ShiaMuslim's Posts
Nairaland Forum › ShiaMuslim's Profile › ShiaMuslim's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 (of 17 pages)
SmartMugu:The Sunni/Shia divide is the oldest in Islam and they are the two versions under which all Muslims identify themselves with the world over and not only in Nigeria. Anyone telling you I'm only Muslim is either devoid of knowledge or in denial. There's no escape from this divide as even out mode of praying is affected. There are slight differences. |
DropShot:We Shia do not hate Sunnis. We do not go about killing Sunnis or attacking Sunni mosques. Our scholars have called for unity with Sunnis in spite of our doctrinal differences. Both Ayatollah Khamanei and Ayatollah Sistani emphasize on Muslim unity. I also don't agree with the generalization that Sunnis hate Shia, no matter the traces of truth. The problem with Sunnis is that they are potential Wahhabis. And Wahhabis are potential terrorists. And every terrorist abusing the name of Islam is a Wahhabi! |
Seun:Mr. Seun, you are an atheist, but to the god fearing, you are truly a man of God. You have more piety and humanity than many monsters who claim God and more than many so called Muslims who disregard the sanctity of life as espoused in the Holy Quran. Imam Ali (as), the first Shia holy Imam stated: "man is either your brother in faith or your equal in humanity". You have renewed my faith in humanity and in God almighty who made you regardless what belief you (are free to) believe in. May God bless you. |
9inches:any verse related to fighting in the Quran, or asking Muslims to fight are conditional. they depend on this; this is the basis: "Permission [to fight] has been given to those who are being fought, because they were oppressed. And indeed, Allah is competent to give them victory. [They are] those who have been evicted from their homes without right - only because they say, "Our Lord is Allah ." And were it not that Allah checks the people, some by means of others, there would have been demolished monasteries, churches, synagogues, and mosques in which the name of Allah is much mentioned. And Allah will surely support those who support Him. Indeed, Allah is Powerful and Exalted in Might. [And they are] those who, if We give them authority in the land, establish prayer and give zakah and enjoin what is right and forbid what is wrong. And to Allah belongs the outcome of [all] matters." (Holy Quran 22:39-41) then you have the rules of engagement further defined: HOLY QURAN 2:190: Fight in the way of Allah against those who fight against you, but begin not hostilities. Lo! Allah loveth not aggressors. HOLY QURAN 8:61: "But if the enemy incline towards peace, do thou (also) incline towards peace, and trust in Allah: for He is the One that Heareth and Knoweth (all things)." |
9inches:In all the wars and battles fought by the Prophet (s) were defensive in nature. He never killed anyone because of his faith. No takfiri based killings which is the essence of the Wahhabi ideology. Permission to fight in the Quran was given to those who have been oppressed, killed and driven out of their homes because they say Allah is their Lord. What Wahhabi are doing today vis a vis takfiri killings is what the pagan Arabian tribes used to practice and practiced against the Prophet (s). The Prophet's family suffered from terrorism. Take for example the tragedy of Karbala. There is no case that the Prophet (s) committed takfiri based terror killings. the Prophet doesn't used to fight or kill civilians or non combatants. He doesn't use to attack churches and marketplaces to kill innocent people because of their faith (takfiri based killings). |
xolomonstrides:"I am the city of knowledge and Ali is its gate. Whoever wants knowledge should approach through the gate"- Prophet Muhammad (sawaws) |
Maulud: Mercy to the World By Adamu Adamu On the occasion of the 1490th birthday of the Holy Prophet [SAW], I send my sincere, heartfelt congratulations to the entirety of mankind and to all the order of being for whom his coming [SAW] is a mercy. And we must rejoice at the coming of Allah’s favour and mercy—as we have been commanded. When Jesus [AS] prayed for manna from heaven and it came, its descent was a cause for an eid of celebrations, not just for them who were there, but for their first and their last—a celebration of God’s favour for eternity. “[Then] Jesus, son of Mary [AS] said: ‘O Allah, our Lord, send us from heaven a table set [with viands] that there may be for us, for the first and the last of us a solemn festival, and a Sign from You. And provide for our sustenance; for, you are the best of sustainers.” Qur’an 5:114 And the Holy Qur’an reminded Muslims that indeed only in the descent of God’s favour will people have real cause to celebrate and rejoice. “Say: ‘It is only in the favour and grace of Allah that people should rejoice; that is better than the wealth that they amass.’” Qur’an 10:58 And the moment of greatest favour came—a favour to the worlds—what are Muslims to do? For those who take Shaykh Abd al-Halim ibn Taymiyya as proof—and the majority of those who do take him so oppose Maulud, even though surprisingly he himself didn’t—are perhaps unaware and may wish to know that he has stated in one of his books: “As to what some people have innovated either to compete with Christians on the birth of Jesus or for the love of the Holy Prophet [SAW] and veneration for him, Allah might reward them for their love and ijtihad,” and he added, “Although Maulud was not practised by most [Salaf], they should have done so since there was no objection against it from the Shari’ah point of view.” Shaykh Yusuf Qardawi, perhaps currently the most media-visible of the Salafi shaykhs of the day, had this to say on the celebration of the Maulud: “We need all these lessons and such celebrations are a revival of these lessons and values. I think that these celebrations, if done in the proper way, will serve a great purpose, getting Muslims closer to the teachings of Islam and to the Prophet’s Sunnah and life.” But Imam Shihab al-Din Abu Bakr al-Qastallani might seem to have summed matters up: “May Allah bless a person who celebrates ‘Eid’ on the nights of the blessed month of the holy birth of the Prophet [SAW], so that