Welcome, Guest: Register On Nairaland / LOGIN! / Trending / Recent / NewStats: 3,163,788 members, 7,855,323 topics. Date: Sunday, 09 June 2024 at 06:35 PM |
Nairaland Forum / Tamaratonye1's Profile / Tamaratonye1's Posts
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (of 10 pages)
Religion / Re: The Lord God Is No More by Tamaratonye1(f): 7:11pm On Oct 18, 2021 |
. |
Religion / Re: The Lord God Is No More by Tamaratonye1(f): 6:23pm On Oct 18, 2021 |
Truvelisback:I wonder how you arrived at this conclusion from what I wrote. Connect the dots for me if you can. I suspect you, like some Christians on this thread are not familiar with criticism of fictional literary works. I castigate your god for his actions in the Bible stories as much as I castigate Lord Voldemort from the Harry Potter series for his actions in the stories. I can't harbor actual negative emotions towards a fictional character. And until you evidence your god, he remains fictional. |
Religion / Re: The Lord God Is No More by Tamaratonye1(f): 6:17pm On Oct 18, 2021 |
Ayo081:Nope. Chuwg means circle and is referenced to the flat circle of a coin. The Hebrew word for sphere or ball is "dur". Post hoc obfuscation merely implies the text is riddled with errors. Something of a problem if you're claiming it's something that can be relied upon. Ayo081:Errr... I hate to break this to you, Ayo081, but Mars can be seen with the naked eye. I've seen it myself multiple times. If you get hold of a decent telescope you can actually see the markings and colouration of the planet. Got anything similar for your alleged god? |
Religion / Re: The Lord God Is No More by Tamaratonye1(f): 1:59pm On Oct 18, 2021 |
Ayo081:Errr... A circle is not a sphere. Circles are flat. The author knew no better and described a flat Earth. Ancient Greeks used a simple experiment to establish that Earth was spherical without traveling into space. Eratosthenes already knew that earth is a ball and was the first to measure it's scope. The Jewish cosmology saw the earth as a flat disk, with "the pillars of the earth" holding up a "firmament", a sort of dome above, with heavenly realms above that, from which god would be gazing down, with the nether regions of Sheol below. This verse is entirely consistent with that ancient cosmology. As one would expect. What else have you got? 3 Likes |
Religion / Re: The Lord God Is No More by Tamaratonye1(f): 1:46pm On Oct 18, 2021 |
Truvelisback:If you want to show atheists proof of a god, then you should be ready to provide empirical, objective and testable evidence. Anything we can examine in shared reality with everyone else (that is, something that everybody can see as well as test, confirm and then contrast or compare their observations) Any assertion made by anyone about anything must first of all be verifiable in this fashion, in order to be even provisionally accepted as likely to be true. This, at least, might convince me that there is a god that exists. But that's just the first step. Did you notice how I said "a god in my last sentence? I'm talking of god in the deist concept. Not the Christian god. If you want to show me that the Christian god exists, then I'm afraid you might have your work cut out for you here. [1] You may first of all have to show me why your god is real and why you worship it, and why you don't worship any of the thousands of gods in other religions OR why they might not be real [2] You will have to convince me that your god is worthy of worship because the Bible sure doesn't contain that evidence. I grew in a Christian home and my parents were staunch fundamentalists. I bet I've read the Bible cover to cover as many more times than you may have, and then some more, and have discussed and studied it extensively. The god of the Bible is a slimy, evil bastard, and even when I believed in him and practiced evangelism, I've always felt something was not quite right with my faith and religion. I suffered cognitive dissonance for years and was convinced I was going to hell because of my constant habit of "Questioning God" When I read the New Testament I didn't think sarcasm and condescension, two of Jesus' major characteristics, were particularly noble or heavenly. I also realized that substitutionary atonement is a crock of shit. Then I looked at the Christians around me, who were monstrous - hands down the nastiest, self-righteous, ignorant group of people I've ever met - and proud of it. [3] You'll have to explain all the problems of God as defined by Christianity, Islam et al. These are what ultimately made me abandon religion The problem of evil, of God's omniscience and free will. Theological fatalism, the