Welcome, Guest: Register On Nairaland / LOGIN! / Trending / Recent / NewStats: 3,160,505 members, 7,843,522 topics. Date: Wednesday, 29 May 2024 at 07:21 AM |
Nairaland Forum / ThaVluit's Profile / ThaVluit's Posts
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (of 10 pages)
Foreign Affairs / Re: Who Has The Strongest Military In Africa? by ThaVluit: 11:17am On Feb 17, 2015 |
FighterPilot: Working for their retirement - and with the threats of arrest, their thirst for money has just been heightened. And Jonathan will pay up or they will stop working. 1 Like |
Foreign Affairs / Re: Who Has The Strongest Military In Africa? by ThaVluit: 11:15am On Feb 17, 2015 |
FighterPilot: |
Foreign Affairs / Re: Who Has The Strongest Military In Africa? by ThaVluit: 11:12am On Feb 17, 2015 |
EVarn: How do you know how they were employed? You don't. And how are mercenaries employed? Based on what? This is what happened the last time. There are strong suspicions that the South African government got wind of Mann and Du Toit’s plans – and even that the coup plotters naively thought Pretoria was turning a blind eye, preferring a white-mercenary-inspired coup to a nasty dictator. Instead, the South African government didn’t just stop them, according to this account; it allowed them to get caught to send a strong message to future would-be mercenaries. And how does our ministry crying foul change the fact that our mercenaries are operating in Nigeria?. No longer denying that, are you? On to the next desperate point now. |
Foreign Affairs / Re: Who Has The Strongest Military In Africa? by ThaVluit: 10:49am On Feb 17, 2015 |
FighterPilot: There's tons of reports. |
Foreign Affairs / Re: Who Has The Strongest Military In Africa? by ThaVluit: 10:43am On Feb 17, 2015 |
EVarn: How many do you want? There's plenty. So, let us know. |
Foreign Affairs / Re: Who Has The Strongest Military In Africa? by ThaVluit: 10:42am On Feb 17, 2015 |
EVarn: As in the previous case, what has been said will not change just because you typed "dismissed". |
Foreign Affairs / Re: Who Has The Strongest Military In Africa? by ThaVluit: 10:39am On Feb 17, 2015 |
EVarn: "Allowed"? How did it "allow" them? Please explain your "challenged" question. There was no "allowing" done, unless you know something we don't. So, enlighten us. How were they "allowed"? |
Foreign Affairs / Re: Who Has The Strongest Military In Africa? by ThaVluit: 10:34am On Feb 17, 2015 |
EVarn: Screaming "waste of data" will not change the contents of this page. Readers can still see what's been posted. |
Foreign Affairs / Re: Who Has The Strongest Military In Africa? by ThaVluit: 10:33am On Feb 17, 2015 |
EVarn: Typing "dismissed" does not change what has already been posted. |
Foreign Affairs / Re: Who Has The Strongest Military In Africa? by ThaVluit: 10:32am On Feb 17, 2015 |
EVarn: You have no evidence based on which you can say that. You only have wishes. Besides, lots of Nigerian media pieces have revealed it. Is this your final desperate line? "Media would have revealed it"? How is that different from saying "I actually don't know anything but I will deny"? |
Foreign Affairs / Re: Who Has The Strongest Military In Africa? by ThaVluit: 10:28am On Feb 17, 2015 |
EVarn: I know because my own defence minister and tons of reports have confirmed it. Simple. You on the other hand have no basis or evidence based on which you can deny what I have just said. I have not seen the space shuttle but I know it has gone into space. |
Foreign Affairs / Re: Who Has The Strongest Military In Africa? by ThaVluit: 10:24am On Feb 17, 2015 |
EVarn: You have not answered the question. How do you know who has not seen what? When was your survey where you asked Nigerians to tell you what they have or have not seen? You don't know that he was a white Nigerian. What proof do you have for that? What proof do you have that he was a Chadian? If you have no proof, then you have not disproved that he was a mercenary. Because you don't know anything, you can't deny anything. |
Foreign Affairs / Re: Who Has The Strongest Military In Africa? by ThaVluit: 10:21am On Feb 17, 2015 |
iterator24: It's not fake. If I am in the mercenary business, I will make sure that I have what it takes to offer a service. http://www.rdm.co.za/politics/2015/02/03/inside-africa-s-private-armies Inside Africa's private armies Private military and security companies: Who controls the guns-for-hire? "For example, former South African air force pilots, technicians and trainers form almost all of Rwanda’s air capability, according to Andre Roux, a senior ISS researcher. Angola today uses private military personnel extensively to develop its command, control, communications, computers, intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance (C4ISR) capabilities, Roux said" |
