a kafir. The former becomes the kafir.

lakesider:
When will ICC prosecute Obama and bush

Did the USA and the UK sign to be under the jurisdiction of the ICC? They didn't ratify the Rome statute. So you are only held liable for what you signed and agreed to. Not that the ICC can't handle them if it had the jurisdiction to. Nigeria is a part of the jurisdiction of the ICC.

QuotaSystem:
Much ado about nothing.

Omar Bashir had been indicted by the ICC for greater war crimes 10 years ago, has he been apprehended? No.

Have African leaders given him up since 2008? No.

All the half-witted fellows giving themselves hi-5's over this development clearly do not understand that where ICC's powers end is where Nigeria's rights as a sovereign nation begins.

Anyway keep hope alive

The day Omar al bashir will be apprehended and handed over to the Hague will be breaking news. Just wait and watch for the right time. He should keep travelling around the world and one day will be one day. Those few places he's been to have not arrested him and they have come under pressure. The day he will step foot where he's luck will run out, his case will be like Charles Taylor's who was handed over by his asylum host, obasanjo. For the fact that bashir hasnt been arrested does not mean he's not a fugitive. If European leaders like milosevic have been arrested, like I said, just wait for the breaking news.

At least the government should be commended for this move. The tension was already spreading into Abuja over the rumor that El Zakzaky had died in custody.

The government has now showed him alive and allowed him to speak to the press. They should make more diplomatic and smart moves to gradually lead up to his release. Maybe allow him to travel out of the country for medical check up. But first release more photos or videos of him. To calm things down before his release in the next few months or weeks.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-W8dsaqz5HI&feature=youtu.be

CC Seun Lalasticlala Mynd44

LionDeLeo:

Stop wasting your time.

What they want to hear are lies against Buhari. As you can see, they were not there, but they know exactly how it happened better than you, lol

The moment you twist it a bit against Buhari, you will see them cheering you up even if the twist doesn't make any logic. One was even wondering how they came with teargas when the Police has comfirmed some of them were with explosives.

This should tell you the kind of "human beings" that dominate this forum.

The two of you should remember that Shiites are Nigerians too and human beings. While you try to pass your fairytale, don't forget that someone's skull got punctured this afternoon at Area 2, and that person is Shiite, not a police officer. If those Shiites had weapons or explosives, those policemen would've taken to their heels. Is it not common armed robbers and thugs that see them fleeing?

Your fairytale will bear some semblance of possibility if it hadn't been the millionth time that Shiites have been shot and killed since 2015 under Bubu's govt.

Your fairytale will bear some semblance of truth if Shiites have been proven to be armed. I don't think armed men would line themselves up in their hundreds and thousands chanting songs and marching in the streets.

Your fairytale will bear some semblance of rationality if you can show us the police officers who were injured by the Shiite protesters. But there was none and the opposite is the case.

And wait, why would protesters have teargas? For what? Teargas is not gun! It is the police who have teargas.

You probably saw teargas smoke and northerners yelling and you concluded in your bias and prejudice that the evil northerners were the ones who were showering the area with tear gas. As someone pointed out, if the protesters threw back the teargas cannisters at the police after the police shot teargas at them, then why are you misinforming us? These people have been holding peaceful protests since forever for the release of their leader whom the court has granted freedom and every time they get shot and killed.

The images of killed civilians look awful and very disgraceful and shameful for any government. The solution is for the rule of law to be followed. Not to create lies and spread propaganda to cover such awful images.

So of all weapons, the Shiite protesters took with them teargas to rain on the area. You just really consider yourself a genius or you must be thinking others you're feeding your story to are dunces. Just fear God. These are human beings having their skulls shattered.

vedaxcool:
If it is true then the officer must be prosecuted immediately. This morally abhorrent and unacceptable.

Vedaxcool has repented. This is good. At least for once you stand with justice and prove you are Muslim.

I learnt that this boy who was shot lost his father who's a lecturer at ABU Zaria and three brothers, all university graduate during the Zaria massacre in December, 2015.

Obviously, this shooting has nothing to do with Osinbajo. This is the handwork of the little kaduna state tyrant. He doesn't want to learn and fear Allah. Allah is already dealing with the big tyrant for the Zaria massacre. The small tyrant will get his own portion of divine wrath.

Seun, pls front page.

I don't understand how a human being has the guts to play with the life of another man. What type of creature is this?

