₦airaland Forum

tctrills:
The Life expectancy in Gaza is 75.7 years while that of Nigeria is 52.89 years. Do you still think Israel is committing genocide in Gaza? If yes, then Israel must be the worst country at committing genocide in the history of the world.

They clearly are but Zoogeria is worse than a place under genocide.

Slytiger:
And you guys are always looking for ways to make Nigeria look bad.

I provided a source from CIA.

There are other countries with lower life expectancy.

Thats a different source. Nigeria does have the lowest life expectancy on earth.

tochez24:
And you think what happened in your era is obtainable now?? Lol

This is a generation of the FAST lane, I'm so sorry sir but that your supposed wisdom doesn't work now♂️

I have traveled far and wide too, even outside country and i can bet you, these generational ladies are the same world wide.... but due to high poverty rate in Nigeria, our ladies turn out to be the worst of them all.

There's no need for us to throw stones at each other as any single male now can easily relate to my point already. It's obvious you don't because you are of the last good generation... thus you're extremely naive of what we single guys pass through everyday in the hands of ladies.

Why do you think we came up with REDPILL in the first place?? It's because our girls are now extremely TOXIC and almost useless.

We need to protect ourselves💯

Its culture and upbringing not really poverty

NaijaCrusader:
So life is generally hard all around? because millions of people will literally kill to be in that UK and face the quagmire

It is hard everywhere truth be told. Western world is nowhere as great as it seems. The whites lied.

motymop:
Anyone who live in the western world will understand that dating is transactional among immigrants especially those from poor countries.

For instance if you are from a country like Nigeria

The women and men are looking for someone with documents to legalize their stay...

The natives don't wanna date an immigrant except if she or he is exceptional handsome or beautiful.

Those Nigerian guys that marry white women, it is a hit or miss, majority of those men found those women in the night club.

As a guy, one of the way to get sex is sex with no emotions aka one night stand on dating apps

Don't ever think you have found love with a girl or guy you met on a dating app. OYO is your own

The most obsessed people that love sex chat are those Nigerians living abroad whether in the UK or US, Canada, that is the period they know they have a ex in Nigeria

Some of the most sexually frustrated and lonely Nigerians are all living abroad, no wonder a week spent in Nigeria for hols is like a week for releasing sexual tension

Hit or miss? This is some serious coping, the ones that date out can meet them anywhere and not all the immigrants in relationships in western countries are transactional. Much of the time, the ones that come from parts of the world like Asia end up dating someone in the western world and come there and overachieve. It’s not to say that other races can’t be materialistic, transactional etc in relationships but it is far worse with us blacks and Africans.

Cousin9999:
South America...has a lot of problems.

When a male goes there and raves about the women, he's likely clueless about how messed up the country and/or society is, or he's a lowlife that thinks exploiting poor women is okay.

If you're a guy and you go to one of those countries, these are some of the reasons women will be all over you:
-She wants to set you up to get robbed.
-She's a hooker.
-She's a known hooker and no other men will date her.
-She's bait for human trafficking.
-She thinks you make at least 40,000USD annually, which is a ton of money to them. And you're her potentially "rich" boyfriend to squeeze money from that her and her local boyfriend/husband spend.
-In her insanely racist/colorist country, the fact that she's slightly darker than an albino causes all kinds of problems in her life, and she knows she'll get the opposite treatment from you. But the fact is, she's racist as well.
-She thinks you're her ticket out of the hellhole country she's in.
-Men in those countries are known to smack women, and she's trying to escape that culture by marrying you.
-It's a purely sexual relationship that will go nowhere because she will only or already has married a local.

ETA: It doesn't matter what one of these women does for you or how many different ways you have sex with her, she's still racist.

All these things you are saying are saying arw far worse in Africa. Passport Bros are in South America and Asia.

DonroxyII:
That Opinion was written in 2023 and as at this 2026, My Opinion still stands For Me as an African Man ....

If You Love the Oyinbo's way, Go On Then !

No what is in them that is making you stronger? 😂

Adakintroy:
All this write up are just over sabi. Women are women all over the world.

If you go to the huwalulu tribe in somalia. You will see bush women bleeping hunters for bush meat while ignoring the other hunters that can't bring home a good kill. In getho girl lash for indomi and data, while in lekki they lash for shopping mall trips and range rover ride. Its a universal attributes with women but relative. Na ur own you know.