Foreign Affairs / Re: Who Has The Strongest Military In Africa? by ThaVluit: 10:18am On Feb 17, 2015 |
EVarn: It's a simple question. How do you know that no one has seen them? How do you know that not a single Nigerian has seen them? Please answer the question. You know because they did not pop up in the pictures that you have seen? Is that your answer? Really? Because Bernie Murdock has not popped up in the pictures that I have seen, then no one has seen Murdock? That's it? |
Foreign Affairs / Re: Who Has The Strongest Military In Africa? by ThaVluit: 10:13am On Feb 17, 2015 |
http://www.laht.com/article.asp?CategoryId=12395&ArticleId=2371772 South Africa to Arrest Mercenaries Fighting in Nigeria against Boko Haram JOHANNESBURG – South Africa is planning to arrest a group of mercenaries fighting alongside the Nigerian Army against the Boko Haram Jihadist group, South African Defense Minister Nosiviwe Mapisa-Nqakula warned on Thursday. “There are consequences when somebody leaves the country and provides any form of military assistance that is not part of the government’s deployment,” the South African official said. At the request of the Nigerian government, several South African ex-military personnel have been training Nigerian soldiers to fight Boko Haram, according to local daily newspaper, Beeld. Mapisa-Nqakula trusted that their arrest when they return to South Africa will send a message to all South Africans who are serving as soldiers for hire. The South African Act of Military Assistance Abroad prevents its citizens from participating in wars in other countries, unless they are acting under the authority of the government in Pretoria. Former members of the South African military have been involved as mercenaries in armed conflicts in countries such as Angola, Liberia and Sierra Leone. In 2004, a group of mercenaries attempted to lead the failed coup against the dictator of Equatorial Guinea, Teodoro Obiang Nguema. In addition, soldiers for hire offer protection and security services to private individuals in countries like Iraq and the Democratic Republic of Congo. After the last war in Gaza, South African authorities warned of possible legal procedures that may be taken against South African citizens with Israeli citizenship who fought for the Israeli Army. Weakened by corruption and a lack of political will and organization, the Nigerian Army has been unable to cope with the attacks of Boko Haram in the north of the African country, where the group seeks to establish an Islamic fundamentalist state. |
Foreign Affairs / Re: Who Has The Strongest Military In Africa? by ThaVluit: 10:10am On Feb 17, 2015 |
Msauza: Which only serves to show that Evarn could not possibly know who has or has not seen what. He was just giving us his usual baseless denials. |
Foreign Affairs / Re: Who Has The Strongest Military In Africa? by ThaVluit: 10:07am On Feb 17, 2015 |
EVarn: On what grounds cay you say "no one has seen them?". How do you know that? Simple question. You have no knowledge of anything. So you can't advance any categorical denials. The farthest you can go on your argument is to say that you simply don't know. |
Foreign Affairs / Re: Who Has The Strongest Military In Africa? by ThaVluit: 10:01am On Feb 17, 2015 |
EVarn: You do have the patience. What you don't have is an argument. Is that it? Your entire argument is based on that "no one has seen a mercenary in the north east"? Really? So because of that you can categorically deny the presence of mercenaries? That's it? And how on earth would you know who has or has not seen a mercenary anyway? Where and when was your survey? In the end, the best you can do is say you don't have enough knowledge to either confirm or deny what you have been told. You can't deny that which you have no knowledge of. You don't know who the white folks are, so on what grounds can you deny that they are mercenaries? Seeing as you have no knowledge of anything, those who have the knowledge are now telling you - those are South African mercenaries. |
Foreign Affairs / Re: Who Has The Strongest Military In Africa? by ThaVluit: 12:16am On Feb 17, 2015 |
EVarn: I asked you two simple questions: 1. List the facts that have been twisted and provide proof that this is the case. 2. What are the mercenaries doing in Nigeria then, according to you? And what is that based on? There's nothing different from the subject here. Simply answer the very simple and direct questions on the issue of mercenaries. There is confirmed evidence - the mouth of our own minister who wants to have the mercenaries arrested. The rest of your diatribe will be left alone for another day. |
