Scholar8200's Posts
Nairaland Forum › Scholar8200's Profile › Scholar8200's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 (of 118 pages)
EngrBouss:Hello, how much do they go for now? I am interested. |
Vikkyboy02:Congratulations. |
Just like Paul and Silas were jailed for delivering the lady with a spirit of divination. |
Vikkyboy02:Have you downloaded the WEKA software? Meanwhile, I saw this: http://www.marketingedge.com.ng/2017/01/10/mtns-adekanbi-set-to-make-nigeria-a-data-science-hub/ I also discovered this: https://bigdatauniversity.com/ http://www.cs.waikato.ac.nz/ml/weka/ It seems this is a very new field and experts are still scarce. cc:y4code |
Scholar8200:Well, the quote from Acts suggests that God was involved in the variation process meaning He did not stop interference in nature after the 7th day. Sch:At least the Bible records the birth of black men, red men etc1. Black Genesis 10:6 The sons of Ham were Cush, Mizraim, Put, and Canaan Verifiable history shows us Cush = Ethiopians, Mizraim = Egyptians. In fact, the Septuagint translates Cush as Aithopia (also see marginal reading of Numbers 12:1). Now what was the distinguishing marks of the Cushites/Ethiopians? They were dark-skinned. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aethiopia Miriam and Aaron spoke against Moses because of his Cushite wife, for he had married a Cushite woman.Numbers 12:1 NLV And Miriam and Aaron spake against Moses because of the Ethiopian woman whom he had married: for he had married an Ethiopian woman. Num 12:1 KJV she was so described because she was dark-skinned. we know this because Moses actually married from Midian, not Ethiopia. Hence, the offence was not that she was an inhabitant of Cush but , being one of the first manifestation of racism, she was a black! Do a search on those described as Ethiopians in the Bible and it will be obvious they were so distinguished because of the unique colour of their skin. 2. Red GEnesis 25:25 25 The first to come out was red, and his whole body was like a hairy garment; so they named him Esau. ANd he went on to become the father of the Edomites: This is the account of Esau’s descendants, the Edomites, who lived in the hill country of Seir. Genesis 36:9 At those times, naming or identification seemed to derive more from appearance. Sch:That is why Paul said :When he said all nations of men, the variations have been factored into it. Sch:Meaning God who made animals of diverse kinds did not stop and let things run. He intended man to have certain variations too.Would you say all specie of animals were present at creation? NO! In the creation account, pay close attention to the phrase, "after his kind".Gen 1:12, 24 |
20 And the sons of Ephraim; Shuthelah, and Bered his son, and Tahath his son, and Eladah his son, and Tahath his son, 21 and Zabad his son, and Shuthelah his son, and Ezer, and Elead, whom the men of Gath that were born in that land slew, because they came down to take away their cattle. 22 And Ephraim their father mourned many days, and his brethren came to comfort him. 23 And when he went in to his wife, she conceived, and bare a son, and he called his name Beriah, because it went evil with his house. 24 (And his daughter was Sherah, who built Beth-horon the nether, and the upper, and Uzzen-sherah.) 1 Chronicles 7:20-24 Now this is where you referenced. Consider the fact that: 1. Joseph was thirty when he got married Genesis 41:46,45 2. He had his sons about that time Genesis 41:50 3. Joseph died age 110 years Genesis 50:26 (meaning when Joseph was 90, his sons Ephraim and Manasseh were about 60) 4. Egyptian bondage started after Joseph's death not during his lifetime. 5. Gath is a city in the land of the philistines. Note that it was Ephraim's deceased sons , not Ephraim that went there; meaning Ephraim remained in Egypt while his sons who went to Gath perhaps to feed cattle were killed. QED |
tonyx4x44:They came about over time. At least the Bible records the birth of black men, red men etc That is why Paul said : and hath made of one blood all nations of men for to dwell on all the face of the earth, and hath determined the times before appointed, and the bounds of their habitation; Acts 17:26 Meaning God who made animals of diverse kinds did not stop and let things run. He intended man to have certain variations too. |
. |
I share your ambition. Do you have any ideas about R Programming and other tools? |
