₦airaland Forum

toprealman:
Your Ngwa brother just confirmed what I was saying. They know Okezie did NOTHING yet because of selfish gains, they still need to replace him with another clueless person.
I love Ngwa dialect, one of the sweetest I know.
https://www.nairaland.com/7623045/okezie-ikpeazu-lazy-weak-fight

That's he's loyalists, that's the issue, many Ngwas voted for otti, others for ahaiwe, because many Ngwas don't know the true intentions of you people,

So to the Ngwas that voted otti is a battle to remove bad government, but to you people is a battle to remove Ngwa. Which is the reason the state is backward, even the media war you people launched against ikpeazu, because you people have the media in pretense of fighting bad government but inside you just want to remove Ngwa and create a bad image against Ngwas, buy forgetting that he was not the choice of Ngwas initially.

Had it been the energy your media used to attack Ikpeazu, was used half on ouk and TA during and after their tenure abia state would have been far better, the attack on ikpeazu started even before given a chance to prove himself.

Same now with ahaiwe now.
Nothing to celebrate people should task any new governor to perform, not celebration of victory against Ngwas and going to sleep, while the governor will refuse to develop Aba because Aba is ngwaland, while trying to create a new city inside his clan far away from Ngwaland, leaving aba to rotten as the previous governments before did. Forgetting that if aba developes it affects not only the Ngwas but everyone.

Denoh68:
STUPID NGWA BABOON,YOU GREEDY SLOTS.YOU ARE THE REASON ABIA STATE IS GOING BACKWARDS.LOOK AT EBONYI OF YESTERDAY,COMPARE ABIA AND EBONYI.FOOL

Humble yourself so that u will lifted.
Arrogance will lead your people nowhere.

You are responsible for backwardness when you voted OUK, TA for 16 years

toprealman:
Even with your mindset of Okezie being removed because he is Ngwa and not because of his cluelessness.
If we continue like this, forget it..... nothing will change
Still waiting for the Ngwa leader you mentioned.

You don't want Ngwa to have a leader to look up to, before they used to mock ngwa people saying no ngwa man can be a governor but failed to admit that they won't support such thing, Igbos usually cry of injustice in Nigeria but do the same injustice to clans they don't like in Igboland. As ngwas have seen the light others will follow suit, like abakeleke people etc

Aguodo:
My brother..
You Sabi am. So the people that voted the house of assembly members in obingwa east and west are different from those that voted the governorship aspirants. Okezie and his mumu brain. Look how stupid he looks with all these magu magu that do not add up.

Most of you shouting rigging for that oti also rigged, but in a different format.
How can local government from lp Stronghold give large amount of vote, pdp stronghold give pocket vote, and for aba, ugwunagbo that have indigenous Ngwa can give enough vote, oti rigged aba, aruchukwu,ohafia,umuahia,, all the EOs are working for oti, they should be arrested.

toprealman:
Lol, ok let me ask you this. As an Ngwa man ...how will you rate Okezie out of 10?
Having a separate state may actually be a blessing in disguise for the region. We have failed to develop beyond Aba. Is Aba even developed?
Ngwa leaders you say, please just mention one of them?

For sure tribal politics will end, everyone will start voting for competency.

toprealman:
Bro stop chatting shit! Okezie changed which silly history? The problem we have is this mindset that when my own enters every thing will change. Oke is as clueless as Buhari. Mention one single thing he achieved?
I understand the Ngwa man and his ideologies....let me not hit much on this inferiority complex issue.
Why did Abaribe even consider taking over from Okezie if he had any modicum of sense left in his brain.
I know that these three criminals including Ogbonna onu wiil get their fill recompense by karma.
Talking about Ngwa man ruling, Allen was the local government chairman from my primary school till I graduated from the university. What did he do for his people in Osisioma? Is it not same depressing old look the LGA still shamelessly parade?
When we are ready to evolve to something better than what a society should be, you will know.
Remember #OtuOnu era, what did the Ngwa man achieve with this? Trying to install his man Ikonne abi?

