₦airaland Forum

Westerhoffe:
It is clear people like you do not read the Bible, but listen to self-made preachers' doctrines.

I repeat, I am not programmable.

Who is programming you? It is clear you do not have anything to say.

jaephoenix:
Has anyone ever shown themselves to u?

Can you live in a house that does not belong to you and not know who the owner of the house/landlord is?

femi4:
Who told you that? Even Adam knew Eve was good

Gen 2:23 The man said,

“This is now bone of my bones
and flesh of my flesh;
she shall be called ‘woman,’
for she was taken out of man.

Eve said the fruit was GOOD and pleasing to the eyes

Gen 3:6
When the woman saw that the fruit of the tree was good for food and pleasing to the eye, and also desirable for gaining wisdom, she took some and ate it.

You talk as if these guys were dummy in the garden of Eden

This is where you see there is a difference between knowing good/bad and naturally identifying things that maybe good/bad.

The knowledge of good and bad requires a person to have the duty and obligation of assessing and considering whether a specific subject matter is good or bad eg considering whether you should travel or not.

And this is different from the natural guide God gave man in immediately discerning things in nature which may be good or bad for him whether he has the information of its goodness/badness or not.

Eg you do not need good/bad to decide which shoe to wear or which soup you can create from yam

Absence of knowing whether a thing is good or bad does not mean dummy as proven by many intelligent people here who have asked whether a thing is good or bad eg
https://www.nairaland.com/445208/it-good-remove-thermostat-stop#6033681
https://www.nairaland.com/1834409/eating-raw-noodles-safe-not#25069887

Clearly, these people have no knowledge whether these things are good or bad but that does not mean that they do not have knowledge on driving and cooking.

Aemmyjah:
The Creator does not have a Father
Jesus has a Father
The Father produced him as the beginning of his way


This Post is directed to atheists using the material universe as a reference.
You're own is to find relevance on NL by tackling me n Max
Why not create your own thread?

Even budhist abi guru or whatever they call themselve also declare

"There is but One God. His name is Truth; He is the Creator. He fears none; he is without hate. He never dies; He is beyond the cycle of births and death. He is self-illuminated. He is realized by the kindness of the True Guru. He was True in the beginning; He was True when the ages commenced and has ever been True. He is also True now.
Guru Nanak

LordReed:
We have no evidence for the conditions that preceded the formation of our universe so why should the formation of the universe convince me of a god? Why can't I be fine with accepting that the formation of the universe follows the pattern of all the other processes which we see all the time i.e. natural processes borne out of physical constraints?

It shouldnt convince you, for it is not like a man toastibg a woman or a job seeker trying to get a job.

You are suppose to know that as far as we have seen and experienced, no thing comes out of nothing as shown by the "pattern of all the other processes" that we see and have seen. Which is why every normal person all over the world has said "no thing comes out of no thing!

KnownUnknown:
I always find it hilarious that these imaginary friend of theirs is one of one and it’s always a man never a woman. If one god can exist, then multiple gods can exist.

And if they existed, they would have shown themselves

femi4:
You are the one missing out.
Yes, Abraham knew.... Adam knew as well cos God told him that if you disobey , you will DIE

God didn't even use the word SIN but DEATH to underscore the importance of keeping his rule and the consequences of disobeying him

Adam had that knowledge that the consequences of disobeying God is death

Sorry, Abraham knew good and bad but Adam did not know good and bad since goood and bad did not exist.

But he knew other things like obidience/disibedience and consequences.

And that is why you see that they were not judged on good/bad but on obedience/disobedience.

blueAgent:
Abeg don't quote me again.
You are not serious

Denial! you cant wake a person pretending to sleep" Anonymous.

The truth is not for all men, but only for those who seek it."
Ayn Rand

Arafat1:
You don dey fear

In addition to being a senseless monkey, you are also a coward... So you "respectfully" observed that "muslims are truly mad people whose heads and minds do not work well."? ..

Muslims have seen your comment and will also "respectfully" react accordingly...

I no come here come insalt any body but as you come be mad muslim you gas represent and show say na una be terrorirism itself, so, alla akubar dey kill dey go!

Cartalk people, looking at this accident is this statement true?

not surviving car accidents are not solely a function of the intactness of otherwise of the vehicle's passenger cabin?