problem of God and time, God and logic and many other problems. The problems of the Bible, it's nonsense claims, contradictions, and faux histories demonstrate it is not in any way true, much less divinely inspired. Two contradictory creation tales in Genesis 1 and 2, talking snakes and donkeys. God who is supposedly perfectly good who commands murders, massacres and genocides. Tales which archaeologists have found never happened, it is all false history made up by ancient lying priests. False prophecies galore. I sincerely don't believe there is a way to save the concept of God. There have been attempts, like Process Theology, and the often bizarre sophisticated Catholic theologians but then God becomes a bizarre shadow of its former self, about as worth worshipping or believing as Santa Claus. 3 Likes |
Religion / Re: What Does God Actually Do? by Tamaratonye1(f): 1:02pm On Oct 18, 2021 |
oaroloye:---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Half of great writing or speaking is not saying everything that you can say. People who talk too much are tiresome, especially those who are not informative, thought-provoking, or funny. Which do you believe most likely to enter an insane convention, a body of English gentlemen honoured by the favour of their Sovereign and the confidence of their fellow-subjects, managing your affairs for five years, I hope with prudence, and not altogether without success, or a sophistical rhetorician, inebriated with the exuberance of his own verbosity, and gifted with an egotistical imagination that can at all times command an interminable and inconsistent series of arguments to malign an opponent and to glorify himself? In some places he draws the thread of his verbosity finer than the staple of his argument. Verbosity wastes a portion of the reader’s or listener’s life 1 Like |
Religion / Re: The Lord God Is No More by Tamaratonye1(f): 8:27am On Oct 18, 2021 |
Truvelisback: I just told you: Tamaratonye1: |
Religion / Re: The Lord God Is No More by Tamaratonye1(f): 8:23am On Oct 18, 2021 |
Ayo081:I'm the last person in the world you want to preach to. You'll find it awfully frustrating. Ask around. Provide objective evidence for your god, and I'll take you serious. Good morning. |
Religion / Re: The Lord God Is No More by Tamaratonye1(f): 7:29am On Oct 18, 2021 |
Ayo081: Tamaratonye5: |
Religion / Re: The Lord God Is No More by Tamaratonye1(f): 6:45am On Oct 18, 2021 |
Truvelisback:LOL. My Ijaw is very rusty. I can hear better than I can read or speak it, so I beg your pardon. My journey to atheism is a long story I can't really go into now because of my schedule. I'd just say I'm an atheist because Christians have not been able to show me convincing evidence their god is real. |
Religion / Re: What Does God Actually Do? by Tamaratonye1(f): 6:17am On Oct 18, 2021 |
hupernikao:Just in case it missed you, but I know it didn't because I now recognize your modus operandi, which is to hand wave apparent facts away anytime you get cornered in an argument; I've already addressed your arguments on "man's help" in this thread so it's intellectually lazy and quite insulting to come back and claim your stance is still valid without any reasonable justification. Although its not surprising, given that you did this in a previous thread of mine not long ago, claiming "gaps" in my reasoning but failing to prove these gaps despite being requested to do so. Why you always think you can bamboozle me with these cheap tricks is beyond me. And please stop patronizing me in your posts, it makes me want to throw up. Also, I never attributed anything directly to the Bible. If you're not being dishonest, I invite you to take any line from my topic to prove this. In my original post, I was specifically referring to the things Christians generally teach and advocate, not the Bible. This is precisely why I noted it as a cognitive dissonance in Christianity. Whether such teachings are found in scripture is a completely new debate you fabricated to sidestep the major point of my discussion. Now you claimed that "...decision on the scriptures shouldn't be based on what is generally said or accepted around but what the scriptures taught.". But isn't this problematic when the scriptures you speak of are, by design, vague enough that there isn't wide agreement on many important aspects of what they supposedly mean? That is why you have people drawing completely different conclusions from the same book. Arminianism vs Calvinism is a good case in point. The role of grace vs works, of god's judgment vs his mercy and love, and other nuances of emphasis. Major differences in practical application ranging from