SmartTalk's Posts
Nairaland Forum › SmartTalk's Profile › SmartTalk's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 (of 11 pages)
camelus: Nigerians will lose Nigeria to a civil war” – Ribadu calls for amnesty for Boko Haram@Bolded: Yipee. The sooner the better. Let the North have their own republic so they can give amnesty to their criminals. |
russellino: The things that bedeviled the biafran war effort were poor organisation, inefficiency and politics. Coupled with lack of weapons it was only a matter of time before the war would have been lost. However I believe that guerilla warfare should have been heavily used with conventional warfare kept for when there would have been an ample cache of weapons to sustain it. The nigerian army was very heavily armed and trained by superpowers and the arab world.The East would have been suited for Guerilla warfare, but it is best to draw the enemy away from your territory. It is not wise to allow all the killings to take place in the East. The other parts of Nigeria should not have been allowed to be in peace while people were dying in the East. If the casualty count on Nigerian soil was as many as it was on Biafran soil, the people of Nigeria would have begone to question the wisdom of the Biafran invasion. Availability of weapons is important, but tactics and strategies are more important. Emperor_007: Biafrans should not have trusted SW, and should never again , especially in war related issuesKeep in mind that the foreign powers who were involved in the war supported the part that they thought was most likely to win. If Victor Banjo had reached Lagos when he was supposed to, they could easily had switched sides, at least some of them. British companies operating on Biafran soil were sympathetic to the Biafran cause. |
Tolexander: but you said they are intelligent? How come they couldn't suggest a strategy to conquer their enemy as many as the biafran soldiers were?Intelligent people know that war is not won by numbers. Read about the Persian war with the Greeks, the Israeli war of independence (the invading Arab armies were more that the population of Israel at that time), examples are ridiculously many. Biafra only needed half the small arms supply that Nigeria had. Negro_Ntns: you did not go north because you feared hausa, choosing instead to go terrorize small communities of people who were neutral. well the capital is in north now and for all the ibo massacres since how many times have you punched back?Lagos was not neutral. Read about the war. There are newsreels indicating that enlistment was up in Lagos as in other parts of Nigeria. The second part of your question would be relevant after Biafra establishes herself. If you are expecting me to support reprisal attacks, you would be disappointed. That is not in line with my principles and I think it is against everything Biafra stands for. I look forward to your own answer to that question seeing as Yoruba and other Southern Nigerians were also killed. If there was an intelligent and compelling tactical reason to hit the North, Biafra should have gone for it but where is the wisdom in that when all offensive against Biafra was coordinated in Lagos. Ojukwu's move follows Sun Tzu's advice of "attacking directly to engage your enemy, attack indirectly to win". If it was followed to the letter, the result of the war would have been different. Even now that Abuja is the capital, any intelligent general at war with Nigeria would attack Lagos first, then other coastal areas and use that as a base to launch attacks at Abuja. Of course, if you have infinite cash you can choose the more economically wasteful strategy of using expensive plans to fly from your territory to Abuja and deliver bombs and probably refuel the plan while it is in the air but Biafra did not have that kind of money - so common sense would be necessary. If I was fighting America and I had one missile at the time, I would strike New York before I even think about Washington. It's called common sense. Back to topic, the ruler of Tanzania, Julius Nyerere, towered above most African political leaders of the time by putting moral principles above politics and recognising Biafra when others were too afraid to. God Bless Tanzania, God Bless Biafra. |
Alfamann: Okechukwu Mmadufo (Amichi, Biafra): joined the Biafran Army on 14th March 1968. Last heard of on 14th March 1969 when he led a small battalion into Nkpor sector. Great hero of Biafra, Nadimma my brother. I wish there were many more like you.The services of Okechukwu Mmadufo to the Biafran people must never be forgotten. He and others like him may not be famous, but they can rest assured that the people who survive them would work to establish the Biafran republic. He did not die in vain. ----------------------- ************* ---------------------------------- The most committed and involved British ally that Biafra had, Frederick Forsyth brought to the knowledge of the World the atrocities that Britain supported in Nigeria. He resigned his job in BBC to come to Biafra when he saw that the government of Britain was trying to prevent the truth from coming out. He made the documentary below after the war: [flash=640,360] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J3ReFoFp0Gs[/flash] | | | | | | |