it hurts them the most who have a serious disease in their hearts and who suffer from an incurable ailment on account of the blessed birth.” Perhaps this is not enough, but the truth is that the fact and reality of Maulud stood in no need for the approval of ibn Taymiyya or any other scholar for that matter; it is something that is so obvious. The fact that today an event like the Maulud requires proofs for its legitimacy is symptomatic of a people who have lost their bearing and are at their scripturally nitpicking worst, fed on a diet of antipathy towards the most sacred personality of their faith. They have raised several objections against the celebration of Maulud. There are those who believe it is a bid’ah. Indeed, in the past, they used to base all their argument on the kulliya of the famous bid’ah hadith; it is unclear why it has now fallen into disuse nowadays. But the reality is that bid’ah is not any newness as erroneously assumed; in the correct theological parlance, the only right and proper meaning of bid’ah is not innovation: it is aberration. Right now, if you ask them why they fly to Mecca for Hajj instead of going, say, on horseback, they bring the new argument that bid’ah involves only religious practices; but, in another breath, they will say that Islam is a way of life, encompassing everything that happens from the cradle to the grave; and, for eschatological recompense, whatever one does from maturity to death. Others say Maulud is merely a Muslim Christmas. Doubtless, those who say it is in imitation of Christians that Maulud is celebrated and that this is a bad thing, as they are quick to point out that those who imitate a people are of them, may find themselves in self- contradiction. Only yesterday, in the attempt to find grounds for the Ashura fast, they were asserted that when he came to Medina the Holy Prophet [SAW] found Jews fasting and when he [SAW] learnt their reasons for it, he [SAW] ordered the Muslims to imitate them. Even if this sounds unlikely to some, it is a proof opponents of Maulud like to present, and so they should be bound by it . Some oppose because they say we shouldn’t exaggerate in praising him [SAW] while they are in fact incapable of appreciating the limit of his excellence let alone surpassing it. Even if Muslims today engage themselves in extolling his praise till the end of their lives, that will still be deficient in capturing the essence of his excellence. So, what is this exaggeration they are talking about? Obviously, no Muslim will ever say the Holy Prophet [SAW] is God Incarnate, so which limit is it that they think the Holy Prophet [SAW] has not reached? There are those who are looking for hujjah to celebrate it. But it is a basic principle in Islamic jurisprudence that you don’t look permission to do things: you look for prohibition not to do them. In other words, whatever is not prohibited is permitted—whatever is not haram is halal. While others concede that celebrating Maulud may be blameless, they still oppose it because they say it shouldn’t just be a one-day, 12 Rabi al-Awwal, affair, and that is ought to be an everyday affair. And they are right, because if people truly realise the full measure of the prestige and sanctity of the Holy Prophet [SAW], they will accept that his holy birth merits the celebration of Maulud every single day of the year—forever. Some hide behind the fact that the Holy Prophet [SAW] was not born on 12 Rabi al-Awwal but that, according to the most exacting modern calculations, he was most probably born three days earlier, or, as others have long maintained, that he was born five days later. And so, they reason, since the exact day is not known with certainty, people celebrating Maulud are wasting their time. But this is not the attitude of believers who care; because, if they do care, we should have seen them doing their best to find and calculate the exact date instead of trying to stop those who remember him. And they sometimes argue that since there seems to be consensus that he [SAW] died on 12 Rabi al-Awwal, Maulud is a celebration of his death; but this is a claim belied by what people do on the occasion. And in any case there is nothing wrong with celebrating the day of his death [SAW] with his remembrance and praise; but there is everything wrong with wanting to stamp out his memory. For those who wish to do this, Tauhid in essence becomes not just the theoretical affirmation of the oneness and uniqueness of the One and only Supreme Being and the practical implication of the meaning of the denial of servitude but to Him: it is rendered a mere cover for launching an attack on the prestige and sanctity of the Holy Prophet [SAW] and belittling his legacy on the altar on which this can conceivably and seemingly plausibly, even though utterly mistakenly, be attempted—the incomparable grandeur of the Uncaused Cause. This way, they downplay the stature of the Holy Prophet [SAW] and little by little, all in the name of tauhid, they chip away at the prestige and status of the Most Perfect of all creation until they succeed in leaving him no greater than the person next door, which is their goal. And in doing this, they try to hide behind Allah’s saying that the Holy Prophet [SAW] is a man like us, but they never finish the quotation which says: except that revelation descends on him. But this is a statement only Allah or the Prophet [SAW] can make; and its intent is not to draw equivalence between the apostle and other people, but to make the case against them. In other words, it simply meant that all acts of worship and devotion that the Prophet [SAW] performed and taught, and which Islam called upon Muslims to do were within their own ability and competence; because the one who did and taught them had a body like ours and used to eat and drink and sleep—and was therefore not an angel in creation. Thus, the demand of Islam as a religion and a way of life is not something beyond human capacity to meet or at least imitate in accordance with level of faith. Otherwise whoever believes that the Holy Prophet [SAW] is like other men has not yet embarked on the path of understanding Islam or his own purpose in this world; and is not likely to ever come to know or appreciate the station of Prophethood, nor that of Messengership, let alone that of their Seal—and the seal of human perfection. http://www.dailytrust.com.ng/daily/index.php/columns/friday-columns/14218-maulud-mercy-to-the-worlds Dear Seun/Lalasticlala , threads opposed to marking Maulud based on the Wahhabi ideology have made to the front page. This thread supports celebrating it. It's fair to have it on front page. |