The Truth is that people from abia north don't want to humble themselves, and show little respect for Ngwa leaders, everyone should come together to elect good leaders, the idea that my own thief is the better thief and that my people are the one that can make the best leader, is destroying Igboland, things like this require wisdom, not nzogbu nzogbu.
If the trend continues Ngwa will opt for a separate state( Aba/ Enyimba state).
In life no matter how you try to hide your intentions it will somehow show.
They are shouting equity but tried to remove okezie by any means possible, because he's Ngwa.

The way they tried to remove okezie in the first term made him get sympathy from Ngwa, hence they massively voted for him in the second term, many people that hated him in Ngwa started to support him, after seeing that it has turned into gang up against Ngwa.

Ngwas said just allow him finish first term let's access his performance since it's our turn, or replace him with another ngwa but abia north said no he must come down and they must replace him with their chosen better thief from abia north.

toprealman:
You skipped the deadliest and meanest of them who is scheming to become the senate president and hopefully the president of Nigeria....Orji Uzor.
These three fools will be wiped off the history books of Abia!

It was not a coincidence, it was intentionally removed,
To people from abia north
1) They are superior to ngwa hence Ngwa cannot rule them, but work under them. The gang up is the reason no Ngwa man have ever ruled even during the military era. Despite being the majority in Igbo. But okezie changed the history.
2) all their politicians are saints, but politicians from ngwa are criminals. Eg Abaribe despite speaking for Igbos, they don't support him, win only because of ukwa and ngwa vote,
3) any of their politician that decides to work under Ngwa man is hated. The reason they hated TA orji, they hate TA orji because he agreed to support ngwa governor, in exchange for ngwa to give him senator,
But they love orji kanu because he hates Ngwa.
4) to them it's wrong for an Ngwa man to rule after ngwa, but right for ohuhu man to rule after ohuhu and after ohuhu, as in orji kanu, to TA, and another ohuhu uche oga, etc,
5) why Ngwas was busy voting for good governers they are busy focusing on voting against anything Ngwa.

Abia state government election should be cancelled, because there are irregularities in almost all the local government.

The most important question should be, why can't CBN make the new naira available, and why are the politicians focused on making the old currency a legal tender but forgetting to talk about making the new naira available.

From every indication the two sides are playing the people.
So don't be in a hurry to take side.

Since there are many ways the law should have been written to clarify that it is not necessary to get 25% from fct, but the question is, why did they choose to write the law in a way that is confusing to majority of the people?, Giving that majority of people are not logical by nature, male/females included.
Even stating, " from the combination" of 36 and fct will do.

First know that "FCT is not a state", "And" fct means that fct is now it's own set because fct cannot be a state = {(36 States)+(fct)}. Combination of FCT with 36 states into 37 States makes fct to become a normal state.
Eg someone tells you to cut off at least 25% fur from 2/3 of the 36 sheep and the goat, even if you cut off the fur from the 36 sheep the task is not done until you do it to the goat because the goat and sheep are not the same, though they have some similarities.

The illogical method is {(37 States)+() }, the problem is that there's no more capital territory, Nigeria is now without capital.

The only way to make it logical is to change "AND" to "WITH" in order not to remove the existence of the capital territory.

casualobserver:
thanks to the ibos who removed the right to referendum and turned Nigeria from a federation to a unitary system of govt and gave the center control of regional resources under ironsi.

the bane of Nigerias problem today (power in the center and the inability to leavethe union) and the so called northern domination was a product of just 6 months of Ibo rule under ironsi. The Northerners could never have done it on their own, they simply inherited what was created by ironsi and didnt change it...why would they?

when you see Ibos telling you they own lagos and proudly telling you they plan to defeat the yorubas in Lagos...understand this is the fundamental pysche of the Ibo man to expand, conquer and dominate!!1

You are a closed minded tribalist. Because.
1) quoting a bastardized history, there's a reason why Nigerian history don't make sense, because some facts have been removed and false information added, a good history will make sense even to a teenager, but Nigerian history is like garbage even to an adult, but you don't ask why because of your tribalism.
Quoting bastardized history without logical fact is as good as nothing.