I came across this book a few years ago. I got so curious why there are so many people who want to have a copy of it. I did some research, and bought myself a copy. The CASE FOR CHRIST is a documentary book about JESUS, it is a thorough investigation If JESUS is really the son of GOD. This is about the search of historical records, profile and evidence for the resurrection of JESUS Christ... They called this book, "The CASE FOR CHRIST" The man behind this documentary book is Lee Strobel, an atheist or a guy who do not really believe that there's a God. He is a journalist and an ex-investigative reporter for the CHICAGO TRIBUNE. He interviewed a number of experts, religious and historical scholars, to prove JESUS Christ to be a fraud by the weight of the evidence. And to find out the truth, If there's really a son of GOD who came here on earth, who died on the cross to save us all from sins. After he gathered all of the evidence, he compiled it and named the book, "THE CASE FOR CHRIST". THE CASE FOR CHRIST E-BOOK DOWNLOAD The CASE FOR CHRIST is a very good book to read, especially, If you are an atheist, or just simply a spiritual skeptic. Many people around the world thinks that JESUS is just a myth... I am not here to convince you to read the book or to make you believe that there's a GOD, and there's really a messiah. Each of us are free to believe, what we want to believe. No one can force us to bend the truth and swallow what we can't really take. But, as for me, I do believe that we will not exist in this world, without the existence of GOD! I would suggest that you get a copy, and then, once you read it, judge the evidence for yourself! http://isp101..com.ng/2011/04/case-for-christ-e-book-download.html To read more about the author read: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lee_Strobel If you want to download(free) this and other books by the author go here: https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B5k8X9N0BKCDVGZsM3Q1WHBrVWc |
Sch:In any case, the 12 that were with Jesus from the beginning of His earthly ministry accepted Paul's ministry. That is enough for me.read 2 Peter 3:15. Sch:No problem, they are seemingly ascetic gnostics in another shade. Besides, the movement started in the early [u]Christian[/u]era so your position covets historical proofNot possible. However, my references are from neither. Sch:Read Matthew 16:17-19 deny His Deity and what you have left is a waste of time.David was not the reference there. That was one of many Messianic Psalms,more like prophecies. Another is Psalm 110. Prove it!The contextual usage there is descendant. Now consider this: 4 but when the fulness of the time was come, God sent forth his Son, made of a woman, made under the law, Galatians 4:4 The emphasis there will not be necessary if Paul did not believe the virgin birth. The speech there reads like one who was versed in the Pentateuch and was well aware of Genesis 3:15 the Seed being one made like the First Adam. |
MrMontella:Second charge falsely pressed! In any case, the 12 that were with Jesus from the beginning of His earthly ministry accepted Paul's ministry. That is enough for me. 2)some books of the bible possibly hadnt been written before the ebionites started existing..No problem, they are seemingly ascetic gnostics in another shade. Besides, the movement started in the early [u]Christian[/u]era so your position covets historical proof. 3)the bible was not compiled until centuries after their existence..and some ''scriptures'' in existence then are lost to us nowThe ones we have suffice. Besides, some 'lost' but founds show errors that is disclaimed on all sides. Since the others are not here, shall we use the ones available to us? 4)denying jesus as being god does not make one a non-christian...that belief is ludicrous and lacking in evidenceRead Matthew 16:17-19 deny His Deity and what you have left is a waste of time. 5)the available evidence points to paul not believing/having an idea of a virgin birth..but believing in a literal birthProve it! having all these in mind...I will come back to your request but we need to clear the above. |
MrMontella:Indeed, my opinion in perfect alignment with the Truth. I did not say they were muslims either. That statement was used to show how un-Christian they were. Besides, it is apparent that they were a neo-Gnostic movement denounced by both Paul and John the beloved, in their epistles. References are available on request. |
MrMontella:the ebionites are not Christians. their tenets contradicts Matthew 16:17-19 hence they are not built on the Rock. Infact, their stance on Jesus is more Islamic than Christian. |
frosbel2:ok |
frosbel2:changes nothing |
thorpido:indeed! one out of hundred of millions of evangelicals. Negligible and infinitesimal, isnt it. |
OLAADEGBU:i wish you same, thanks. |
OLAADEGBU:John the baptist. |
hayoakins:Congratulations sir, I am inspired. |
Splinz:he did not heed Peter's admonition. Apparently, for those deep in the occult, after they have believed, there might exist the need for deliverance especially for those who had gone deep therein. I believe his pride provided a stronghold and he was a willing tool. |
