₦airaland Forum

jaephoenix:
Lol. Its obvious you don't even know your onions as a lawyer. Which arguments have you laid forth, apart from casting unconfirmed claims here

See proof of madness. You think people are mad and blind because you are?

DaddyCoool:
Funny guy. Next time think things through b4 rushing to create a thread

Funny guy. Change of post means you could not answer the issue, so.you created your own exam, so, think b4 speaking.

advanceDNA:
Lol....why did God destroy annais and saphira his wife for lying.... for ordinary lie??

Why did God cause the ground to open to kill millions of Israelites in the wilderness for idol worship ??...

Why did God curse michah's womb and make her baren just because she despised David for dancing like a commoner in the open??..

Is the topic about these? No! So, Off Point and Deviation from Post.

advanceDNA:
See I don't know why u think you are an expert of what punishment God chose to dish out...

Ever studied, criminology, jurisprudence and Admin Law? No. So i am the expert here and that is why you do not have any valid thing to say but to cry and wail because of the things i have said, which in your denial you are desperately searching for something to say to the point of going off point.

Truth remains the Truth.whether.you.like it or not so deal with it.

advanceDNA:
I am sticking with the words of the bible, which said Adam and eve disobeyed God...

yet u accuse those who decide to stick to the accounts of the bible as it is :

Clearly, another pain your denial is giving you.

Yet you have not plucked out your eye and hand where it leads you to sin in your sticking to the bible.

But, no one asked you what you stick to and therefore all this is off point.

So all that remains is for you to deal with it as you like.

advanceDNA:
the bible is clear about this. the fruit made them wise and become more aware about everything including themselves.

And sex does that too, which is why we say "dia eye don tear' the exact open.eyes the bible said.

So.you are repeating yourself, as you have nothing to say but to troll

So all that remains is for you to deal with it as you like.

And Truth remains the Truth.whether.you.like it or not!

jaephoenix:
And with this yardstick you just created, can you be said those be a lawyer?

Is this a yardstick? Clear proof you are mad and incapable of understanding anything.

Judas1X:
Abeg what have you said now that contradicts what I said? You see why it's so easy to beat you in an argument . Your brain is clearly not developed well enough to understand common sense. I always wonder what an unhinged, trans-rural, sub Saharan gorilla like you keeps looking for in the cyberspace .

This is internet, StillDFool , stop acting like anybody actually cares about how he or she looks on an anonymous chat forum. You're the only one who does, which is understandable given the inferiority complex that is hardwired into your brittle brain. Fuckwad

Says the mad foolspeaking incoherently and disconnectedly, but which normal person is going to tell him?

Judas1X:
Jesu! Stray bullet don knack StillDFool, sorry, StillDTruth .

StillDtruth you're the only Christian I know that sleeps on Nairaland religion section crying about atheists and fighting with them. It can only be you they are talking about here .

See display of madness! Nothing was shot at me but.who shall tell the mad devil?

And of course satan's demon is complaining that i spoil his feeding.here hence the cry covered in deranged and maniacal laughter and madness

Anyway, what else shall a mad demon do than to display madness?

Everyday247:
This is kinda true in a sense. There are intelligent theists and there are dumb theists. Also there are intelligent atheists and there are dumb atheists. Most of the time it's usually intelligent atheists arguing against dumb theists, thats why these debates always appear to lean in favour of atheists.
Many theists are not properly prepared for debates. And just tend to dive in recklessly hence making them easy pickings. FXmasterz has the right idea to prepare before hand. One should always prepare before coming for a debate.

Accurate and True.

Everyday247:
BTW, you know I'm one of them, right?

Not really. You just registered this year so, i never met you before.

And interesting a fair atheist, i wonder if the zombies are gomna bite you and you would change some posts thereafter.

Judas1X:
Bwahahahaaa ! Mehn, you're stupid as fucck!

[b]The whole point of being a lawyer is to advocate for one side only! Also just listen to how stupid and inconsistent you sound....

See, you are purely mad and moronically stupid. I just pointed out that it is because the opponent already has a lawyer on his side but like stones and mad people, the info is incapable of entering your foolish mad heads.

For you not to understand this simple statement just proves you are ncapable of understanding anything.

FxMasterz:
Thanks for the heads-up. I understand the situation about you rejecting my invite.

I'll be very much at alert against her antics since I'm now aware of them. The Spirit of God would raise a higher standard against her.

I have challenged AI before challenging Atheists here. Even AI gave in. Screenshot posted below. Atheism is just lies upon lies upon lies. The more you're able to quickly spot the lies and deceits, the quicker atheism falls.