Foreign Affairs / Re: Who Has The Strongest Military In Africa? by ThaVluit: 11:33pm On Feb 16, 2015 |
EVarn: Name the facts that have been twisted and provide proof that this is the case. Don't give us longwinded, baseless opinion. What are the mercenaries doing? Feel free to answer that too. |
Foreign Affairs / Re: Who Has The Strongest Military In Africa? by ThaVluit: 11:09pm On Feb 16, 2015 |
EVarn: With thanks to South African mercenaries. |
Foreign Affairs / Re: Who Has The Strongest Military In Africa? by ThaVluit: 11:03pm On Feb 16, 2015 |
lezz: As expected - empty rhetoric with no objective. Point out the source of my pain. You won't be able to because you just say anything that you deem right at the time. Point out the instance of self-deceit. Once again, you won't be able to because you just spew things with no mental engagement. Your only contribution here are words, but meaning? Never that. |
Foreign Affairs / Re: Who Has The Strongest Military In Africa? by ThaVluit: 10:53pm On Feb 16, 2015 |
lezz: Less talking to himself as usual. Question is why are Nigerian threads unable to go a day without mentioning South Africa? For as long as the name "South Africa" features, there will be South Africans happily visiting your threads. The thread has been colonised by SA - just like your markets have been. |
Foreign Affairs / Re: Who Has The Strongest Military In Africa? by ThaVluit: 10:47pm On Feb 16, 2015 |
EVarn: See why I say you say the first thing that comes to your mind without any thought? Below, your own posts for the world to see. Now all of a sudden, you have issues with "reports". Your job on this thread is to post whatever you are feeling on a specific day. Thought? What's that? And our minister herself confirmed it anyway. ____ Johannesburg - Defence Minister Nosiviwe Mapisa-Nqakula says the “mercenaries” from South Africa helping to train Nigerian soldiers to fight Boko Haram should be arrested on their return, according to City Press. Briefing journalists on the sidelines of the African Union summit in Addis Ababa on Wednesday, Mapisa-Nqakula said: “The police have a responsibility to ensure that, when they come back, those people are arrested and the [National Prosecutions Authority] has a responsibility to charge them. There are consequences for going out of the country and provide any form of military assistance as a mercenary, not as part of the deployment by government,” she said. Mapisa-Nqakula said law enforcement officials should take care to gather enough information to prosecute these “mercenaries” in order to make an example of them. “It should be that you’re doing it so that you can secure a conviction so that it sends a message to all of the South Africans who are going around as mercenaries,” she said. Mapisa-Nqakula said in the case of the South African security company Executive Outcomes deploying its private soldiers to conflict zones outside of South Africa, the prosecuting authority didn’t have enough information to secure a conviction. 1 Like
|
Foreign Affairs / Re: Who Has The Strongest Military In Africa? by ThaVluit: 3:39pm On Feb 16, 2015 |
EVarn: Just look at this one, for example. Six lines. Zero substance. Yes, of course. You came onto this thread to just move your fingers and post the first thing that comes to your mind. No plan. No intellectual message. Just empty responses. A thread is about discussion. So everyone needs participants for a thread to be lively. But because of the lack of stimulation coming from the type of rhetoric on here, your own fellow Nigerians can't participate because to go along with you is a major embarassment. Who wants to spend the whole day dealing with looooong posts that have no substance? You are on every single page. Hogging page after page. But no one could even learn a single thing from your posts. No links. No citations. No evidence. No facts. Just looooooong posts comprising baseless opinion. It is a fact bra. You aren't stimulating. Just scroll back and see how many pages you are on. Go back and see what has happened to the behaviour of your fellow Nigerians. Go back and see the change in the flavour of the thread. Sometimes the bitter truth has to be said. Now is that time. |
Foreign Affairs / Re: Who Has The Strongest Military In Africa? by ThaVluit: 3:29pm On Feb 16, 2015 |
Msauza: Yes, my man. It is an undeniable truth. Nigeria has had to go and hire South African skills. A very clear recognition that Nigeria doesn't have similar skills. 1 Like |
Foreign Affairs / Re: Who Has The Strongest Military In Africa? by ThaVluit: 3:27pm On Feb 16, 2015 |