2) you are tribalist because you failed to differentiate the difference between individual or group from the decision of an ethnic nationality, ironsi did this an that so there for, Igbos did this and that,not even his family, village,community,etc. Did you tried to put okafor in charge to see his decision, even two brothers have opposition decision, you didn't mention how Igbo elders and leaders including committee agreed to do it, talking like a tribalistic fool with full confidence.
But Igbo leaders and elders gathered and said they wanted Biafra, but your history is telling you that it was only ojukwu that declared Biafra without consulting elders,

If you hate the laws why not change it, since you claim it the reason you hate Igbos, or you have another reason you hate the Igbos that you don't want to say, if it's the oil in South South, why not
Why not take it and leave Igbos or you enjoy seeing them suppressed, you claim you hate the white supremacists yet u re helping them in Nigeria to achieve their aim.

3)The list goes on and on, but i don't blame you i blame the Igbos that failed to see things and know that they are highly profiled for subjugation in Nigeria,
Nigeria looking for things to paint the Igbos bad at all means.

gidgiddy:
Well, Ironsi never introduced unitary system and he never tampered with the resource control of the 4 Regions throughout the 6 months he was in power. It was Gowon that came after Ironsi and used decree 14 to abolish all 4 Regions, created 12 states to replace them, then followed it up with decree 15 that abolished resource control

What makes me laugh however is that when Gowon was implementing this unitary rule, Ojukwu and the East rose up, declared Biafra and fought to resist it


What did the rest of Nigeria do? They followed the North to fight Ojukwu so as to make sure that Gowon implemented the unitary rule that would keep Nigeria under Northern domination

Its just laughable

Most Nigerians are not thinking properly, tribalism can make someone to think like a slowpoke.

Instead of them to dissolve Nigeria completely or partially, rather they love it the way it is, thinking that it will affect the igbos the most, not knowing that everyone is affected.

Ssddff:
Mutation always occurs when there has been a change or error during dna replication and that’s what I meant by trigger. Mutation leading to resistance is always caused by exposure and adaptation to what has been killing the microbe.

Don’t you think if all anopheles are eliminated. Plasmodium will find a way to evolve, infiltrate other vectors and find their way in us one way or another in future. I believe this micro organism are just as intelligent when it comes to survival.

The probability of Plasmodium evolving to use a new vector increase only with time scale of centuries, by that time most humans would have transcended into non-biological entity, in combination.

Ssddff:
And your number 1 isn’t how mutation works, and artificial sporozite is not accurate. They might be Genetically modified to survive in labs or whatever but they are not artificial. And mutation does not occur suddenly, it takes a trigger like fighting off our antibodies etc. Mutation in this sense gets dangerous if a resistant sporozite finds a way in a humans body and passed its ability to other sporozite buddies through horizontal transfer.

Mutation can also occur during cell division (mitosis) without trigger, because of errors in creating new copies of the gene, the probability of this kind of mutation is directly proportional to the number of cell divisions (mitosis).
I used artificial sporozoites because they are going to make or increase the number sporozoites themselves, in-vitro.

[quote author=Ssddff post=120707745][/quote]From the article, they said it was difficult to make your on sporozoites in the lab, but now they developed a method to do it, so with the method they can produce as many as possible weak/inactive and strong sporozoites in the lab and the they are going to use the weak or inactive sporozoites by injecting into people so that their body will develop resistance against sporozoites, and not for other stage of the protozoa.

Then here comes the problem
1) they make artificial sporozoites in large quantities in the lab, giving room for mutation, the greater the cell population and mitosis, the greater the difference between each of them
2) introduce weak version into the body, gives room for "first/original antigenic sin". The lab generated sporozoites will be slightly different from wild species over time making the immume system having a difficult time. It might even trigger autoimmune response in some people.
3) some might escape the immume system's immediate response to form a different strain, then boom! Every anti malaria drug becomes useless.then we will have to develop a new drug which is not easy.

Ssddff:
I have to read more on the ability of sporozites to gather resistance fighter but for you to under what I was talking about with life stages or life cycle. Here is a picture

And I guess since this is an African issue, research should be carried out by Africans to remove fear. But I don’t think we are there yet. Requires funding, electricity, equipments and technical expertise then clinical trials.

