SSIPON's Posts
Nairaland Forum › SSIPON's Profile › SSIPON's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 (of 17 pages)
RomanGreen:Sabon Gari has a healthy mix of Muslims too. Don't talk what you don't know. |
geezonaire1415:Lmao, you are very wrong. It was a bomb. I stay in Sabon Gari, Kano. Don't mind what the news media is telling you. I was in the toilet taking my bath when I heard the blast. No body sells gas in that area (ABA road). It happened a shop near a school. They are currently excavating the area and removing bodies and flesh. If it was a gas explosion, why is there no fire. I stay in the street close to ABA road (I won't mention it for the sake of my privacy) by the way. I went there and saw the thing with my korokoro eyes. No be gas be that. It has to be some sort of explosive. |
paulGrundy:They are clowns |
Dtruthspeaker:So if your father commits a crime, the police can come arrest you since you and your father are the same. Dliespeaker ![]() |
MaxInDHouse:Jesus is God |
Dtruthspeaker:The son of Okonkwo is not Okonkwo himself werey. |
Kobojunkie:Provide me with the scriptural evidence for the trinity |
DaInferno:He said when Osinachi came to him complaining of respiratory problems, he referred her to the hospital, while she was dying in the hospital, despite his several prayers that availeth nothing, he was busy packing crutches in Cameroon like a golf caddy. Crutches he claimed people left behind after healing. Religion na better business ooo.. |
This is a man that has seen "visions" and has performed miracles. Osinachi performed one of the most popular Gospel music in Nigeria. Why did God abandon her? And why couldn't Enenche the mighty man of God see a vision that She was being abused? ![]() He said when Osinachi came to him complaining of respiratory problems, he referred her to the hospital, while she was dying in the hospital, despite his several prayers that availeth nothing, he was busy packing crutches in Cameroon like a golf caddy. Crutches he claimed people left behind after healing. Religion na better business ooo.. |
Dtruthspeaker:Keep going. You are matching closer to Atheism. Good job |
tctrills:Thank you for proving my point. Jehovah's Witnesses are not Christians they are of another religion. |
Kobojunkie:Lmao, go and sit down. I just provided you arguments why Ahimelech was definitely a high priest and you don't even argue with it. You are insistent that the argument that Ahimelech was a high priest must come from the Bible. Okay then, following your logic, then the trinity is not really a thing since the concept was not mentioned in the Bible. |
Kobojunkie:The high priests belonged to the Jewish priestly families that trace their paternal line back to Aaron—the first high priest of Israel in the Hebrew Bible and elder brother of Moses—through Zadok, a leading priest at the time of the reigns of David and Solomon over the United Kingdom of Israel. In Mark 2.26, Jesus is reported as saying: πῶς εἰσῆλθεν εἰς τὸν οἶκον τοῦ θεοῦ ἐπὶ ᾿Αβιαθὰρ ἀρχιερέως καὶ τοὺς ἄρτους τῆς προθέσεως ἔφαγεν, οὓς οὐκ ἔξεστιν φαγεῖν εἰ μὴ τοὺς ἱερεῖς, καὶ ἔδωκεν καὶ τοῖς σὺν αὐτῷ οὖσιν… Or, in English, “Haven’t you ever read what David did when he was in need and he and his companions were hungry? How he entered into the house of God when Abiathar was high priest and ate the sacred bread that is not lawful for anyone but priests to eat, and also gave it to his companions?” (Mark 2:25-26). The fundamental problem with the phrase “when Abiathar was high priest” is that this incident in David’s life is recorded in but one passage in the OT, 1 Sam 21.1-7. But there, Ahimelech is mentioned as the priest; Abiathar, his son, would later become high priest, but he is not introduced into the narrative for another chapter (22.20). Now as I mentioned earlier, the title of the high priest is usually passed down from lineage to lineage. The succession was to be through one of the high priest's sons, and was to remain in his own family (Leviticus 6:15). So it doesn't matter if the Bible mentioned it or not. What we do know is that the title of "high priest" was passed down from father to son. And since We know that Abiathar (the son of Ahimelech) was a high priest, we can also draw the conclusion that his father Ahimelech was a high priest also. Oga Kobojunkie are you there? |
Kobojunkie:The high priests belonged to the Jewish priestly families that trace their paternal line back to Aaron—the first high priest of Israel in the Hebrew Bible and elder brother of Moses—through Zadok, a leading priest at the time of the reigns of David and Solomon over the United Kingdom of Israel. In Mark 2.26, Jesus is reported as saying: πῶς εἰσῆλθεν εἰς τὸν οἶκον τοῦ θεοῦ ἐπὶ ᾿Αβιαθὰρ ἀρχιερέως καὶ τοὺς ἄρτους τῆς προθέσεως ἔφαγεν, οὓς οὐκ ἔξεστιν φαγεῖν εἰ μὴ τοὺς ἱερεῖς, καὶ ἔδωκεν καὶ τοῖς σὺν αὐτῷ οὖσιν… Or, in English, “Haven’t you ever read what David did when he was in need and he and his companions were hungry? How he entered into the house of God when Abiathar was high priest and ate the sacred bread that is not lawful for anyone but priests to eat, and also gave it to his companions?” (Mark 2:25-26). The fundamental problem with the phrase “when Abiathar was high priest” is that this incident in David’s life is recorded in but one passage in the OT, 1 Sam 21.1-7. But there, Ahimelech is mentioned as the priest; Abiathar, his son, would later become high priest, but he is not introduced into the narrative for another chapter (22.20). Now as I mentioned earlier, the title of the high priest is usually passed down from lineage to lineage. The succession was to be through one of the high priest's sons, and was to remain in his own family (Leviticus 6:15). So it doesn't matter if the Bible mentioned it or not. What we do know is that the title of "high priest" was passed down from father to son. And since We know that Abiathar (the son of Ahimelech) was a high priest, we can also draw the conclusion that his father Ahimelech was a high priest also. |
