₦airaland Forum

Billyonaire:
Vampires/Witches/Demons ?

Aliens/UFO/Extra-terresterials ?

Above mentioned are real. They exist.

Dont doubt it, cos you can be a vampire without knowing. Tomorrow, using the instrumentation of science, we will establish the nature of soul, the mind and body.

How soul can become vampiric, and create a peripheral for a demon to attach itself and wreck havoc. It is real and it is happening even in your homes. Even tonight.

Tomorrow, make it a deal. I wont fail.

Possible.

Anyone who truly reasons, practises and reads suspects their are forces within and around us. Except the Atheist who betrays commonsense in the very attempt to show it.

You can't be a good student of Quantum Mechanics and still see stupidity in Religion. The therapeutic power of Magnetic Energy is a simple example. I'd be checking.

samb4luv:
I did get the same mail.... pls don't bother ursf because the place is a bar and a small office for administrative purpose which am sure the office of the supposed SNL is located...

Thank you. I gave up after I searched for their website and got negative feedback.

do4luv14:
lolzzz wich means you don't even work with Dem @all,

look at it, from ma base in Ajcity to mushin, is a long journey,
imagine leaving home everyday by 5.30am, after getting to mile2 ontop bridge to look for molue going to oshodi, and taking a 30mins walk to work, i Ws able to make it by 7.15,

den came (if you come work like dis 3times in a roll, nah 1day absent be day, and if i absent you for 1day, i will cut ur salary for 2days), dats what i went tru, and i bear it for 6good months,

Chai! Lol. Man pikin don suffer. E go better. Is it how the Chinese sack their Nigerian workers! You'd hear: "Hey! You, get out!". Lol. Imagine where foreigners are more powerful than the citizens. Smh.

do4luv14:
even the distance lncluding,

imagine working from 7am-5pm, Monday to Saturday, and salary is a cheap 18k,
and out of it, transport to and froo for a month is 6-7k,
wat will you do

I've seen worse. As at 2015, the Chinese-owned Oceanic Bakery pay 9000. You'd work from 7-5, 7 days a week. I resigned the day I got the job.

Dopeyomi:
Not here to rubbish ur work/site but the truth its not detecting anything... i actually composed an invite message myself and i got a pop up of 'Likely a genuine invite'

This was why I asked how it works. I got three different invites from the same company for interview on Wednesday, Thursday, and Friday, an attitude of desperation, but the site said they all are likely true. I hope he makes it better with our observations.

babayug:
hey guys. I just built a web app that detects fake interview invites( gnld and their likes) .

HOW DOES IT WORK

1. copy your interview invite text message /email.
2. Paste it on Fivor
3. Click the "detect" button

Fivor will tell you whether the interview invite is fake or not

the URL is http://fivor.tk

Just tested it. I hope it lives up to that. You mind sharing how it works?

JackBizzle:
Gerarahere.
#swerve

Bravo! Freethinker!

JackBizzle:



Christian troll. Epic dodge- kingebuka style

A freethinker is not even free from ad hominem?

Dgaffer:
Please, do you have a Gmat past Questions. I got the test invite too

Not at all. You can download one online.

JackBizzle:
A 6-feet tall midget person can not exist.
A married bachelor can not exist.
An omniscient God who needs to do tests can not exist.


Follow the logic

So these are the reasons atheists hand on to show that God doesn't exist?

JackBizzle:
Shifting goal posts abi?

Atheism is as follows

1) The disbelief in God or gods. "There is no evidence for God, hence, I do not believe".

2) The outright rejection of certain gods. "The God of the bible does not exist as he is self-refuting; how can an all knowing God need to test humans?"


Number 2 applies to what you are talking about.

You first line means atheist do not know if God exists?

What about the God(s) of other religions? Do they exist too?

So an all knowing God testing humans is proof that such God doesn't exist?

....

JackBizzle:
I do not believe in the tooth-fairy as there is no evidence for it.

I do not believe in God as there is no evidence for it.


Atheism is a lack of belief and not a belief.

But Atheists also claim their is no God. How did they arrive at such bold confession? The deficiencies of Theism?

Kemmia:
Who else got this? What do i need to know that can aid my interview? Please can someone give me a direcrion to the place from Oshodi. Thanks for your prompt response.

Based on ur interest in our vacancies you're invited for an interview at WORKFORCE Beside UPS Gbagada Lagos on Fri 17th MAR by 1PM. Bring a CV and dress formal.