Meanwhile the passenget cabin is intact and both driver and passenger doors are opened for us to see

Arafat1:
No need casting aspersions on Muslims... I am not even Muslim... If you have a problem with Muslims, go to any mosque in the North and state your grievance there...

In any case, you are the one who is clearly mad for assuming that because the passenger cabin is intact, the car's occupants didn't die.. People have died in far less serious accidents, even mere fender benders..

A discussion that was going respectably, you decided to poison it by suddenly showing your pig ancestry by bringing in insults and even insulting a religion... Even if your parents didn't give you any home training, must you be so eager to showcase your family's uselessness in public?

Sense you no get, home training you no get, and I sure say you dey very ugly join.. Hippopotamus without sense and home training.. .

If you are not a wild animal, why won't you know that surviving or not surviving car accidents are not solely a function of the intactness of otherwise of the vehicle's passenger cabin?

Monkey beating chest online.. If e sure for you, go to any mosque in the North and insult Islam the way you have done here..

I did not cast any aspersion, i respectfully pointed out an observation. And see the rain of abuses you have dropped in accordance with what muslims do when criticized.

The bold: Anyway, car experts una dey see this kain judgment?

kingreign:
When you buy crashed salvage vehicle that it's safety is very compromised from previous crash and improper repair then run the highway at breakneck speeds without caution for your own safety, what do you expect?

This is off point na!

blueAgent:
Are U this daft?

Point the signs out list them.
And explain to me what how there are signs in this verses that hint at sex.

Clearly, your denial has turned you into
a mad blind liar of a person for i posted some of the signs in my post to you and you even responded to in a way showing you saw them. And i even put the link for you to see them and also took you to the thread itself.

Yet you say "which signs?" and now "Point the signs out list them". You need to go see Dr. House and co.

Arafat1:
I said "at the time of the crash" not "after the crash"

Nothing is said in the story about anyone surviving the crash ...
. Being the car owner doesn't automatically mean he was in the car when it crashed.. . Op is simply assuming what isn't narrated

The person or persons in the car when it crashed might have died, and owner simply recovered his vehicle to go fix it himself..

Sorry o, you are making me form an opinion that muslims are truly mad people whose heads and minds do not work well.

There is no damage in the passenger cabin and yet you say they "might have died"

Then you say "at the time of the crash" meaning they/he did fast and furious and jumped out of the speeding car before it crashed?

Forgive me, but i think you need to see a psychiatrist.

blueAgent:
One of the most useless articles I have ever read.

Usual reaction when Truth is first heard.

Arafat1:
Lol

Nothing in the story states that the vehicle owner or even anyone was even in it at the time of the crash

So I am at a loss at how op concluded that someone survived the crash

How can anyone be in it after a crash?

Or you are saying the car was going to see his babe before it crashed?

Look at the passenger cabin, it is intact.

kingreign:
Fallacies. You don't know that Lexus you're comparing with the Peugeot is actually safer than the Peugeot you comparing it with

Which lexus? Lexus catarpiller?

See how lexus and camry scatters on the road and their speed is less than 100kph

Arafat1:


You sef, as you talk dis kain tin, how e sound for your ear?

Guy you jus wan shake d guy confidence. You sef no say the owner survive, The pic shows that the passenger and driver cabin is not damaged and in that country they use seat belts. So unless he had a heart attack before the crash or during the crash, our guy survived with only seat belt pains.

Natbrowny:
Op. Pass me the blunt.

I need to post some trash tonight. I need that thing that inspired you

Mr blunt man, you have already posted thrash with your own inpirition

blueAgent:
Which signs?

You want to believe illogical signs that are not related.

I ask u , do sex grow from the ground

The thread already proves i showed you the signs and hints in the bible and you saw them so, something is very wrong with you when you pretend that you did not see them and keep saying "which signs?"

And nowhere did i say anything about sex growing from the ground all i show is that too many hints and signs point to sex.

And yesterday, i saw another hint which proves that indeed it is sex which i have presented in the thread https://www.nairaland.com/8069879/another-proof-eves-adultery-mens#129579970.

Michael547:
Oga I no understand this your statement.....
Adam did not do anything bad by eating the fruit from the tree, yes or no?

Guy you understand it, joor. Good and bad no dey dat time, so no body including you and me no fit say anything dey good or bad at dat time as good and bad no dey for world dat time.