people you couldn't tell from the general population to people wearing clothing from the 19th century. There was a group called the Shakers in the mid 19th century that were entirely celibate, not just the clergy. Predictably they aren't around anymore. The list is basically endless. And then we have people like you who are claiming to have carefully studied it and accomplished what theologians for millennia have failed at: figuring out the correct interpretation. The scriptures are sufficiently daft that they made the decision for me. I was a de facto atheist by age seven. You keep saying things like "God's satisfaction," "God's word," etc., as if the existence of your divine buddy were a fait accompli. Nope, not around here it isn't. You seem to forget not everyone on this site is a Christian. Your interpretation of these archaic books is just one among many, and you have not given me any reason to take you seriously. So get down off your high horse instead of pretending that you have any qualifications to teach me. All holy books are vague templates upon which the current generation can project whatever they want, to validate what they need to in the moment. There are dozens of major and conflicting traditions of Christianity alone, and technically tens of thousands of denominations. And that doesn't even include the free-formers who decide for themselves what they want it to mean. Well, no thanks. Not any more. I've left that behind decades ago, and don't miss it at all. These are clear truths that you can't and won't ever respond to. You are a nothing but a phony and a liar of the highest order. And it's a shame, because you appeared to be capable of sensible debate. This isn't the first time we've crossed paths on this site, and you seem to be plunging deeper and deeper into the abyss of dishonesty with each meeting. LOL. Continue to deceive yourself. Your god has always been the father of lies, so I'm sure he'll be much pleased with you. 6 Likes 2 Shares |
Religion / Re: The Lord God Is No More by Tamaratonye1(f): 12:00pm On Oct 17, 2021 |
Truvelisback:Yes. |
Religion / Re: What Does God Actually Do? by Tamaratonye1(f): 5:29am On Oct 17, 2021 |
hupernikao:It is true that "god helps those who help themselves" is not in the Bible. I knew that much already. The aphorism is actually of ancient Greek origin, and may originally have been proverbial. It is illustrated by two of Aesop's Fables and a similar sentiment is found in ancient Greek drama. In his Philoctetes, Sophocles (409 BCE) wrote, "No good e'er comes of leisure purposeless; And heaven ne'er helps the men who will not act". But that wasn't the point of bringing it up. Many Christians regularly use and repeat it. Doubtless not the ones as enlightened about the scriptures as you fancy yourself, lol. But it's out there just the same. So your defense is true to an extent, but nonetheless splitting hairs. hupernikao:Well, that certainly answers the question of idiocy vs dishonesty. In spades. LOL You are blind and stumbling in a single corridor of a labyrinth whose walls and floor you've worn to absolute familiarity, and so believe you have all the answers, totally uncomprehending you're trapped in a labyrinth, or even what a labyrinth is. You are more to be pitied than mocked, but your vitriol invites only mockery. hupernikao:You are scripture driven from the position of belief. It has never occurred to you to examine historical context, prose, accuracy, or translation. You accept it all at face value with no doubts whatsoever. That's why you're a Christian; you have been conditioned to accept it all as truth and never question anything. And that's why you will never understand how other non Christians view your belief system. You are incapable of understanding it because you don't want to hear it in the first place. hupernikao:Your entire argument is a variation on the teaching of the "utter depravity" of man. Its purpose is to create the demand for assistance that is not needed. If you buy that you are "helpless" then you will require the "help" offered to you by the belief-system - or at least you will be convinced that you cannot function without it. There are certainly people who expect to "find satisfaction" in wealth, toys, status and acclaim, but the false dichotomy is that those things are 100% of what is available to people to make meaning and find purpose for themselves, apart from what it's claimed that god or his church offers. In reality, though, empathy, kindness, humility, and contentment are not beyond our ken. They are just not, for the most part, for most people, most of the time, automatic and have to be