slimghost: JOE ACHUZIA, the biafran Hannibal!Here Here, I would acknowledge that though I would not describe him as a forgotten hero. Tolexander: so biafran soldiers never killed any civilian?You do understand what genocide means, right? Civilians are always killed in war, but read about the Calabar massacres and other such. Gathering men and shooting them in front of their children and wives is not the definition of collateral damage. Other strategies would have won the war, you say. That is why I put up this post for people like you who keep saying that but have no suggestions: https://www.nairaland.com/1215556/additional-strategies-biafrans-should-adopted#14610995 |
Tolexander: introduction of Jesus into this matter has no mental affliation.And what makes you think Satan was aware of that plan?... My point exactly. Ignorance make people drunk from temporary victory. |
FSU: Who are the plenty Yorubas? I DID NOT KNOW THREE OUT OF 40 MILLION IS PLENTY. AWO BEING THE YOROUBA LEADER LED THEM TO JOIN THE NORTH IN KILLING FELLOW HUMANS MAINLY VIA STARVATION.Well, the few people of whatever ethnic group who supported justice should be acknowledged. The word PLENTY is misplaced, I grant you that, but a few of them stayed on the side of justice. |
Negro_Ntns: add Victor Banjo there. Plenty Yoruba struggled so you can be freed from your oppressors. You fvkd up when instead of heading north to fight your oppressor you headed west to fight a friend, ended up with a new enemy and the demolition of biafra.Only a fool would head up North, there is no tactical advantage. You go to the capital, that is where the devils planning war on Biafra are located. Banjo did well for Biafra, but his refusal to see his mission to the end was a major error, NO intelligent general would have passed up that opportunity to end the war by striking the snake at the head. He must however be noted for the successful liberation of the Mid West. |
CyberG: You funny o! The guys who LOST are HEROES but the VICTORS who pummelled the losers into fleeing to Abidjan and beyond are not HEROES?? Well, history cannot be re-written nonetheless! Talking about ZEROES:That must have been what the devil thought when Jesus was crucified - Son of Man dead, I win, I am a hero - but that is not how life should be measured by intelligent people. If Hitler won, the way the story of Europe would have been told would be very different. Back to real heroes: Canadian writer Stanley Diamond supported Biafra. Richard Nixon, despite his faults, stopped Johnson's policy of supplying weapons to Nigeria. The people of Britain protested Harold Wilson's idiotic policy of support to Nigeria - dock workers refused to load ships with weapons protesting being used to kill Biafran babies. |
Special mention should be made of Wole Soyinka and Tai Solarin who stood for what is right and were jailed for it. While all around them - relatives and friends - blindly supported genocide, and still do, they spoke up against evil. God bless them. A memorial must be created for them in the Biafran relm after the demise of Nigeria. |
Tolexander: who are criminal in the real sense.The two criminals you mentioned committed recorded acts of genocide. Killing unarmed civilians is not what heroes do. Read your history. |
Tolexander: General Benjamin Maja Adekunle.Like I said, criminals and hell-bound bigots are not included. The two genocidal killers you mentioned belong with Strum Thormond in his section of hell. The title says "Heroes" of the war not villains. Conor Cruise O'Brien knew the potential Biafra had of liberating African intellectualism given the intelligentia Biafra produced on the world stage. Biafra had the largest proportion of Black intellectuals in the world. Same with Kurt Vonnegut who wrote: "Miriam was annoyed by my conversation at one point, and she said scornfully, "You won't open your mouth unless you can make a joke." It was true. Joking was my response to misery I couldn't do anything about. The jokes of Ojukwu and Effiong had to do with the crime for which the Biafrans were being punished so hideously by so many nations. The crime: They were attempting to become a nation themselves. "They call us a dot on the map," said General Ojukwu, "and nobody's sure quite where." Inside that dot were 700 lawyers, 500 physicians, 300 engineers, 8 million poets, 2 novelists of the first rank, and God only knows what else -- about one-third of all the black intellectuals in Africa. Some dot. Those intellectuals had once fanned out all over Nigeria, where they had been envied and lynched and massacred. So they retreated to their homeland, to the dot. The dot has now vanished. Hey, presto." |