And that is why God did not judge anything saying it is good or bad, so you cannot put good or bad in there, at that time!

bobestman:
Something go just enter your head and without proper reason you don turn am to post. You just they derail this forum with nonsense threads that even kids will educate you on. Oga stop posting nonsense

See frustration! Instead of you to say silent as you no fit argue the matter, you just come here kon show how you dey take disgrace yaself when you hear something wey you neva think or hear before proving the Truth of this quote

"The truth is not for all men, but only for those who seek it."
Ayn Rand

1000Capacity:
Whatever you do, sha don't take more than 1 wife. The Sapa wey go hold you go strong if you try more than 2

I be antipolygamist and antipolyandrist.

https://www.nairaland.com/8050350/men-women-should-not-treated#129247816

https://www.nairaland.com/8040571/westerhof-finally-confesses-adultery-polygamy

Aemmyjah:
Thank you very much TenQ
At a point, as I would admit, I became confused as to what tangible and real means but your explanations with the use of software, life, information was amazing though we don't always agree on everything. LordReed showed the most integrity but won't still admit the truth cos it is the foundation of him seeing the whole truth of God's existence. Budaatum was just acting like a boxer that has received a heavy blow to the head but still wants to keep fighting, embarrassing himself before his opponent and friends. Jaephoenix always talk nonsense, wisdom is not for everyone and cos he is a doctor as he claims, he knows the profession well but he's not reasonable...

Apt!

Aemmyjah:
Triplechoice and Knownunknown are just confused confusionists who can't make up their mind but I think I'll add something the same atheists were pushing you to explain- The existence of God as a Spirit... I'll drop what someone said as quoted

Their nanes show their confusion.

TenQ:
I agree with you: they wish their position might somehow turn out to be true. Their self importance deludes them from reality!
And of course, submission to Gods authority is what they abhor with all their soul

Exactly!

Michael547:
So therefore, the man did not do anything bad by disobeying God?
Yes or no?

Bad and good was not activated, them so, like God, no one can put them in.

Michael547:
So you are saying that obedience did not mean good while disobedience did not mean bad in the eyes of God right?

Did you not read "knowing good and bad like us"

God already knows but did man know? No.

And did God judge them for it? No, He did not.

He only judged them for their obedience/disobedience which they knew.

Rexymania:
Sorry but you're not making sense.... Your narrative is poor

Na lie e make sense. You are just going through the shock of the Truth of it and the fact that you find that you cannot counter it.

Michael547:
So you are saying that Adam's disobedience was not bad in the eyes of God?

I am saying good and bad was not in issue or in view when God judged which His judgment shows that they were judged only on obedience/disobedience.

TenQ:
It is spiritual because Logic never makes sense to them.

Can Matter come out of Nothing?
Can Order come out of Randomness?

To the Atheists, YES!

Have you not now seen and proven that atheists are liars and deluded people living in denials?

They know they are lying when they speak their lies and delusions like matter comes out of nothing and order is random.

They know they are Lying and that they are Liars. That is what our threads prove.

Michael547:
So why did God later say the disobedience was bad and punished Adam since Adam did not even know that disobedience was bad?
How is that fair?

Where did God say that?

And did you not see that (if He truly Said that) He Said that only after man now knew good and bad?

Which is why you see that God judged them only for obedience/disobedience.

blueAgent:
is the commandments different from how GOd made the trees?

You just proved your naivety.

The purpose of me mentioning the ground and GOD planting trees was to prove, that the fruit and the tree were not figurative.

Your brain need to reset.

Is "how God made trees" a Commandment?

See how you have proven that you refuse to focus on the issue because of you do not want the Truth, so you are in denial proving the Truth of

"Denial is the Way People Handle What they Cannot Handle or What they Don't want to Handle"

Carelessly not remembering that

"ignoring the signs is a good way to end up at the wrong destinatiln"!

And all tbese explains why you would ignore the signs that your wife is fucking her boss because he gave you people a car. What a denial.

You need a new soul this one is damaged and condemned patapata and cannot be reset or formatted.

blueAgent:
Mr Know all , we should believe that GOD planted SEX in the ground? Since it was tree, he planted and its fruit was the commandments he gave Adam and Eve not to touch or eat.

People already believe whatever they want to believe but all i said is look at the signs and you have seen it and you have seen you cannot answer it and that is sufficient.