We're there already, all u need is the BSL-3 or BSL-4 lab, then developed talent, for me the issue is the developed talent. As for electricity you can use solar
and battery or generator.

Ssddff:
I have to read more on the ability of sporozites to gather resistance fighter but for you to under what I was talking about with life stages or life cycle. Here is a picture

And I guess since this is an African issue, research should be carried out by Africans to remove fear. But I don’t think we are there yet. Requires funding, electricity, equipments and technical expertise then clinical trials.

From my first comment i summarized everything,
That the risk outway the benefit
Because having malaria strains resistant to anti malaria is by far worst, because it took many years of research and funding to develop current drugs , so the question is how possible, then the answer is very very likely considering that it have enough genes to change surface protein which the immune system use to indentify and kill it. And that the reason malaria is difficult to kill is because it is very good at changing its surface protein. But the drugs dont Target it's surface protein unlike vaccine.

Ssddff:
I have to read more on the ability of sporozites to gather resistance fighter but for you to under what I was talking about with life stages or life cycle. Here is a picture

And I guess since this is an African issue, research should be carried out by Africans to remove fear. But I don’t think we are there yet. Requires funding, electricity, equipments and technical expertise then clinical trials.

Sure it should be done and regulated, in Africa by Africans.
The major advantag of fighting the sporozoites is that it is stage the mosquitoes transfer into the body hence fewer in number, if you check very well that's the reason they chose it.
Even there's a risk of first/original antigenic sin .
Moreover having large population of blood sucking insect in Africa, is a security risk, and should be considered a national emergency, mosquitoes might develop an ability to carry dangerous virus or an enemy might use it against us. So the task to reduce or remove mosquitoes should be non- negotiable. No Serious nation would allow such.

Kobonaire4:
I am not

(A bit about myself...my parents were academics and I grew up in the university milleu. One of the main complaints then, as at now, was lack of funding for research and poor lab facilites. There are good reasons why ASUU goes on strike because....I also knew people who worked in research facilites run by government. Same story. Need I mention that most of them were religious people.? ).



Which is the fact of all resource dependent nations, and has nothing to do with religion....it is just that it is easier to sell raw materials rather than develop. We fell into the trap because we 'had a lot of resources'. Most of the industrial nations, like say Japan or China or even Germany realized that they did not have enough resources...and promptly industrialized.

The industrial revolution started in the UK...which at the time was religious. And remained religious until some 50 years ago, when the religious observation began to fall.

Infact , this is one of the things I love to hammer on...the fact that we need to realize that oil dependency is messing us up. But most of us, regardless of relgiion, work on the idea that oil is enough, and we say that other oil producers are doing well. (They do well because their populaiton is too small ).



That's a flawed view, I am sorry to say. If they did that,...and yes they did do it....how did my father, who read a science based course in the early 1970's get Nigerian professors, in addition to the foreign profs they had? Science was being taught back then. UI had science based courses in the 1950's. By independendece...we had science and tech being taught in our schools..



Am afraid this is just propaganda.I don't like propaganda...even if it is from my relgious side (COVID 19 nonsense has annoyed me a lot recently)

Nigeria has a host of research institutions...and yes, I can defend that comment very well. Our universities also function as research institutes. Why we do not have more is not because religion, but because we do not have enough of a R and D industrial base to provide the profits, and the motive for domestic R and D. Even then, we have enough of the institutes.

But because we are a dutch diseased nation, we prefer to import and import....Being dutch diseased is why we do not have enough of a domestic industry which could then encourage and provide a motive for indigenous R and D.(As seen in the deeply religious India...which has a lot of industries which in turn provide motiive for domestic R and D and lead to things like their Mars explorer project).

(The USSR was an athiest nation, yet it relied on money from high oil prices in the 1970's...once the money collapsed, so did funding for a host of things...which led to its breakup, and to scientists running out of the country.)