Also encourage discussion on suggestions on additional strategies the Biafrans could have adopted to win the war, see https://www.nairaland.com/1215556/additional-strategies-biafrans-should-adopted#14610995 Apparently, Strum Thormond supported Biafra, but I cannot include his name as he was probably more interested in the prospects of blacks killing each other. So people like him and the leaders of South Africa should be excluded. Auberon Waugh named his child Biafra Waugh after he saw the carnage on his visit to Biafra. Let's not forget Kurt Vonnegut and his essay "Biafra: A People Betrayed" (read http://journeytoforever.org/rrlib/biafra.html ). He was so hurt by the Biafran tragedy of losing her independence that he was said to have wept bitterly. |
I realize that our Efik brothers feel bad that Philip Effiong is not given enough recognition in stories the Biafran struggle. This has inspired this post to encourage readers to list Biafran heroes and if possible discuss them. Some I can think of are: Phillip Effiong: second in command in the Biafran army Senator Edward Kennedy (Massachusetts): supported Biafra and pressed for American recognition of the humanitarian disaster in the war Senator Charles E. Goodell (New York): same as above Senator Donald E. Lukens (Ohio): same as above. |
Litmus: So now how is this going? Is the Port in use?Good Question. Saw an article similar to that in title so I thought it was old but I clicked the link and was surprised that it quotes a recent date. Ultimately, I think the Federal Govt involvement with this project is what can drag it back. They only got involved after they found that others have done work on it only to slow it down. Regional autonomy is the way to go if not outright independence from Nigeria. |
Demdem: Having stayed within the NigerDelta region for over a decade now, i doubt if majority from here will want to have anything to do with Biafra (which to me is a waste of time). Its a long story. The question is, will Biafra accept to leave without annexing these areas? Die-Hard Biafrans believe its part of their land up till the Atlantic oceanI believe my comment answers your question - Biafra can do without the parts of the Niger Delta can choose to stay with Nigeria. It is preferable for Biafra to not include the Niger Delta, purity is a good quality in Nation building. We do not need to be shouldering the ethnic problems in the Niger Delta, let them deal with the hatred they have among themselves without drawing the Igbo into it. The only parts that would be with Biafra are those that vote for permanent statehood in the Biafran union and meet requirements of social, economic and political harmony. I put this exemption in consideration of the regret Anglo-Cameroonians have on the vote to join Cameroon due to silly fears of Igbo domination (Read my previous comment on this https://www.nairaland.com/1155411/tribal-war-noise-making#13830349 ), otherwise I would prefer Biafra to consist only of Igbo areas. |
Now, before you start reacting to the topic without understanding my reason for this post, a few caveats: 1. War is unnecessary. The Nigerian Civil war would have been avoided if Nigeria stuck to the terms agreed on in the Aburi Accord. 2. Biafra would rise again, but I do not think war with Nigeria would recur. Nigeria is doing a good job of destroying herself, so Biafrans only need to opt out when the madness reaches a head. Meanwhile we would just bid our time. 3. This is more of an intellectual exercise. Every country reappraise their pasts and see how they would have acted differently given the prevailing circumstance. Too many people comment with ignorance about the Civil War so encouraging this discussion makes us understand the subject more. This post is directed at those who blame the people running the Biafran effort but do not suggest what they would have done differently under similar conditions. I have concluded that if I was in the same shoes as Ojukwu, I would have done exactly the same thing. I would have seceded knowing that Nigeria was planning to invade the Eastern region after reneging on the Aburi peace agreement. This post is to discuss what extra efforts I would have made to defend the Biafran people from Nigerian Aggression. A lot of the strategies adopted by Ojukwu were excellent given the conditions. Sun Tzu advices the general to avoid the strong part of your enemy and attack the weak. This was what Ojukwu did when he noticed the Nigerians were attacking from Nsukka and left their Eastern flank exposed. He sent a division to attack Lagos. If his subordinate had carried out the order to the letter, the outcome of the war would have been very different and Biafra would have been an independent country. But imagine Lagos was better protected, the tactics of Sun Tzu, himself, provides a template on "attacking directly to engage your enemy, attack indirectly to win". The Nigerian soldiers were pulled from the Nsukka axis and sent to protect Lagos. Encircling them, the way Sun Tzu did to the warriors from Chu, as they head for Lagos would have been a good strategy in such a scenario. This is illustrated in the Documentary below: Watch the video below from 0:36:48 - 1:25:21. Especially 