Atiku2019:you're welcome. we can worship in the same mosques. in fact, all mosques belong to Allah; that is the declaration in the Quran. the only difference is in administration/leadership of the mosque, whether it is Shia or Sunni. this is very much a political affair. that can make the mosque to be described as a Sunni or Shia mosque. and there are some technical differences in the performance of religious acts. |
Curlieweed:live and lets live...let everyone live. what you see as "mental slavery" (and you are duly free to subscribe to that opinion), others see as a matter of salvation and damnation. a matter of eternity, paradise and hell fire. we can only come out from "mental slavery" if the power to choose is in hands of the individual. not imposed. |
Atiku2019:yes sir. not all Shia are members of the IMN. there are Shia all across the world. Shia Islam, and Sunni Islam are the two versions or branches of the religion of Islam. both versions or interpretations of Islam have adherents across the world. IMN is a local organization or group in Nigeria. for example, an Iraqi Shia Muslim naturally does not belong to the IMN. even let us go further than that. Not all Nigerian Shia Muslims belong to the IMN. there are other organizations or Shia umbrella bodies like Rasul-al-Azam Foundation and Al-Thaqalayn in Nigeria. IMN happens to be the one with the most adherents going by the political utterance and fiery speeches of Zakzaky. you can also be a Shia Muslim without subscribing to any organization or religious organization. you just mind your business and do your prayers quietly. Most Yoruba Shia Muslims do not belong to the IMN for instance. |
DanGombe1:I do not agree with you naturally. The points you have raised are red herrings and off topic in this thread. You can research more online through Google and YouTube or use nairaland Islam section. You will get the rightful responses. Therefore I wouldn't drift into a religious discussion. This thread is strictly political on divisions in the Muslim ummah. |
HAH:My brother, please do not bother to ask him. He has no evidence to back up his claim. His intent is to sabotage this thread and turn the discussion into a religious one. This thread was create with the sole intent and purpose to be a political discussion in the political section for the benefit of the generality of people. Therefore it is not in the Islam or religion forums but in the political forum. Any drifting into religious topics can be discuss in the right forums. The Wahhabi barking dog is uncomfortable with the fact that many will get to know about Wahhabi terror and misconceptions. They would like non Muslims to be misinformed, uninformed and blind to their takfiri terror ideology of death. This thread is not a religious thread as the title shows and the op clearly illustrates. If any members want to turn the discussion religious, the mods should delete those individual posts and ban the member. This thread is a political discussion. |
The barking dog is a known fanatical Wahhabi. Terrorism and lies go hand in hand in their misguidance and erroneous misconceptions. Only for the record, and for the sake of non Muslims who may not know much about Islam. Shia Muslims believe in the authenticity of the Holy Quran. Disbelief in the authenticity of the Quran is exception among Shia and not the norm, and similarly among Sunnis. We can equally dig out few exceptions among Sunnis who have challenged the authenticity of the Quran and even in their classical hadiths. We do not have any extra two chapters in the Qurans we read and revere. My Quran is made up of 114 chapters as every Quran the majority of Sunnis have. The Quranist sect that was born from Sunni Islam, have reduced the chapter of Joseph with a verse or two. But as normal human beings, no Shia would accuse the generality of Sunnis of subtracting from the Quran because that is the exception and not the norm among Sunnis. Likewise they accuse us that we hate or insult the companions of the Prophet. Again, we don't. There are some companions we disagree with while others we love and respect. You can't Angelize thousands of different people because they were contemporaries of a prophet. There were bad and good ones. However, blinded by hatred, this barking dog would not understand the difference between norm and exception. They give a dog a bad name in order to hang it. I am Shia Muslim and I am not a member of the IMN. But evidently, a Wahhabi doesn't distinguish between IMN and Shia Islam, to the extent that the IMN have been called misleadingly in the media "Shiite sect", yet no one calls boko haram "Sunni sect". Of course, by no means am I comparing IMN to boko haram. Far from it. Im only highlighting the ignorance and double standard. And to show that the IMN are being victimized and targeted simply because they are Shia. All the claims and judgments passed on them can be said of any Sunni group like Wahhabi Izala or NASFAT. Talking about lies, the Wahhabi would also accuse the Shia of grave worship. We visit graves of prophets and holy Imams. But we neither worship the stone nor the dead. Yet they insist we are polytheists and grave worshipers. On the other hand, the generality of Muslims face the direction of the Ka'bah (the Qiblah) during prayers. Yet, the Wahhabi will become reasonable to understand that facing the qiblah or going to hajj doesn't translate to worship of the black stone or the walls of the holy Ka'bah. This is the oppression and injustice we face from the Saudi promoted Wahhabi ideology that has infiltrated and infected Sunni Islam like cancer. It is a takfiri ideology and it continues to promote hatred and division within Islam. Their aim is to promote tyranny and injustice because we reject their predecessors of tyranny and injustice who have filled the pages of history with acts of inhumanity. |
