₦airaland Forum

Unless he's counting AA females including the 1 day olds.

Why?
Because she's one thoughtful woman that saw the Oprah show were it was announced that 70% of African American women are single

Do you have a link to this claim?

This is why I am not God and will not play God. I don't want to see them suffer, but it is not my will, but the will of the Lord that matters.

God's will be done.

ALL life, not some, but ALL life is sacred.

What if they are on life support machines or artificial hearts? Will it be morally wrong to pull the plug on that machine?

No weapon fashioned against me prospers.

Except those fashioned by your baby mamas. Good nite,

Now scram!!! Randy Osun babe.

Me randy? I still wear my chastity belt as thongs,
i'm from Ilesha.
BTW,
It's not just babe but hotbabe.

Your scriptures say love thy neighbour as thyself.
Besides, your name is stillwater. . . . . . .My science told me still water are prone to contamination. Grin Cheesy
You don't want to get infected, do u?

I can see you are looking for a way to hit on a black sister, i just hope she can separate the sheep from the wolves. Try and update your child support payments first before continuing abeg.

When i said "Black Goats". . . . .I meant animals not humans.
Every compound had about 13 goats each running around the yard. . . . . It was so amazing.
I have been to Ilesha n Abeokuta and trust me. . . . .Abeokuta(under G Daniels) developed rapidly.

Ok; i thought you were talking about our beautiful complexion. again, we love goats and it's part of our heritage.
On the issue of Abe looking better than Ilesha, it's your opinion. Osun is a wonderland in my own opinion.

Are u from Ilesha? You are putting up a good defense!!!
I havent been to Ilesha for 11 years but the last i went. . . . .They have more black goats than humans

I don't know why people like to associate Osun people with dark color as if there is anything like black, blacker and blackest. Black is black as far as am concerned and the shades of skin has nothing to do with Ilesha being urbanized with a rich accentuated culture that can never be found anywhere in the world. Besides, the class of infrastructures in todays Ilesha is by far better than the ancient walls of abeokuta.

I am from Abeokuta. . . . . .Even a village goat knows Abe is posher than Ilesha

Abe is also an ancient city with dem old roofs. Posher than Ilesha? on what grounds? electricity, strip clubs? pubs? water? Every city in Naija na the same abeg.

You would be specifically banned from coming near my grave, anyway, so don't give yourself headache

Sweetheart you are not gonna die before him. His sins against women are so numerous that they'll start haunting him before he turns 80.

Oshogbo?? That ancient town??
No way, Jose!!!

No you didn't!!! wetin be your town name? No be that place dem dey sniff gutter?

Now that's where the stupidity lies with most African Americans.

Is it only African Americans that do it? High school kids do that in Nigeria too and am sure white kids do that too.

Lol, some place better.

Ilesha or Oshogbo?

The stereotypical black female in the outside world, do not faze me because[b] I know who I am and I know where I'm going[/b].

Where are you going then? lagos or Abuja?

Always in and out of nairaland in one minute.

RedHotChic I get your point and I am not saying that it is right to bash any gender or race. I am just stating the obvious.

yea, brothers need to wake up and impress sisters and most importantly, they should stop hanging their shoulders whenever they are dating non black chics as if those chics are more superior than black women. The lighter the skin, the uglier the chic, no be so?

Many years back while in Maiduguri on national service, I remember those abokis get high on superglue and stuff like that.I think its crazy.

Were they doing glue because it's a drug of choice or because it's cheaper than igbo(marijuana)?

shes against feminists

I don't think so. She's against those redefining feminism to suit their cause.

I chose not to bother watching it. It is just incredible that a black woman would say that. It's just silly. Black women have always stood by their black men while black men have been degrading the black woman for a long time. The tables have only recently turned. Oh well we all have a right to our opinions abi

Are you sure the table actually turned? Don't you think that if brothers are down, sisters may eventually go down with them?

happy birthday honey.

Hear her complain about the delusions of black women:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4tdNxTV9i2c&eurl=http://www.asorock.com/People/asorockDefault.aspx?TabID=30&CategoryID=8&TopicID=6352


What do you think about her 8 minute lecture on feminism and race? I think she said some cool stuff except the racist comments.

