₦airaland Forum

LightandDarkness:
What exactly can I not prove

repogirl:
Buhari, Merkel is most likely laughing at you , not with you. Idiot.

Shebi next term he will be soliciting for women's votes and the women will tell him they are in their husband's kitchens and bedrooms. senile old dolt!

33bandit:
this sexual assault issue is not something serious .a normal person have once or more times gist someone about there sexual escapees .he is a man after all ..if it was Nigeria .we for hear alotta oloshoes talking about one night stand with prominent people like dem buhari sons and GEj ..even Hilary Clinton was raped so no body is an angel besides we don't need perfect people .we only need people who are ready to admit there mistakes and are ready to learn

LightandDarkness:
This is you dodging the question. Either say you cannot or you can.

krak101:
Uncle. Uncle is not a sign of respect but the name for your fathers/mothers brother irrespective of age. Same goes for aunty.



Better still just call him by his name. Simple

Tallesty1:
You have brain injury. Buy declofenac and ampiclox.

JESUSBOIY:
3 idiots

CAPSLOCKED:

IT'LL NEVER STOP, BROTHER..
ITS UNFORTUNATE THAT THE FOLLOW TRAIN WON'T STOP BRINGING US HERE.

AZOGtheDEFILER:
ur a disgrac ranchoddass

sonnie10:
As you no mention me, I will keep my 10k for the next person.

TV01:
As you are one of 2 who actually mentione me by name, I will take the time to post a few replies. The others knew to keep thier coo'ings coded, lest I swipe - what's it to be a cat among pigeons

I also have exprience of the West . And I'll tell you something else that occurs. Pet ownership in some countries is quite high. And some people really love their "pets". But it's still ownership - and they are in a sense "gods" to these animals. And, it shows, in the way they speak about, and treat them.

Feral animals will often be "neutered", and you'll hear "owners" talking of "castrating" or "spaying" their pets. But that's to be expected really, they are after all only animals right? But wouldn't you find that kind of language degrading if applied to humans?

Does anyone think that because they may drop something, or even take a genuine long-term interest in this girl, they have the right to make these type of pronouncements;





Along with a number saying she had to terminate the pregnancy?

Only if they prove totally incapable of looking after them. Further, the West is not determinative for Nigeria - there are local customs and morés. This woman is an adult living in the bosom of her family. You get to decide whether you give or not, they get to decide how they wish to proceed. Rendering assistance doesn't give you "ownership", or even rights as such. Is that overly difficult to comprehend?

Nobody beats the drum for the behaviours that leads to flourishing societies on this section more than I do. So please leave that. Where there are negative outcomes from destructive behaviours, we should by all means offer support, and work to breach the gap, but there are limits - and they don't extend to the kind of pronouncement above.

It's not your place to say that. And her antecedents are not necessarily instructive to her future. And even if she cannot, her family - who by the way have been there until now - are next in the hierarchy - not those of us here.

And if she has passed responsibility to “society”, that means any random individual, or FamilyLanders - if “society” does not have codified and workable laws?

Believe what you will, she asked for assistance, she didn’t agree to sign away her freewill, or sign up for a new god , and it says more about those who will think, write and justify that, than it does about her.

It's also good that you notice the kind of person "she is", because as I stated in my OP, I personally don’t see this as a charitable case. Her mother and wider family clearly have the means, her core problem is her rebelliousness.

If she would simply humble and apply herself she’d have a decent chance to make a good go of things. The crusading effort here is mostly "gist and preening" and will serve mostly to enable her on her current path.


TV

MzLarem:
You dont seem to get what the write up is about?

youngest85:
Chai! I wish to help but life is about give and take....

HungerBAD:
You are among the 8 i sent an email.

Please no more pm guys.

Thanks.

HornyTiwa:
Don't change your mind yet,I need it and sent you a Pm already

HungerBAD:
Thanks for helping me change my mind.
A lot of people are not hungry too and might not need it.

realmindz:
why can't I be ur boo? is it bcus I don't believe in the bible?
You may not knw my moral standard, values, achievements, vision or perhaps my level of discipline, focus, integrity and background....

All u see is a demon possessed monster with two horns, red eyes and vampire teeth, I may just be the humble happy innocent sweet looking guy u admiring in the real world..

And yes u are my boo

Anas09:
Where have you been? I was going to shout out looking for you. Are fine?

Anas09:
Me your boo, hahahahahahahahaha. *falls from chair*

LightandDarkness:
Not my intention. As you have required proof of me I require the same of you. Dreams are a common phenomena,you can prove dreams exist to someone who has never had one again by exposing them to research and studies...

how do you want to prove spirit spouses to me? First hand accounts describe events but say nothing about the cause, I've shown why I believe in sexomnia and sex dreams as the underlying cause of such experiences. You haven't said/shown/provided evidence about spirit spouses

I don't have hiv but I know I exists, I've never had cacer but I know not exists, i've never met a schizophrenic but I know schizophrenia is a mental disorder.

Forgive any typos. On my phone

Seun:
Sexomnia seems to have little to do with the "spiritual spouse" superstition, but of course this doesn't mean that the superstition is real.

LightandDarkness:
No memory suggests sexsomnia.

Memory suggests it could be a persistent sexual dream.

How exactly do you intend to prove a spirit spouse to me?

Believing in a spirit spouse assumes spirit exist (assumes because so far you have all claimed you can't provide evidence of spirits), assumes they exist in a separate plane (which you also can't prove), assumes they can can leave this plane (but apparently only when their target is sleeping), assumes that once they leave they become physical and can now have sex with a person in this plane. You might notice the key theme here are assumptions, you can call it fact if you wish but fact requires actual evidence and proof.

This is in comparison to the sexomnia theory which is supported by observation, brain scans, psychological studies etc. Essentially the difference between actual science and pseudoscience.