MaxInDHouse:Can some one say almighty Gods? Meaning multiple persons? |
MaxInDHouse:You still haven't answered the question. Is Jesus God or not? The concept of trinity is believed by most Christians. If Jesus is not God then what is He? An angel? A spirit? |
Kobojunkie:The High Priests, like all Levitical priests, belonged to the Aaronic line. The Bible mentions the majority of high priests before the Babylonian captivity, but does not give a complete list of office holders. Lists would be based on various historical sources. In several periods of gentile rule, high priests were appointed and removed by kings. Still, most high priests came from the Aaronic line. One exception is Menelaus, who may not have been from the Tribe of Levi at all, but from the Tribe of Benjamin. Here are the High Priests of Isreal: Aaron Eleazar, son of Aaron (Numbers 20:2 ![]() Phinehas, son of Eleazar Abishua, son of Phinehas Bukki, son of Abishua Uzzi, son of Bukki Although Phinehas and his descendants are not directly attested as high priests, this portion of the genealogy given in 1 Chronicles 6:3–15 is assumed by other sources (including Josephusand Seder 'Olam Zutta), to give the succession of the office from father to son. At some time, the office was transferred from descendants of Eleazar to those of his brother Itamar. The first known and most notable high priest of Itamar's line was Eli, a contemporary of Samuel. Eli, descendant of Ithamar, son of Aaron Ahitub, son of Phinehas and grandson of Eli Ahijah, son of Ahitub Ahimelech, son of Ahijah (or brother of Ahijah and son of Ahitub) Abiathar, son of Ahimelech My source is Wikipedia. Oga Kobojunkie |
Kobojunkie:Here is a more coherent version Ahimelech was the [b]12th high priest[/b]and officiated at Nob, where he was visited by David (to whom and his companions he gave 5 loaves of the showbread when he fled from Saul (1 Samuel 21:1-9). He was summoned into Saul’s presence, and accused, on the information of Doeg the Edomite, of disloyalty because of his kindness to David; whereupon the king commanded that he, with the other priests who stood beside him (86 in all), should be put to death. This sentence was executed in the most cruel manner by Doeg (1 Samuel 22:9-23). |
Kobojunkie:Ahimelech was the 12th high priest,and officiated at Nob, where he was visited by David (to whom and his companions he gave 5 loaves of the showbread when he fled from Saul (1 Samuel 21:1-9). He was summoned into Saul’s presence, and accused, on the information of Doeg the Edomite, of disloyalty because of his kindness to David; whereupon the king commanded that he, with the other priests who stood beside him (86 in all), should be put to death. This sentence was executed in the most cruel manner by Doeg (1 Samuel 22:9-23). Oga you no dey read your Bible |
.. |
omoiyamayor:You have obviously not read the Nicene creed I believe in one God, |
![]() |
The day this man will die, not a single Nigerian will mourn |
omoiyamayor:I thought Jesus came down from heaven and became human? What was He before he became human? |
MaxInDHouse:So your argument is that Jesus is merely given and authority and He is not actually God? Do you believe in the concept of trinity? |
Kobojunkie: 1 Samuel 21:1-6 New International Version 21 David went to Nob,to Ahimelek the priest. Ahimelek trembledwhen he met him, and asked, “Why are you alone? Why is no one with you?” Oga Kobo, are you well at all? |
Kobojunkie:Some people have developed a long and complicated argument to the effect that even though Mark indicates this happened “when Abiathar was the high priest,” it doesn’t really mean that Abiathar was the high priest, but that the event took place in the part of the scriptural text that has Abiathar as one of the main characters. Their argument was based on the meaning of the Greek words involved and was a bit convoluted. However, the fact is that they had to do some pretty fancy exegetical footwork to get around the problem, and that their solution was in fact a bit of a stretch. I think we can conclude that maybe Mark did make a mistake. But the problem with that conclusion is that a lot of Christians believe that there are zero mistakes in the Bible and admitting that Mark (or whoever wrote the book of Mark) made a mistake will counter the claim that the Bible is inerrant. |
omoiyamayor:Yes. Jesus is a spirit just as the angels are. Now your argument is that He is not God. Then what is He then? |
MaxInDHouse:You are missing the word, "like". There is a difference between "like God" and "God". |
omoiyamayor:So is Jesus an angel or something? |
omoiyamayor:so is Jesus God or not? |
OBALOLA55:Aren't you a Satan worshipper yourself? |