I got it. There would be a test to reduce the number of persons. The test is GMAT based. Later, the qualified are interviewed by the WorkForce team. There could be a final interview for those who passed the WorkForce interview by the Real Companies doing the recruitment.

JackBizzle:
Atheism is a freethinking position.

It does not mean that all atheists are freethinkers because some people are born into atheist families.

How come it is a position based on BELIEF or FAITH and not a position arrived through logical thinking?

gsmphoneseller:
I said it that those behind apostle sulemans ordeal and spreading the lies are Hidden Muslims..... Not the sincere Muslims but those that have planned to annihilate Christianity in Nigeria.....

I only feel bad because My Nairaland is one of the channels they are using to propagate lies against Christianity and Pastors....

But why don't these accusers of the BRETHREN go to court to seek redress orther than this campaign of calumny and character assassination?

Simple because it's fabrication that can never be proven in a court of competent jurisdiction......

In all, let the accusers go to court and stop the media trial.......

Sincere Muslims? You mean a Muslim with the Morality of a Poker Player?

I hope you are not confusing Atheism for Freethinking or a Freethinking Position?

who else got this invite

Hello. This is to inform you that the management of S.N.L approved your details and has selected you to come over for an assessment interview on Friday 17/03/2017.
Time: 9am
Venue: 228 ikorodu road, opposite NEM insurance by Obanikoro b-stop, Lagos.
Come with your credentials and a passport photograph.
Pls you are strictly advised to be punctual.

For help/directions you may call the Admin Unit: 0909-467-9990.
www.snl.com
RC:023/MPT

WiseYoungMan:
Thanks, i'm going with this

Be careful, bro. Bitcoin doesn't grow. What you have are ponzi sites for coins. What appreciates is the value of dollar to bitcoin and not bitcoins itself. Be careful. I'd advise you keep it and work towards adding more coins.

I don't understand. Why do people sell bitcoin when they can create a BitX account, transfer it and withdraw directly to their Nigerian account? Is there something I'm missing?

cc150615:
Brotherly, why don't you leave anybody that wants to argue. Afterall you're not the one looking for job, I was still discussing with a friend today about how this generation of job-seekers are quick to tag a job advert/invite scam or gnld even without any legitimate proof,nd I can't help but wonder if they really need jobs as badly as they claim.

A Job that pays 15-20k daily? That's about 375,000 to 500000 a month. Is that not a good reason to reexamine it?

ksstroud:
Oga
They are not GNLD, it is a new recruitment firm...
Find out info before you nail post...

And they pay 15-20k daily? Was that a mistake?

zoedicus:
GNLD dem don come again. #Spotted.

Daily for that matter. I was foolish enough to apply for some Jobs via Jiji and I'm still paying the price. Rogues!

Splinz:
Since atheism according to you lacks philosophical, ideological and conceptual standing, then what exactly makes atheism a rational or intelligent position? In other word, how is this "response position" intelligent or rational?

For all we know, this so-called "response position" could be someone's dumb, irrational, and ignorance riddled conclusion, since it lacks known principles (at least you've not stated any).



Agnostic-atheism is utter nonsense and a complete usurper of the English language. Like Sapiosexuality said, whoever coined this term is worthy of serious flogging. WTF! It is akin to saying "I am illiterate-literate". What sort of buffoonery is that?



How can one challenge a position that is baseless and devoid of any known principle, on factual grounds? What is factual about your "response position"?

Watch how he finds words in irrelevancies instead of saying how his response position is rational.

akintom:
You're a hilarious synonym for a confused mind, in an amplified level.

You neither hold theistic or atheistic views, yet you strayed in here to display pseudos.

* How can you possibly be challenging the logicality of atheistic views, when you don't subscribe to theistic views?

* it's idiotic of you, to be challenge the logicality of atheism, on the premises of philosophy or ideology. When i had repeatedly told you that atheism doesn't belong in that mode of knowledge body.

It's a pity you haven't yet seen how illogical you're, by ignorantly asserting logicality of atheism, when you hold no theistic views.

See how your sparkle within these favorite lines transcend you.

You find the right words when you are explaining the unnecessary but short of words when faced with being rational

It is not easy to make a different argument and attach conclusions, ridiculing others(with figments of your imagination), within them.

Simple. Your 'response position' is not a philosophical, ideological or conception position–your argument, no problem.

The new task was to tell how your 'response position' makes sense and you are gathering spittle. That should be simple to any rational mind. Go on. Don't spit too much.

akintom:
Your difficulty is a common one with most apologists here. You're reading your perplexed, hazy and confused mind into my writing (a childish mischief there).