EVarn: 1. What has gone awry? Point it out. 2. You won't be able to because every argument of yours is baseless. 3. It is a fact that you are not stimulating. 4. Your posts are not stimulating, my friend. They stimulate neither Nigerian nor South African. 5. Of course you have no patience for "mediocrity" because you have enough of it in the form of your posts. 6. Your only job on this thread is to post anything. Anything that is a response, you will post. But think it through before posting it, you won't. Just go back and look at the type of rhetoric associated with you on the thread. Scroll back my friend. Scroll back. No one could be stimulated by that. And because of the type of responses you invite, your fellow Nigerians have left. The flavour of the thread has crossed over to empty banter. |
Foreign Affairs / Re: Who Has The Strongest Military In Africa? by ThaVluit: 3:08pm On Feb 16, 2015 |
EVarn: How do you know that "everyone is in hibernation mode"? They do log on. See what I mean? You just post anything without thinking. Fact is not even a single Nigerian from the old guard on this thread wants to follow you on your line of empty banter. You thrive on empty rhetoric and invite long unstimulated debates on this thread. People respond to you if and when they have the time. Otherwise, no one is really stimulated by your posts. |
Foreign Affairs / Re: Who Has The Strongest Military In Africa? by ThaVluit: 3:04pm On Feb 16, 2015 |
EVarn: Yes, you don't care because you can't go beyond a certain intellectual level. You just post anything without thought. Case in point, you can't just give us a bare denial without any evidence supporting your denial. You need to base the denial on some evidence. And as predicted, you won't post any evidence supporting your denial because all you are about are thoughtless posts. Even Nigerians are tired of going along with you. You are not very stimulating or stimulated. Check for yourself and see if anyone from your side follows your line of empty banter. Scroll back my friend. They have left. |
Foreign Affairs / Re: Who Has The Strongest Military In Africa? by ThaVluit: 2:56pm On Feb 16, 2015 |
Very nice read. http://sites.la.utexas.edu/utaustinsoc/2012/10/03/from-mercenaries-to-contractors/ POLITICAL SOCIOLOGY FROM MERCENARIES TO CONTRACTORS OCTOBER 3, 2012 ADMIN LEAVE A COMMENT Upcoming presentation at Go-Betweens: Crossing Borders – An Interdisciplinary Conference at The University of Texas at Austin. Session B3: ‘Human Rights? Social Justice?‘ October 12, 2012. 3:40 – 5:20 pm. SAC 3.112 Contemporary conflict areas and warzones across the globe witness the emergence of an old actor in a new face-the hired guns. As the quintessence of the spirit of capitalism in the battlefield, the new contractors’ companies take an increasing part in modern battlefields. From a pariah and symbol of cupidity the soldiers of fortune turned into businessmen in suits and million dollar companies, transformed from mercenaries into contractors. These contractors and companies proliferate in conflict areas, conducting various tasks as partners of governments and armies, from logistics and maintenance to intelligence and even actual fighting. In many battlefields they outnumbered the standing armies’ regular soldiers. This is the result of an historical process and an old arm wrestle between the market forces and political forces that tilt to one side or the other. Nevertheless, current trends evince these new characteristics. This differentiates them from former times and raises interesting questions on accountability, while challenging the Weberian notion on States and the monopoly of the legitimate use of violence. Not so long ago, in the mid-90’s, mercenaries such as ‘Mad’ Mike Hoare, Bob Denard, ‘Black Jack’ Jean Schramme, Yair Klein, and many others prowled all across Africa and Latin America; following the committing “tradition” of Ernst von Mansfeld, Roger de Flor, Francesco Sforza and many other respectable names. These individuals, though many times operating under the advice and request of governments, were considered pariahs in international politics. Even the surprisingly successful intervention of the South African mercenary company Executive Outcomes (EO), which forced the notorious Revolutionary United Front that menaced Sierra Leone to ask for peace, was concluded with rapid banishment by the international community the moment EO harbored stabilization and democratic elections. In spite of the mitigating effect of EO presence on the Sierra Leone civil-war, (which was an arena the international community failed to deal with) no one in the international community could envision that hired-guns run the security and indirectly, the politics of a UN member. The world, post 9/11, presented more than a few challenges for the international community and especially for the only world power, which was occupied with two distinct and