developed. Conversely, sociopathy, cruelty, arrogance and acquisitiveness are entirely within the grasp of theists as well - even devout and observant theists. The fallacy you're advancing is that morality, ethics, and "right living" if you will, begin and end with the teachings of the scriptures, when in fact they're all in the public domain at the expense of just ordinary self-reflection and patience. hupernikao:Oh look. He's preaching at me. Isn't that special. Hupernikao thinks he can tell me what the gods take satisfaction in. That despite the fact that St. Paul told him Romans 11:33, "Oh, the depth of the riches, both of the wisdom and knowledge of God! How unsearchable are His judgments and unfathomable His ways!" But hupernikao is special. He knows the mind of God. hupernikao:If your god is as fictional as I believe it to be, it is powerless to help anyone. Therefore, I believe that you are grossly overstating the alleged helplessness of humanity - so much so that you are libelling the people past and present who have facilitated the life that you live here on Earth in 2021. Whatever though, you do you. No probs. Just so long as you don't claim a monopoly on the Great Virtues. 4 Likes |
Religion / Re: What Does God Actually Do? by Tamaratonye1(f): 10:34pm On Oct 16, 2021 |
LordReed:The Christian god probably sits around the house and paints his nails. 3 Likes |
Religion / Re: What Does God Actually Do? by Tamaratonye1(f): 10:31pm On Oct 16, 2021 |
hupernikao:Only an idiot, or a profoundly dishonest mind, would regard that premise as true. Mr. Hupernikao you are either one or the other. Further, that sentiment is one of the most vile, corrosive sentiments ever concocted by religious zealots, that can only have emerged from minds that regard themselves with a deep and deadly disdain. hupernikao:That seems odd to me because I've done perfectly fine and prospered without the help of God ever since I came out as an atheist in 2006 1 Like |
Religion / Re: The Lord God Is No More by Tamaratonye1(f): 10:21pm On Oct 16, 2021 |
Judas1X:Hahaha |
Religion / What Does God Actually Do? by Tamaratonye1(f): 12:57pm On Oct 16, 2021 |
I thought of another cognitive dissonance in Christianity during my walk today. Have you heard that saying, "God helps those who help themselves"? I was always taught this in the manner of "if you pray to pass the test, you have to put the work in and study. You can't just sit around and expect to pass the test based on prayer alone." Why not? If I study for it, what is God's part in it? Like, where exactly is he helping? I would expect, if I study for something and memorize/understand the material, then yeah, no duh. I'll probably pass it. Prayer or no payer. Yet if I said a prayer, fully expecting to pass the test when not doing anything for it, wouldn't that be an example of devoted faith? Like, I believe so much I'll pass the test because I asked God to help me, that I don't need to study. Invoking a god's "help" disincentivizes doing your utmost; it rewards being half-assed. Some might argue that they are doing their utmost and are just adding prayer as a "no-cost" kicker that "can't hurt". But prayer takes energy, and some degree of focus, necessarily diluting the full energy and focus possible without it. Those who pray aren't likely to pray to a jug of milk, also "no-cost" and "can't hurt", but a waste of energy and focus. Meanwhile there's the bothersome question of why should your prayer elicit a useful effect when 10,000 people elsewhere with identical belief in the identical god praying in exactly the same fashion get no effect? Someone believing they're really "that special" compared to everyone else is a social menace because they have no reason act carefully. 4 Likes |
Religion / The Lord God Is No More by Tamaratonye1(f): 12:30pm On Oct 16, 2021 |
Hello Christians, The Federal Register wants you to comment on the fact that there is no Lord God any more, and on the species being declared extinct. As in kaput. https://www.nationalgeographic.com/anima...woodpecker Of course atheists have known that for some time 4 Likes |
Religion / Re: Could Dtruthspeaker A.k.a Truespeak Be Mentally Unstable? by Tamaratonye1(f): 10:07pm On Oct 15, 2021 |
budaatum:LOL. Well, you might say that. I find this forum to be one of the more entertaining forums I've ever been on, not at all for intellectual stimulation though, but more because it is chock full of colourful and eccentric characters. And nowadays I still take care not to get drawn into their crazy la la land. 2 Likes 1 Share |
Religion / Re: Could Dtruthspeaker A.k.a Truespeak Be Mentally Unstable? by Tamaratonye1(f): 6:34am On Oct 15, 2021 |