Has anyone realized that this government's woes started immediately after the Zaria Massacre in December, 2015? Even Buhari going to Mecca and entering the Kaabah couldn't save him from Allah's wrath. How can you massacre innocent women, children and men at different locations all because some of them blocked a road? You then lie about assassination attempt on the COAS. Then one lie after the other. All because of their different faith.

They should continue playing with curse and divine wrath. Some people who cannot fight you even after you killed them like chicken and buried them in mass grave, and you think God will just sit down and clap for your inhumanity to your fellow man.

If Lai likes let him share the mansion with Zakzaky. As far as the man cannot step foot outside that mansion on his own will, he is in detention.

Neighbors don't want Zakzaky but there are millions of his followers who are ready to even give him their own life and properties and share their bed with him. If neighbors don't want him, why not let him decide to go where he is wanted? His son was begging on Sahara Reporters that his father (Zakzaky) needs urgent medical attention abroad. He's been denied that. Let him go abroad to treat himself like some other people do. It will save government the money to house him. In fact he will more likely use his personal money to treat himself unlike others.

This Lai-ar deserves an award for that his mouth.

Melania and Ivanka didn't cover their heads in Saudi Arabia, but they did to meet the Pope

Posted about 6 hours ago by Joe Vesey-Byrne in discover



The First Lady and First Daughter have wore head coverings in the presence of Catholics, but they did not in the presence of Muslims.

Following the tradition of other diplomats, Melania Trump decided to forgo a head covering when she visited the capital of Saudi Arabia - a luxury yet to be extended to other foreign women, or the kingdom's female residents.

In 2013, Donald Trump criticised Michelle Obama for not wearing a head scarf in Saudi Arabia.

Diplomatic protocol dictates that as the spouse of a foreign leader, Melania was not expected by the Saudis to wear the covering.

On Wednesday, moving onto to the third leg of Donald Trump's world tour 2K17, the First Family visited Pope Francis, in Vatican City.

Visitors to Vatican City are asked to keep their shoulders covered, and their skirts below the knee. Head coverings are not expected of visitors to the papal state.

Melania Trump and Ivanka Trump did however, wear head coverings.

Melania wore a mantilla - a lace head scarf in her audience with Pope Francis.



During the presidential campaign of 2016, Pope Francis called the President's border wall policy 'not Christian'.

In the social and civil context as well, I appeal not to create walls but to build bridges, to not respond to evil with evil. To defeat evil with good, the offence with forgiveness. A Christian would never say 'you will pay for that.' Never.

At the time, Donald Trump responded by saying the Pope's questioning of his faith was 'disgraceful'.

During a debate with his opponent Hillary Clinton, Trump criticised her for accepting donations to the Clinton Foundation from Saudi Arabia.

His criticism cited the character of the Saudi Arabian regime:

These are people that push gays…off buildings. These are people that kill women and treat women horribly and yet you take their money.

Mr Trump recently signed off on a $100 billion Saudi arms deal.

HT The Week

https://www.indy100.com/article/melania-trump-ivanka-pope-francis-vatican-head-covering-saudi-arabia-7752751

usermane:


Trust me, I would never have responded if you had chosen your words carefully. Misconstruing Islamic terminologies like "Kafir, Jizya or Jihad" is a fatal blunder that cannot be overlooked in the slightest. I never intended to speak for the sunnis in the least, even if my post may give that impression.

I take it you are refering to verses like Quran 5:17, 73. Put these verses in context, they address Christians who received the messenger yet denied his revealation. The truth had been clarified for them and they rejected it. These are not random Christians who know little to nothing about Islam. You can't call such persons rejectors/deniers/kufr. I'd love to go further than this, but I believe I have presented enough for you to look further into the subject, starting with Qur'an chapter 109.

You are persisting to change the topic. The topic is hijab, not definition of who's kaafir and who's not.

Your argument on the definition of who's a kaffir has to do with someone who has never heard of the religion of Islam or what it is. Not heads of states and their families in this age and time of technology and information. Please rest!

Trump travelled with his wife and daughter to Israel and the Vatican, after leaving Saudi. In both Israel and the Vatican, those women used head covering to show respect to the values of those places.