distanced arenas about half the size of Texas. After a quick triumph in Iraq and Afghanistan came the phase of control and reconstruction for two turn countries with bad infrastructure and unstable politics, a phase which demanded further ‘boots on the ground’ than the over stretched and exhausted coalition could supply. The solution came in the form of outsourcing; outsourcing of control, construction, and if necessary, of fighting (Chatterjee 2009). Table 1. Comparison of Contractor Personnel to Troop Levels (As of March 11) Contractors Troops Ratio Afghanistan Only 90,339 99,800 .91:1 Iraq Only 64,253 45,660 1.41:1 CENTCOM AOR 173,644 214,000 .81:1 Source: CENTCOM 2nd Quarter FY 2011 Contractor Census Report; Troop data from Joint Chiefs of Staff, “Boots on the Ground” January report to Congress. Notes: CENTCOM AOR includes figures for Afghanistan and Iraq. CENTCOM troop level adjusted by CRS to exclude troops deployed to non-Central Command locations (e.g., Djibouti, Philippines, Egypt). Troop levels for non-CENTCOM locations are from DMDC, DRS 11280, “Location Report” for June 2010. Figure 1. Number of Contractor Personnel in Afghanistan vs. Troop Levels Source: CENTCOM Quarterly Census Reports; Troop Levels in the Afghan and Iraq Wars, FY2001-FY2012: Cost and Other Potential Issues, by Amy Belasco; Joint Staff, Joint Chiefs of Staff, “Boots on the Ground” monthly reports to Congress. This rapid ‘makeover’, from pariah into mainstream political consensus, took less than a decade. At present, contractors or private military companies (PMC), are the providers of a variety of services starting in logistics and catering and ending with intelligence gathering, security and sometime even offense. Western companies are not the only players in the market and many other companies are taking their share in the “scramble for Iraq and Afghanistan”. Many of them are local, especially in Afghanistan. Comparing major American conflicts from the last 250 years yields interesting results. The ratio of mercenaries/contractors and troops in the battlefield increased dramatically and shows record highs of 1:1. Historically this trend is new in the U.S context, though it has historical precedent for other nations. Source: http://www.economist.com/node/11955577?story_id=11955577 A ratio of 1:1 proposes that a significant military effort is conducted by contractors and not by military personnel. This trend raises points at issue over accountability and responsibility and questions the state’s ‘monopoly on the legitimate use of violence’. Take for example Blackwater, which retains a private navy, air force (it purchased recently a fleet of ‘Super Tucano’ turboprop fighting planes), and produces and sells its own armed personnel carrier- the Grizzly. Its capabilities surpass those of more than half of the UN members. Furthermore, in order to avoid the bad reputation associated with its activity in Iraq, the company rebranded its image and changed its name to Xe and later to Academi. Thus, we can see the dilemma of power and accountability (or problematic accountability) in the contractors’ contexts. Currently, the interface between state/military and PMC’s is vast and not fully regulated. Problems occur frequently on the basis of determining jurisdiction and responsibility on the ground. Meanwhile contemporary warfare is changing as two distinct populations with different norms, characteristics, and organizational culture are working together, adding to an already complicated scenario. |
Foreign Affairs / Re: Who Has The Strongest Military In Africa? by ThaVluit: 2:52pm On Feb 16, 2015 |
Msauza: Ja - the caption says that he is South African. |
Foreign Affairs / Re: Who Has The Strongest Military In Africa? by ThaVluit: 2:26pm On Feb 16, 2015 |
EVarn: Where is the "reputable source" that confirms your baseless denials? Please post it. There's none. The fact of the matter is that those are South Africans out there. Mercenaries or not. They are South Africans. Thanks. By the way, you're the sole reason why your fellow Nigerians have left the thread. The type of posts that you invite. Scroll back and see who's left on your side. It's only you in your two forms (lezz and evarn) and the occasional overhypedsteve. Everyone else has left. You're an embarrassment. 1 Like |
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (of 10 pages)
(Go Up)
Sections: politics (1) business autos (1) jobs (1) career education (1) romance computers phones travel sports fashion health religion celebs tv-movies music-radio literature webmasters programming techmarket Links: (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) Nairaland - Copyright © 2005 - 2024 Oluwaseun Osewa. All rights reserved. See How To Advertise. 83 |