I watch online dating site and see passport bros in america talking about coming to Africa to find decent women. For my mind I just laugh say see mugu. While we here de look to go there to find decent women. Na wetin we de see dem them de see the tin just turn upside down that's all. If you stand am straight, una go see say women na women.

Good de yeye de, na so life be. Start your search early you go eventually find good one. But if he turn out say you no see at all. Chance are you are the yeye person.

Passport Bro is almost entirely Asian or latinas. That’s what western men go for. It’s rarely ever Africa. But it is true women are women everywhere but cultural differences exist.

mapist:
VERY WRONG move but them better pass whites o or Western women.

Not even remotely. Naija need their men to do everything. Western ones don’t

Gerrard59:
- I am not the one denigrating black or Nigerian women just because I travelled abroad.

- No be me create thread explaining the differences between Nigerian women and overseas women. You don see me put down Nigerian women in comparison to abroad women? Women all over the world are known to be hypergamous. In fact, abroad women are more hypergamous than Nigerian/African women. I was told of an Ivoerien who works for Panasonic who has been unable to save anything substantial because as he is dating a Japanese lady and about to marry her, as he has to provide the same standard of living she would expect from a Japanese man. If na Ivorien woman, you think say him for never save? Would the average Ivorien lady be demanding he spends yanfu-yanfu while being with him in Japan?

- Nigerian nay black men have failed their women. I am ready to die on that hill, any time, any day. https://www.nairaland.com/6643241/nigerian-men-failed-women It is men who develop societies. Black men have been unable to develop their societies so that other men will desire black women. How come no one is rushing Laotian or Bolivian women? Why South Korean or British? Bolivian women no fine ni?

Nobody is stating that hypergamy, gold diggery or even leeching doesn’t exist abroad but that it is not as bad and that the women abroad are able to look after themselves without help from a man.

JWtriplex:
This op sha.

I've dated white women before and I can assure you na Dem bill pass


I'll still settle for a Nigerian lady tho

Absolutely delusional no one absolutely no other race of women be it white or Asian or Latina or whatever leeches on their men like African particularly Nigerian women do. It is not even close. Gold digging and leeching is everywhere but it is far worse in Africa especially Nigeria. Only in Nigeria will a girl ask you to fund not just her but her family, entire lineage. The women there are incapable of looking after themselves witbout a man.

DonroxyII:
Economy Bro ... A woman Is meant to take care of her people.... So, if you are her man, You will be helping her in helping her home.

Men are meant to respond to the economics of the economy but if you fail to do your job & perform Ya role, That won't stop the opposite gender from asking you for securities... It's African Way ...

If you love the Oyinbos way, then go for the white pvssy bro ....

Some of us like it the African Way ... It Makes us Stronger ..!

Which kind dirty stronger? Go hide

BloomingDale:
This one na just childish rant. Go look at statistics and stop the foolishness.

BW were the least desired.

Lol look at this mumu, Naija women also marry white men but we don't make noise about it, but naija men will be all over the place yapping spittle about glorifying being used for washing plates, washing pants, cooking and cleaning, Naija men are bottom feeders thats why you are proud that they did you a favour by marrying you, you black naija men are a curse to Africa and the whole world, they hate you that's why they kill you in South Africa, you are known all-over the world as drug pushers and fraudsters, your so called president is currently an embarrassment in the world right now, a known drug pusher, you all are a curse to curse itself.

Abi you think say they no dey divorce you slow brain COONS? The witch wey ruin Eboue of Arsenal sotey the nigga dey sleep for homeless shelters for London, no be white woman do am? So many countless videos of Nigerian men sleeping on the streets because they've been used and dumped by white women, you think it's a thing of pride? You all have nothing to offer them, you are just a sex slave that can be used and dumped anytime, they see you naija men as below par dregs that has to be tamed like slaves....nothing more.

Nowhere near as much Nigerian or black men with white or foreign women.

tosinhtml:
Yeah I have issues with South Asians too, I have worked with them in every company. Those guys are terrible, I try to avoid them as much as possible. Actually my brain doesn't even recognise South Asians as Asians, i rarely categorise them as such unless someone explicitly points it out to me.

They are Asian then your brain needs healing

Gerrard59:
East Asians are different from South Asians. To me, there is no difference between South Asians and Africans. Then when you consider the likes of Pakistan and Afghanistan, we are better off.