In Saudi, a Muslim country, the land where the Prophet's body rests and the land hosting the two Holiest shrines and cities in Islam, they rejected the culture of the land and flaunted their hair and bodies. Please what do you call that if not disrespect and direct insult to Muslims. The western media deemed that as "making a statement" to Muslims. And the leaders of Saudi open heartedly welcomed them to make that statement as nothing but little servants to mama America. While at the same time, a Saudi woman can't drive and cannot travel alone, talk less of moving without hijab. The point is trump arrived in Saudi as the kingmaker and boss. He's telling the world of Islam that he's in control where we consider the Holy of Holies. If you can't see that and you didn't feel belittled and insulted, you need to search your heart and examine your faith.

usermane:
Peace Rafidi

this thread is meant for Sunnis. are you Sunni? i doubt. i suspect you are from the so called "Quran only" cult.

I do not approve your language at all and I think if you want to preach Islam, you need to understand the meaning of common terms like kafir which you have inappropiately used to describe non-Muslim women like Melania Trump or Frederica Mogharani.

A kafir is not one who merely disbelieves but one who who recieved the message the but restrain or conceal it from others. And these women you addressed as kafirs evidently do not qualify as such because they've neither received the pure message nor restrained or concealed the message of Islam.

how do you know?

and what does the Quran say about those who believe God is "three in one"?

Next, according to the Book, there is only one holy site in Islam and it is definitely not in Iran.

so Al-Aqsa is not holy? i think you're from the so called "Quran only" cult? dont worry, its no issue if you do not regard some places as holy. they are not meant for you anyways.

Additionally, non-Muslims are under not compulsion to abide by Islamic dress code just as they are under no compulsion to abide by Islamic prohibitions on food.

non-muslim women who are not prominent cover up in saudi. dont they? so why are some exempted?

You need to reconsider your words because you or any Muslim out here may be no better than these non-Muslims in the sight of God. Study Islam and question your beliefs, stop being a complacent Muslim. Most of us who claim to be Muslims are in the wrong path. No one can be 100% certain that he/she is on the true path.

i am not claiming superiority. please its not even about the non muslims. it is about the muslims with double standards. stop drifting from the topic please.

Salaam

I'm not asking this question to spite my Sunni brothers. I'm asking because no matter my feelings towards any monarchy, the holy lands of Makkah and madinah are in what we all know as Saudi Arabia.

When the non believing women such as Angela Merkel and Melania Trump visit, they are welcomed without Hijab. Then Saudi TV while reporting the Visit is compelled to blur the image of these women without Hijab. The media of the west also go on to boast that these women are making a statement by refusing to wear hijab where the holiest lands of Islam as a whole are found.

On the other hand, when Kafiraat visit the Islamic republic of Iran, they cover up. Or if they refuse, the Visit is cancelled. Frederica Mogharini visited and she wore hijab in Tehran. Iran is the most powerful Shia country on earth and the Saudi Wahhabi sympathizers love to hate Iran.

How do Sunnis, and particularly the Wahhabi/Salafist Sunnis feel about this?

Iran has two holy cities, Mashhad and Qom (mainly revered and visited by Shia Muslims) where the grandchildren of the holy Prophet Muhammad (s) are buried. Those cities are by far lesser in sanctity to Makkah and madinah which are the holy of holies for all Muslims, Sunnis and Shia.

AnonyNymous:

Oam4j mynd44 lalasticlala Seun

Please apprehend this person. You should be able to pass your point across without insulting.

And fyi, before you get banned, educate yourself. The Sunni majority party won the elections in Iraq. Then, Obama backed Shiite leader Al-Maliki hijacked the elections and seized power. He eliminated top Sunni officials, and persecuted Sunni Muslims openly. These same Muslims who couldn't take it had to leave and for their own 'insurgent group' which is now called ISIS. The only thing you got right in your meaningless post was that ISIS is Sunni, which, if you had read my initial post before rushing to quote me with insults, you'd have understood.

Iraq elections: Maliki's State of Law 'wins most seats'

19 May 2014
From the section Middle East

Source: http://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-27474518

jbcul4ril:
Remember that two sons of the El Zakzaki were killed under GEJ government. Where was FFK then?

The same FFK who sounding like a concerned Nigerian now once called this group Terrorist.

Who is he deceiving now me or you guys?

May be you guys not me.

GEJ apologized personally by calling zakzaky on phone for the road incident in 2014. there was no escalation and no justification. it died down right there on the road. it was el rufai who called the army "jonathanian genocidal army" on facebook for the incident. el rufai was back then defending the shiites. he even paid a visit to zakzaky.