Thanks again.

See it. Misinterpretation.

If you misinteprete her statement, you may find yourself in trouble.

I did not reject, i only warned you that i.may not be here when you need me.

And she is not AI. She is human and she fights very very dirty.

Gat to go.

Everyday247:
. Haba oga!!! This is too much Na. Why are you making her seem as if she's some kind of boss character that requires an entire trained squad to take her on?

Ah! She is the worst kind of person to debate with. She is very very unfair and cheats, fights dirty and hits below the belt breaking every rule you know and don't know.

Its like that olympic woman who fought a man.

It is already an unfair fight.

That is one of the reasons i joined nairaland. Atheists don't have a valid case that is why you see that they are always underground crawling like bandits and.drug dealers and scammers. It is only in social discuss that they have power because they know most people have not yet seen.that they are big deluded people trying and struggling to sound intelligent, which people accept as intelligent.

Not knowing it is materially void and empty.

JessicaRabbit:
This is not what we agreed on my dear.

We agreed to have two or three unbiased referees to supervise the debate. Think of it like a jury. None of them should be allied to one side to check the other, because that's what a lawyer is: someone arguing for one party alone. You're trying to make this a free for all where any and everybody can shoe in his unsolicited opinion, and I'm not having it. This is strictly between the both of us.

And DeepSight is also a lawyer. If you really need a lawyer to be involved, why involve one who has a history of dishonesty and incompetence (StillDtruth), as opposed to one who is probably one of the most revered and respected intellectuals to ever grace this forum in DeepSight.

StillDtruth is heavily biased, and if you think he isn't, then I might have to start wondering if YOU are actually interested in having this discussion. DeepSight and budaatum to the best of my knowledge are objective commentators, but if you reject them, fine. You'll also have to respect my decision to reject StillDtruth as well.

DeepSight a lawyer? is a Lie!

Lawyers are trained to be impartial that is why we are Judges

The partisan nature of a lawyer is because the opponent already has a lawyer on his side and boh sides will be going to a Judge himself a lawyer, who suppports no side.

That is why you must have seen lawyers representing the 2 sides because in that moment he is an Arbitrator as you see ADR.

FxMasterz:
You're a lawyer. You can join the debate and be our referee. I'll try my best to spot infractions as they come.

Thanks in advance.

I can't and will not always be here at the material time to point out any infraction she may make before you respond. And i'm about signing off now to do somethings things and will only come in when i.want to play here.

And you have a very big weakness going against her, she is not the ordinary people you argue with, she knows how to argue and decitfull arguments which sound reasonable but are all invalid arguments because they break many rules of debates which she knows including ones she does not know.

Then you have a second problem. She does not fight fair, she always, always fights dirty and Lies when she sees she is going to lose.

And atheism is built on Lies, so if you cannot spot or prediict the lie in advance, you would walk into trap for she guarantees that she will Lie and throw every dirty trick and misrepresentation and distortion of facts and natural Truth, so the debate will never ever be fair as you have already seen she did even from the beggining.

I recommend you do not engage her for she is not the normal people you engage.

JessicaRabbit:
Go sit in the corner, child. Let the adults talk. 😂

😆 hahahahahahaha 😆 You are already complaining because you.have been caught. 😆😆😆😆

And the debate has not even started 😆😆😆😆😆😆😆

JessicaRabbit:
Denial is a bold word coming from someone who outrightly refused to address any of my actual arguments and resorted to pointless trolling instead. 😂

It is expecting the Queen of Lyings will Lie!😆😆😆😆😆

FxMasterz:
Yes to all.

All arguments must be contained within the limits of the stated facts. No derailment.

Easy man. How well do you know the rules of debate?

She knows them more than you, so, you would be in trouble if she breaks one and you don't know it.

JessicaRabbit:
You do realize that most atheists have better things to do than to sit on their ass all day to engage in eternal rounds of "prove the existence of God" bingo? We have lives, we have careers, and we have Netflix shows to binge. Me personally, I have a work calendar that's more crowded than a wedding reception in Lagos. In past debates, I've taken up to a month to respond to my opponent, not because I was "floored" or "ran away," but because I have priorities. Nevertheless, if you want to dance, we'll dance, but under the following conditions. Logic will be our guide: No logical fallacies, no emotional appeals, no straw men. Also, and this is very important: we must stick to the rules of reason and evidence. Empirical evidence and scientific consensus will be our benchmarks for truth claims. No sentimental arguments, and no unprovoked personal attacks that don't contribute to the discussion in any way, shape or form.