ademoladeji:1.And said, For this cause shall a man leave father and mother, and shall cleave to his wife: and they twain shall be one flesh? Matthew 19:5 Marriage is between two (not 3 or more) who would become one till death separates them. What do we call the second wife? 2. 2 For the woman which hath an husband is bound by the law to her husband so long as he liveth; but if the husband be dead, she is loosed from the law of her husband. 3 So then if, while her husband liveth, she be married to another man, she shall be called an adulteress: but if her husband be dead, she is free from that law; so that she is no adulteress, though she be married to another man. Romans 7:2,3 The highlighted also applies to the man, he shall be an adulterer if he marries another while his wife is still alive. And adultery is: 19 Now the works of the flesh are manifest, which are these; Adultery, ... and such like: of the which I tell you before, as I have also told you in time past, that they which do such things shall not inherit the kingdom of God. Galatians 5:19,21b And/or Marriage is honourable in all, and the bed undefiled: but whoremongers and adulterers God will judge. Hebrews 13:4 |
So Simon never truly repented! |
EVarn:The instances you have referred to here refers to an initial response which did not persist unlike the experience of the lady I was referring to. |
Pls correct your pix. It says an 87 year young lady. |
EVarn:We are here referring to the Holy Spirit in Whose Presence there is liberty(what of love, joy peace?). The concluding part of the previous statement is based on 2 Corinthians 3:17. I'd rather base my Theology on the Word than your experience. Besides, all the while Jesus manifested God's Power, who fled away or cried in terror? Not man, but devils! |
MizMyColi:Watchman Nee said sth which I'll paraphrase: the baptism in the Spirit releases the spirit man to the realm of the spirit where you have the Holy Spirit, and also principalities and power. At this point, the believer needs great care as not every voice, feeling, impulse is of the Holy Spirit. I believe this is where we need the guidance of the Word. (find this in his book on Spiritual and Authoritative prayer). Hence your persistent feeling of fear etc cannot be attributed to the Holy Spirit in Whose Presence there is liberty not a snare of fear. Besides, the constancy of feeling fear simply means it had nought to do with reverence of a Heavenly personality since the initial reaction of those that encountered them was usually dispelled immediately. Apologies for digression. |
deleib:And said, For this cause shall a man leave father and mother, and shall cleave to his wife: and they twain shall be one flesh? Matthew 19:5 Marriage is between two (not 3 or more) who would become one till death separates them. What do we call the second wife? 2 For the woman which hath an husband is bound by the law to her husband so long as he liveth; but if the husband be dead, she is loosed from the law of her husband. 3 So then if, while her husband liveth, she be married to another man, she shall be called an adulteress: but if her husband be dead, she is free from that law; so that she is no adulteress, though she be married to another man. Romans 7:2,3 The highlighted also applies to the man, he shall be an adulterer if he marries another while his wife is still alive. |
deleib:Yes, it is. In the first place, why would a married man desire another woman? Is that not already adultery/unfaithfulness in the heart? Besides, both require you to deal treacherously with the first wife. Infact, keeping her in the house and bringing in another is more treacherous than sending her out. Can We Logically Also Say The Man Has Not Disobey The Law Of God That 'he Made Them Male And Female' In That The Man Marries Two Females(wives)? Does The Bible Really Frown At Polygamy As Being Done In The Church? Is Polygamy Punishable By Hell Or Lake Of Fire?The Bible frowns at it. As revelation unfolded, certain things that were overlooked due to the previous limit of revelation, are no more overlooked hence the statement, "the times of ignorance, God winked at". |
pesty100:alright |
frosbel2:Since you know the highlighted, why the generalisation in your Topic? |
op, there is repetition, and there is VAIN repetition. The former was commended (Luke 18) while the latter is condemned . You have given us an example of the latter. The former is illustrated: And he left them, and went away again, and prayed the third time, saying the same words. Matthew 26:44 Besides understand that what makes repetition vain is when we: think that they shall be heard for their much speaking. Matthew 6:7b In other words when our faith is not in the Lord but in how much/fast we pray. Does this condemn long prayers? NO (Jesus spent whole nights in prayer but it was based on faith in God, not faith in prayer length achieved by affectatious repetitions) |




