₦airaland Forum

Michael547:
Abi na...... You talk say bad no dey....so where you see sin?
God no talk about Sin. Even Adam no know about sin According to you. So why we talk say Adam sin? IF disobedience no be bad, meaning say disobedience no be sin.

So come see am for the new thread..

LordReed:
Yeah it was not his fault that his dick entered their pussy. Bwahahahahaha!

Still doesn't deflect from questions posed. 12 sons from 4 different women all supposedly blessed by the god. Yet you say the god doesn't support polygamy. What further support is evident then blessing the offspring of polygamous relationships?

Off Point! As long as you have seen he did not pursue any woman, you have no case. No Road! hahahahahahahahaha

gohf:
you keep quoting me so let me answer for the sake of others.

The husband marries the wife, pays the bride price is referred to as lord and his wife, children and home are his. Now he can commit himself and all he has to God and becomes God's property. This is basic understanding


I don't know who you were having a conversation with that told you women are the only ones affected by adultery but try and read my own post and response on the subject.

For the sake of others I will repeat it, adultery is between a married woman and a man who isn't her husband, both of them have commited adultery.

I never and will not discuss bigamy. Why, because I am not interested 🥺 and you can keep mentioning it. Someone will probably answer you.

And please erase your false accusation, except you want to be held accountable for it. Erase everything that you wrote claiming I sad what I did not say. When you do that I will consider having a conversation with someone who isn't a liar or defamer.

You dodged the question

I clearly asked Does the husband own himself?
You did not answer.

Do you say that adultery only works against women? Cos your definition says
adultery is between [b]a married woman and a man who isn't her husband, both of them have commited adultery.

So are you.saying that a married man who is with a woman who is not his wife does not commjt adultery?[/b]

Do you say that God only punishes women for adultery.and does not/will not punish the man who commits adultery?

And do you not to see that the adultery of the man still stands even though he goes ahead to commit another crime called bigamy?

Whether you are interested or not bigamy which is explained as
bigamy. noun. big·​a·​my ˈbi-gə-mē : the crime of marrying someone while already married to someoneelse

Is already here waiting for you. And.we are talking adultery and adultery flows through all types of marriages, so bigamy, is in issue.

budaatum:
See another lie!

Your spirit, Stillliar, is not invisible to buda!

If you are not the liar tell us the colour, size, shape and height of it?

budaatum:
Why do you lie so?

How can buda possibly talk for all "man" when there are some men here telling you they are not aware of any spirits?

See you how you show that atheists are Liars? Who Lie at their whims and caprices?

My statement is there for.all to see Evilatum, the Liartum and it did not say "all man".

But, you are the evil Liar who said so!

Reflect7:
Really?

DO YOU REALISE HOW PSYCHOPATHIC YOU SOUND?

BY YOUR SICK LOGIC, I CAN STORM YOUR HOUSE NOW AND KILL YOU AND YOUR WHOLE FAMILY AND STEAL YOUR MONEY AND BELONGINGS, BECAUSE IT MIGHT BE FOR A FUTURE GOOD REASON THAT GOD HAS PLANNED, WHICH YOU JUST DON'T KNOW ABOUT YET?

That is the ANIMALISTIC rationalisation you have for the mass murder and rape of your ancestors by British invaders?

This is why we say Christianity is nothing but a death cult.

I guess the British troops who shot dead your ancestors must be chilling in HEAVEN now, correct?

After all they brought Christianity to you, correct?

So they did a good thing by murdering and gang-raping your ancestors, correct?

YOU ARE SICK, DEMENTED PEOPLE, AND THOROUGHLY BRAINWASHED TO THE POINT OF UTTER MADNESS.

Wow! see mad cursed person who has never experienced a good thing come out of a bad situation. See better curse.

Michael547:
Lol....SIN did not exist either....neither did God punish Adam for committing a SIN.....so why do you agree that Adam committed a SIN?

Ehen. New topic. Old one don end finally

Ah, You don dey find the existence of good and bad since now you don see am say e start only after them on sin,

So the correct question na, "When did sin Start?"

When i come back i will raise the thread. see you there

LordReed:
LoLz! He had 4 women but was not a polygamist. Bwahahahahahahaha!

See am, you don change directilon again since that road don block.