The example you gave, shows your depth of foolishness and cognitive incapacity. Because those eg are your false deductions.



I will answer you, if you admit to discussing this point as a theist.

My examples are false deductions but you can show how? What is even a false deduction?

No, I won't argue it as a theist. Your attempt to shift it and bring God into the discourse will not work. Seems that is what intelligence means to an atheist. You need admit theism to have their attention. Not here.

4everGod:
Intensely deep confusion lurks within the soul of that individual you are discussing with. He is lost to your position so predictably throws left winged jabs to try and throw you off. It has always been his MOO

Exactly. It is easy to throw the jabs at any given opportunity but finds it boring to explain your points. And this same character will lay claim to superior intellect. Unfortunately, his brothers in the faith have deserted him.

If this was about the stupidity of God any dissenting view would have been placed in the asylum as is the custom but here he can't even argue out how his position is logical or how the nonsense agnostic atheism makes sense.

akintom:
This response is for audience of this your dark tunnel groping.

Agnostic-atheist -

* theist claims god exist, i reviewed the premises on which god proposition was based, i found no substantial evidence in such claims - atheism.

* then the theist says that he knows god exist, lack of substantial evidence notwithstanding. Then i said, i don't know if god exist, and i don't know of any premises on which to probe it - agnosticism.

I simply responded to propositions on the very premises they were presented. Nothing more.

This is the reason i said atheism (for the lack of better word), is not a philosophical, ideological or conceptual position.

You are confusing yourself. You cannot dismiss a thing and affirm ignorance in the same sentence. E.g:

"That man is mad AND I wont say for sure he's mad", "The girl is a harlot AND I can't say she's a harlot", "That family is cursed AND I can't say they are cursed".

First, you reviewed it and found it unsubstantial but secondly you've no tools to review it and they linked together.

They are mutually exclusive positions and can never agree. It is like saying:

"The bachelor is unmarried because he's yet to see a spinster available for marriage"
"The man is married because he met an available spinster and married"

Therefore, we can call the man a Married Bachelor. Isn't this the kind of argument you'd hear from an alien? This is just a conglomeration of bull shit. It makes zero sense.

akintom:
Were it that am not on a public forum with you, i would have abandoned you to rat on in your dark tunnel.

What are you examining?

Am not discussing philosophy or logic here. The claim of god existence is the crux here.

Below is simple enough "response position".

If this isn't rational position, to claims of god existence that's devoid of observable, verifiable and substantial evidence, then you suit yourself.

By Frank Fernandez

This is your first problem. Atheist don't say that there's no god. Atheists say that they don't believe the claim that God exists. These are two very different things.

One is the rejection of a positive claim. The other is a positive claim. Someone who says they don't believe in a God has no need to disprove the God claim.

The burden of proof lies on the person making the claim. If you claim that a god does exist then it's YOUR job to prove it. It's not the other person's job to prove it false.

If someone says the there is no God, they are now making a claim that does carry a burden of proof. But we atheists don't claim that God, in fact, does not exist. We simply reject the claims that one does.

So you can toss all the word salads you want. But you're not gonna pin the burden of proof on us. You claim that God is real, then it's your job to prove it. Plain and simple.

Who's talking about the burden of proof now? I thought we left that when you said Agnostic Atheism is your closest position.

Don't derail. We are still on agnostic atheism. You want to make sense but it has nothing on philosophy. Genius.

Why is this too hard for you? On what basis does this 'response position' make sense? Isn't this simple enough?

And don't throw that usual line of ad hominems that spend more than the words required to respond rationally responding pointlessly.

How is your 'response position' correct? You can use any tool you want: Astronomy, Philosophy, Etc. I don't see why you can't answer this.

akintom:
It's simply because your attention span is pitiably weak.

I told you earlier that atheism (for the lack of better word) is not a philosophical, ideological or conceptual position, it's simply a "response position".

Agnostic-atheism is simply a descriptive response to claims of god existence.

Enough of this your boring circus.

If you can't challenge my "response position", on factual grounds, pls hold your definitions to yourself.

A response position? So with what tools do we know that a 'response position' is rational? Is it beyond examination?

The truth is, you are defending atheism like the faith it is even though within you you can see it is not logical enough.

Whoever coined the word on agnostic atheism deserve a spank for misleading people and betraying meaning.

You need honesty if you really want to learn. Agnostic atheism is nonsense. It is saying you are literally an inhuman human.

I'd like to see how you respond to this.

miyagi01:
do u no ow much a land cost in lagos?

A land costs 60 million and that thing there was built with 100 million.