The Emir and his subordinates should use the opportunity to create suitable sniffing zones by putting up open sewer reservoirs with comfortable seats. They could make a lot of revenue from this. The youths should be awarded certificates for being environmentally caring and friendly. at least they are helping to recycle the waste and the evidence of bad governance.

Roflmao, una go kill us for this nairaland. E don do abeg.

another note
i'll be noticin people standing for reasonable amount of time now at gutters, i think d phenom might spread to d south. that reminds me of one guy i usually see sitting in the gutter opposite my house, could he be. .

have you considered that part of the over 500 arrested may be do their interval prayers beside the gutter and not necessarily sniffing it?

I thought it was you who said its impossible for 90% of hausas in tokyo to take drugs. Now u are stating a baseless 90% Grin

Could you kindly state 3 of your "strange illnesses" that emanated frm the north?

Ethnicity should not cloud sensible reasoning sister.

This has nothing to do with ethnicity else why should i challenge the 90% junkie rate abi you sniff gutter when you dey write this one?. I can't even remember the names of all those epidemics that usually emanate from the north. Did you remember sometime they were showing a fungi looking plant that was growing out from their cheeks? That one happened in sokoto. There was also an incident of brain worm some 5 years ago in Borno, other worms ranging from guinea to Kebbi worm are countless besides, why is leprosy rate still very high in the north? How many of these beggars you see beside the road afflicted with leprosy are southerners?

Apparently so. According to the court. The court has ruled that women cannot be trusted; thus confirming a prejudice I held.

No court ruled such thing. Stop looking for a reason to excuse your prejudice against women.

@post

It's not fair period. . maybe the judge was thinking about the welfare of the child, since the mother does not seem responsible enough. .

The vote was 7-0 against the guy,

Trust me, Mr Parker was careless about the whole case. . . . Why would Hannibal wait more than a year to file post-divorce lawsuit??

Because you may be lousy or you may not have money for the process after the divorce.

It's parker's fault for trusting his wife.

Is it a sin to trust women again?

Don't mind H Cannibal, he doesn't know that he can be played and [b]played [/b]again in America.

Dad wasn't dad after all, but still owes child support
A Florida Supreme Court case raises fundamental questions about the nature of fatherhood and legal responsibilities.
By Warren Richey | Staff writer of The Christian Science Monitor

FORT LAUDERDALE, FLA.
Sixteen months after his divorce, Richard Parker made a devastating discovery. A DNA test revealed that his 3-year-old son had been fathered by someone else.

Mr. Parker immediately filed a lawsuit claiming fraud by his apparently unfaithful ex-wife. He took his case all the way to the Florida Supreme Court.

Last week, the Florida justices ruled 7-0 against him. They said that Parker must continue to pay $1,200 a month in child support because he had missed the one-year postdivorce deadline for filing his lawsuit. His court-ordered payments would total more than $200,000 over 15 years to support another man's child.

"We find that the balance of policy considerations favors protecting the best interests of the child over protecting the interests of one parent defrauded by the other parent in the midst of a divorce proceeding," writes Justice Kenneth Bell for the court.

"We recognize that the former husband in this case may feel victimized," he writes. He then quotes a scholar to explain the ruling: "While some individuals are innocent victims of deceptive partners, adults are aware of the high incidence of infidelity and only they, not the children, are able to act to ensure that the biological ties they may deem essential are present."

In effect, the high court is saying it's partly Parker's fault for trusting his wife.

The Parker case illustrates an increasingly contentious debate over the rights and responsibilities of divorced fathers who have been duped and don't challenge paternity at or near the time of divorce. But it also raises fundamental questions about the nature of fatherhood and the legal responsibilities that can attach to a father-child relationship – even when that relationship is the result of fraud and deception by a wife and mother.

Most states have laws that permit courts to order men who have been deceived to continue to make child- support payments even when they have no biological connection to the child. The idea is to minimize any disruption in the life of the child. In recent years, some states have begun passing laws that give deceived dads some ways to fight back.

There are no reliable estimates of how often "paternity fraud" takes place. Some findings suggest 4 to 10 percent of fathers, but no definitive study has been completed.