AnonyNymous:
Are these not the same Shi'ite Muslims that caused the creation of ISIS (with the help of Obama) after hijacking the elections in Iraq (won fairly by the Sunnis) and torturing, persucting, raping, and killing Sunnis? If the Nigerian government is infringing on human rights then its bad, but I also don't trust the Shi'ites.

****what you are smoking is best known to you. it is the exact opposite. Shiites are majority in Iraq. they won election. they lead government. all the suicide bombings target Shiites in Iraq. ISIS is Sunni.

and then the below fool is cheering the confusion or rather lies, and yet he calls others deceivers:

FriendChoice:


Only few people like you understand this.

keep creating more usernames on Nairaland to spread confusion and lies.

Demmzy15:
What exactly is your problem ehn ShiaMuslim? You like trouble and when you're given one, you start your emotional gibberish of Shia persecution. Toh, continue!

Oh! finally affirming that he is a terrorist and his Wahhabism is a sectarian terror ideology.

do not let ShiaMuslim come after your post. i'm just saying.

FriendChoice:
RadiyalLahu an Mu'awiyya.

"RadiyalLahu an Iblees"

lexiconkabir:
may the curse of Allaah be upon the liars.

Ameen Ya Allah!

may Allah guide the ignorant folks to repent from manifest error.

lexiconkabir:
may Allaah break those that keep speaking ill of the virtuous companions of Muhammad.....Ameen ya Allaah.

Ameen Ya Allah!!!!

this is real catastrophe when someone is cursing himself and little does he know. hope you know that Muawiya was one of those who spoke ill of the "virtuous" companions of Muhammad (S)?

it is unanimously agreed that Muawiya (la) instituted the cursing of Imam Ali (as) for forty years on the pulpits of mosques, especially during Friday sermons. it is also for that reason that he made adjustments on the timing of the two (Friday) khutbahs contrary to the Sunnah of the Prophet (s). many people used to enter mosque to pray and immediately the khutbah start, they would leave. so instead, to force them to hear the insults on the Imam (as), the khutbah was made before the salat!!! there goes another bid'ah by the so called "Ahlus Sunnah"!!! i am sure many beating their chests over here (about companions of the Prophet) would not have known these facts if a Shia had not mentioned them.

this same Muawiyah made Hujr Ibn Adi al-Kindi (RA), a companion, to be beheaded because Hujr (ra) refused to speak ill of Imam Ali (as) and used to praise him.

this same Muawiya had his governor in Egypt, Amr Ibn al-Aas assassinate Muhammad (RA) Ibn Abu Bakr, THE BROTHER OF AISHA and burn his corpse into ashes. while some people are obsessed about Aisha and defending her ills, they forget about Muhammad (ra) Ibn Abu Bakr. as if Muhammad (ra) was not the son of their beloved caliph or brother to their beloved mother; all because Muhammad (ra) was a Shia of Imam Ali (as). he refused the gang and rejected the legacy of Saqifa Banu Saeda.

once more, a very big AMEEN to your curse!!!!!!

the opinion of mainstream Sunni scholars is that Muawiya was a baghee. he was astray. he was cursed by the Prophet (s). no amount of fabricated merits and their proliferation can erase those facts. only Wahhabis praise Muawiya, his evil father and his criminal son who beheaded the grandson of the holy Prophet Muhammad (s). i really do not understand if it is Muhammad (s) that is truly your prophet or Abu Sufyan.

lexiconkabir:


exactly how a true shia curse out, but i won't stoop so low to this your pathetic level.

The prophet mentioned sincerity as a criterion, no?



what's in the heart manifests outside most times....