What a lie nowhere is as backward as Africa absolutely nowhere.

tosinhtml:
Ohhhhh, i don't even consider those Asians Those are Middle Eastern people & Indians.

Asians are basically Hong Kong, China, Japan & Korea (South & North).

The Middle East is in Asia.

1Sharon:
I got pissed off when I read about the Asian man. Asians are in no position to speak on Africans in the UK! They're the most despicable demographic.

They are doing far better than Africans but also consider that blacks are the most likely in the western world to be single be it UK, USA etc especially the women. There was even a survey on this.

CaptainIgbo:
How about if we all stop with racial hierarchies? Maybe we should look at the value of individuals. Some black women are queens and others are... bottom of the barrel.

We are all human that is true but it was her that brought racial hierarchy.

CaptainIgbo:
I think the anti-black sentiment is a bit exaggerated here. Brazil actually has a large black population, and Colombia also has a sizable black population in parts of the country, and the populations of both countries are largely mixed. I cannot blame Western men for going to places like Bangkok to find a wife, but I think we shouldn't lump that in with anti-blackness of either gender.

The vast majority of Brazil and Colombia is mixed. Black and whites are minorities there. Asia and Latin America is mostly passport bros journey especially in Asia. Philippines, Thailand etc are by far the most popular. All I was telling that other person is that if they want to start doing racial hierarchy then BW are at the bottom.

CaptainIgbo:
Some passport bros are traveling to Africa to find wives, by the way. Also, Latinas are not a monolith: there are plenty of attractive Afro-Latinas in Latin America, and many of these women as sought as wives by Western men. I think there is plenty of individual variation with attractive and unattractive people in every racial group. My understanding is that black men are doing fine when they travel to Asia.

The overwhelming majority of passport bros go to Asia and Latin America. The top countries are Thailand, Philippines, Brazil and Colombia whom all have minority or next to zero black populations. Not all Afro Latinos are black either. Most tend to be mixed. Beauty is everywhere but get real if you want to start doing racial hierarchy. Then BW are right at the bottom too. There was even surveys in the west showing BW and Asian men as the least likely to date groups. That is why I could not stop laughing at that girl’s comment. African women are hated far more outside Africa than inside. Do you see BW Asian man couples frequently? They are literally the least likely to engage in IR outside Africa.

erniok:
Guess you were dropped as a baby and it's reflecting in your posts. So defeat has a new meaning for scallywags like you. So what do we call Germans that lost ww2.

Your talibans would have attacked them when they were pulling out or surrounded them oo capture and execute as they did Afghan soldiers lets how well it'd have fared for them.

Afghanistan Defeated them by political means and not militarily. Really? Then it'd be okay to say the Nazis were defeated politically bynthe allied forces. And I thought I was discussing with a normal human.

You shouldn't use mature in any of your sentence because you're far from that w9rd and know I can go the whole nine yards with you on the insult lane. Be warned.

None of this made sense in ultimately the US lost in both counts because the people did not like American/western ways of life etc.

erniok:
The way you write make me wonder if I'm conversing with a teen. Its 9bvious what happened 8n Afghanistan but you chose to twist it.

Presidential aspirants have always campaigned with bringing back the boys from Afghanistan and Iraq. Trump campaigned with it( as he campaigned with no more wars this period) but couldn't do it. Biden promised to do so but the withdrawal was so calamitous that several US politicians berated him for it especially Trump.

The US trained and equipped troops who were supposed to push back the talibans but that never happened and the US gets the blame.

The doctrine of rules of engagement made them court martial service men caught breaking the rules. True or false? Remove that like the Israelis or japanese (WW2) and see US be a monster no nation would dare to attack.

Vietnam was during cold war era same with Russia misadventure in Afghanistan. If you have something else worth reading apart from history revision, I'm here.

Bro is trying to sound mature. Nothing you state is any different from the western rhetoric or coping shall I say. Even the most patriotic Americans out there tend to accept that Afghanistan and Vietnam were unequivocal US defeats.

You haven’t debunked as to why the US lost but explained what led to their defeat 😅

Rules of engagement? The very act of invading a sovereign nation is a violation of international as defined in the UN charter. Since when has America or the West cared about international law? You keep on rambling about rules of engagement. Abegi get out. Tout like you. Rules of engagement is killing millions of innocent people?