Sheikh Dahiru Bauchi Warns Gov. El-Rufai, Buhari On ‘Izala Wahhabi Terror,’ Shia Pogrom, Says Tijaniyya, Christians Next [AUDIO] By NewsRescue October 19, 2016 https://newsrescue.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/dahiru_bauchi-480x375.jpg Sheikh Dahiru Bauchi NewsRescue Revered north Nigerian Sheikh and Islamic scholar and leader of Tijaniyya, the largest Islamic group in West Africa has issued a strong warning to Kaduna state governor Nasir el-Rufai, Nigeria’s president Muhammadu Buhari and Nigerians and the world at large on “Izala extremism” crisis in the north and the persecution of Shi’a Muslims. About 20% of Nigerian Muslims identify with the Tijaniyya sufi order which spans West and North Africa. The Izala Society, formally Jama’at Izalat al Bid’a Wa Iqamat as Sunna (Society of Removal of Innovation and Re-establishment of the Sunna), also called JIBWIS is a controversial north Nigeria sect created to labe and attacking other Muslims that it regards as “deviant,” including Tijaniyya and Qadiriyya sufi orders and the Shi’a. In the 20 minute interview clip, Sheikh Dahiru Bauchi raised an alarm to the world on the brewing religious crisis centered in Kaduna state. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XEPrW4FAKVw Asked if it’s true that Darika (his Tijaniyya) and Izala are coming together to fight Shi’a. He denied it flat out and said it’s a lie by whoever that invented it. Further stating that there was never a time they agreed on that and that the Tijaniyya have never had problems with Shi’a but only had issues with the Izalas. He said Tijaniyya has no problem with Shi’a, that the Shia have never attacked them and that the two groups have lived in peace all the years. He said the Izalas have been calling them, the Darikas, Kuffars (disbelievers) too as they also call Shi’a. That they, the Darikas are concerned about the spiritual leader of the Izala sect. The Sheikh said that the attack on Shi’a had an ulterior agenda. That not only shiites are the the target, but any group found deviating from such monstrous extremist teaching of Salafi is in danger because when they got supported and finished off with Shi’a, they will then redirect their blind weapon towards Darika and Christians. Blaming Kaduna state governor Nasir el-Rufai for precipitating the ongoing attacks against Shi’a Muslims, the Sheikh said the attacks on Shi’a by Wahhabi thugs is a dangerous precedent in Nigeria. He warned the government especially Kaduna governor el-Rufai to stand up to his duties and stop the Izala extremist youths from burning Shi’a houses. In the passionate speech, the path leader who escaped a Boko Haram bomb attack in 2014, also equated the Salafis and the Izala sect with Boko Haram, ISIS and other Takfiri groups all over the world, saying they are the creation of Saudi Arabia and that all over the world where there was Muslim crisis the kingdom was behind it. He said some Wahhabi elements who went after the Shi’a to kill them and raid and burn their homes, were heard saying that after finishing with Shi’a Muslims they would turn on Christians and then “Darika” (Tijaniyya path) followers. He warned that the Federal government should watch out and prevent Izala youths or what will come will be the worst! Sheikh Bauchi accused the Buhari government of romancing with radical Wahhabis and their Saudi masters, warning that it is bad omen for the government and Nigeria. He specifically singled out Bala Lau whom he dismissed as a trafficker of women to the Saudis as the architect of the Shia pogrom. https://newsrescue.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/Bala-Abdullahi-lau.jpg Bala Lau The Sheikh said is wrong for governor el-Rufai to end the peace and attempt to limit religious freedoms, that the government cannot prevent the Shi’a from practicing their religion. El-Rufai cannot ban any body. He has only two years and seven months left. Let’s see who he will ban after that. Sheikh Dahiru also warned of attacking His Darika (Tijaniyya), that its better to touch electricity than dare attack them. He said governor el-Rufai is taking the law into his hands by encouraging Izala youths. The Sheikh called on the world and Nigerian federal government, emphasizing that Boko Haram and Izala are one and the same with the same ideology. He said that the only difference is Boko Haram isn’t afraid while the Izalas are are afraid and love money. https://newsrescue.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/bala-lau-buhari.jpg Buhari with radical Izala cleric Bala Lau He further said that Mohammed Yusuf, the Boko Haram leader was a progeny of Sheikh Jafar and Jafar was late Sheikh Abubakar Gumi’s disciple before they had a misunderstanding about western education and politics. He accused Sheikh Abubakar Gumi I of importing Wahhabi takfiri ideology into Nigeria from the Saudi monarchy. He continued that because of that, the non Muslim encouraged Boko Haram for political gains and Mohammed Yusuf was backed by non Muslims with dollars and SUVs. Speaking about the conduct of Nigeria’s police and military, the Sheikh said that the police and soldiers are the two vital institutions to ensure public safety but unfortunately in Nigeria some of them were noted as using the Boko Haram phenomenon as mechanism to make money. he said all over soldiers and police violate their duties. http://soundcloud.com/user-703920246/sheikh-dahiru-warns-gov-el-rufai-buhari-on-izala-wahhabi-terror-shia-pogrom Dr. Peregrino Brimah; @EveryNigerian Read more: http://newsrescue.com/sheikh-dahiru-bauchi-warns-gov-el-rufai-buhari-izala-wahhabi-terror-shia-pogrom-says-tijaniyya-christians-next/#ixzz4Rx8rl25P |
ShiaMuslim:https://www.nairaland.com/3500375/soldiers-disperse-dariqa-muslims-yobe/3#51648127 |