Unlike most duped ex-husbands in the US, Parker may still prevail in court. Last summer the Florida legislature passed a law that allows men to use newly discovered paternity evidence (like Parker's DNA test results) to overturn a court order to pay child support for someone else's child.

The June 2006 law is aimed at preventing the kind of outcome ordered by the Florida Supreme Court. The policy approach taken by the Florida Legislature stands in sharp contrast to the "policy considerations" cited by the state supreme court justices.

Supporters of the Florida law see it as a major step toward justice for deceived ex-husbands. Critics see it as a potential danger to the well-being of mothers and their vulnerable children.

In addition to Florida, Ohio, Georgia, Maryland, Alabama, Indiana, Virginia, Arizona, and Wyoming have laws allowing ex-husbands to overturn a child-support order when deception or fraud by an ex-wife is discovered, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures. By contrast, most other states set a one- to four-year deadline for fathers to file lawsuits challenging paternity determinations.

The idea behind the deadline is that any action taken in a marriage breakup should be completed while the child is as young as possible to avoid a major disruption during the most formative years.

"We don't want a system where a child is 10 years old and you have people who come in and undo what has been put in place many years before," says Susan Paikin of the Center for the Support of Families in Silver Spring, Md.

Ms. Paikin says that it is up to the adults in the relationship to thoroughly investigate any paternity issues at the time of the divorce.

But fathers' rights advocates say that few husbands are aware of a paternity deadline and its legal implications. And many have no idea that their wives have been unfaithful.

In generations past such infidelity might have gone undetected. But the advent of DNA testing is changing that. It is giving new momentum to a debate over how best to provide for broken families.

"There is no perfect answer," says Paikin. "There are a lot of people who will argue that it is always in the child's best interest to have a relationship with the biological parent and that should override everything else. There are others who believe just as fervently that being a parent has more to do with being caring and nurturing, and that is what makes you a father."

Part of the difficulty in paternity disestablishment cases is that once the financial contribution of the nonbiological father is terminated, the courts do not recognize a legal right to continued contact between the child and the man.

"It is the ultimate Catch-22 for my client," says Parker's lawyer, Scott Lazar of Miami. "On the one hand he has a relationship with this child and cares about this child and would probably be willing to provide money for this child, but he doesn't want to provide it to the mother to use as she wishes."

Family court judges aren't interested in fostering a continuing relationship between men and the children of their ex-wives, says Carnell Smith, who runs a DNA-testing company and is founder of Atlanta-based US Citizens Against Paternity Fraud. "The court is only concerned about financial payments."

Judges generally view the man in a divorce proceeding as nothing more than a "walking checkbook," he says.

Smith says that instead of targeting deceived ex-husbands, the legal system should investigate the conduct of the wife and hold the mother and biological father responsible for the child they produced.

"In no other area of the law do we punish the victim for the conduct of two other people," Smith says. "For me it is disingenuous for the Florida justices to turn around and say [to Parker] 'Well, it is your fault that you didn't find out sooner.' "

The Florida legislature tried to balance the law to avoid forcing children onto welfare rolls, says Tom Sasser, chairman of the family-law section of the Florida Bar. It rejected a proposal to allow ex-husbands to recover prior child-support payments. It also rejected a proposal to allow triple damages against deceptive mothers. Instead, the law allows ex-husbands to be released from future payments.

And that, advocates say, opens the door for some ex-husbands to attempt to build a trusting relationship with someone new and perhaps start a family without the burden of a court-imposed financial debt hanging over his new wife and children.

http://www.csmonitor.com/2007/0209/p01s01-usju.htm

Where do u get all these shituations from??
Why would a judge force child support on a man that is not the biological father??
Can't he appeal and prove DNA and stuffs?? This is not feasible.

man, that was on the news for a long time during the last year.

I wont put it past the guy. No wonder there is a popular movement in one of the States to name the Public Waste Disposal Agency after G.W. Bush. They consider it befitting considering the many shit loads of his presidency.

hahahaha, Nigerians, always looking for who to blame for their problems or how to excuse it, This time around na George W Bush go take the bullet.