And those are just a hand few of US war crimes in the region in the past 20 years. A million people in Iraq died and America and the West is funding the Palestinian Genocide.

* Abu Ghraib torture scandal (Iraq)
U.S. personnel tortured and abused Iraqi detainees—beatings, sexual humiliation, stress positions, dog intimidation. Photos became infamous worldwide.
* Haditha killings (Iraq)
U.S. Marines killed 24 Iraqi civilians, including women and children, after an IED attack. Widely regarded as one of the worst civilian massacres by U.S. forces in Iraq.
* Mahmudiyah killings (Iraq)
U.S. soldiers raped a 14-year-old Iraqi girl and murdered her and her family.
* Drone strike civilian casualties (Iraq / Syria / Afghanistan / Yemen)
Multiple U.S. drone and airstrikes hit civilians, including weddings, homes, and aid workers.
* Kunduz hospital airstrike (Afghanistan)
U.S. airstrike hit a Médecins Sans Frontières hospital, killing 42 people.
* Baghuz airstrike (Syria)
U.S. strike reportedly killed large numbers of civilians, including women and children, during final battles against Islamic State.
* Kabul drone strike (Afghanistan)
U.S. drone strike killed 10 civilians, including 7 children, after wrongly identifying an aid worker as a terrorist.
* Support for coalition actions in Yemen
The U.S. provided arms, intelligence, and logistics to the Saudi-led coalition, which has been tied to strikes on civilians, schools, hospitals, and markets

The US was defeated in Afghanistan and Vietnam cause both wore them out through political means. You cannot win a war just by having better weapons especially in a guerilla war. The Taliban and Viets wore Americans out to the extent that they were tired and gave up giving them the victory and the L to America. That is not revising history.

The monster America is 😂. We have seen this monster do 20 years in mych poorer countries and still get beat.

erniok:
US did not defeat taliban? How do you guys even revise history.

You used Russia-Afghanistan as example and I had to point out a fact you obviously ignored.

Fact is every nation under the earth can be overrun. Same Persia Alex conquered abi another one? Persia that was mightier and bigger than todays iran was overthrown. What could save them would be US doctrine of rules of engagement.

The US did not defeat the Taliban otherwise the Taliban would not be in control of the country. Taliban now have a stronger grip of Afghanistan than they did pre 9/11. How is that history revision? Go on Wikipedia and it states US Afghan War to be Taliban victory. The general consensus with that war is that the US lost.



You speak as if America hasn’t commited countless of war atrocities yet still lost all the wars it started. The country hasn’t won a single war since WW2. And so what that Persia was over thrown? No country including the US can successfully invade Iran. America is getting weaker and weaker. This same country that cant even conquer Afghanistan and Vietnam take on a much bigger and more advanced opponent. America lost to farmers in Afghanistan and Vietnam not even a military.

erniok:
You are ignoring the fact that the soviets came to prop a government and it was the cold war era.

I wasn’t talking about the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan but rather the American ones in Afghanistan and Vietnam. You are insane if you think the US could invade a country that large.
Iran is 2.7 times larger than Ukraine and it is much bigger, more mountainous and harsher climate.


The US could not even defeat the Taliban and Vietcong In Afghanistan and Vietnam in much smaller countries.

Country

Land Area

Population (2025 est.)

Population Density

Iran

1.648 million km²

~91–92M

~55/km²

Afghanistan

652,000 km²

~42–43M

~65/km²

Vietnam

331,000 km²

~101M

~305/km²

Ukraine

603,000 km²

~36–38M (wartime est.)

~60/km²

US ground invasion of Iran would be a bloodbath.

Helinuse:
Iran is Byzantine
Until it rose!

Again deflection. I never cared about Iran’s capabilities or how powerful it was. My point is that the so called world’s superpower has been stalemated by Iran. They did not achieve a single objective in their war. And these same Americans want to face China or Russia 😂 they can’t even deal with the small fish.

erniok:
US was never at war with Iran like the Russian-Ukraine war. Let congress approve a war and you will see wonders. This was Trump misadventure that the Iranians resisted well.

Boots on the ground is both political and military suicide for the US. Iran is several times the landmass of Afghanistan and Vietnam with several times the population. The US can’t even invade and conquer much weaker countries. The terrain and climate is really not friendly for foreign incursions either. If US tried to do a Russia in Iran that would fail far worse than what Russia is doing Ukraine.