Maybe, but on the other hand, expecting a university like UNN to produce world beating research for malaria on a budget of 25 billion naira...or 45 million pounds sterling...when one university got 600 million pounds sterling for malaria research is basically expecting a underwieight child to beat Usain Bolt at althletics,or enter into the ring with prime Mike Tyson.

We can cry (rightly) about mismanagement, but it does not change the fact that we have underfunded universites and research and techincal institutions.

When I was a kid the common ideology was that the white hid science from us, but i came to the conclusion that nobody is hiding anything from us rather people are running away from science,
Same thing with this funding issue, many people that innovated the world didn't have all the funding. Eg there's no indigenous company making something as simple as wood pulp, simple chemical like methanol, even the ethanol we use are mostly imported while we can only make small quantity by fermentation. Iron and steel that other people do hundreds of years ago, up till now we can't, sodium hydroxide etc the list goes on and on, technologies that are open to the extent you can get full industrial design online and books.

wirinet:
I vehemently disagree with you. Religion plays a huge role in our technological and scientific backwardness. First of all modern Islam and Christianity is against acquisition of knowledge. According to the doctrine of the religions, the Bible or the Koran is the only knowledge they would ever need. Remember "Boko is Haram ". Secondly, they make adherents waste most of their time, energy and resources in worshipping and religious activities, thereby allocating very little for acquisition of knowledge or research. Go to our universities, Students spend more time in religious activities than research. You will think all Nigerian universities have become convents, where prayers, fellowships, evangelisms, etc are carried out almost everyday.

Finally, religions make it impossible for people to work together or achieve a common goal, even in research and everything else. A Muslim would not collaborate with a Christian, much less an atheist. Even members of the same religions but different sects would refuse to collaborate on a research project.

I want you to see this 17 year old boy, Robert Samsone, who is about to revolutionise the electric motor. He does not have the millions for research just the passion for acquisition of knowledge and hardwork. He won the Regeneron International Science and Engineering Fair price worth $75,000 last year.
https://www.smithsonianmag.com/innovation/this-17-year-old-designed-a-motor-that-could-potentially-transform-the-electric-car-industry-180980550/

Too much religion in Nigeria is mainly due to low thinking ability, i don't want to say low IQ, one can come out of a very religious family and still be a scientist, though the person must be an undercover atheists. But for sure religious scientist are almost non existent. The moment you grow in science you loose interest in religion. So had it been we have a thinking population religion will die a natural death.

Eg some people still believe the Earth is 6000 years, and that in the beginning God made heaven and Earth, is either the person is mentality lazy or low IQ, so i go with the first one most Nigerians are mentally lazy and poor curiosity.

So if you like bring 1000 trillion, it will be wasted with poor research output or nothing outstanding. More like paying an average football player to play like exceptional player, one thing people don't understand is that mental ability is like physical ability, both needs to be developed.

Kobonaire4:
We do have the people, the problem is, we don't have the industries to take advantage of the ideas and export them

For sure, the people who can do it are there but as a raw talent, the issue is, are they refined and developed for it, am not talking about being a medical graduate or PhD, it takes more than that to make an impact. The talent needs to be nurtured in the right direction.
For now I don't think we have such people here not diaspora, if you know any mention them,

Kobonaire4:
I am not

(A bit about myself...my parents were academics and I grew up in the university milleu. One of the main complaints then, as at now, was lack of funding for research and poor lab facilites. There are good reasons why ASUU goes on strike because....I also knew people who worked in research facilites run by government. Same story. Need I mention that most of them were religious people.? ).



Which is the fact of all resource dependent nations, and has nothing to do with religion....it is just that it is easier to sell raw materials rather than develop. We fell into the trap because we 'had a lot of resources'. Most of the industrial nations, like say Japan or China or even Germany realized that they did not have enough resources...and promptly industrialized.

The industrial revolution started in the UK...which at the time was religious. And remained religious until some 50 years ago, when the religious observation began to fall.

Infact , this is one of the things I love to hammer on...the fact that we need to realize that oil dependency is messing us up. But most of us, regardless of relgiion, work on the idea that oil is enough, and we say that other oil producers are doing well. (They do well because their populaiton is too small ).