So, to the new direction you don twist go, the bible shows that 3 of them came in through no fault of his meanwhile polygamists show that polygamy is about the pursuit and acquisition of women and wives. So, No Road! Hahahahahahahaha

How about this other leg of the polygamy issue where you are trying to say that if the married man does not have sex with the second wonan, but goes straight to marry her, is it adultery?

immortalcrown:
A married man that marries a second wife before having sex with the second wife is not committing adultery with her.

You do remember that the bible Said "adultery even takes place without having sex", so explain, how can a married man have a second wife where he has already committed adultery by just looking at her?

Michael547:
Lol...you are funny....so what Adam did cannot be described as bad....you are therefore arguing that sin is neither good nor bad.
Is that correct?

Please now, let it enter your solid head and
heart of stone and stop all these endless repetitions.

I have said maybe up.to 8 times that good and bad did not exist at that time and God did not punish them based on good and bad as His Judgment shows., so you dont have any valid thing to say but turn around and around yourself looking for what is not missing.

immortalcrown:
I never said otherwise. Check my main comment.

No problem!

LordReed:
Where in it do I ask about Jacob? Nowhere so I am very on point. The 12 sons were not from one woman. All 12 were blessed . If you say Rachel was cursed what of the other 2 women? Why is Joseph such a prominent character if Rachel was cursed?

You came on a thread talking about polygamy and you raised "12 sons were not from.the same woman". Therefore, you are talking about Jacob, the man many wrongly view as a polygamist.

immortalcrown:
A married man that marries a second wife before having sex with the second wife is not committing adultery with her.

You do remember that the bible Said "adultery even takes place without having sex", so explain, how can a married man have a second wife where he has already committed adultery by just looking at her?

immortalcrown:
Nuisance.

See you cannot answer bevause you know what the guy has said is True.

immortalcrown:
You are confused. That's why you assert that a man must lay a woman before marrying her.

We are talking adultery here and not "a man".

So by your definition, you must keep a married person whether man or woman in view.

And the real eyeity has already proven that married men lay with women first before they commit the crime of double marriage called bigamy which is polygamy as proven by this guy

Re: Marrying A Second Wife Good Or Bad I Need Ur Opinion by Blunttruth: 5:27pm On Aug 05, 2022
Trustedapparel:
I am a married man with 2kids but their is one big lady that I met she loves me very much ....since I Bleep that lady I can't get my eyes of her ....I have been thinking about her since after the marathon sex we hard last month .... honestly[b] I want to make her my second wife[/b]....she has agreed that she will b my second....but some of my family' n friends are not in support of it....

immortalcrown:
If you want to condemn a married man for lusting after another woman, why not condemn single men who also lust after women? You are confused indeed.

What do you claim I admit?

Is it me who condemns? Is it not God Who has condemned?

And has He not already condemned lust, whether by single or married?

See how jittery you are that you are desperately trying to remove attention (deflection) from adultery to fornication.

Your definition proves that adultery is about married persons, and that is the focus of these threads, the fact that you are guilty does not change God's Stand on it.

Aemmyjah:
Go and save money and buy a lawn mower
You can go to people's homes and help them cut grass
You'll get paid

Better than showing folly on NL

I'm not StillDtruth that will be answering you all the time
You're just seeking attention. I now see why you're so keen on adultery polygamy. I don't support it but it's like you really need it for your emotional and mental condition
May you have peace

Obviously. Ooh

Telling him he is damned is making him go beserk crazy!

LordReed:
And the other women nko? Jacob had a total of 4 women that gave birth for him. Why didn't the god curse those other ones?

Off point! You asked about Jacob, not about the other women, of which you see that it is not jacob who went to get them. But off point all the same.

[quote author=LordReed post=129660960]If Racheal was cursed how come the god used her son to save them from famine? And you didn't answer why the god blessed ALL the sons not only those from Leah.

Off point again! But common sense even tell you say, if person curse mama no mean say person curse pikin exactky as God the land of Egypt but Goshen was spared. But off point all the same.

Westerhoffe:
Veecruz, StillDTruth, this quoted is another comment by someone who defined ADULTERY to you in clear terms. But your hypocrisy is top notch, making it difficult for you to accept this resounding explanation.

Did you.not see i said "Thank you o." And asked him

"So how can God ever support polygamy since it has adultery/harlotry/fornication and all the wrongs and sexual immorities in it? Is it possible?