For the sake of fairness and to prevent butthurt or dishonest narratives from being peddled, I would propose that we enlist at least 3 mature, intellectual and objective monikers as our referee and judge. Someone with no stakes in this argument and who can call out fallacies, ensure we stick to the rules, and declare a winner (or a stalemate, if that's where the evidence leads). So, if you're ready to put your argument through the wringer, I'm game. But don't expect any free passes or special treatment. I'm as strict as they come when it comes to upholding the rules of logic and the scientific method.

Please respond accordingly to this post, accepting the aforementioned conditions. If you accept, then give me a mention and I'll proceed to respond to the arguments presented in your OP. Thanks.

You have already started with everything you say he shouldnt do with bullyings and intimidation of your opponent and trying to cover your ass when you run away to come back with an "After thought" because you could not answer at the material time.😆

See am debate never start and you already don dey violate the rules of debate which you.say he should keep but you will never keep it. 😆😆😆

(imagine, people have to wait months for your reply. You must be living in Jupiter)😆

Even in just courts there are time frames parties must respond if they do not want to lose their respective cases, how much more in a public debate. You are not serious at all and you are just trying to cover up the fact you know you will fail.

Runaway means runaway you know do not have any valid answer to give and so you know you are losing or going to lose, so you run as you are supposed to do when losing.

Also, you did not add "No Lies" and Twistings and Perversion of an opponents statements.

JessicaRabbit:
I get it. You're good at reciting songs but are terrible at having intelligent and honest discussions. I totally understand your challenges. At the very least, I'm happy you finally found your intellectual level. Lol

Clearly, you are the queen of lies and your true nane is Lilith, Satan's wife, 😆

So jessica is even a Lie. Mrs Satan, the Liaress and queen of denial in nairaland .😆😆😆😆

I'm sure you would still win World Champion Queen of Lies 😆😆😆😆

Liaress Forever! 😆😆😆😆😆

advanceDNA:
.it's like u only read part of a sentence and leave the rest.........I did not tell u not to jump into my mention..i said u jumped into my mention which is a question to another person without answering the question or nor addressing the context....it's a weird way of dialogue ..

1) Then why did you complain about jumping into your post?

2) i even still answered you question on punishment, so this is just hatred.and bias speaking.


[quote author=advanceDNA post=131648842]Lol....what is the basis?? It's a carnally driven basis with no evidence.....Everyone of you who claims fruit is sex and Satan slept with eve got this interpretation from those who just claimed as well it without evidence too.....u are all the same...

This is the denial for who read Genesis and thought sex? No one. It is the many questions it raised which we all asked an wondered about eg Why did God Curse her stomach? And why does God seem to hate women? And why are women so so evil?

And VinnyBaba has just reminded us of another one we asked which is

"The Way God Punished Adam and Eve is way "TOO SEVERE for a sin of eating Fruits. sad

Again, why will 2 persons eat Fruit and run to cover their Genitals when they heard God is coming? "

So you have seen the different ways which different people independently at this conclusion but you cannot accept the Truth, you decide to Lie and accuse me of other lies i never said and more.

Truth remains the Truth.whether.you.like it or not so deal with it.

JessicaRabbit:
Look at StillDtruth (ironic choice of username since he clearly hates to hear the truth). He tried his best to poke holes in my position, but he couldn't hack it, so he broke down and went on a.trolling rampage.to cover his embarrassment. The only manipulation that is happening here is your attempts to deflect from the fact that my arguments have left yours wanting.

(Yo', woman) Yo' (Open up, woman)
What do you want, woman?
(My guy just caught me)
You let him catch you?
(I don't know how I let this happen)
With who?
(The guy next door, you know) woman
(I don't know what to do)
Say it wasn't you (it was him)
Alright! 😆😆😆

Honey came in and he caught me red-handed
Creeping with the guy next door
Picture this, we were both butt-naked, banging on the bathroom floor

How could I forget that I had
Given him an extra key
All this time he was standing there
he never took his eyes off me

How you can give your man access to your villa?
Trespass and a-witness while you cling to your pillow
You better watch your back before he turn into a killer
Let's review the situation that you caught up in a

To be a true player you have to know how to play
If he say a night, convince him say a day
Never admit to a word what he say
And if he claim, ah, you tell her, "Baby, no way" 😆😆😆

But he caught me on the counter
(It wasn't me. It was you) 😆😆😆
[Saw me bangin' on the sofa
(It wasn't me, it was you) 😆😆😆
Saw me kissin' on the sofa
(It wasn't me.It was you) 😆😆😆
I even had her in the shower
(It wasn't me. It was you) 😆😆😆
She even caught me on camera
(It wasn't me it was you) 😆😆😆

She saw the marks on my shoulder
(It wasn't me. It was you) 😆😆😆
Heard the words that I told her
(It wasn't me. It was you) 😆😆😆
Heard the scream get louder
(It wasn't me. It was you) 😆😆😆
he stayed until it was over 😆😆😆😆

Liaress forever! 😆😆😆😆😆😆

jaephoenix:
So why don't you engage every atheist here every time? Did you land on your head? Please beg your gf to cum back and stop disturbing us

See, Proof of madness!

