Mrfeel: Of course they push those laws for their best interest, they don't want to feel threaten by others, they want to powerful, but just because those laws are there doesn't mean they can't be broken, north Korea broke the laws today north Korea is respected
Meaning that every small nation for their safety should amass nuclear weapons and every weapon of mass destruction.
Mrfeel: I think china will strike and annax Taiwan when they are ready to do so , china feels about Taiwan the way Russia feels about Ukraine, trump himself loves what Putin is doing that's why he is looking around to see where he might annex to America
I just wish then that all Trumps supporters will advise Taiwan to capitulate to China so that needless war be avoided! And of course, Trump himself should lead by example!
Mrfeel: The world is like a jungle you can do whatever you want as long as you are strong enough and smart enough to get away with it, it's not always about what is wrong or right in most cases
Britain funded The Nigerian -biafra war not because they love Nigeria, they funded the war for their best interest which was the oil at that time
In other words you support the first world saying that your country shouldn't build the nuclear bomb only to invade your country next day!? Why does it make sense to sign such a stupid deal when you cannot trust the big countries to keep their part of the bargain!
Mrfeel: As long as Putin Russia is concerned Ukraine can't be lost to EU or NATO, somehow Putin still sees Ukraine as part of Russia
But this is extremely wrong? Britain should still see Nigeria as part of itself isn't it?
Do you think that Britain should disallow Nigeria from join BRICS? Isn't BRICS a coalition of the Enemies of the West? In BRICS we have China, Russia, Iran, South Africa etc
Mrfeel: Putin wants the best for Russia, and letting NATO have Ukraine is never in the best interest of Russia And Putin will do everything to make sure that doesn't happen, he will rather prefer this conflict escalate into world war than let that happen, and as long as Russia has nuclear weapons no country even the US that has as much nuclear weapons as Russia will ever want to engage Russia in a nuclear war , cause planet earth itself will be destroyed if such war happens
But NATO had already said NO to Ukraine in January 2008 when they applied by President Viktor Yushchenko. Ukraine applied again after 2014 precisely in 2018 by President Petro Poroshenko following the Russian annexation of Crimea and the answer was still NO from NATO. The third time was in 2022 by President Zelensky during this Putin senseless war and the answer was an ambiguous NO all because NATO didn't want to anger Putin!
So, when was the proposal from NATO to accept Ukraine. Apart from 2008, every time Ukraine applied was because of Russian aggression. Tell me something else.
When you have a big aggressive bully threatening your security, is it wise to seek protection from a stronger friend?
baralatie: trump has not started. His position on zelensky
He did.
He called him a moderately successful comedian He called him an incompetent president He said Zelensky should have negotiated and he wouldn't have lost anything Etc
sonmvayina: Hahahhhahah...but you said you talk to him like you talk to God. If you did, you will not be quoting what somebody wrote 2500+ years ago.... God is consciousness....the universal consciousness. That is the totality of the consciousness in the universe.
I understand! Just admit that you are Spiritually dead!
musicwriter: Zelensky is the dumbest person I've ever seen rule a country.
You have two world powers to protect you- one in front of your door, the other across the ocean. And when it comes time to choose, you chose the one across the ocean.
What a fool!!
Only that Russia signed a Budapest agreement to guarantee your security but was the first to annex your Cremia militarily!
GistMedia0: A Nigerian lady has sparked reactions online after claiming that "real men don’t care about your past, they don’t care about your body count… they only care about your present, how far you have gone to be a better person, and how your present life affects them positively." She placed strong emphasis on "real men."
However, her statement didn’t sit well with many men on social media. Netizens, mostly male, expressed skepticism, with one commenting, "Once you hear ‘Real men,’ you better run," while another added, "I avoid anything that will make a woman call me a real man."
The discussion has since sparked controversy, with people divided on whether a man should care about a woman's past or solely focus on her present character. What’s your take on this?
sonmvayina: God is everywhere... omnipresent. Simple.
Which one is also "some where again? Does not make any sense nah. He fills the heaven and the earth(universe) simple. God is everywhere And Everywhere is God.
Does quantum physics make complete sense to you?
My God is far much more complex than quantum physics . You can only know what he showed you about Himself.
The statement: God is the universal divine consciousness is meaningless if he isn't a person/personality