Sheikh Dahiru Bauchi Warns Gov. El-Rufai, Buhari On ‘Izala Wahhabi Terror,’ Shia Pogrom, Says Tijaniyya, Christians Next [AUDIO] By NewsRescue October 19, 2016 https://newsrescue.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/dahiru_bauchi-480x375.jpg Sheikh Dahiru Bauchi NewsRescue Revered north Nigerian Sheikh and Islamic scholar and leader of Tijaniyya, the largest Islamic group in West Africa has issued a strong warning to Kaduna state governor Nasir el-Rufai, Nigeria’s president Muhammadu Buhari and Nigerians and the world at large on “Izala extremism” crisis in the north and the persecution of Shi’a Muslims. About 20% of Nigerian Muslims identify with the Tijaniyya sufi order which spans West and North Africa. The Izala Society, formally Jama’at Izalat al Bid’a Wa Iqamat as Sunna (Society of Removal of Innovation and Re-establishment of the Sunna), also called JIBWIS is a controversial north Nigeria sect created to labe and attacking other Muslims that it regards as “deviant,” including Tijaniyya and Qadiriyya sufi orders and the Shi’a. In the 20 minute interview clip, Sheikh Dahiru Bauchi raised an alarm to the world on the brewing religious crisis centered in Kaduna state. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XEPrW4FAKVw Asked if it’s true that Darika (his Tijaniyya) and Izala are coming together to fight Shi’a. He denied it flat out and said it’s a lie by whoever that invented it. Further stating that there was never a time they agreed on that and that the Tijaniyya have never had problems with Shi’a but only had issues with the Izalas. He said Tijaniyya has no problem with Shi’a, that the Shia have never attacked them and that the two groups have lived in peace all the years. He said the Izalas have been calling them, the Darikas, Kuffars (disbelievers) too as they also call Shi’a. That they, the Darikas are concerned about the spiritual leader of the Izala sect. The Sheikh said that the attack on Shi’a had an ulterior agenda. That not only shiites are the the target, but any group found deviating from such monstrous extremist teaching of Salafi is in danger because when they got supported and finished off with Shi’a, they will then redirect their blind weapon towards Darika and Christians. Blaming Kaduna state governor Nasir el-Rufai for precipitating the ongoing attacks against Shi’a Muslims, the Sheikh said the attacks on Shi’a by Wahhabi thugs is a dangerous precedent in Nigeria. He warned the government especially Kaduna governor el-Rufai to stand up to his duties and stop the Izala extremist youths from burning Shi’a houses. In the passionate speech, the path leader who escaped a Boko Haram bomb attack in 2014, also equated the Salafis and the Izala sect with Boko Haram, ISIS and other Takfiri groups all over the world, saying they are the creation of Saudi Arabia and that all over the world where there was Muslim crisis the kingdom was behind it. He said some Wahhabi elements who went after the Shi’a to kill them and raid and burn their homes, were heard saying that after finishing with Shi’a Muslims they would turn on Christians and then “Darika” (Tijaniyya path) followers. He warned that the Federal government should watch out and prevent Izala youths or what will come will be the worst! Sheikh Bauchi accused the Buhari government of romancing with radical Wahhabis and their Saudi masters, warning that it is bad omen for the government and Nigeria. He specifically singled out Bala Lau whom he dismissed as a trafficker of women to the Saudis as the architect of the Shia pogrom. https://newsrescue.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/Bala-Abdullahi-lau.jpg Bala Lau The Sheikh said is wrong for governor el-Rufai to end the peace and attempt to limit religious freedoms, that the government cannot prevent the Shi’a from practicing their religion. El-Rufai cannot ban any body. He has only two years and seven months left. Let’s see who he will ban after that. Sheikh Dahiru also warned of attacking His Darika (Tijaniyya), that its better to touch electricity than dare attack them. He said governor el-Rufai is taking the law into his hands by encouraging Izala youths. The Sheikh called on the world and Nigerian federal government, emphasizing that Boko Haram and Izala are one and the same with the same ideology. He said that the only difference is Boko Haram isn’t afraid while the Izalas are are afraid and love money. https://newsrescue.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/bala-lau-buhari.jpg Buhari with radical Izala cleric Bala Lau He further said that Mohammed Yusuf, the Boko Haram leader was a progeny of Sheikh Jafar and Jafar was late Sheikh Abubakar Gumi’s disciple before they had a misunderstanding about western education and politics. He accused Sheikh Abubakar Gumi I of importing Wahhabi takfiri ideology into Nigeria from the Saudi monarchy. He continued that because of that, the non Muslim encouraged Boko Haram for political gains and Mohammed Yusuf was backed by non Muslims with dollars and SUVs. Speaking about the conduct of Nigeria’s police and military, the Sheikh said that the police and soldiers are the two vital institutions to ensure public safety but unfortunately in Nigeria some of them were noted as using the Boko Haram phenomenon as mechanism to make money. he said all over soldiers and police violate their duties. http://soundcloud.com/user-703920246/sheikh-dahiru-warns-gov-el-rufai-buhari-on-izala-wahhabi-terror-shia-pogrom Dr. Peregrino Brimah; @EveryNigerian Read more: http://newsrescue.com/sheikh-dahiru-bauchi-warns-gov-el-rufai-buhari-izala-wahhabi-terror-shia-pogrom-says-tijaniyya-christians-next/#ixzz4Rx8rl25P |
ShiaMuslim:https://www.nairaland.com/3500375/soldiers-disperse-dariqa-muslims-yobe/3#51648127 CC: Seun, Lalasticlala |
[b]Many are confused and asking what is "Dariqa Muslims"? there is actually nothing like "Dariqa Muslims". "Dariqa" is a derivation from the Arabic "Tariqa". "Tariqa" in Arabic means "path" (to spirituality). Tariqa refers to Sufi movements within Sunni Islam. while majority of Sufis are Sunni Muslims, you can also find Sufis who are Shia, in places like predominantly Shia Iran and other parts of the world. the Sufis practice mysticism and their sole aim is acquiring higher levels of spirituality through sometimes excessive acts of worship, and sometimes acts of worship that the generality of Muslims do not subscribe to, and are not obligated by Islam. therefore, the word "excessive" as the practices aimed at reaching higher spirituality are supplementary and not obligatory. so what is the problem here? why are Nigerian Sufi Sunnis targeted this time? within Sunni Islam, there are two extreme currents: the Sunni Sufis, and the Wahhabi (aka Salafist) Sunnis. the Sufis happen to be more peaceful