BTW I'm expecting you to log in with your other accounts so you can like this your post as usual.

whatever! the Prophet (s) mentioned sincerity is that not the reason why there is a difference between a Muslim (one who submits with the Shahadatain) and a Mu'min (who truly believes in his heart) even in the Quran? that sincerity is no criteria. it is part of being a true Muslim or a Mu'min. and reciting the Shahadatain itself is a condition against every vice. you have no instrument or right to determine who is a sincere Muslim and who is not. that is why Wahhabism teaches you misguidance and hatred and everything that pulls Muslims apart. how are you sure a random Shia or Sufi Sunni is not more sincere in his love and belief in Allah (swt) than you?

who gives you the right to label people idolators for visiting graves? and many more things which your own parochial ideology rejects? you have no monopoly on Islam. you are just another sub-sect of Sunni Islam that is bound to fade with the erosion of the power of Al-Saud over the centuries and the drying up of oil fields. when the oil goes dry, or its rightful owners in the Arabian peninsula get hold of it, the money spent to spread your hatred will stop flowing. and your ideology of hate and terror will disappear.

lexiconkabir:


actually, the shahadatain has shuroot(criteria) which many people lack....

a criterion set by the prophet himself...

lexiconkabir:
because we've seen people claiming the shahadatain but it does not enter their hearts.

thunder fire you and your shuroot. did the Prophet (s) mention those shuroot?

who are you to tell what is in the hearts of people? are you God? is that not shirk in itself to play God and judge people's hearts and intentions?

^^

you guys keep lying to yourselves and you believe your lies.

"The Alleged Role of Khawajah Nasir al-Din al-Tusi in the Fall of Baghdad" :

https://www.al-islam.org/al-tawhid/vol8-n2/alleged-role-khawajah-nasir-al-din-al-tusi-fall-baghdad/alleged-role-khawajah

Allah (swt) has stated in the Quran that he has not placed any burden in the religion. it is an easy path. it is only WAHHABIS to whom saying and believing in the Shahadatain, the principle set by Allah and His Prophet (s) for one to be called Muslim, is no longer enough to be identified as a Muslim based on the standards of Ibn Abdul Wahab. and you are playing with takfir, when the Prophet (s) clearly said that anyone who calls a Muslim who believes in Shahadatain a kafir is himself THE KAFIR!!! so continue playing until you meet the Day which Allah has promised.

Shiites: Emir cautions against attacks

December 21, 2016


Emir of Argungu, Alhaji Samaila Mera

Adeniyi Olugbemi, Sokoto

The Emir of Argungu, Alhaji Samaila Mera, has called for caution on the attacks on Shiites Islamic group in the country by citizens and security forces.

He also admonished religious leaders to preach peace and religious harmony.

Speaking to journalists in Sokoto, Mera said attacks by citizens on one another and jungle justice may lead to anarchy, stressing that the rule of law should be allowed to take its course.

The traditional ruler described the attacks on the Shiites as an attempt to break the ranks of Muslims.

He said, “I think we need to be careful; if you look around the world, the problem between Sunni and Shiites is terrible for Islam and Muslims. I hope our religious leaders would step in so that we don’t drift into unwarranted violence and killings.

“You find adherents of Sunni and Shiites everywhere, their differences was not pronounced as it is today in Nigeria, in the last five years, at least.”

Going down memory lane, the emir emphasized that Allah foretold that Islam would be divided, noting that he never authorised unlawful killings.

“The gory pictures of Muslims taking arms against fellow Muslims; Muslims are not expected to pick arms against Christians or even atheist, how much more, fellow Muslims,” he noted.

“What we believe is that anybody who believes and follows the tenets of Islam is a Muslim. How someone chooses to worship is between the person and His God. For goodness sake, we all believe in the same prophet and we will all be accountable to God in all we did on earth, “he added.

Copyright PUNCH.
All rights reserved. This material, and other digital content on this website, may not be reproduced, published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed in whole or in part without prior express written permission from PUNCH.

Contact: editor@punchng.com

http://punchng.com/shiites-emir-cautions-attacks/

CC Seun Lalasticlala

Isn't this a good interview, Seun Lalasticlala and mynd44? Looks like major arguments have been refuted.

HAH:


The libya script was what they wanted to play in Syria but it woefully failed.

The hypocrite Saudi, Qatar and other Arab the financed and armed the terrorist wahabis to take over power from Assad could not take a single refugees among those they funded to fight, they trekked all the way to Europe for asylum, the hypocrite wahabis called the Europeans kafir but when there to seek refuge, and now their terror campaign will also start in countries that took them in as refugees.

Without mincing word every salafist/wahabi is a potential terrorist. Boko haram, alqaeda Isis, alshaba etc are all wahabis.

