₦airaland Forum

Teddy0147:
Tinubu is smarter than this… there is a law that protects American students….Dey can only release the result transcript not personal information…

Did you read the Judgement and Atiku request that was granted?

This is a different case sir. Don't defend what's indefensible. All the people you mentioned were not having any litigation.

Allow Atiku waste his money.

spyder880:
No lives were lost, we thank God.

To God be the glory ooo!

Hope nobody died?

Pay as requested or end of discussion.

What is this writer saying?

One of the negative effects of open grazing.

garfield1:
You need good defensive lawyers like wole,ikpeazu,fagbemi,olujimi,dodo etc in this kind of cases.if nnpp don't change their lawyers,they will lose totally.the best they can get now is a partial rerun.you can see that apc in nasarawa,Ogun abd pdp in Enugu used wole

That's true.

fergie001:
fixed game.

Hahaha! West Ham don't stand any chance at Anfield.

garfield1:
Which they failed to do at the trial stage which is crucial.it is almost impossible to upstage such concurrent findings

I don't know what came over those lawyers.

Kukutente23:
I have followed with interest the information coming from the Kano judgement and the issues from it.
The kernel of the judgement is cancellation of unsigned ballot papers which were in favour of NNPP totaling over 166,000.
The prevailing opinion stemming from the judgement is that any ballot papers not signed and stamped by the Presiding Officer should be rejected as invalid. This raised two questions in my mind.
1. Towards the elections, INEC voter education unit informed the public about means of knowing fake and genuine ballot papers.
2. If a Presiding Officer by error of commission forgot to sign ballot papers, it seems from this judgement that the voter and the benefitting party stand to bear the brunt of his error.
I found 2 to be unfair given the fact of 1 which never included signature and stamp as means if identifying genuine ballot papers.
Thus, I consulted the electoral act 22 and I've reproduced the particular section which I think deals with ballot papers signing below.
Section 63

From here, it is obvious that there's a remedy prescribed for unsigned or unmarked ballot papers. So i wonder if APC showed in court that the ballot papers were not from INEC or rejected by the returning officer because I think that's the only case where the ballot papers should be rejected according to the Act.

cc: fergie001
garfield1
What do you guys think about this?

You have a good point here. It's only left for the respondents to put up a convincing argument.

fergie001:
As a Hammer, we have to get 3 points from here, anything short of that will really hurt me.

You see am?

fergie001:
As a Hammer, we have to get 3 points from here, anything short of that will really hurt me.

You wan start again today. Na so you talk last week wey com backfire ooo! Thank God say you narrowly escaped last night, Burnley for wipe you.

garfield1:
Nnpp have a strong case in taraba

I don't think it's that strong. I will do a recheck now.

I have checked, the NNPP can't proof their case. They alleged BVAS failure but they could not proof it. Also, over voting could not be proofed successfully and INEC really stood their ground with their argument in defending Kefas victory.

fergie001:
Nothing will change. The cases are porous, weak and of no moment. The petition will be dismissed.

The same way I see it.

I hate to see court tampering with masses choice of candidates during the electioneering BUT the elected candidates should always put their house in order. The law/constitution should be understood/checked before taking any step.

Politics is taking another dimension in Nigeria.

APC can't win Bayelsa with Sylvia now. This is a wrong move.

I don't think anything will change here.

Make dem go waste money small!

I can't trust the media anymore!

They just want to crumble this country!

Jonathan is a big name ooo!

APC self dey?

HomoSapiien:
There’s a brother of mine who’s been admitted to the hospital for about a week now. Man is pain.

He’s always been diabetic but the foot got worse this past week and he’s been admitted. Unable to eat and sleep. I’m really scared for him.

Doctor gave advice that the foot is amputated to prevent the spread to the entire leg, but his families are objecting to this saying that they’d prefer to treat him.

My question is, is it best to treat him or get the leg amputated?

What are the chances of his survival doctors in the house?

File Photo: for illustration

I know some active local herbs for diabetics he can use. He will start seeing the effect within 3 days.

As expected!

fergie001:
.

Details?

Shinjawestside:
Why are head slamming mohammadian terrorists always st^pid

I do not know what you guys gain from irrelevant response like this.

confusedlady:
They actually live in a parallel universe to reality.
The referendum you are calling for..does it conform to the Nigeria constitution? Answer that question , then we can take it from there.

No mind them jare!

etrouble:
Biafra oooo, you won’t get.
Presidency oooo, you won’t get.
Senate President oooo, you won’t get.
Referendum oooo, you won’t get.

You weep for long

You are too troublesome

These people can deceive themselves for Africa.

fergie001:
Yea

That's what I am saying.

fergie001:
Gawuna didn't need to be a Party.

The SC in Buhari & Ors v Obasanjo & 265 Ors ruled categorically that non-joinder of the Political Party does not invalidate the petition.

Buhari had challenged OBJ's victory petitioning over 200 people without the PDP.

133(1) of the EA:
An election petition may be presented by one or more of the following persons;

A candidate in an election; or
A political party that participated in the election.

However, the tribunal's verdict was that Gawuna was winner but that was fundamentally wrong, it should have been to the Petitioner.

That is APC right?