₦airaland Forum

airmark:
Nobody has Tim.bros' time again. He didn't even know that our defender was awarded the Motm.

He should continue his dance of macabre alone, Raumdeuter has abandoned him.

Was Leyqute replying my post or was he talking to me when you jumped in and start mentioning me?

We all know who has whose time here. Keep disgracing yourself.

airmark:
Obviously and as usual, you didn't watch the match. No need arguing with a blind person about the colour of my pant.

Did our attack score? Yes, just the way we scored 2 against Arsenal. They played their role.

Did we win the match? No. Why? Because, just like Arsenal, the defence didn't play their own role.

If our team was balanced, this two matches would have been maximum points for us.

@bolded... Who is arguing with you when you already agreed with my points?

airmark:
Mention one match in which we conceded 5 goals or 4 goals without a red card, this season then I will agree with you.

I won't be surprised if you even blame our defence for the barren draw we played yesterday. You are the elder brother of Lord.falcao.

Comot from my mention jor..

popizaino:
Now over to @tim.bros and his compatriot talking about balancing like say football na economics department.

@raumdeuter is already a football lost cause so no need to tag him.

Judging from our match against city today with the way we defended and the chances we missed. Which department should we try to improve on next time?

I can still rephrase my question if you don't understand me.

airmark:
I am not sure Tim.bros watched today's match as usual. But next week he will be looking for balance that is not lost.

Both of you are very foolish if you don't accept that both attack and defence have specific role to play in the football pitch. Balancing those roles form a perfect team.

If both play their roles correctly, the team win matches consistently. A balanced team score goals and is water tight in defence.

You guys are shameless to even think of mentioning me in a match where we are on course to win (attack played their role) but a porous defence conceded late in the game to deny us all 3 points. Even more shameless is the fact that both of you forgot that Timbros is existing when we were scoring 6 goals in 2 matches. Where were you guys when we were conceding 8 goals in 2 matches?

I can forgive Popizaino if he doesn't understand what a balanced team in football term means because he is a French speaking Ivorien, but Airmark? It is a big shame that through all your years of sojourn in the white man's country, you still find it hard to understand the term balance in football dictionary... Oh damn, I forgot, Canada is a French speaking country too.

Make both of una getat.

Lana1:
You guys should pity timbros now. The dragging never too much like this

Dragging? Which dragging?

Wetin concern me?

izzou:
[color=royalblue]Will Timbros deny the Peseiro he hugged last week?

Time will tell![/color]

Shut up.

Check the date and comment again.

izzou:
[color=royalblue]See your reply to that quote.

So, who did you SPECIFICALLY MENTION FOR THE JOB?

Was it Peseiro?
[/color]

My recommendation will take Super Eagles to the final like Peseiro did

Can Rohr do the same? You are shameless.

izzou:
[color=royalblue]From who?

You are the poster boy for shame tonight

You voluntarily took the role yourself

I congratulate you[/color]

Shut up!

Shame on you and your goons.

popizaino:
Did you support the sacking Rohr or not?

Is Rohr still the NT coach ?

If your answer is accordingly then why are you not accepting your L? He no dey kee now.

I DID support Rohr sack now Super Eagles are in the final.

Who has the L now?

izzou:
[color=royalblue]Which kind show of shame be this?

Eeiii

[/color]

Hide your face in shame.

Capaldi:
This is very hilarious. Posts that were made to you, that you rejected and argued against back then for days, you are now quoting them again to accept them . What level of shamelessness is this?

Is Super Eagles in AFCON final without Rohr or not?

airmark:
For this international break, na Timbros be the scapegoat. Next one fit be Lordfalcao.

Who is the scapegoat now?

Airmark no dey view thread like that. Come out and talk.

izzou:
[color=royalblue]I really don't know why you want to keep dragging something this is very clear.

You didn't care who replaced Rohr, and Eguavoen DID NOT replace Rohr.

I am surprised you are beginning to inteprete INTERIM. Where in this universe is an Interim tagged as a Replacement?

The reason i asked for rest, is because you have refused to take your L. So no need to bore people with back and forths

Eguavoen did not replace Rohr. NFF affirms Jose as his replacement. You know that, but because of L, you dey interprete English

I really hope you rest this matter. It is tiring[/color]

So you even confirmed this Izzou? Chai...

airmark:
Can you please answer the question I asked first?

Who said 'i don't care who replaces Rohr, he must go to move forward'?

I was the one that said that.

Have Super Eagles not moved forward without Rohr now?

airmark:
Who said 'i don't care who replaces Rohr, he must go to move forward'?

Airmark come outside

airmark:
You are the one not ok, and everybody have told you.

NFF announced Peseiro as Rohr's permanent replacement. You should have objected if not ok with him. But because your solution was Rohr must go and anyone could replace him, you didn't object.

You need to stop embarrassing yourself.

Izzou take note. From the horses mouth.

Kenturkey048:
Only few people understand how things work in this country. And the few of us voice no loud reach.. The ones with zero understanding get loud voice...