Wahabism is a curse to humanity and bringing disgrace to our peaceful religion

Wahhabism aka Salafism is a satanic disease of hatred and division to humanity. in Libya, there are NO SHIA. Qaddafi was not Shia. yet, look at how Sunnis are killing themselves in Libya thank to those among them who follow the extreme Wahhabi ideology. in Syria, they are using sectarianism. once those extremists succeed in Syria (God forbid, and they will not succeed), it is their fellow Sunnis they will butcher. Syria will then be in perpetual chaos like all the countries the West gifted their so called democracy. people are no longer in need of democracy. thhey just want a good life and peace. take China as an example. it is a one party state with good governance and the interests of the people at heart of the government.

quickly:


YOU CAN STOP LYING NOW

Syria is 92.1% Muslims

Of that 92% -75% are Sunni while 11% are Shia and the remaining are indigieous or mixture with zoroastranisym.


Obamas position -- is remove Bashaar and replace him with a Sunni Man

Russia- is an ally of syria
Tight ties between Russia and Syria stretch back more than four decades. During the cold war, a newly independent Syria aligned with the Eastern block. As a young man, Hafez Assad, Bashar's father, learned to fly fighter jets in the Soviet Union. Soon after taking power in a coup in 1970, the elder Mr Assad paid a visit to Moscow, seeking weapons and support. A lucrative arms pipeline started flowing; when Bashar came to power, he expanded the contracts, turning Russia into Syria's biggest supplier. The Syrian government also allowed the Soviet Union to build a resupply station at the port of Tartus, which is now Russia's sole remaining naval base in the Middle East and on the Mediterranean sea. Syria is also an important Russian military-intelligence base and listening post. Cultural connections elevated the relationship beyond the obvious strategic and commercial interests. Scores of Syrians came to study in the Soviet Union; many married and raised mixed families



Bashaar Alsayaad is 100% Shia man ruling a Majority Sunni population....which the majority hate.

its not simplistic it is fundamental truth

STOP DECEIVING URSELFS U ARE UR OWN BEST AND WORST ENEMY-

there is no lying on my part. the thing is you just do not use your head. 5% more or 5% less is not a problem at all. but the point i am trying to make is that your bloc of 75% Sunnis are not united. they are not politically uniform because they are divided by ethnicity. the average Sunni Arab is a racist. if you are not exactly like him, in all aspects including ethnicity, even if you call yourself Sunni, you will not get along too well. what i am even saying further is to diagnose where the opposition to assad is from. Sunni Kurds do not oppose assad in their majority. the opposition is from the largest community, the Sunni Arabs. they form roughly 50%. and yet, on Assad they are divided. majority of the syrian army fighting for assad are sunnis, as well as his government, parliament and all state institutions. syria remains secular and that tells well why even the Sunni Arabs are divided. so stop making it seem as if there is solid Sunni bloc in opposition to Assad. you should check online polls and not talk based on sentiments and false perceptions.

quickly:
SYRIANS WAS A CHRISTIAN COUNTRY WHEN THEY ALLLOWED MUSLIM BECOME A MAJORITY SEE WHAT HAPPENED.

THEY STARTED THERE SUNNI VS SHIA FIGHT AND KILLING.


LOOK AT THIS

BASHAR ALASLAAD IS A SHIA RULING A SUNNI COUNTRY AND THE SUNNI DONT WANT HIM TO RULE ....THAT IS THE SIMPLE STORY


BASHAR CALLED RUSSIA TO HELP HIM AND THAT IS WHY YOU SEE BOMBINGS


MORAL OF THE STORY: WHEN MUSLIM BECOME MAJORITY AWAIT THERE ETERNAL SHIA VS SUNNI FIGHT..


PREVIOUSLY IT WAS IRAN (SHIA) VS SA OR IRAQ (SUNNI)

this view is too simplistic. Syria is 50% Sunni Arab and these people are divided between pro and anti-Assad. the turmoil appears huge because Sunni Arabs are the largest single community in Syria, but definitely not the majority. the Sunni Kurds make up around 20%, but Sunni Kurds and Sunni Arabs do not get along because of their difference in ethnicity. there is 10% Christians and 20% Shia (including the Alawite Shia sub-sect that Assad belongs to). one can conveniently say the majority of Syrians, as polls have shown, support Assad.

and correction, Iraq is majority Shia. but saddam was Sunni. kind of the opposite with syria. only that in iraq, the Shia Arab are clear cut majority making at least 70% of the population.

Stalwert:


He is indeed a fool of fools

keep replying to yourself using two different usernames Mr. Vedaxcool.