So, how can a married man have many wives without first committing adultery and breaking othet God's Laws on his first and original wife?

Immortal crown
By marrying a second wife and paying her bride price before having sex with her.

Is he buying a mannequin? Won't he first look at her and date her first? Is the looking and dating not already breaking some couple of Commandments of God eg The Law of lust, covenant breaking, harlotry, adultery, sexual immorality?

And did you not see it ended with him admitting that he was guilty?

immortalcrown:
You are being irrational here. If a married man commits adultery by merely looking at a woman, every husband is guilty of adultery...

At least, you admit they are guilty and that therefore proves why God can never support it.

But since they are already guilty for looking only, should they now perfect the sins and make it worse by solidifying that guilt by marrying the partner in sin?

As i said, knock yourself mad!

Everything you said and everything you wish to say is already answered in the threads!

And you do not have anything to say because, "There is no valid argument against the Truth" so enjoy repeating yourself in the threads.

Westerhoffe:
[b]But I see no POLYGAMIST there!..]

But you see "all unrighteoesness" which listed all the crimes a person must commit to do before he reaches polygamy.

So sin on and marry as many women that catch your eyes, shebi your matter will land in God's Court, it is you who shall answer to God for them all.

Westerhoffe:

Can't you see that's what you have been doing?
I'm back for you, and we're just starting afresh.

Give me your evidences from the Bible where GOD said, "It is adultery for a man to have more than one wife; before or after GOD told David He would have given more and more of such to David instead of him taking the wife of Uriah."

Repeating yourself and trying to reargue after you couldn't argue before is proof of "There is no valid argunent against the Truth'

You said all these before in the threads and my.answers are there for you to knock yourself out with,

So, go have fun with the threads, since you are saying the same things you said in the threads which have all been answered.

So enjoy the threads and repeat yourself crazy till you go madder than what you have already played out i

Aemmyjah:
You're just wasting your time with that guy
He'll drag you until this thread reach 100 pages
You better use your time for someone worthwhile

Thanks! I am closing the door on him.

Westerhoffe:
I can quote the whole of Romans 1 for you.

Show me where polygamy is mentioned in that 1 Corinthians 6:9-11 you quoted.

Stop being hypocritical by mincing words.

You saw fornication and adultery, Romans 1, said '"ALL UNRIGHTEOUSNESS"

Then it counted the sins you must commit eg lusts of your heart, dishonour your bodies and here you are changing the Truth of God into.a lie, (exacctly as prophecied)

Others include covetousnes, covenant breaking, deceit, for you shall have deceived and lied to your first wife, first, which is why you may even swallow up your phone like your brother in crine here
https://www.nairaland.com/8041886/man-swallows-phone-prevent-wife#129109568

and shall deceive your second and 3rd wives.

And now 1st Corinthians further destroys you

Know ye not that the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God? Be not deceived: neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor abusers of themselves with mankind,

10 Nor thieves, nor covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor extortioners, shall inherit the kingdom of God.

And here you are deceiving both yourself and others.

As i have said go and sin again and marry as many women that catch your eyes, shebi your matter will land in God's Court, it is you who shall answer to God for them all.

Westerhoffe:
Replying to the bolded in the quoted, yes, there is no valid argument against a truth. But when it is a lie portrayed to make it look like the truth, there will always be valid counters against such; and this is what I have been dishing out to you in every angles.

Presenting counters is not "there is no valid argument against the Truth"

"there is no valid argument against the Truth" occurs when an opponent cannot answer the last point of argument and therefore, he starts to repeat hinself.

Which is why i have been saying you have said everything before and it ended when you had nothing to say which is where i closed the matter saying "there is no valid argument against the Truth"

So, you have no valid argument, So. go and carry yourselelf and your wives to God's Court and we shall see what shall hapoen to you. So, journey dey go dia. I no stop you.

Westerhoffe:
You have no truth spoken in all you've been saying. No single iota of truth in all your words, that's why those who are much more knowledgeable reacted to your contorted truth, bringing your errors to your knowledge, but you are just one of those who detest the truth, but claimed to know the truth the detest.

So, pulling you back to the same question you have never been able to answer, show me where GOD called a man marrying more than one wife adultery.