I was surprised when I saw Nigerians supporting the sack of Rohr.. Like if you know that team before Rohr came him, you go respect Rohr..

But I no know if Nigerians get short memories, or they just be actual stupeed people , or they lack basic understanding about things. I just don't get..

See where them don bring themselves back to.. It's clear we aren't gonna qualify from this group..If south win today, they are 4points ahead of us..

It's interesting to know who the stupeed one is right now

airmark:
You said you didn't care who replaced Rohr and when Peseiro was signed, you didn't object.

This L you are trying to shy away from, will eventually choke you.

Izzou can you see where your almighty airmark confirm that I don't care who replaces Rohr?

izzou:

Renard is a 2 time AFCON winner with 2 different teams. Who says he cannot do it a third time with Super Eagles?

You wan argue, abi?

popizaino:
Forget about airmark.........Tell us how the team is improving without Rohr as you told us.

Ok, I have forgotten airmark.

The team is improved without Rohr as you can see. Super Eagles are in AFCON final, with the potential to become champions. Something Rohr could never do.

Isn't that enough improvement?

izzou:
[color=royalblue]Are you hoping on this one too?

You seem not to know your stance again. [/color]

Since you don't want to agree the fact on ground that Rohr got sacked and we are in AFCON final.

Let's argue that Renard will still take this Supe r Eagles team to the final. You wan argue am?

izzou:
[color=royalblue]See wetin person recommend.

Then he has the guts to call out Airmark

Lol[/color]

Yes. And we have sacked Rohr and in the Final.

Renard would have taken us to the final too. If you want to argue speculations, bring it on.

Leave the fact that Rohr got sacked and we are in the final. Bring on the speculations

Capaldi:
Instead of taking 1 L and a W, he is receiving 2 L's.

The same Renard would have taken us to AFCON final. As long as it's not Rohr.

The L and shame is on you

izzou:
[color=royalblue]Tueh



Even Peter did it thrice. How many times we go count for this guy?[/color]

Renard would have taken us to this AFCON final. Want to argue it?

Capaldi:
Somebody asked him this



And he replied






How can his own post be exposing him yet he wants to keep arguing. He has twisted it to I only wanted Rohr sacked.

Anybody but Rohr will take us to AFCON final. Argue with your keypad.

Capaldi:
Your own post will expose you. You said sack Rohr and appoint Renard.

Below is the answer to your post...

popizaino:
The only thing everyone sees is that you said you don't care about who replaces Rohr.

My main campaign is LET ROHR LEAVE THE DUGOUT. Disstroy now wanted to know my opinion who should replace him. I gave my opinion. That is by the way.

Popizaino above have told you that I DON'T CARE WHO REPLACES HIM,BUT ROHR HAS TO GO!

I can argue with you that Renard will still take us to this final if he was in the dugout. But that will be mere speculation.

The fact on ground is that Rohr is no more and we are in the final! Deal with it.

popizaino:
The only thing everyone sees is that you said you don't care about who replaces Rohr.

Exactly!

I don't know why Izzou is dancing skelewu all over.

I don't care who replace Rohr. What I care is his SACK!

popizaino:
I dey.

Anything?

Who has the mail now?

raumdeuter:
The same 3 at the back Rohr played that made you laugh is what Peseiro is playing now

A better coach have utilised the 3 at the back he couldn't use.

That's why I said he has to go!

izzou:
[color=royalblue]Go to bed, oga.

You didn't support Peseiro, so you have no bragging rights to drag anyone.

Maybe you should try in 2025.

You told who? [/color]

But I told you guys ROHR OUT, didn't I?

Try as much as you can, you cannot bring Peseiro into the discussion. You supported Rohr. I told you Rohr has to go.... Now Rohr is no more, are you not enjoying the final feeling?

izzou:
[color=royalblue]Exactly!

If he had accepted the Peseiro we forced on him, we for dey dobale now.

See as e dey lie like small pikin

[/color]

I don't have to accept Peseiro because my main stand from day one is SACK ROHR!

You are shameless to bring in Peseiro to this talk. I made it clear as crystal that I DON'T CARE WHO REPLACE ROHR. HE HAS TO GO.

He has gone and we are in the finals. Aren't you ashamed of yourself?

izzou:
[color=royalblue]When we dragged him for supporting Peseiro, he said this was his choice.

Failure has no friends, truly.

See as e dey change mouth like Danfo wey dey evade traffic.

SMH[/color]

You can only speculate.

Renard could be here and take us to the finals too. He may, he may not. That's all speculation.

Let's face the fact. Rohr couldn't take us to final. I championed his sack. You guys attacked me. He got sacked and we are in the finals now. Facts. Not speculation.

I told you

Capaldi:
Leave story for Mattias. When he wasn't successfully you denied him and said you wanted Rohr out and Renard appointed not
Pes. Have some shame and rest.

Did you see the "my opinion" there? The bone of contention is Rohr. He needed to go. I even stated that I DON'T CARE WHO REPLACES HIM. I would recommend Renard. But Rohr has to go.

We are in the AFCON final now. Is Rohr in the dugout?