Deepspirituals:
You have a Legit Work you do ,No Man Is Perfect, by Virtue and Standard of Grace according to the Holy Book .

No Fornication

No Adultery

No Cheating

No Yahoo Yahoo .

No Internet Scam.

No Jealousy.

No Consultations with Alfas ,Dibias,Traditional Witch Doctor , Spiritualist.

No Sacrifice to Witches and Wizards .

No Ogboni Cults ,Amorc Rosicrucian ,Awopa ,Eledi Awo,Osugbo ,Free Masons , Illuminati etc Membership

Just Read The Holy Book Bible ,Pray Only .

No Conjuring ,No Black Magic.
Etc

At Least Someone Scores 85% of Galatian Chapter 5 v 22 to 23.

Fruits of the Holy Spirit.


Can Someone be a Billionaire By Being Faithful to Almighty God Alone ?

I mean Super Wealthy by Being Faithful to Almighty God Alone .

Did you.not hear that rich people, millioniares and bilionaires are 99% going to helllfire?

kingxsamz:
No, that has nothing to do with athesim. Athesim is the lack of belief in a god. It's even ridiculous that people have to be given a name for not believing in the delusions of other people. I don't see anyone calling anybody anything for not believing in mermaids or leprechauns.
If you say the universe has a creator, then you're free to prove it. If you can't, there's no point.
Just because an atheist chose to argue with you over those subjects doesn't mean it has anything to do with Atheism.
So no, you did not "destroy" Atheism.

You people don't think before talking, You people are so deluded that you forget that. "Action speaks louder than words"

jaephoenix:
Ok. Whatever 'permanent madness' means 🤦🏾‍♂️

See, proof of the permanency of your Madness! 😆 You are incapablle of understanding anything at all. 😆😆
You do not even have lucid moments! 😆😆😆

advanceDNA:
This man again....u have not said anything..

. I mentioned someone else and told him to go read other offences and punishment of the bible and tell me how they are in line with each other........but u jumped in and started with your usual claims that have not head or tail...

The most absurd part of your statements is that u are always expecting people to accept whatever u say..u keep accusing pple of denial

U are the one that can't even see that your claims have no valid premise or valid similarities to compare to or give u claims some strenght

See bros...u don't know how to dialogue...

If I come to you and Nigerians are scammers I should be able to tell you why and show you many examples of Nigerians that are scammers for me to reach that conclusion..

But it doesn't make any sense to just tell you Nigerians are scammers and then accuse you of denial when there is no evidence of my claims...this is exactly how u talk...

1. Even you jumped in and addressed a post that did not mention you.

2. The basis of this assertion is already well known and some have been expressed here which is why you are the only one pretending not to know the basis.

jaephoenix:
What the good lady is tryna say is get some psyche management

Even your statement here proves you are permanently Mad!

DaddyCoool:
See below. And if one tree is fucking, what is the other tree, shitting? Also how were they to "increase and multiply" without sex? ETC, ETC

Now you have changed post and repeating yourself.

JessicaRabbit:
Tsk, tsk... sadly, I don't debate with sore and dishonest losers. But don't worry, I'm sure there are plenty of other users on this forum that might be willing to satisfy your uncanny urge for self-embarrassment. Furthermore, I crave intellectual stimulation in my debates, and I don't imagine I can achieve that with someone whose conduct and post content on this forum clearly shows evidence of his poor cognitive capabilities. My time is too precious for that.

Once again, I'm sorry to disappoint you.

Boo hoo! Lady, You're fleeing because you now see and know that i will spot every invalid and fallacious argument you ever make and your Lies and deflections and twistings won't ever work on me

DaddyCoool:
You succinctly summarized all the points. Sex made them became like God, wawu!

Read well, they were already like God.

The only thing they did not have was "knowing good and evil"

advanceDNA:
go and read the bible...all the sins of the Israelites was disobedience, serving other Gods..go and read their punishment and tell me if it's commensurate or not...... If u don't know obeying satan is a big issue..well no wahala

If you read their punishments you would see that it is always equal to the crime and crimes they committed.