I know your heart will start beating faster again with that question.

The threads already show you are lying and repeating yourself like a robot.

And the threads have shown that a married person who goes after another person commits adultery.

And that if the adulterer goes ahead and marries his partner in adultery, they become guilty of adultery and double marriage called bigamy, all of which are all sins of adultery, unfaithfulness, covenant breaking, whoredom, harlotry, all unrighteousnesses.

1 Corinthians 6:9-11
9 Know ye not that the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God? Be not deceived: neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor abusers of themselves with mankind,

10 Nor thieves, nor covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor extortioners, shall inherit the kingdom of God.

And here you are deceiving both yourself and others.

As i have said go and sin again and marry as many women that catch your eyes, shebi your matter will land in God's Court, it is you who shall answer to God for them all.

Michael547:
How can you say that Adam committed a 'Sin of disobedience' When he was not aware of SIN?
Don't you think it would be wrong for us to say that Adam Committed a 'SIN' because he was not aware of 'SIN' just the same way that it would be wrong for us to say that Adam did 'bad' since he was not aware of 'bad'?

Because sin is an actiion, and not a word used to describe an action. I told you that already.

And the question is did Adam do an action WHICH HE WAS AWARE NOT TO DO, that could be called a sin?

And the bible Answered, "Yes" for He WAS AWARE hat He should obey God!

I said this before you went of another direction of "So you mean that in the Garden of Eden, there was nothing like SIN?",
Only to bring it back to where i have already answered before.

So, clearly you are committing ths fallacy of argument in a circle since you do not have any valid thing to say, so this matter is over and no need for endless argument.

FayaBall:
Na wa o! Na instians dem be because I no see the Christ in dem o!

You mean Sintians or Insintians!

So, effectively, Budaatum has already answered for himself the question i put towards atheists which they dodged and dodged.and dodged and ran away

Which saith
So if you truly believe your atheism is right, publicly stand and speak the words denying that men, do not know that they have a none physical and invisible side of him.

And Budaatum has just answered it confirming the Truth that man are truly aware of the existence of the spirit of man.

Thus, we see that Budaatum affirms and confirms my definition "Spirit is the none physical and invisible part of a man"

Confirning, that people may lie and claim not to see it with the "naked eyes" hence invisible.

"the only people who would say that your spirit is not visible and not real and is intangible, are those looking at you with their naked eyes.

However, he confirms like the rest of the world that it can be seen and he shows us example of how he sees my own spirit.

"StillDtruth/Veecruz/dtruthspeaker, I see your spirit on Nairaland

Your spirit is reflected in your words you post on Nairaland and in your conduct and how you relate with others and how you think and reason too, and it is real and it exists..."

FayaBall:
Your point has been made already and who no like am, that one naim cup of jedi jedi. Wetin e see naim go carry am.

I am actually blown by the so called Christians who all have it in mind to commit Adultery using Polygamy as a cover. Wooow.

Clearly, these are not Christians. These are fornicators and adulterers carrying bibles and going to church, planning to fornicate and commit adultery.

Obviously, they have no fear of God, even up to the extent of blaspheming Him and calling Him a liar that He likes the sins of adultery and covenant breaking if the adulterer marries the person (bigamy) they did the adultery with. Imagine.

God has many people to throw in hell

budaatum:
StillDtruth/Veecruz/dtruthspeaker, I see your spirit on Nairaland because your spirit is not invisible...

Your spirit is reflected in your words you post on Nairaland and in your conduct and how you relate with others and how you think and reason too, and it is real and it exists and it is tangible for those who open their eyes to look, and just
.

The record bears witness that you herein confess that spirit is real, so end of argument!

budaatum:
Incidentally, Tenq's first post re this subject, was on the 16th of April and is posted below, and it was rather nonsense as was pointed out to him, and as I've now found with your silly definition of spirit as the invisible part of man as was quickly pointed out too.

See overafterthought coming over 2 weeks late as if it is now and for the first time you saw my definition, whereas, since the 14th of April, you saw my definition up here and you ran away from addressing it like your fellow atheists.

So keep running away!

budaatum:
StillDtruth/Veecruz/dtruthspeaker, I see your spirit on Nairaland because your spirit is not invisible. ..

1) Overr Afterthought!

2) The record bears witness that you herein confess that spirit is real