and organized, and also more accomodating and tolerant. going by Sufi teachings, sometimes one can mistake a Sufi Sunni for a Shia Muslim. Sufi Sunnis are close to Shia Muslims, and many of the coverts to Shia Islam in Nigeria are from the Sufi orders such as Tijjaniyyyah, Qadiryyah, Isawiyyah etc. the other extreme being the Wahhabis see the Sufis equally as heretics and apostates even though Sufis mainly fall within Sunni Islam. Sufis veneration for saints, grave visitations, recitations of zhikr (Islamic incantations), celebrating the Prophet's birthday and a general sense of peacefulness and tolerance, make them "less Sunni" in the eyes of the Wahhabi Sunnis. they are referred to by Sunni Wahhabis as "Ahlul-Bida'a wash-shirk" (the people of unlawful innovations in Islam and polytheism). polytheism is the most heinous sin in Islam and in the Quran. Wahhabis are Takfiris (excommunicators/excommunicating other Muslims) and they carry out Takfiri killings (faith based killings). they accuse Shia and Sunni Sufis as being "mushrikeen" or polytheists because these two sets of Muslims revere Islamic saints and do grave visitations among other things Wahhabis frown upon. in the warped mind of the Wahhabi, grave visitation is seen as "grave worship" even though that is not the case; just as facing the Ka'bah during prayers does not mean worshiping the Ka'bah, therefore, visiting the grave doesnt mean worshiping graves or worshiping the dead! so to clear things, the Dariqa/Tariqa are Sufis. and Sufis are mainly Sunnis. among Sufis there are "Sufi orders" (different Sufi groups following different saints such as Tijjaniyyah, Qadiriyyah, Isawiyyah etc.). they are closer to Shia Muslims and generally they are peaceful and tolerant of Muslims and non-Muslims alike. west Africa is very much populated by Sufis, thus you observe that most Muslim countries in west Africa such as Senegal and Mali are peaceful because there is no infiltration of Saudi funded Wahhabism (aka Salafism). Takfiri terror groups such as Alqaeda, al-Shabab, Boko Haram, ISIS, etc. are all Sunni Wahhabi. (Izala or JIBWIS is a Wahhabi organization, while the Islamic Movement in Nigeria is Shia and the Tijjaniyyah order is Sufi).the Sufis are also the largest group of Muslims in Nigeria. Sheikh Dahiru Bauchi is their spiritual head. in this incident (in Yobe), they were celebrating Mawlud (the birthday of the Prophet Muhammad). Wahhabis frown at celebrating the birthday of the Prophet Muhammad (s) and consider that too as "shirk" (polytheism) and see it as mimicking the Christians (who mark Christmas), while Sufis and Shia justify commemorating the Prophet's birthday and see it as nothing un-Islamic or shirk. i hope this explanation helps.[/b] |
Demmzy15:claps for urself ![]() |
Demmzy15:If this was a Hadith in your so called "sahih" Bukhari, it will be narrated thus: Demmzy al-Takfiri al-Wahhabi reported from the hate mongering Wahhabi YouTube channel, that Yasser al Habib (an anti Iran cleric) reported from a PURPORTED member of the Sadr movement who reported from an arrested Wahhabi suicide bomber that Iran sponsored him to bomb the Shia! The chain of narrators: Demmzy Wahhabi channel Yasser al Habib Sadrist Wahhabi terrorist Is this Hadith sahih? At least two unreliable narrators. Yasser al Habib has a motive. His motive is to discredit Iran (to the Shia), who the Shia greatly look up to for moral support as a spiritual base, that it is sponsoring Wahhabi terrorists who kill Shia. The question: Since you have been shown to be silly for the mere fact that you circulate such rubbish, do you believe that Iran sponsors ISIS? Don't circulate such claim, and when the facts and happenings prove it false, you then throw the towel at the people you're quoting. Do you believe the claim or not? Do you believe Shia Iran is sponsoring a group that is bombing Shia Muslims and Iranian pilgrims just as at today? A simple yes or no is all you need to answer the question. ![]() |
Demmzy15:"The jihadist group Islamic State said it carried out the attack." "Buses carrying Iranian Shia pilgrims appear to have been targeted in the attack, which struck near the village of Shomali." ACCORDING TO A WAHHABI PSYCHOPATH ON NAIRALAND, SHIA IRAN SPONSORS ISIS, THE GROUP WHICH JUST TARGETED IRANIAN PILGRIMS ATTENDING A SHIA MUSLIM RELIGIOUS CEREMONY IN THE HOLY CITY OF KARBALA. people who have blinded their heart towards the truth because knowing the truth will make them change their mind about what they were spoon-fed!!! Guilty conscience!!! |
Iraq suicide bomb: Shia pilgrims among nearly 80 dead 41 minutes ago From the section Middle East Nearly 80 people, many of them Shia pilgrims, have been killed in a truck bomb attack at a road stop in Iraq, a security official says. The blast struck at a petrol station and restaurant near Hilla, some 100km (60 miles) south of Baghdad. The road stop was full of people returning from commemorating Arbaeen in the holy city of Karbala. Many of the dead were reportedly Iranians. The jihadist group Islamic State said it carried out the attack. It claimed that as many as 200 people had been killed and wounded in the blast, in a statement delivered by its news agency Amaq. Targeting Shia Buses carrying Iranian Shia pilgrims appear to have been targeted in the attack, which struck near the village of Shomali. Some reports say the suicide vehicle was parked, and the force of the blast completely destroyed the petrol station and scorched many cars. Provincial security chief Falah al-Radi told the BBC that Iranians were among nearly 80 people who had been killed and more than 20 wounded in the attack. The toll was expected to rise, he said. Millions of Shia pilgrims travelled to Karbala to commemorate Arbaeen, the end of the 40-day mourning period for the third Shia Imam, Hussein. This year it took place on Sunday. Hussein, the grandson of the Prophet Muhammad, was killed in battle at Karbala in the 7th Century on a day that is known as Ashura. His martyrdom is considered a defining event in the Sunni-Shia schism. The Sunni extremists of IS consider Shia to be apostates worthy of punishment by death for their veneration of the Prophet's family and other beliefs and practices. Officials said IS militants attempted to infiltrate Karbala last week after six suicide bombers entered a town to the west, Ain Tamr. Five of the six bombers were shot dead but the sixth blew himself up, killing eight civilians. http://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-38090006 |