Helinuse:
Seems like you easily get angry.
It's only an inferiority complex that makes a man this easily angry, oh.


I just agreed with everything you said, and now you claim it is "whataboutism."
Do you even know the meaning of "whataboutism?"

I just said I agree with you that ALL the nuclear facilities of Iran are not destroyed. They are still above the mountains, and some that were even built in the high seas have even grown larger.
I also agree with you that all their navy and air force are still intact.
I also agree with you that all their industrial complex for the production of missiles and drones are still intact.
I also agree with you that Iran still has the ability to project power, not terrorism, all over the Middle East.

I agree with you
What again do you want?

Inferiority complex? Me I like the truth but you don’t. You’ve spent this entire argument deflecting entirely from all the main points cause you cannot handle the truth. The truth is that this America got humbled by a much weaker foe. It’s been having that for god knows how long. I am not on anyone’s side but I am very happy to see an arrogant country like the US get humbled. America is Rome before it collapsed and what you spew is no different from the usual western rhetoric
‘We don’t lose wars but interest’

‘We won the battles thats all that matters’

I have heard all this bs before

Helinuse:

"Britain and France tried to stop them"
"British and French were no longer the undisputed hegemon"


I like how you like making yourself happy.

Well, it was Israel who went on to stop Egypt, and then France and Britain joined.
Just as Israel rose to stop Iran's nuclear program, the USA joined.

If you like, make yourself happy by excluding the Lion from the hunt and focusing the camera on the foxes.


Second, I am sure you don't know the meaning of a "hegemony." If you do, you won't ascribe it to TWO entities.
Assuming you now know, if America became a "Superpower" before the 1950s, how come it was a war in 1956 that made Britain and France no longer the undisputed hegemon? You see how you are contradicting yourself?


And yes, I mentioned Egypt because I want you to understand that small-scale sea piracy does not, in any way, position Iran as a superpower. They are only lucky that America has a lot of influence on the Arab states due to its ability to pressure them to tamper with justice with ease.



America would have just released Israel to do what Israel was doing to Egypt before France and Britain joined

You have just again waffled. Bringing up things that have nothing to do with the current argument. The US was not a superpower in 1898 just because it defeated an empire that was mostly dead. In that time frame, America might have rivalled the UK economically but in the military, political etc sense it was nowhere near the UK. The US was very isolationist up until WW2. How is claiming that the US not a superpower till 1945 contradicting Britain and France no longer being superpowers/hegemons. That is what happened because before the rise of the USSR and USA. It was the Europeans that were the world powers and that Suez Crisis showed that the UK and France were no longer the world’s superpower. The same way the war in Iran has shown that the US is no longer the world’s superpower.

‘And yes, I mentioned Egypt because I want you to understand that small-scale sea piracy does not, in any way, position Iran as a superpower. They are only lucky that America has a lot of influence on the Arab states due to its ability to pressure them to tamper with justice with ease’
Again what a load of bs. Who the hell said Iran is a superpower or that small-scale sea piracy does.

Latest military budget for USA: $916 billion

Iran: $9 billion.

Iran is not even a peer to the US with like 1/1000th of the military budge but it has still been able to fight America to a standstill. As I said before, superpowers cannot really win these kind of wars. It is not possible. It’s happening with Russia and Ukraine now when they turn to guerilla tactics. It is game over.

Helinuse:
Take a look at the bolded.

It sounds familiar.
When we were little kids, a child started throwing such tantrums when he has nothing left to respond to.



If you think America is a paper tiger, let Iran fly one air force plane to Washington, D.C., or move one naval ship towards Pearl Harbor. Let's see.


But I bet you, America had its ships right at the nose of Iran.



Now, I want to be that type of paper tiger.

No cause ultimately you have failed to prove how the US didn’t lose the war. You have not meaningfully debunked a single claim i made. Not a single objective did the US achieve in Iran not one.
As the Ukraine War has shown, aircraft carriers and huge warships are just targets. Iran’s cheap drones proved that in this war too. What is the point of having an overstretched military is a flex?

America is a paper tiger. The country has not won a single war on its own since WW2 not even one 😂😂. The US just picks on weaker countries and still looses 😂