1:24:59 - 1:25:59 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4BX_elvw-4c&rel=0&start=5099&end=5159&autoplay=1 While Nigeria adopted genocidal tactics to break the Biafran will, this only strengthened the will of the Biafran people. The most important asset a general should have, according to Sun Tzu, is the moral authority of the people - and Ojukwu had that. Till today, the Biafran spirit cannot be extinguished. The Nigerian soldiers, on the other hand, were not as motivated. They were motivated only by lies told to them, fear of Igbo domination and hatred of the Igbo people. They were not a disciplined force. The only advantage they had over Biafrans was international support. If the Biafrans had just enough guns, the Biafrans would definitely have won the war - this is not in doubt. But given the disadvantage, the only way of winning the war for a country not getting the same financial support is to take the war to the enemy. It is a tragedy that while the Biafrans were facing threat of genocide from the Nigerian soldiers, people were going about their normal daily businesses in Lagos, Kano, and other parts of Nigeria. I do not condemn Ojukwu for letting soldiers from other parts of Nigeria go safely with a rifle while Biafran soldiers and civilians were massacred. This is a good thing and in line with the Biafran Christian ideal. Other strategies should have been adopted to disrupt normal life in the major cities of Nigeria and force the Nigerians to pressure their government to stop the war. The best way for Biafran to fight Nigeria was not through a war of attrition but through Guerrilla tactics. A few examples: 1. Spies: The use of spies is a critical advice from Sun Tzu. There were Igbo people leaving in Nigeria under false names to evade persecution by the Nigerians. Since the Igbo are the best travelled and most cosmopolitan Nigerias, they can blend in to any environment and speaking other Nigerian languages can get them access to important information. I do not know the extent to which spies were used but their use would be critical to carrying out other suggestions I have. 2. Sabotage: Bombs should be placed to destroy important facilities in the Nigerian cities. Public buildings, stadiums, etc should be bombed - not to kill people but to create unease in the society. For example, place a bomb in an important building; call the management to alert them about the bomb and your intentions to detonate it in a few minutes so they can clear the building; detonate the bomb after the building is cleared so no one is killed. The aim is not to kill people but create sufficient panic so Nigerians question the benefit of fighting Biafra when their normal way of life is threatened. This method is adopted by Basque separatists ETA. 3. Assassination: Attempts should be made at the lives of Nigerian leaders authorizing genocide in Biafra. It's okay if you don't always succeed, you only have to be lucky once, they have to be lucky all the time. This would bring the nightmare they gave Biafrans everyday to their doorsteps. 4. Money: Nigeria was given money and support by the foreign powers that wanted Nigerian oil. Finances are important, this is why Nigeria changed the currency after Biafra seceded. It was a means of economic sabotage against Biafra. Biafra should have returned the favour by introducing a flood of counterfeit nairas on the Nigerian market. This would have served the purpose of buying essential items for Biafrans while destroying the value of the naira and creating inflation in the Nigerian economy. Small denomination notes should have been counterfeited by the Biafrans and introduced to Nigeria. Beggars are the best way to distribute these notes. Biafran spies should have given many of such notes to Nigerian beggars and destitutes. These are the few strategies I can come up with now. Do feel free to add more. Add please, so this discussion does not get derailed IGNORE TROLLS. Silence is the best answer for fools, so please prove your intelligence by not engaging foolish commenters. |
BOA®:I agree, the article Dele Sobowale wrote was utter rubbish. |
Source: http://citizensplatform.net/2013/02/re-minister-of-aviation-declares-war-on-yoruba-1-by-joe-obi/ OR http://citizensplatform.net/?p=21903 ‘’In almost twenty years of writing this column, I have never written any article in support of anyone because he is ‘’my brother’’; neither have I written one against anyone because he is not ‘’my brother’’, Dele Sobowale asserts in an article under the above headline in the Vanguard newspaper edition of February 24. Everyone, according to the self acclaimed ‘’Area Boy in the Media’’, from the North to the South, East and West received the same amount of treatment (vitriol?) from him. Well, we cannot ascertain the veracity or otherwise of this spurious claim, but in a space of one week, Dele, writing in his column, ‘’Frankly Speaking’’ has suddenly become an advocate for one man-Wale Babalakin of the Bi-Courtney infamy, a man from the same ethnic stock as Sobowale; producing in the process, two articles in defence of a fellow Yoruba. |