Fora like these attract not just garden-variety evangelical crackpots, but also sometimes folks off their meds, people on the spectrum, people acting out experimental personas, children posing as adults, etc etc. I don't care to get drawn into their alternate reality or drama, but I can choose whether or how much I engage with them. 3 Likes 1 Share |
Religion / Re: The Bible Is Overrated by Tamaratonye1(f): 7:10pm On Oct 14, 2021 |
budaatum:The "rib" thing is a play (pun), in the Hebrew, on Eve's (Babylonian) name. They got it from the Babylonian myth system, as well as numerous other mythological concepts, including one of the many sons of their chief god, whose name was Yahweh. There is a line in Deuteronomy which accidentally confirms this, as well as states that Jacob was the allotted apportioned part of the human race given to Yahweh, by his father, El Elyon. Scholars have not always understood where Yahweh came from. His relationship to Babylon/El Elyon was not fully understood until the Royal Library of Ashurbanipal was discovered at ancient Nineveh in the late 19th Century. budaatum:Scholars know a great deal about the texts, and many, if not most would not agree with that. It's a religious excuse for not actually doing the real work to understand ancient Near Eastern literature, and that there may be things the texts are saying which are not there. Depending on what you mean by "asking and knocking", without the academic work, is worthless. 2 Likes 1 Share |
Religion / Re: The Bible Is Overrated by Tamaratonye1(f): 7:01pm On Oct 14, 2021 |
LordReed:LOL. Budaatum is he. I know, trust me 1 Like 1 Share |
Religion / Re: The Bible Is Overrated by Tamaratonye1(f): 7:20pm On Oct 13, 2021 |
budaatum:The Bible is not a "book". Ta Biblia is a set of ancient texts. It's a set of various texts, by many and varied authors, editors and redactors, all with very different motivations and styles, eventually assembled into a "canon", which is to this day, not universally agreed upon. Unfortunately, just reading it may get you a modicum of understanding, but without knowledge of the ancient Near East, the literature of the time, and very specific (and probably extensive) knowledge of the culture(s) which produced them all, you really would have very little "understanding" of what you were reading. The comparison to Aesop's Fables and Confucianism is probably not very accurate. budaatum:Wow. Stop the presses, we have the greatest mind this world has ever known. LOL budaatum:For the record, "suspension of disbelief' is a literary term and doesn't mean what you seem to think it does. budaatum:Judge what? There are thousands upon thousands of mythologies in this world. And I did mention other religious tomes other than the Koran. I see you've conveniently kept silent about the sacred texts of all other religions. I take it you've read all of them as a child, right? Like, I don't know, all that science has discovered since those primitive times and has taught us about the world and ourselves. But by all means, if you need your mind profoundly opened by the mythologies of people who knew infinitely less than we do, that's entirely up to you. budaatum:Hey there 2 Likes 1 Share |
Religion / Re: The Bible Is Overrated by Tamaratonye1(f): 5:13am On Oct 13, 2021 |
budaatum:I have read the Bible, first of all. And frankly, no offence by the way, you have no idea what "preconceived" notions have or haven't been blinding me or any other person here while reading it. I, personally, read it as a kid and had never been to church then. So all those words above for the profound insight of "read the bible"? Talk about preconceived and blinded. Question: did you read the Koran like a child and did it provoke your brain into action as much as the bible? How about Avesta? The texts of all other religions? Which was the most action-provoking? 1 Like |
Religion / Re: The Atheistic Side Of Christians by Tamaratonye1(f): 4:59am On Oct 13, 2021 |
hupernikao: Tamaratonye1: hupernikao:I have no need to check anything. There is absolutely no "gap". You wish there were, but since you can not even be bothered to state what that "gap" is, you are dismissed as yet another ignorant fundamentalist who actually knows nothing about the actual culture and history of the time. State what you are actually talking about, or keep shut. 1 Like |
Religion / Re: The Bible Is Overrated by Tamaratonye1(f): 12:12pm On Oct 12, 2021 |