@Beta$hit while you keep regurgitating the same $hit, and spreading your lies based on videos from a youtube wahhabi hate channel that does not make the sense it portrays nor the claims it makes in the content of those videos; the challenge for you still stands. GIVE JUST ONE EXAMPLE WHERE A SHIA MUSLIM TURNED HIMSELF INTO A SUICIDE BOMBER AND ATTACKED A SUNNI MOSQUE OR A CHRISTIAN CHURCH. YOU CAN GO BEYOND THE BORDERS OF NIGERIA. ALL AROUND THE WORLD, LOOK FOR ONE EXAMPLE THAT A SHIA MUSLIM BLEW UP HIMSELF IN A SUNNI MOSQUE OR IN A CHRISTIAN CHURCH, OR EVEN IN ANY PLACE OF WORSHIP OF ANY RELIGION, IN TAKFIRI BASED KILLING OR TAKFIRI ATTACK AGAINST WORSHIPERS/CIVILIAN TARGETS. YOU WILL NOT FIND!!! ASK YOURSELF WHY? WHY IS IT ALWAYS YOUR OWN SIDE DOING SUCH $HIT? YES SHIA DO FIGHT AND THEY DO KILL. OUR RELIGION IS NOT PACIFIST. WHO DO THE SHIA KILL? CIVILIANS? WORSHIPERS? NO!!! BUT WHY BRING UP EXAMPLES OF CRIMINALS SENTENCED TO DEATH IN IRAN, OR SHIA MILITANTS KILLING ISIS WAHHABI TERRORISTS AND COMBATANTS IN SYRIA? FIGHTING AND KILLING IS FOR COMBATANTS AGAINST COMBATANTS. THAT IS WHAT OUR ISLAM SAYS. YOUR CLAIMS ARE NOT CONVINCING CLAIMS TO PROVE YOUR HATRED. FACE UP TO THE CHALLENGE, ITS ALREADY BEING YEARS AND COUNTING AND YOU CAN NEVER FIND ONE EXAMPLE OF A SHIA BLOWING HIMSELF UP IN A MOSQUE OR A CHURCH. THE RUBBISH YOU WANT TO RUB ON OTHERS IS WHAT NONE OTHER THAN THOSE YOU DEFEND EXCRETE. i will not delve into your religious propaganda and arguments. you have your religion and others have theirs. your claims have been trashed many times on the Islam forum. Google is everyone's friend to research. you are insistent and persistent in drowning your head in rubbish. continue. nothing new. regurgitated trash also. when we bring our proofs from your books, your entire faith will rest on denials and rejection of historical facts as usual; while you misinterpret our beliefs and concoct claims that are baseless or imagination. do not bring red herrings to make a simple point you cannot. look at how many post to reply to a simple one post. you need psychotherapy. |
muhamadnur:Wahhabi terrorist! takfirism is your religion. instead of trying for yourself to make paradise, instead you try to send others to their grave or condemn them to hell fire. i will advice you to either listen on YouTube or read the Sermon of Sayyida Zainab (as),the granddaughter of the Prophet Muhammad (s) to the tyrant Yazeed after the Tragedy of Karbala. pay close attention to comprehend her words. then you will know that not even the Tragedy of Karbala succeeded in wiping out (Shia) Islam!!! then you will know that tyranny, oppression, bloodshed, intimidation, threat and every word that represents persecution have not wiped out the Shia. it has only played into making our case stronger and spreading our teachings farther. obviously, your problem is not with the IMN as a group or organization and one that blocks road. your problem is with the Shia as a whole. do you know that the mayor of London is Shia? do you know there are five or six countries in the world with Shia majority populations (Azerbaijan, Bahrain, Iran, Iraq, Lebanon, Yemen)? do you know that one third of the populations of Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, Turkey, Afghanistan, and Kuwait is Shia Muslim? how on earth you intend to wipe out a religion is beyond human comprehension. it is IMPOSSIBLE!!! you are fighting a lost battle. it wont succeed. you are only bringing unnecessary trouble upon yourself. you are scared of the doctrines of another version of Islam, and you feel so oppressive to claim supremacy. the mind infested with Wahhabi terror teachings!!! |
Iran Intelligence Ministry dismantles terrorist team in eastern country Tue Nov 22, 2016 12:38PM Iran’s Intelligence Ministry has busted a terrorists team in the eastern parts of the country, an Iranian security official says. “A terrorist team was dismantled last night by the Intelligence Ministry in the country’s east,” deputy interior minister for security affairs, Hossein Zolfaqari, told reporters on Tuesday. He added that one of the members of the four-strong terrorist group was killed and the other three were taken into custody. The official noted that some explosives were also confiscated from the terrorists. Iranian forces have been engaged in clashes with terror groups, thwarting their terrorist activities on the border and within the country, arresting several of them, and confiscating large amounts of explosives and bomb-making materials. Iran’s deputy intelligence minister for strategic studies on national security said on November 15 that the country’s security forces confiscated nearly two tonnes of explosives from Daesh terrorists in the city of Garmsar, southeast of the capital Tehran. He added that the terrorists had sought to use the explosives to carry out bomb attacks in at least 10 locations across the country. Back in June, the Iranian Intelligence Ministry reported thwarting a Takfiri-Wahhabi plot to stage attacks in Iran’s major cities, including the capital, Tehran. It also released a video showing security forces raiding the hideout of the terrorists in the capital. In another case, Iran’s security forces arrested members of an Iraqi-based terrorist group, comprised of two terrorists and their two accomplices, in a village near the Iranian city of Marivan in the western province of Kordestan on September 16 and 18, before they could find a chance to conduct any acts of terror. The Iranian forces found a number of weapons and ammunition in their hideout. On September 20, Iran’s Islamic Revolution Guards Corps (IRGC) forces arrested two terrorists of Pakistani nationality in the southeastern Iranian province of Sistan and Baluchestan. According to a statement by the IRGC, the terrorists had been funded by Saudi Arabia and had received intelligence assistance from spy agencies of enemy states. http://www.presstv.com/Detail/2016/11/22/494687/Iran-Intelligence-Ministry-Hossein-Zolfaqari-terrorists |