truth4meal: What part of your body do you engage it service when you are compelled to think? Am sure its not your brain...because if you alluded the "well done" of infrastructural projects to an igbo commissioner of Finance and in comparing it to the Yoruba-ful cabinet of Tinubu insult the dexterity of the yorubas - you have only shown you are not privilege to have a brain. If the Igbos are as so good why is all the development indices favouring the west over the east? Or is that commissioner of Igbo extract the only Igboman that can produce result cos the rest is not producing "well done" results.First of, a brainless person cannot determine who should have the privilege of having a brain. If you chose to read my post in that light, it is your choice not mine. My post is quite obvious - merit is better than "Federal Character" - and it is a waste of time for me to start explaining it. Just an advice, processing information through the back-end orifice will not work in trying to understand my post. Next, the "development indices" you choose is subjective and most stats out their do not favour the West as a region than the East as a region. I will give you that Lagos state can contend with Abuja as the most developed state in Nigeria but that is it as far as the West is concerned - Lagos state. Other Western state are not leveraging on the advantage their proximity to Lagos gives them. The most important index for the future of any place is the human capital, and education of the youth. The East has done better than any other region in Nigeria in this respect. Goes to show you that Free Education does not imply Quality Education. [Check http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/special/world/11/nigeria_election_toggle_maps/img/nigeria_literacy_624.gif ] |
truth4meal: so Yorubas don't leave in the east? Why are they not fanatically opening stupid hating thread of their host governor? Why is it that you guys just hate Fashola's collosal achievement that eyes can see.Who told you you Yoruba people in the east do not complain about the governors. Fashola and other former Lagos governors close markets, relocate traders to bad areas, overcharging traders, work with agberos who harass traders and no one calls it tribalism; Obi closes down an illegal market populated mainly by Yoruba and Hausa traders but also Igbo traders, and we would not hear word. Because Yoruba people are affected, it must be tribalistic. And yes, you guys open stupid hate threads not only online but also in the Newspapers y'all control. Four Igbo people among 25 military officers and the Yoruba press is all over it talking about "Igbonising" the military. This is the definition of stupidity. And it did not start today, your politicians did nothing but complain about Igbo domination of the Universities and civil service of that time, so please when coming to equity, come with clean hands. |
What those from Anambra should be bothered about now is the call for zoning of the seat of the governor to the Northern senatorial district. This is highly unhealthy for the state. We should not allow Anambra to be infected by the Nigerian disease of zoning and enthroning mediocrity. |
There were criticisms, but not constructive. Notice his statistics on education gives Anambra a very high score. But he was all too willing to talk about adult literacy - which is less important than youth literacy - in the state as the lowest in the region (despite it's high score). He claims Anambra is doing worse than other states in the region and yet gives stats of those doing worse than Anambra, examples: "Unemployment rate in Anambra is among the highest in the South-east zone, at 21.3 per cent, it is higher than the national average of 21.1 per cent. Imo’s unemployment rate is 29.9 per cent and Enugu is 15 per cent. The state has tried to reduce unemployment through its Anambra Integrated Development Strategy (ANIDS) and the Anambra Youth Reorientation and Empowerment Program (ANSYREP), but the problem with these programmes is that they contribute very little to the production base of the state."I am not in support of turning the debate into an ethnic bashing fest, but a lot of what was written seems too eager to point out the bad, that is not constructive. Much of the criticism wreaks of schadenfreude. The analysis should be objective and focus on trends of the indices - have they improved over time or have they remained the same. El Rufai's piece is more political than analytical. The references to the budget does not explain how he came about his talk of misplaced priorities and suggests he believes solving problems require throwing more money at it, absolutely false. Anambra is heading in the right direction. We should be talking about sustaining and building on the good work that has been done (read http://www.thisdaylive.com/articles/cbn-ranks-anambra-third-in-deposit-mobilisation/137412/ ). No people become great overnight, it starts with sustained little improvements over time. |