Depends on what you mean by overrated. What I know is, it is a heaping, steaming pile of contradictions. Christians skew things such that some verses are allegorical and others aren't. Some things imply this, while others imply that. That way, if the bible makes mistakes, you can interprete it to mean whatever the hell you want it to mean and still believe in this mythical nonsense. This is a book on which not all Christians can agree, and the Jews and Muslims have their own religion based on its mythical god. This is why the bible is a useless, pointless piece of nonsense. Aesop's Fables and Confucianism provide more practical counsel, and you don't have to believe in an angry ass deity that murders children. 2 Likes 1 Share |
Religion / Re: The Existence Of Jesus: History Vs The Word by Tamaratonye1(f): 7:50pm On Oct 10, 2021 |
Oladimeji247:Walls of text that amount to poppycock. Citations needed for the bolded? And take out all the scholars who work for religious institutions - inherent conflict of interest. The consensus of scholars argument is not convincing. Virtually all of them were educated by others who never once actually asked the question, as though it had any merit. They have no secret stash of documents or knowledge. They know nothing that is not available to us. We know what they know. What they can demonstrate is not convincing. I don't care how many scholars say they are convinced. Let them show us their convincing evidence, and stop trying to muddy the waters with the consensus argument. If they are so sure, let's see the evidence. Oladimeji247:False. He was an historian, and the movement was real. It impacted Jewish culture. The point is not who or what the founder was. The point is that there was an important historical change going on. He didn't just write about messiahs. I notice how you keep using Orthodox Jew for a time period when I am fairly certain there was simply the Jew and no sects to warrant a separation to recognize one as Orthodox or untraditional. |
Religion / Re: The Existence Of Jesus: History Vs The Word by Tamaratonye1(f): 5:54pm On Oct 10, 2021 |
Oladimeji247:Gee, if you thought of that, then why didn't Eusebius? Oh right, He didn't give a shit. He was just spinning a yarn for the dolts. By the way, this is exactly the reason why scholars believe the Testimonium Flavianum is an insertion. If Josephus had believed Jesus was the messiah he'd have written much more than that small paragraph. It was his style of writing that he went into great, lengthy detail about historical figures. Anyways, to answer your question, Christianity was, supposedly, still a Jewish internal movement, as a sect of 1st Century Judaism. It was important enough that the High Priest required the Expulsion Curses be read, at the end of the 1st Century. One would have expected him to comment definitively about that problem and it's origins if anything about it was what it's portrayed as. http://lawrenceschiffman.com/the-benedic...the-minim/ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Council_of_Jamnia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Birkat_haMinim But, for anybody totally denying the historicity of Jesus, the fact is, this sect was going, and strong enough to pose a threat by the end of the 1st Century. Something or someone had to have got it going. |
Religion / Re: The Existence Of Jesus: History Vs The Word by Tamaratonye1(f): 5:06pm On Oct 10, 2021 |
Oladimeji247:LOL. |
Religion / Re: The Existence Of Jesus: History Vs The Word by Tamaratonye1(f): 5:01pm On Oct 10, 2021 |
@auntyvera01, as to your question, I refer you to Dorothy Milne Murdock: The Jesus Forgery: Josephus Untangled in which she cites John Eleazer Remsburg writing of the famous (infamous?) Testimonium Flavianum passage; Its brevity disproves its authenticity. Josephus' work is voluminous and exhaustive. It comprises twenty books. Whole pages are devoted to petty robbers and obscure seditious leaders. Nearly forty chapters are devoted to the life of a single king. Yet this remarkable being, the greatest product of his race, a being of whom the prophets foretold ten thousand wonderful things, a being greater than any earthly king, is dismissed with a dozen lines.... Murdock also cites religious skeptic Gordon Stein; The vast majority of scholars since the early 1800s have said that this quotation is not by Josephus, but rather is a later Christian insertion in his works.—http://www.truthbeknown.com/josephus.htm |
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (of 10 pages)
(Go Up)
Sections: politics (1) business autos (1) jobs (1) career education (1) romance computers phones travel sports fashion health religion celebs tv-movies music-radio literature webmasters programming techmarket Links: (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) Nairaland - Copyright © 2005 - 2024 Oluwaseun Osewa. All rights reserved. See How To Advertise. 189 |