At least 13 reported dead as blast hits Shiite mosque in Kabul (GRAPHIC IMAGE) Published time: 21 Nov 2016 | 08:26 GMT Reuters / At least 13 people have been killed and 30 injured after a suicide bomber has reportedly caused a powerful explosion at a Shiite mosque in the Afghan capital, Kabul, hospital officials told local TOLOnews. The blast took place in the Darul Aman (Dar-ul-Aman) area of the city, local media reported. 1TV channel reported that the blast took place during a Shiite ceremony in Baqer-ul-Oloom mosque, west of Kabul. Children are among those killed in the attack, TOLOnews reported. The suicide bomber reportedly detonated his explosive vest after entering the mosque. According to Pajhwok news agency citing unconfirmed reports, more than 20 people have been injured and “a few” killed in the suicide attack. Taliban spokesman Zabihullah Mujahid has denied his group had a role in the fatal attack, the network added. This is the second blast to rock the Afghan capital on Monday. Early in the morning, two people were injured in an explosion in the Bagrami district, Basir Mujahid, a Kabul police spokesman confirmed to Pajhwok. According to eyewitnesses, two Afghan National Army (ANA) soldiers were the victims of the explosion https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.rt.com/document/5832af3ec361883f258b4652/amp?client=safari |
Demmzy15:Silly one celebrated by another silly! And the fiercest "Shia priest", Yasser al Habib, is also a fierce anti-Iran critic. He doesn't like Iran's rapprochement with Sunnis. Why not listen to what he states about Umar? He has very lovely lectures on your idols, Umar and Aisha on YouTube The Western countries are safe havens for Wahhabi migrants and extremists. You should read on which countries bought tens of thousands of Toyota hilux vans from Japan and supplied to ISIS. The same vehicles used by boko. Russia, Iraq and Syria demanded from Toyota to know how Isis was able to have such huge fleet of its vehicles. Find out which two countries' governments paid Toyota for thousands of hilux vans. Toyota released a statement. Google can help you. |
Demmzy15:you are beyond ridiculous! i wanted to reply to your post without quoting it, but who would resist quoting such comic relief! so Shia Iran supports Sunni Wahhabi ISIS and Alqaeda who behead Shia Muslims, and who would love the idea of one day invading Iran, like they invaded cities in Iraq and Syria? They have not attacked Iran proper because they have no safe haven in Iran. Iran is 95% Shia. Where will they hide? Their troubles and terrorism are restricted to Sistan and Balochistan, the only Sunni majority provinces of Iran, near the Pakistani border. Even there, they get beaten by Iranian security forces. never mind how ridiculous your claims are. it still remains to be reckoned with that it is Sunni Wahhabi Takfiri terrorists who go about blowing the places of worship of other faiths and they randomly kill innocent civilians of other faith in Takfiri based killings. regardless whether you claim that Iran is sponsoring your Sunni brothers or not. and it is Sunni based ideologies and doctrines that the likes of ISIS and Alaqaeda use to perpetrate their atrocities against humanity and claim that they are serving Allah. You still cannot come up with JUST ONE EXAMPLE where a Shia Muslim blow up himself in a Sunni mosque or in a Christian church in takfiri attack. Why?! Iran is not using Shia youth to blow themselves up in Sunni mosques. it is funny that Shia Iran is using Sunni Muslims to blow up Shia worshipers and places of worship based on the claim that Iran supports Sunni terror groups who like your stupid self believe the Shia are not Muslims, but apostates and heretics who should be killed. i can swear that you do not even believe what you just typed. not even the CIA can establish a link between Iran and alqaeda or ISIS. yet, the fantastic mind of an idle Sunni youth, whose brain is submerged in sectarian hate mongering, and roaming an online forum is making such claims to make himself feel better to sleep at night. if you really believe your claims, then you need your head checked! religion is dangerous for your health!! Very irritating that someone like you is using scaremongering and terror claims to attack another faith. Terror is your trademark! You have destroyed the image of Islam and Muslims. Do some reflections and soul searching. You need to be emancipated from the evil spirit of sectarian hatred so as you can see the true spirit and beauty of Islam. |
ShiaMuslim:https://www.nairaland.com/3229194/seeking-muslim-solution-islamist-terrorism/6#47857765 |
MicroBox:there are no Shia in Libya. care to explain how Gaddafi fell because of what you call "Shia hypocrisy"? it was Sunni Wahhabi countries (particularly Qatar) that supported the NATO campaign against Gaddafi. they even bore the cost!!! Saddam used chemical weapons to kill his people. do you expect the Shia to stand up and fight for him when the Americans invaded? of course they will view the American intervention as karma. after all, at a point, Saddam was America's boy whom they supplied with deadly weapons to use against Iran in the eight years war. so it is good riddance to bad rubbish. he was a tyrant and tyrants and brutes dont end well throughout the course of human history. Lest I forget, was it not from military bases in Sunni countries (Saudi and Qatar and Kuwait) that the USA used to attack Saddam? It was Sunni against Sunni!!! So why blame Shia? Aleppo is under the control of Wahhabi terrorists. do you expect the Syrian government to fold its arms and watch them take over its second largest city in the country? are you no longer a fan of "constituted authorities"? you condemn Sheikh Zakzaky and his IMN because his followers hold religious processions not permitted by the state. but you support Sunni Wahhabi terrorists armed to the teeth invading a city in Syria. so who is the sectarian hypocrite? ![]() |
Adagba1:what is the definition of "terrorizing"? ![]() |
MicroBox:this is a Wahhabi Takfiri talking. the wahhabi is scared and suspicious of the intentions of all else who are not wahhabi, while what he is scared of others doing to him, he engages actively to do unto others. no worse example of double standards and hatred. |