That's a flawed view, I am sorry to say. If they did that,...and yes they did do it....how did my father, who read a science based course in the early 1970's get Nigerian professors, in addition to the foreign profs they had? Science was being taught back then. UI had science based courses in the 1950's. By independendece...we had science and tech being taught in our schools..



Am afraid this is just propaganda.I don't like propaganda...even if it is from my relgious side (COVID 19 nonsense has annoyed me a lot recently)

Nigeria has a host of research institutions...and yes, I can defend that comment very well. Our universities also function as research institutes. Why we do not have more is not because religion, but because we do not have enough of a R and D industrial base to provide the profits, and the motive for domestic R and D. Even then, we have enough of the institutes.

But because we are a dutch diseased nation, we prefer to import and import....Being dutch diseased is why we do not have enough of a domestic industry which could then encourage and provide a motive for indigenous R and D.(As seen in the deeply religious India...which has a lot of industries which in turn provide motiive for domestic R and D and lead to things like their Mars explorer project).

(The USSR was an athiest nation, yet it relied on money from high oil prices in the 1970's...once the money collapsed, so did funding for a host of things...which led to its breakup, and to scientists running out of the country.)



Maybe, but on the other hand, expecting a university like UNN to produce world beating research for malaria on a budget of 25 billion naira...or 45 million pounds sterling...when one university got 600 million pounds sterling for malaria research is basically expecting a underwieight child to beat Usain Bolt at althletics,or enter into the ring with prime Mike Tyson.

We can cry (rightly) about mismanagement, but it does not change the fact that we have underfunded universites and research and techincal institutions.

If the equipment are there it can be done in Nigeria, though there's a minimum amount of funding required, it should be in few billion naira or less but not less than 200million, problem with modern scientific research is that, it involves expensive equipment, but i think the problem with Nigeria is poor talent, breakthrough requires exceptional people not average.

Ssddff:
I like your reply. And I now understand your fear which stems from resistance and the fear Plasmodium will change to superbugs.

But looking at this innovation. Their method is not to develop vaccine for the matured Protozoa, but the sporozite which is like their zygote phase for human.
Sporozite can’t mutate or evolve because the have to grow and pass through life cycle stages.

Their goal is to develop vaccines that produce antibodies that fight the sporozite and kill them before they mature into the plasmodium that causes malaria. Sporozite are like the egg form and I believe don’t cause malaria until the cycle reaches PF that breaks down blood.

I believe this is not what to fear. Lifecycles is one of the factors that determine how we combat a microbe. Which also determines how difficult it is to eliminate

In this case what matters is the "gene" and surface protein. not the life stage, the sporozoites stage will even gather resistance faster than matured plasmodium, because the transposable elements/ genes are more expressed, can't go into details, it's a deep complex topic.
And one thing you should understand about scientific research today is that, the people that funds the research instruct the researchers on the what outcome they want, unlike early days of scientific research were the scientist determine the direction of the research,
I can't go into details. That's why there are many conflicting scientific publication today.

Europeans always bring greek offer, check their history.

Ssddff:
Wrong! All animals including mosquitoes are important to the ecosystem. What you would have said is the eradication of the blood suckers but they also have their use. If you doubt, make your research. Vaccine is the best, especially if it a one time vaccination type.

That's what they told you, eliminate mosquitoes ( i mean the blood sucking species) the ecosystem will adjust, after all 95% of all species on Earth are extinct , the ecosystem didn't collapse.
Putting pressure on plasmodium will make it to start rapid mutation, which may lead to new strains,
In biology the higher an organism is, the more difficult it is to kill it by vaccine, because the have many genes to adapt and change, protozoa is higher than bacteria which is higher than viruses, so ask yourself why hasn't be any vaccine for bacteria but they're planning to introduce one for an organism higher than it, an organism that undergoes rapid surface protein changes the reason it's difficult for our immune system to fight it, hence expecting a permanent or single vaccine to cure it is speculating on mirage, so expect them to introduce new vaccine every time after the plasmodium acquire a resistance against it, more like advanced malaria periodic injection. By then all the anti malaria drugs will be ineffective.