Exactly why i created the thread
https://www.nairaland.com/6319053/when-eve-charged-court-charges#97161190

Count 1
That You Mrs Eve-Adam, on the ... Day at .... 00hrs, Did Eat the Fruit of knowledge of good and evil, thereby Committing An Offence Contrary To Commandment No.1 of The Laws of God, Within The Jurisdiction of The Most High!

Count 2
That You Mrs Eve-Adam, on the ... Day at .... 00hrs, Counseled and Procured thy husband Mr Adam to Eat the Fruit of knowledge of good and evil, thereby Causing him to Commit An Offence Contrary To Commandment No.1 of The Laws of God, Within The Jurisdiction of The Most High!

Count 3
That You Mrs Eve-Adam, on the ... Day at .... 00hrs, Did Give to thy husband, Mr Adam, the Fruit of knowledge of good and evil, to eat of it, thereby Causing him to Commit An Offence Contrary To Commandment No. 1 of The Laws of God, Within The Jurisdiction of The Most High

Count 4
That You Mrs Eve-Adam, on the ... Day at .... 00hrs, Did Knowingly Breach the Trust of The Lord by Knowingly Eating the Fruit of knowledge of good and evil, in Breach and vBreak of the Trust God Placed in you, thereby Giving Personal Offence to The Lord God, Contrary To The Laws of Trusts, Within The Jurisdiction of The Most High! (TRUST BREAKER)

Count 5
That You Mrs Eve-Adam, on the ... Day at .... 00hrs, Knowingly Breached the Agreement between yourself and The Lord God To Refrain from Eating the Fruit of knowledge of good and evil,Which You did Knowingly Eat thereof, thereby breaching and Breaking the Agreement which you Hold with The Lord God thereby Giving Personal Offence to The Lord God, Contrary To The Laws of Contract, Within The Jurisdiction of The Most High! (COVENANT BREAKER)

Count 6
That You Mrs Eve-Adam, on the ... Day at .... 00hrs, Did Counsel and Procure thy husband, Mr Adam to Breach the Trust of The Lord God in eating the Fruit of knowledge of good and evil, to thereby Causing him to Commit An Offence of Breaching the Trust of The Lord God and Causing him to Give Personal Offence to The Lord God, Contrary To The Laws of Trusts, Within The Jurisdiction of The Most High! (OFFENCE OF CAUSING ANOTHER TO SIN)

Count 7
That You Mrs Eve-Adam...

advanceDNA:
cover genital....bible never said they covered only genitals.... Again they became wise like God and became more aware of themselves because of wisdom....how u relate it with sex na u know...

The bible said "they were naked" and nakednes always refers to genitals exactly how people try to hide and cover themselves when caught cheating.

Everyone knows that. It just shows the level of denial you are into.

advanceDNA:
How can God bless them saying be fruitful and multiply yet make sex forbidden...telling them never to to do it....?? So how are they multiplying

These are just question that will support your sex narrative if u can answer them...if u can..no wahala..no be fight...

All these answered by the fact that God was still coming to formally join them together as husband and wife and celebrate their marriage.

And it is after lawful marriage that sex between the lawfully married persons and child birth and multiplication is lawful and blessed and celebrated as we already have.

No decent and holy parent wlll ever be happy to see their children fornicate and get pregnant before marriage. And as we have they do not bless that union.

https://www.nairaland.com/8179397/fornication-first-sin#131401430

VinnyBaba:
The OP is clearly RIGHT.

Very Right thinking Person knows This.

Only Church fanatics and Dullards will disagree.

The Way God Punished Adam and Eve is way TOO SEVERE for a sin of eating Fruits.

Again, why will 2 persons eat Fruit and run to cover their Genitals when they heard God is coming?

Ooooh oooooh! I did not see the bold oooh. See another clue.

VinnyBaba:
The OP is clearly RIGHT.

Very Right thinking Person knows This.

Only Church fanatics and Dullards will disagree.

The Way God Punished Adam and Eve is way TOO SEVERE for a sin of eating Fruits.

Again, why will 2 persons eat Fruit and run to cover their Genitals when they heard God is coming?

Ooooh oooooh! I did not see the bold oooh. See another clue

VinnyBaba:
The OP is clearly RIGHT.

Very Right thinking Person knows This.

Only Church fanatics and Dullards will disagree.

The Way God Punished Adam and Eve is way TOO SEVERE for a sin of eating Fruits.

Again, why will 2 persons eat Fruit and run to cover their Genitals when they heard God is coming?

Ooooh oooooh! I did not see the bold oooh. See another clue.