Total eradication of mosquitoes is the only effective way to end malaria, other methods like vaccine can't be reliable because the protozoa will evolve a resistance against it faster than it will against direct chemical approach currently used, there by making the current chemical less effective.

Sagamite:
You are a cretinous fuuktard!

The same fooolish tactics of fuuktards.

I am the one supposed to go and look for and present your "scientific reports" that YOU saw and read?

Ori e daru!

If you don't know common facts about humans and as little as this, it means that you have not learned enough to argue with me, you should be reading/studding/researching to improve ur knowledge instead.

Most of you claim women are illogical but can't list the illogical things they do that men don't,
only talking about discussion, of which men and women have different values and target goal. Even one of the females goal is also to emotionally blackmail u, so clearly they know what they are doing which means logic.

reddingtonblack:
That the way you chose to see it, in my context i am saying how women react to problems while men handle problems and that becos women are plainly emotional.

The only time you can enjoy a woman conversation is probably when you are discussing educational studies, discussions within profession of interest, but the moment the discussion crosses the line to informal topic or general situations you start noticing what OP talked about.

A man & woman are most likely to share same view on politics, entertainment and even food but the moment you bring r/ship in o ma change nii 🤣

That's the issue, only in opposite relation do women and men differ, due to different frames of reference, like the up and down "6"or "9" argument due to different frames of reference, one argues it's 6 while the other says it's 9.
Even logic has a limit , the reason in computing they say that some problem are NP-complete, in physics you have "many body problem " , in logic and philosophy that you cannot have a universal truth machine.

Sagamite:
Ehen!

E mi o logical lo so? (I am not logical is what you state)

Kaa bo! (Welcome)

Oya, provide me with your scientific studies that indicate:

1) Men are more emotional than women on average
2) Men are lesser intelligent (sic) than women on average

Oya, sharp sharp. Go bring am.

Lazy man, the studies are on the internet, but because you were busy chasing women up and down and watching football, you missed it, when it was published, the internet is ur guide, as for emotional it's almost the same for both gender but manifest in different ways but for intelligence women are more intelligent on average.

So why don't you bring a scientific prove that men are more logical or intelligent on average, your cognitive biases will always prevent you from seeing the complete reality.

shantti:
Yes but it's very very rare. Their normal conversations is about Korean love series

Same with men mostly sex, football, politics , politics is like a type of gossiping,

The thing is that women view the world from their frame of reference, same with men.

shantti:
On the contrary, u are the illogical one, I proved all your assertion wrong, and you resorted to accusing me of being illogical, accusing me of stressing other men. A typical feminine behavior. When you are ready to be logical enough l, we can have a diplomatic conversation.

You claim you are logical but can't answer a single question but busy returning questions with questions i just outlook them not that i didn't notice it.

I repeat you don't know the meaning of "logic".

shantti:
I asked u the question cos u were making a baseless assumption. On the contrary all u wrote in the first paragraphs only applies to women but they aren't intelligent enough to tolerate themselves. I am a man who has lived with a fellow man during my school day and during my NYSC, I can bodly tell u that the only time we had issues was when our girlfriends lived with us, so for what benefit would you peddle a lie that men pretends. Pretends to what end, pretend to impress who. Let me tell u this, men value their peace, if they are in an environment where their peace of mind is threatened, they simply walk away, yes it's in our nature. One of the jargons you typed was this men's bad character gets reinforced due to natural operand conditioning,. What the Bleep is this? Why do u like to make baseless assumptions?

I like how you did the cherry picking. So you haven't seen men discuss politics, history, inventions, climate change, it is so common. Why didn't u go ahead to expose what women typically discuss, zee world, Brazilian wig, BBL, fake lives, so just cherry picked to suit ur stupid narrative.

Your third paragraph is trash cos it reeks of sentimentalism, yes men discuss football, but they also engage in intelligent conversations unlike women who only rubbish that has no relevant to humanity.

All your writeup are baseless accusations on d male gender. So many silly assumptions

Woman also engage in politics, climate change, history, inventions, the issue is how often, how far can you go with the discussion, and how serious are you about it.